In the morning I read the news where one of the leading multinational finance company stats that the “Bitcoin & Other Cryptocurrency will be zero”. So is it possible? If possible then which instructions should be followed getting out of debt?
Yes it can be. Bitcoin started from no value and it may end up in no value also. It is possible to happen if the demand of bitcoin will continuously goes down and the people are not anymore interested in cryptocurrency. |
|
|
|
The thing that catches my attention in Lina Review is that it aims to create a review platform built on trust and reputation meaning the reviews will be based on quality of the reviews, quality in the sense that we can be sure that the reviews are honest and reliable and not just so-so reviews and full of bluffs and misleading?
Based on what I read the reason they create this lina.review project is to give us honest and reliable review in this way it prevents misleading reviews from other sites. I believe they will make ways to stand to thier claim. Do you believe that paid review is reliable? I believe in clients/users who are angry and disappointed over a certain product or service who give negative reviews.    . They would sometimes curse the services or the products/company for giving them a bad service or products.  I think they can be reliable if the reason they are paid it to create honest/transparent review. Lina will be the one to set rules to their helpers so they will get the honest review. In short they are paying for review? Did you find the logic? Imagine that I will give you money just to give feedback to a certain service, are you sure that you will give feedback based on your experienced or based on what will be your benefits? Practical people always find the easiest way and that is giving a positive review because they are satisfied in the payment of the review and not at the service. Yes, it is good to see that lina will give some merits for the customers review but I am hoping that what will be the feedback of the clients are true and not be based on the incentives they will get from their review. |
|
|
|
In case some of STE holders missed the news.  A blockchain vote has been launchedUnder the request of a group of STE holders STeX project has been launched a blockchain-based vote to override projects initial rules, in part of the following:
"Additional stages of the STE ICO will take place if no more than 30,000,000 will be sold" and "If more than 30,000,000 STE will be distributed, the rest can be burned".
The current team's plan is described here: https://t.me/stex_news/24
In short, team is going to burn all unsold and undistributed tokens over the 30m and to sell the remaining later using STE-shop smart contract.
If you support the STE holders group proposal for:
"Stop any next rounds of the STE ICO, and distribute the unsold tokens remained to reach the 30M limit between all STE holders proportionally and finalize distribution, calculate founder's stakes and distribute them"
Please send a 0.000001 Ether with gas limit 300,000 and recommended by https://ethgasstation.info/ gas price (now it is 2 GWEI)
to the voting smart contract 0xc512DB2a8774D7923bfD625Aa590DD15c5EBf017
From each and every of your STE holding addresses. Your vote will be weighted proportionally your STE share by issuing a equal amount of STE(poll) on the smart contract. We recognize this vote as valid if more than 8,827,683 STE(poll) tokens will be issued (50% from current STE distributed supply).
STeX team does not vote in this poll and does not support the current proposal as we see or original plan more balances and more secure for the projects future and therefor for all STE token holders.
However, if the majority of the STE holders will support this proposal, the team will implement the changes described above within 3 days from passing the 8,827,683 STE(poll) tokens to be issued.
The vote will be closed 3 days before the STE ICO or upon reaching 50%.
Anyway, we will took in account the results of this vote as we always did for the community's feedback.
When you send an amount to the voting contract from your wallet, your amount of the STE on this wallet is checked and same amount is issued.
Best regards,
STeX TeamI think I missed the boat! Actually, I am not updated in STeX but I always looking for its progress. So, the vote will be done by sending 0.000001 ETH wherein you will vote for the "yes" and that's why there is "no" vote. Ah, I already recognize the voting. Is the voting done already? It seems like 1/3 of the people just voted it. Well, I cannot say that those who did not vote like me are not in favor of STeX. Maybe, they have reasons behind that. |
|
|
|
10% from the A2A supply will be distributed via airdrop to current STE holders (pre-ICO and ICO stage 1) in any case, it doesn‘t depend on the outcome of the poll. Ivan confirmed that on Telegram.
In general, the more people vote the better. It shows a strong community and the STeX Team knows that way that people aren't just invested with their money but with their time and that they'll try to do the best for the project (what is also in their own interest). That's the reason I would've liked to see a YES and a NO option like they did last time. I hope the community is active without being 'rewarded' for every step. We're at a weighted 3,906,760 out of 8,827,683 for the accepted proposal, which means right now it's a NO: https://etherscan.io/token/0xc512DB2a8774D7923bfD625Aa590DD15c5EBf017So it means STeX is not a good project? Because it seems like many people in telegram did not vot for the yes. It simply said that they are not set STeX as their best project ever since no vote means no. Probably, if you are interested well to the project, you are making some efforts in voting it. |
|
|
|
Let's say your alt coins rises to 1 mil. Are u still investing? What happens if it pop to 600k? Ur waiting again for the rise. I think I'm dumping at 1 mil.
If it is equivalent in 1m usd and I gained much of it, why not? Maybe I will sell half of my investment but I will hold 50% of it so that, I am expecting that I will earn more or of the price drop again, I gained already! |
|
|
|
Akala ko may gagawa ng thread na ito dito sa forum, naghihintay ako since di ako yung taong nagiinitiate kaagad. Napakaraming mga kababayan natin ang nagrereklamo sa bagong sistema sa kadahilanan na mahirap magkaroon ng merit, pero para sakin nasa atin ang problema dahil ang daming pinoy ang may sMerit pero karamihan sa kanila hindi basta basta nagshashare.
I have some sMerit that I can use, pwede niyong ilink mga post niyo dito na Pwedeng imerit. Since hindi ganun kadami ang sMerit ko, I think some Pinoys can help me to merit those posts na "Merit-able". Sa tingin ko, I can pick one post per day. 2 merits pinakamataas kong ibibigay since as I said, hindi naman ganun kataas ang sMerit ko. Also if you have some suggestions, PM na lang po ako. Thanks.
Gumawa na ako ng thread regarding dyan pero wala namang tumangkilik, tingnan mo ang thread ko : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2854623.0 inilock na sya ni admin kasi wala naman pumapansin ng thread na ginawa ko para makatulong sa ating mga kababayan. Yun din talaga napansin ko sa mga pinoy dito. gusto lang nila earn ng earn ng merit pero ayaw naman magbigay. Yan ang malaking problema sa bagong sistema ng merit. Kung ikaw nagiisa lang, kahit anong ganda ng post mo walang magbibigay ng merit maliban sa merit sources. Malaki na ang 1 or 2 merits na makukuha where in fact, pag maganda ang post is makakuha man lang ng 5. Nagbibigay, kakaunting katao lang naman, Karamihan, reserba ang merit sa ibang account or mga kaibigan. Kaya kung wala kang kakilala, walang mangangahas magbigay ng merit sayo. |
|
|
|
A single negative review can damage the company's prestige and profitability. So how could Lina.Review can tell if a certain review is not bias?
Very good point! As what I've seen on their whitepaper, Merchants will pay an amount for lina review in order for them to make some reviews, suggestions and comments about the company/firms. In short, company paid lina to criticize them. It is now in the decision of the helpers to make a good or bad point about a certain company! The hand is upon the helper, as long as he did his job even it damaged the image of company. I guess helpers are not very harsh of what will they say. And I think they have ethics, if then, no worries to have damage with the company. Lina is equal, it is not bias! |
|
|
|
|
Wether it is true or false, I like how the experts convinced people to buy and still hold bitcoins. They back the enthusiastic force to the people to become more interested in bitcoin. Saying that it will fluctuates around up will contribute to the growth of bitcoin again because some panic sellers will control. I think that bitcoin will back coming soon.
|
|
|
|
In the last days I've observed, I saw lot of topics in bitcoin discussion and economy are more constructive and they are not giving some merits based on what they have post. I just concluded that merit points give only in the Meta and Serious discussion.
You have gathered an incomplete data set. Analyze the merit system for at least a month or so before you make conclusions. I can already tell you based on my actions that you are wrong. :/ Few numbers of thread in bitcoin discussion that recieved merits and I think that some of the people are hessitating to give some merits. I am not an activist with the system but I am hoping that the merits will give credits to any person that is deserving to have merits. I just observing that most of the merits are in meta only. Hopefully, I am wrong. |
|
|
|
|
I know most of you are aware of the merit system. The newly system implemented in this forum which will make us more competitive than others using our brains to make quality posts. I just noticed why is there a place for receiving of merits. In the last days I've observed, I saw a lot of topics in bitcoin discussion and economy that are more constructive and they are not receiving some merits based on what they have post. I just concluded that merit points give only in the Meta and Serious discussion. And as a summary, I think that bitcoin discussion, economy and alternative cryptocurrency are for bounty hunters only. So making post their seems like no one did not acknowledge. However, Meta and other serious discussion about the forum received some merit points because the threads in meta or other serious discussion in not be paid and they are for the wellness of the forum. I just hoping that take a look at the bitcoin discussion and economy are not shitposting. Some of us are using minds in creating posts or new thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin did not ban all coins but it just wanted to remove all advertisement coin in facebook in order to eliminate those HYIP and ponzi schemes together with the scam/shitcoins. Facebook want the people to be free from scams and it is so much good for us.
It is not necessary for facebook to make new coins since we know that facebook already reach its peak, it is popular and it don't need to make a blockchain technology to make facebook well. They can participate in a big project but it is impossible that it is conspiracy.
|
|
|
|
|
There is nothing wrong with btc even its price is volatile. What is wrong is the speculations of the people from btc. They are just saying based on what they see in the price. Speculations make bitcoin more dipping down because some of investors having a panic selling.
|
|
|
|
Sign up with Lina.review by attaching CV, proof of domain knowledge, personal value, etc. The applicant is only considered as a
Helper after being approved by the Helper Board. Please note that in the later stages of the system, when Lina.review has grown, the approval for being a Helper will be very strict due to the user - oriented assessment of the system.
- Does signing-up with lina is required only for the investors? or anyone those who is interested are welcome to do so? Because according to the statement above applicant will only be approve by the board of lina right? Isn't you have a very strict rules regarding this matter? I just don't know if my understanding is right.
How can we sure that being a helper will be a good thing for the company for the review? Look we have government officials who create law and implement it to the citizen of the country, yet they were the one who break the law and corrupt the people's wealth by getting the tax for the development of the country. As per this how come those helpers to be same as politicians of LINA REVIEW can be true and not corrupt? Review is one of the most important thing for the product over the internet. And it must be pure and transparent! Yes! It is a must for a helper to become transparent to all, they must give point to each other and make a review that is fair to all in order for the people to trust again the online reviews. Helpers must be responsible and can handle two opposite sides!. P.S. Sometimes politician made the law for the their own purpose. |
|
|
|
|
It is good to see the development per day and at first, I saw that in the end you have your profit then when I review again, I noticed that, you are loses again your money but it is minimal. The minimizing in a total loss is a helpful to back your capital again but I think that it is better to hold on your invesment when there is a great loss to the coin you hold. Hold until it came back.
|
|
|
|
|
It is not easy to store our digital wallet. We do not know how secured are wallet and most of the time we are hessitating to put some money in our digital wallet. Hackers easily attack those who have not strong security. Hackers are evils! They steal money in others. I hate them all.
|
|
|
|
|
I do not love cryptocurrency, I just like the way it built and works. We don't deny the good things that we've got in crupto and it is important to appreciate every part of it because if crypto does not exist, we don't have opportunity to make money using technology. Either you are a degree holder or not, you have the chance to gain profits.
|
|
|
|
Actually, I already asked it here that, if STeX will have partnership soon. I guess it is important for the project to support by other popular companies since they need as of now the help of it. The promotions boost the popularity of the project and it is can be more successful in a lot of people are spreading the word of STeX. Since STeX has potential to become successful, I think it is much better of this has partnership.
In fact, all other exchanges are competitors. Do you think it is possible to conclude a partnership agreement between competitors? And when one of which is a new firm that will fight for its market share? It is not necessary for the STeX to undergo for a partnership agreement because the project is already popular and as I can see, a lot of participants in their telegram account. I just thinking that it is nice if there is also a popular site or company that will promote this project. In order to motivate a lot of participants to join to the crowdsale. Well, it is good if there some exchanges that will become a mutual friend and partners of STeX. It will make a great relations with both of them plus many people will attract to this project. |
|
|
|
|
There is no ban that India said! They just remind the citizen that cryptocurrency is a risky asset! You can gain double profits or it may lose all of your money. Don't make some news a misleading topic! A lot of newbies are having a panic selling because of this such thread.
A lot of banning cases I've seen before, China is one of it but bitcoin still moving and ot doesn't affect even there are numerous country that bans bitcoin. Unless bitcoin will not be banned in this world and many people are using it, don't be scared to invest with bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
All of us has our own point of view. Ako nga 14days to go na lang full member na pero biglang nagbago ang takbo ng sistema kaya mahihirapan na akong magparank up.
Sana magkaroon pa ng new updates tungkol sa system dahil karamihan sa atin hindi naman na nagbabasa ng replies, swerte na lang ang makita at malagyan ng merit! Suppose to be, lahat ng constructive at on topic post mabigyan ng merit as part of appreciation na binigyang ng effort at idea ang isang thread.
The advantage of this new system ay marami sa atin ang magpupursige pang palawakin ang kaalaman sa crypto at magiisip ng mas malawak at malalim sa pagpost. Soon, makikita natin na kahit sa Local Board ng Philippines marami ng informative article at sites na related sa crypto.
As long as kaya nating sabayan ang mga datihan gawin natin, time doesn't matter if the person is determine to reach the goal! Wag natin gawing kahinaan ang karanasan ng iba bagkus gawin natin itong motibasyon para mas lalo pa nating pagtibayin ang pagpost natin upang maabot natin sila.
|
|
|
|
I am currently storing all my coins at myetherwallet. Collect all your accounts where you store your altcoins and put them in one valid wallet you would like to use. Metamask would be a wise option.
It is extremely reckless to store coins at exchanges unless you actively trade.
For most coins, store your keys offline. The best solution is to have a dedicated pc that is never connected to the internet. Hardware wallets are very convenient for the coins they support.
Metamask is the best option when accessing MyEtherWallet. It prevents user from getting phished and make the user more safe in transacting coin. Somebody told me that nano ledger is also a safety wallet. I watched it on a video and I saw how it works. I think it is a hardware wallet where you can put your different wallet. Nano ledger is like a usb that restore all of your data, the advantage of nano ledger is that, your private key will not easily hacked because the private key will remain to the nano ledger. That is what I know in nano ledger. I want to buy nano ledger but it seems like it is too much expensive. I think I will buy it when I have some coins. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
