Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 05:02:58 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
401  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Blockchain.info - Bitcoin Block explorer & Currency Statistics on: March 23, 2012, 07:32:24 PM
I am not sure if this is a known bug, but I noticed that the wallet functionality of blockchain.info isn't dealing well with an orphaned block.  Here is my circumstance:

  • I have an address in my wallet that I use to mine with p2pool
  • When p2pool finds a block, my address receives some BTC via the generation transaction
  • One of the p2pool blocks was orphaned
  • The generation transaction for that orphaned block appears in my wallet transaction list and is marked as an unconfirmed transaction
  • The BTC from that generation transaction appears in my balance even though it's not really available to me and never will be available to me

Everything seems ok except for the last point.  There appears to be no way for me to tell the wallet to only include confirmed transactions in the reported balance and so my balance is going to be "wrong" forever.

Is there a workaround for this?
402  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 22, 2012, 11:28:50 AM
Uh, so what happens when a few, or when most nodes switch? I can't imagine the sharechain would split, you would have made instructions about that. So it doesnt matter when we switch, as long as it is in the next days? Sooner, to get all the nice new features! :-)

You can upgrade anytime you want between now and April 1.  Assuming this is going to work just like the last protocol change a few weeks ago, the p2pool software will automatically switch from the old way to the new way at midnight (U.S. Eastern Time probably) on April 1.  And there is probably a 1 hour grace period like there was last time to account for the fact that everyone's clocks are not exactly synchronized.
 
403  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 22, 2012, 02:04:56 AM
P2Pool release 0.10.3 signed tag: 0.10.3 UPGRADE REQUIRED before April 1st (BIP 16 date), March 27th for Litecoin

This version also includes the suggested message at startup about donations.  If you explicitly enabled donating, it thanks you.  If you have forced donations off, it asks you to change your mind and donate.  If you don't have the donation command line argument at all, it explains that it is donating 0.5% by default and explains how to change that with the command line parameter.

Thank you, forrestv.
404  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 21, 2012, 08:11:41 PM
hmm, okay then..
I just rechecked, and could telnet into 9333 from outside. P2pool saw that connection (and timed out), so I just have to wait for connections to come in (still 10+0, after one hour)

Thanks for the info!

Ente

It will take a while.  P2Pool nodes prefer to connect to nodes that have been up for a long time, so if your node is just recently added to the network, you won't get chosen very often.
405  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 19, 2012, 05:34:59 PM
Yay, Internet.
406  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 19, 2012, 05:01:34 PM
What if p2pool prompted the user the first time it ran:

Do you want to support ongoing development of the p2pool software by donating 0.5% of your earnings to the developer?  [y/n]

It could store the answer in the data directory just like it does the vip password, etc.  And of course if someone actually included a donation parameter on the command line, it would not prompt.  It seems like this would address the fact that the default donation is "hidden".

407  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [ANNOUNCE] +Coin Web UI for Bitcoin and its forks. on: March 19, 2012, 11:09:52 AM

I'm planning on CC since that allows most things, but I have a new issue... I'm unsure what the licensing issues I'll have if I throw it under CC considering:
  • Bootstrap is Apache v2
  • and JSONRPC-PHP is GPL v2

Can anyone good with licenses explain to me whether I'm allowed to release my code under Creative Commons, and whatever steps I have to do to ensure I'm not breaking their licenses?

First, please don't release software under Creative Commons.  Creative Commons wasn't designed for software (it's designed for content:  photos, books, music, etc).  See http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_I_apply_a_Creative_Commons_license_to_software.3F

Second, IANAL, but if you use a GPL's library like JSONRPC-PHP and if you choose to distribute your application to others then your code must also be GPL (or public domain, since that means you are relinquishing your copyright altogether).   If this isn't something you want to be forced to do, then don't use the JSONRPC-PHP library (JSON RPC is not that complex... you could probably just whip up a couple wrapper functions yourself if you had the desire).  Apache v2, on the other hand, is a pretty restriction-less license.  In fact, it may be one of the licenses you might want to concider instead of using Creative Commons as it basically says "do whatever you want, just don't blame me, and don't remove my copyright notices, etc").
408  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 18, 2012, 02:15:44 AM
I just upgraded to 6.0 rc4 and the most recent version of p2pool as shown on the first post, and am having issues. The error log is here: http://pastebin.com/3nga0nSB
Log was expanding rapidly, so I shut the node down.

Running on Server 2008 R2.

Seems your p2pool version is not current, so perhaps the first posting links to an obsolete build. Try to look a few pages back to get the link to a current p2pool build.

Dia
It's the latest tagged version from 16 days ago, and I went back several pages to no avail, because there do not seem to be any newer windows versions on previous pages.

The error messages you see are coming from bitcoin, not from p2pool.  Go make sure you actually have the latest version of bitcoin.  Based on what others have reported, it seems that the bitcoin installer often does not actually update old versions.  Maybe try the .zip file instead, or try uninstalling the old version first.
I used the zip, and I verified that I had downloaded rc4.

I don't know what to tell you to try next.  The error is coming from bitcoin when p2pool tries to ask it for the list of transactions to include in a block.  You need to figure out how to get bitcoind or bitcoin-qt happy again.  Only thing I can think of is to blow everything form bitcoin away (except your wallet.dat, if it contains any addresses you care about), and start clean with a freshly downloaded blockchain and a fresh install of the bitcoin binaries.
409  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 18, 2012, 01:09:02 AM
I just upgraded to 6.0 rc4 and the most recent version of p2pool as shown on the first post, and am having issues. The error log is here: http://pastebin.com/3nga0nSB
Log was expanding rapidly, so I shut the node down.

Running on Server 2008 R2.

Seems your p2pool version is not current, so perhaps the first posting links to an obsolete build. Try to look a few pages back to get the link to a current p2pool build.

Dia
It's the latest tagged version from 16 days ago, and I went back several pages to no avail, because there do not seem to be any newer windows versions on previous pages.

The error messages you see are coming from bitcoin, not from p2pool.  Go make sure you actually have the latest version of bitcoin.  Based on what others have reported, it seems that the bitcoin installer often does not actually update old versions.  Maybe try the .zip file instead, or try uninstalling the old version first.
410  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 17, 2012, 01:36:50 PM
Strange problem with my P2Pool node.
Everything was running fine, hashrate about 1600Mh/s (600Mh/s of my own hashpower + 1Gh/s of unknown other miners I assume).
I go away for two hours, come back and it takes 20 minutes (!!!) to establish a remote desktop connection to my server. Finally get on and the p2pool window is scrolling so fast I can't read anything, whole system is almost completely unresponsive. Memory usage is about 140MB and CPU Usage is 100%.

Hard reboot vpn, find that bitcoind now refuses to connect.
Have now switched over to 0.5.3.1 and reinstalled everything and p2pool is working again, stable with 2% CPU load and 105MB of memory in use.
Any thoughts?

What does the p2pool log say for the time that it was broken?  Hard to diagnose without knowing that.  The log is kept in the data/bitcoin/log file under the folder where p2pool is installed, so you can go back and look at it after the fact if you didn't delete it when you reinstalled p2pool.
411  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 17, 2012, 12:13:44 AM
Fixed.   Grin

Hehe. I don't see why people make such a big deal about the default voluntary donation. I was just in a discussion where someone equated it to a mandatory fee as seen in other pools. I can disable this voluntary donation any time I want and continue to use P2Pool! Simply awesome.

I've left the donation at the default setting on my P2Pool nodes. forrestv easily deserves it.

I agree.  Lots of pools have optional donations that default to being enabled at some amount (often 0.5%, even).  I don't see this as different. 

Sometimes I hear it argued that with those other pools it's more obvious because you can see it in a web page.  I think that is B.S.  The optional donation for p2pool is not any less visible than any other setting.  The mechanism for telling other pools what your settings are is a web page.  The mechanism for telling p2pool what your settings are is the command line.  The default donation command line option is clearly documented right there next to the command line option to choose your payment address, and to the options to specify your bitcoind hostname, username, and password.

If you want to use p2pool, the reality is that you should be comfortable with the command line.  If you want to argue that that is not ideal, fine.  A GUI wrapper to p2pool might be a good thing to create.  But I think it is disingenuous to single out the donation command line option as somehow more obscure than any of the other command line options.

412  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 15, 2012, 02:34:31 PM
I've used pypy for a couple of days, it works ok, I don't see a big difference in CPU usage compared to python, but it has a problem: it is not compatible with pygame so you cannot show/generate graphs.

Bummer about both.  I don't use the graphs so hadn't noticed that pygame wasn't compatible.  But if it doesn't offer any significant CPU efficiency gain, it's probably irrelevant.
413  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 14, 2012, 06:18:07 PM
Yes, I understand the percentage of actually seeing some if not any shares are; the thing that confuses me is how am I able to show accepted on the miner when my pool doesn't show any shares, unless it's mining so low that the pool already is on another block. :\

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool#Frequently_Asked_Questions

Q: Why does my miner say it has found a lot of shares but p2pool say I have only found a few?!

A: The real P2Pool difficulty is hundreds of times higher than on normal pools, but p2pool essentially lies to your miner and tells it to work on relatively easy shares so that it submits shares every few seconds instead of every few hours. P2Pool then ignores any submitted shares that don't match the real share difficulty. By doing this, P2Pool can more accurately report your local hash rate and you can see if you are having problems with too many stale shares quickly
414  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Are there any pools that don't mind botnets? on: March 13, 2012, 01:59:32 PM
Of course this would require work and money on the part of a botnet operators.  Operators are leeches of society.  The idea to actually do a token amount of independent work is a concept completely foreign to them.  They simply expect pools to to take their extremely unprofitable, server crashing workload AND be happy about it.

while that can often be true, botnet developers have matured considerably.  its turned into a multi-million dollar industry and the operators/devs at the higher end, often treat it like any other business venture.

Cocaine cartels think of what they do as just a business as well...
415  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 12, 2012, 03:57:56 PM
No you shouldn't have to port anything. PyPy should just work with normal Python code. It's simply a different implementation of the standard Python interpreter. No difference in the language it interprets, just how it does it.

For one thing it has a built-in Just-in-time compiler powered by LLVM, which means that instead of the writers of a Python implementation needing to worry about how to create an efficient Just-in-time compiler, the work of people from the LLVM project, who are already experts in constructing such a compiler, can be leveraged.

This made me curious, so I am running p2pool with pypy as we speak.  It seems to be working fine, but I'll watch it for a day or two and see if there are any abnormalities.
416  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: SOLVED - Adding GPUs reduces each cards' output, overall hashrate stays the same on: March 11, 2012, 10:22:35 PM
I ended up ditching XP and everything works fine on Win7 32bit. Lame.

I agree.  XP is lame.
417  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 11, 2012, 10:10:30 PM
This is probably a total newb question but what is an orphaned share exactly?

Ive been in the pool about 3 weeks, and Ive had fun supporting this pool, but man its been dry the last couple weeks for sure. I don't understand all the variance. orphaned, dead share stuff yet. Also learning a lot each day about Bitcoin. Now mind you Ive never had a dead share, and only 2-3 orphaned in the last 3 weeks or so, so I don't think there is an issue just wanted to understand it better.

As I said Ive been having fun with Bitcoin and p2pool just wish it would pick back up a bit.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Block_chain
Quote
Blocks in shorter chains (or invalid chains) are called "orphan blocks", and while they are stored, they are not used for anything. When a block becomes an orphan block, all of its valid transactions are re-added to the pool of queued transactions and will be included in another block. The 50 BTC reward for the orphan block will be lost, which is why a network-enforced 100-block maturation time for generations exists.
I think it's actually a 120-block mature time, though.

He's asking about orphaned shares and not orphaned blocks, but the concept is similar.  An orphaned share happens when two people find shares at about the same time both building on the same previous share.  These two new shares are now in a competition.  One of them will get extended by the next person to find a share and the other won't.  The one that is not extended is an orphaned share and won't result in any payout.

418  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [320GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 11, 2012, 02:32:54 PM
my p2pool log says Local: 300mh/s   but i'm not getting any shares or btc or anything. cgminer is definitely mining but p2pool is only picking up my hashrate and not showing any shares.  
what am i doing wrong?

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool#Frequently_Asked_Questions

Q: Why am I not getting very many shares?!
A: The P2Pool difficulty is hundreds of times higher than on normal pools. It can take time to get a share. P2Pool displays an estimate of how long you have to wait in the console output.

also. i can't seem to get the graphs page to work. it tells me to install python-rrdtool.  I installed python 2.7 and zope interface, but when i tried to install rrdtool when i run install.cmd

The graphs don't work on windows because python-rrdtool doesn't work on windows.  Switch to linux or wait for the graphs to be changed to not depend on rrdtool.
419  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Windows 8 Consumer Preview ISO images on: March 11, 2012, 03:30:00 AM
Can this consumer preview of Windows 8 be installed to a USB flash drive? I know it's supposed to be a feature come retail.
Really?

Can't seem to find any information regarding this.

It's called Windows To Go (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_To_Go) and will probably not be a feature of the consumer versions (i.e. it will probably be for the Enterprise version only)
420  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: a few questions about p2pool on: March 10, 2012, 07:34:17 PM
So I guess I'll have to change the p2pool source code somewhere after the difficulty 1 shares are checked. If there's an easier way to export that data please let me know.

There's not an "easy" way.  You'll have to dig into the p2pool source and start enhancing it to do whatever you want it to do.  This is, in effect, what they guy behind p2pmining.com has done.  He has a customized version of the p2pool software that does enough additional accounting that he can pay his miners based on the difficulty 1 shares they submit.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!