I do not push for immediate payment though. I have allowed several people to go months. However, it is typical when you pay for something to well um, pay.

It is not mandatory or required that someone leave you positive trust rating (you call it feedback, but this is not ebay, it is not feedback) for a single transaction. Yes, we had a couple more recently and I would have left you positive feedback as you have acted trustworthy.

But now attacking people who are giving back to the community (simply because you are not eligible to enter) repeatedly and then asking me where your feedback was and then insinuating that others are somehow getting feedback while you are not as if I was treating you differently when it is simply not true. I typically wait until many transactions occur and time has passed. I probably would have left you a positive trust rating at the start of next month.

Your insinuation about everyone being corrupt and that people are censoring poor ol' you is just over the top.

What I do here is mostly a service to the community - I do not profit from my actions here on the forums. Most sales are at cost and sometimes below cost.

You were wrong to attack the raffle makers - you were wrong to ask me about not leaving you positive trust rating. You were wrong to leave the feedback on me that you left, it is not true (while what I left you is very true) and is done out of spite and retaliation.

I will not feed your delusions and will not respond to your gibberish further. And yes, I blocked you on telegram. You already went off about the forums corruption there as well. Life is too short for this drama. You can have it - I choose not to.

I did not "change" it - it was always neutral. And I had no issues until he became disrespectful and was consistently derailing numerous threads attacking the OP's as well.

Having an opinion is great, even welcomed - slamming it home with post after post - nah, not so great or respectful.

I left no negative - it was alway a neutral. I would have left positive if he didnt insuniate that I somehow was treating him different than others with the part about "what is different about the coins they pay with" or something along those lines. up to the middle of last month, we had one interaction. now all of a sudden when he blasting people for running free raffles - it comes up that I never gave him trust for the deal from 2021? when I explained how/why I dont do it off of single deals, he further insulted me. Mind you he also never gave positive trust for the same deal (nor did I expect him to) to me. Kind of hypocritical of him, no?

I simply do not have the time to deal with such individuals so I choose not to. made the post to leave it at that.

I agree with you on that bitbollo and that is why I usually wait until several deals have been successfully concluded.

interested in the mantis roll!

lot 2: .001 BTC

it was not false. you made several posts now questioning why I did not give you "feedback" stating it misrepresent you in some fashion. I will not be bullied by you into giving you feedback simply because you feel it appropriate. I will also no further respond to your trolling banter.

As for losing a customer, who wants customers that badger them, insult them, and cause conflict? I do not need the sats that bad, for sure.

I do  not see any further reason to derail their thread:


Let me address your concerns:

First off - no one has gotten feedback from me for a single transaction - no one.

edited to add this: the feedback system is based on whether you can trust someone - and a single transaction does not always mean you can - this is not like eBay feedback where it is based on each and every transaction. that is why you cannot get 20 trust ratings and it count as 20, it will not count like that here.

Also funny you are complaining I did not give you "feedback" for that transaction from 2 years ago - if you go look you did not do that for me either - nor do I expect you should or would. Just funny to see the hypocrisy.

I do periodically go thru (usually every few months and give feedback to people with numerous transactions - 2 of yours are within the past 60 days - 1 within the past week.

It is funny how you do not want people to put rules on how they do their raffles but you now insist that I must give you feedback?

as for someone asking if you bought those cards - they can review the OP where they were sold.

as it stands now - I will do no further business with you, you are excluded from bidding on anything I raffle or even that I auction or do group buys for. I am here to serve the community and to enjoy myself. Not to banter with a half wit who wants to argue about how people handle their raffles and/or when/how they give feedback.

I am not trolling - I never troll. Now simply GFY

and the forum rules state they can decide how they want to do their raffle provided they are not requiring merit to partake.
so its not his rules - its the forum rules and they are compliant with them - so why are you complaining again?

enough derailment - you want to rail against the system - create a thread concerning raffles and their processes - see what the community thinks there vs de-railing this thread.

oooh i have one of the solid silver ones (#13)

would love to have a gold one to go with it.

lot 2: .0015 BTC

Their raffle - they can decide how to give it away or who to include - exclude.

I usually exclude anyone with an account create date less than the current year, sometimes longer. Sometimes, I limit it to people I have done business with. There are sometimes specific people I exclude.

Censorship is to say you have no ability to be included - that there is nothing you can do to be included. IE the race question you posed. One cannot change their race. But one can perform a translation service, one can have their account for a longer time etc etc

Even Bitcoin does this - look at the fees, if your fee is too low, your transaction will have to wait. You want to be included, pay a higher fee. No different then this raffle, you want to be included, do the translation. (note: this is the 6th card they have given away - the other 5 did not require someone to have done translation services)

as for the feedback thing - really? you have 3 transactions with me - 2 of them in the past 60 days. I leave feedback after several transactions and time have elapsed. Now I am forced to leave feedback based on your time line preference? I don't think so.

Every raffle does do this - there are always exclusions. Typically to prevent alt accounts, people creating new accounts just to get a second entry - it happens.

When people give things away - they have a right to decide who/how they do it. They are not Bitcoin - Bitcoin is Bitcoin.

So all auctions should be free? because making people bid is wrong it violates those who have less Bitcoin because they cannot bid as high? So everything just should be free to all?

again you are in the wrong here. They are allowed to decide how they give away free items. You can claim all you want about it not being free but it really is.

There is no need to keep derailing threads because you may not qualify to enter the raffle. Doing so only contributes to the possibility of you being excluded from future ones.

It is free to people who have done an action in the past.

By your logic no free raffle could ever exist as all would require the participants to do at least one thing - register for the forums. That is taking an action and thus by your logic - not free.

You are nitpicking where it need not be done.  People did translations, they are rewarding those that did with a raffle for a free card that only one of them will get. It is not payment.

Note - anyone can do the translations - if you had done one (that does not make you their employee - some do the translation to benefit members of the community who cannot translate)_They are not employees of the company. They are members of the community here.

It is a free raffle for members of the community - while it is for specific members who have done (I believe translation services) an action. Those actions were already done. And this raffle slots are awarded to them. Still free and still free for members of the community. Even if limiting.

Every single raffle held in the collectibles area has requirements and limits on who can join. In the end, they are giving something away so they have a right to decide who is eligible to participate.

The only time it really becomes an issue is if they require merit.  And that has been pointed out on prior raffles where it was removed from the list of requirements.

tried to win this piece - being native, it really appealed to me. but alas it got way too expensive for me. however, congrats to you for getting such a great price and the sale!

56 - moparminingllc  thank you for raffle!

I am just happy that I could give a few small things back to this great community.

Lot 2: 0.003BTC

ahh that 3rd quote settled it - I somehow missed that.

I am confused - are the coins solid silver? or silver plated? the OP seems to suggest both? Is one solid silver and the other silver plated?

https://www.printables.com/model/592499-bitcoin-high-quality-coin-2-colorsembossedpuncheda

except the one i did was about 10 inches across.

I have gotten nothing new from him - last response was that the cyberpunk store wants to be the exclusive seller so looks like anyone wanting them will have to go thru their store to get it - and do note these are for LBTC - not regular BTC storage.