|
No development, no communication.
No support from community.
No living.
P.S. Never seen such rude team members like JuilanSheen in other coins before.
|
|
|
|
I mined at royalminers for a whole day, but never get paid, and also my workers were not shown in the workers list.
What the hell are you doing?
Where did you rent at? Either you didn't properly configure your worker or you rented at a place that does not pass the entire stealth address over as the username. When I rented myself, I found that miningrigrentals truncates the address and doesn't work. Nicehash and leaserig both worked properly. I didn't try any other places. If you could open a support ticket (click on support link on royalminers.com to get to our freshdesk ticket system) and let me know the worker username you were using I'll see if I can correlate your shares and make sure you get paid out what you are entitled to if your worker did actually connect and the data was captured. Remember XCASH mining pays out to stealth addresses, but not all rig rental places support that long of a string as the username. It is your responsibility to double-check your miner configuration and ensure that it is correct and that the address is specified correctly. oh... I use miningrigrentals, which is the one you mentioned to be ill working. My two worker is: xr16196NV75RoNB1QA4C5gVFdNPBpw16TLJzF2Ai1xrtJ9HRTsBS7j87D3We8tb9HLpkLwCrjpRbTKN kYQfXCgXgPK9xccLeEREasX and: xr1B4ohN1wEVAmrAXfX6JWBk4KNZdGkdwtCHJo5xjXgfF13LZhBA2bZQKW1npBtt5uTJK4WZdHDzf3c wbNZ4GBnpjuku1QxRFojHaQ |
|
|
|
|
Glad to see that Windows user will have a one-click installer soon.
Any plan for we MAC users?
|
|
|
|
|
I mined at royalminers for a whole day, but never get paid, and also my workers were not shown in the workers list.
What the hell are you doing?
|
|
|
|
The BUY wall story is getting boring. I mean really boring. Devs agreed to defend the pre sale price, before the coin was launched. The walls were there and were filled due to unfortunate start of this coin. That story is over, coin lost a lot of its pre sale price, but that doesnt mean it will not hit it again. Sell pressure is lowering each day, and when marketing kicks in the price will recover. The value of this coin will be recognized by people sooner or later. I see this price range as buy oppurtunity. I have confidence in devs because they have proven themselves honest in multiple ocassions. They may not have experience, but they will gain as time passes...
Despite promises, this coin does not differ from any copy paste crap coins out there, and does not matter if its "yet". I did not expected miracles when invewsting in IPO, so I am not dissapointed, just hope no one loses much of his savings. Right, so let me guess.. You have not even looked at what the coin offers and code.. We are here, still working away in the background. Our main propose for the last while has been to weed out the bugs that was stopping us for continuing with the roadmap. These are now all fixed and working. We are consolidating the team, adding the new devs to the workflow, assigning tasks and moving forward. Its nice to hear, but blah blah blah. Same ss with other alts. No promised features added so far, You should AT LEAST add disabled features to wallet - it looks same like others 500+ shitclones. Pure facts. I am starting to think you are just fudding at this stage. ALL the promised features are there.. Every single one of them.. "Pure fact".. As we have said before integrating these into the QT-Wallet UI was not meant to be a part of the initial release. It was added, but did cause some issues with wallet load times, hence why we disabled them. This will be re-enabled when the load issue is resolved. The words in red is exactly the points. Quite many ppl leave sys just because they are skeptical about your development capabilites. From launch till now, we have seen too many cases that you guys can't managed to handle even the simplest problem properly. Hope you can do well later. Maybe you might need to hire some highly experienced devs for consultant purpose. |
|
|
|
I will change the name when you guys come up with a really good name which has not been used already for another coin, and the .com, .info or .org domain is still available, and you have a really good logo made which is better than our existing one (I'm not spending money on another logo when I really like the one we have). The green and black color scheme cannot change though, because then I would have to redesign the entire website and the web wallet. The currency code cannot change either because we are already listed on several exchanges and I don't want to hassle them.
Also, please release a MAC client. |
|
|
|
|
We don't have a MAC client?
Hope we mac users are not neglected.
|
|
|
|
Also Alexander has started to work on the next version which implement the paper.
His current roadmap is an early alpha version in four weeks.
Beta version and finale release for October.
I started to think about a potential relaunch for this coin. What do you think guys ?! Is that a bad idea ?
What do you mean the so called relaunch? I have already mined the current meta coin for months. I don't want to see that you create a new coin with a brand new genesis block. |
|
|
|
Skycoin transactions offer increased privacy. Skycoin is designed for advanced CoinJoin support.
....
CoinJoin RFC:
- Skycoin naively supports a simplified CoinJoin protocol
- CoinJoin mixes transactions from multiple wallets to increase transaction privacy
- Skycoin is designed so that it is impossible to determine which transactions are CoinJoin transactions
Skycoin Coin Join Protocol:
- three people send their inputs and outputs to a remote server
- server creates a transaction containing the inputs/outputs from all three people
- the server sends each person the transaction.
- Each person verifies the transactions and sends the signatures for their inputs
- The server publishes the transactions.
This protocol is much simpler than zero coin while dramatically improving transaction privacy.
My advice: drop the coinjoin turd and implement ring signatures right into the core code, and if that isn't possible make some way to connect to Monero to achieve anonymity. Can't agree with you any more. Coin join is definitely not a serious solution for privacy, instead, cryptography based solution is the ultimate choice. Either stealth address or ring signature approach like cryptonote( https://cryptonote.org/) is in a much higher class than coin join. |
|
|
|
|
need more infographics, especially in the Innovation section.
|
|
|
|
better open a trading thread for this? you can open a trading thread and find a escrow. because we may have a burning pool later. then we will have less rootcoin, and every rootcoin will means a lot. also check some innovative features:
1 Anon through a totally different and innovative approach: BitKey
2 rootEX™ - cryptocurrency exchange [95% progress]
3 rootBay™ - marketplace [85% progress]
4 rootOS™ - CryptOSystem [75% progress]
5 Economical feature: BurnPool™
BurnPool™ will be a new kind of multipool. Users will be able to choose between two mining-options.
First option will be payout in RootCoins. Second and NEW option will be to multimine RootCoins
which get "burned" automatically by transferring them to an "proofen unspendable" public-key.
So with this step coins get burned, the coincap minimized and the value higher. Two chinese chat happily in english. |
|
|
|
I have paid bittrex the moment he asked for it you silly little FUDsters.
For long term project, FUD does not mean too much while development does. So, can you give us roadmap/schedule/status on development? |
|
|
|
|
We need a one-click installer
It's a major obstacle for noobs to use XCR.
Any one agree with we, please repost the pledge.
|
|
|
|
Can you explain how do you further anonymize cryptocoin transactions beyond Crypotnote.
All the information I can see now is pure cryptonote, nothing new.
By this i mean further anonymize the typical bitcoin type coins, cryptonote, monero and boolberry already offer untraceable and superior technology with ring signatures, this coin is basically a modified bitcoin clone, and on the side is a base cryrptonote loaded into the frame, meaning all transactions are send through the second coin (cryptonote basecoin) then to the original recipient, delivering completely untracable transactions, without being an actual cryptonote coin. this means you can still use the coin in every aspect bitcoin is used, as in online payments, and still have the generic qt wallet, something which has not been delivered in monero/boolberry/cryptonote at this current stage. Need to check the source codes for sure. |
|
|
|
|
Can you explain how do you further anonymise cryptocoin transactions beyond Crypotnote.
All the information I can see now is pure cryptonote, nothing new.
|
|
|
|
Sorry I didn't give any news earlier but yes this project is alive.
We plan to release an updated version of the client matching bitcoin 0.9.2 by the end of this week.
I still need to finish the PoW part and start testing the code before release it. Once this is released, we'll move forward to implement the paper design in the next release (0.9.9). This phase will be lead (at least in the coding part) by the guy who wrote the paper with me looking over.
Seems a long way to go. The next phase is the most challenging one, thus to see a version with the paper implemented, we might need much longer timer, any timeline for that? |
|
|
|
|
Is this project still alive?
|
|
|
|
There are plenty of altcoins that do a pre-mine but ohh god forbid someone does a post mine after attempting to purchase NUD etc.
The price has doubled on bittrex so I take it the fork is healing properly, the majority of people seem to agree with us with a minority being lost as predicted. While I rather not lose the minority it seems like we can live with the losses.
if no change after hardfork,price will drop to below 1k sato. confidence lost ripidly. now 2500 sato. What surprised me most is that you even did not contact bittrex and c-cex!!!! Any lost of the exchanges caused the hard fork will hurt NUD in the other direction. I've notified you in earlier post. What a implausibly silly team! Everyone was notified about the hardfork, bittrex were notified even earlier via both PM and email. Writing messages with no basis in fact sure is great. We were delisted because there was no block explorer, not because we had no volume, the volume was great. It will be smooth sailing from now on and we will introduce remarkably innovative features. The dev always opposed paying +2500 satoshi per NUD in his earliest messages as you can clearly see at the start of the thread because he predicted that there will be some turbulence ahead with an innovative coin as there always is. If you want to hold a highly innovative coin with huge upside potential mine NUD, otherwise invest into the next shitcoin pump and gamble your money away inside the bubble.... Pool ，when it will open? There is such a program? There is a pool already, just no miner. Once bittrex is up again we will either place a bounty or do the miner ourselves. The next update will features a completely different blockchain and a couple additional innovative concepts thus we won't meddle with the current code to get it to sync from the 0st block. When will the next update be released? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
preorder accepted!
