I have bought cash with my crypto, and that is more than enough to keep on this business. I hope that some of the initiatives to allow direct payment succeed eventually.

ICOs are mostly legitimate, as long as you really take a little bit of time to know the team and make a basic research on the project. The are also rewarding sometimes.

I am trying to get some long term returns by "betting" to the coins that are here to stay for a long time. Most of them will dissapear, but a few good ones will makes us rich.

They use ICO as a mean of financing or they are true blockchain companies that are looking to build a good investment community around their project.

Why not? The teams seems to know their stuff, but in any case if you are unsure, you can always try to invest a bit less or research more in-depth to make sure.

Not at all, I had the pleasure of doing some recent investments that came out very good, so it is more likely that you don´t know how to choose and blame it on ICO.

Just stay away from coins that are dubious, you need to have some common sense to buy and lots of common sense when selling. You won´t make money if you don´t.

The best one for beginners could be Binance or KuCoin. These are very simple to use, and later on you can learn the more developed commands, so you can do lots of stuff.

Qurrex is a good coin, it is a exchange that has a very innovative technology and now it is really important to be in the business of exchanges, they make a lot of money.

The bounty manager is critical for the success of the campaign. It must be someone reputable because we put lots of effort into promoting and we need a good referee.

Si, Hacienda, que ya no Montoro, tasará todo lo que pueda porque España tiene una deuda monumental, de las de asustar hasta a Swarzeneger o como se escriba.

De todas formas es normal, un incremento de patrimonio o ganancias de bolsa siempre lleva aparejado un impuesto, es lo que se llama "el socio tonto" en el argot.

Are you aware of how forks work? Have you heard about Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold? A majority of miners could decide that there will be 41 million and change the issuance rate and...

It doesn´t matter what you support, because if you are in a network that has not the maximum hashing power for the algorithm your network is not secure.

Unless the majority of the hashing power of bitcoin decides the opposite.

One of the sacred arguments of Bitcoin backers is that it is limited and thus more valuable with time. However, it is not impossible that a fork is decided and changes that rule. For example, you can decide that it will not be limited, but issued at a fixed rate every year or revised by the community every X time, ...

The common use is that the chain with more hashing power behind would be called the "true Bitcoin" and receive full support from exchanges and users.

What do people think of this scenario?

 Una pregunta: Si esa moneda promete un rendimiento del 10% anual, ¿no quedará anulada la ganancia real por efecto de la inflación? Me suena muy parecido a varios esquemas piramidales.

Si compras GAS es uno de los tokens de la cadena NEO. La confusión suele venir de que Ethereum llama "gas" al consumo por transacción y no tiene nada que ver con el de NEO.

Lo que tú quieres hacer, comprar GAS y llevarlo a tu cuenta NEO es perfectamente factible, te lo confirmo.

It is very important that the soft cap and the hard cap are not too far apart, because that means that the price of the token may go down immediately after the sale.

Some ICOs have the valuation a bit wrong, but that is only while the market is down, those may be the ones that can recover the most afterwards.

I think that the largest part of the growth is not as much in the coins as it is in the tokens that are in the top 10 chains that support them. Bitcoin is not one of these.

By beat you mean have better profit I guess, and that means that any token of newer ICOs can actually have a better chance to moon than plain old good bitcoin.