someone put out a bounty to kill abinito
We can meet if you want. Do you live in Europe? PM me. lol even if i was, your not worth the hassle il use my profit from here to do it, So someone else has to pay the bounty because you only have little bit money? |
|
|
|
someone put out a bounty to kill abinito
We can meet if you want. Do you live in Europe? PM me. |
|
|
|
Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old?
The max coin limits the maximum coin,
but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all.
The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()
These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke!
busoni will slap at his own face 5 times in one minute for such a stupid mistake! Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin Today at 10:22:21 PM Reply with quote #84 Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM diversion tactics won't work guys Roll Eyes classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you. Oh internet your so creative ahahha Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ? yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here. but he's not.. what you just said is not true. for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them. so how can he be wrong on that point ? and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it. It's been explained.. so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth. And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy. And that IS the truth. if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner.. and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth . Suck it up.. for the good of our scene please lol Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad Angry |
|
|
|
lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them  Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation: Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions: - GetProofOfWorkReward() - GetProofOfStakeReward() and - GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor() These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded. I can't believe this, it's like a circus Yes, and also you can set the upper limit to be 10000000000000000000 trillion, but only generate 15 millions, is there a problem there? someone is completely idiot. If you want to know how many coins will be generated, look at the functions generating them, not the limit. Idiot! Again on this MAX_MONEY, for those who does not understand the code, here is where it used: bool CTransaction::CheckTransaction() const
{
...
if (txout.nValue > MAX_MONEY)
return DoS(100, error("CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : txout.nValue too high"));
What does it mean? It mean if this *transaction* amount exceeds the MAX_MONEY, return error.Does it check how much money you have? Not at all. You can have 10 times MAX_MONEY in your wallet! Does it check how many coins the system generated? Not at all. So MAX_MONEY does not limit the system generated total coin at all!Idoits, follow and learn... you'll never get it! +1 The max coin limits the maximum coin,
but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:- GetProofOfWorkReward() - GetProofOfStakeReward() and - GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor() These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin Today at 10:22:21 PM Reply with quote #84 Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM diversion tactics won't work guys Roll Eyes classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you. Oh internet your so creative ahahha Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ? yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here. but he's not.. what you just said is not true. for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them. so how can he be wrong on that point ? and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it. It's been explained.. so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth. And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy. And that IS the truth. if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner.. and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth . Suck it up.. for the good of our scene please lol Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad Angry |
|
|
|
lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation: Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions: - GetProofOfWorkReward() - GetProofOfStakeReward() and - GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor() These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded. I can't believe this, it's like a circus +1 Better then TV. We'll at least we learned what exchanges are able to read and vet code. Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin Today at 10:22:21 PM Reply with quote #84 Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM diversion tactics won't work guys Roll Eyes classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you. Oh internet your so creative ahahha Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ? yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here. but he's not.. what you just said is not true. for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them. so how can he be wrong on that point ? and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it. It's been explained.. so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth. And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy. And that IS the truth. if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner.. and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth . Suck it up.. for the good of our scene please lol Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad Angry |
|
|
|
lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation: Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions: - GetProofOfWorkReward() - GetProofOfStakeReward() and - GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor() These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded. I can't believe this, it's like a circus Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin Today at 10:22:21 PM Reply with quote #84 Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM diversion tactics won't work guys Roll Eyes
classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you.
Oh internet your so creative ahahha
Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?
yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here. but he's not.. what you just said is not true. for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them. so how can he be wrong on that point ? and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it. It's been explained.. so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth. And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy. And that IS the truth.
if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner..
and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth .
Suck it up..
for the good of our scene please lol
Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad Angry |
|
|
|
Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoinToday at 08:20:32 PM Reply with quote #1 Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post: Quote - Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions. - Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000. And these parts of the source code: Code: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0) Code: static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN; static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN; MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin. |
|
|
|
Here is a Simple a analysis on Supercoin reasonable price after Anon wallet release Until now, only Dark coin and XC coin has some Anon features Darkcoin has a worked mixer but also some problem with their master node XC coin has a test net mixer and do not worked Anon wallet yet, they will have a version2.0 two weeks later. Vericoin do not have a Anon wallet, they only have a development plan Supercoin has a Anon wallet on testnet. Dark coin Current total supply is 4.3 Million, the Price is 1.7 Million Satoshi/11$ XC coin Current total supply is 5.5 Million, the Price is 130K Satoshi/0.84$ Vericoin Current total supply is 26 Million, the Price is 15K Satoshi/0.1$ Supercoin Current total supply is 10 Million, the Price is 3K?  /0.018$??? personally i think we have done much work on Anon features than Vericoin now the Current Supercoin price is only 3K Satoshi. so what are we waiting for???. +1 thank you for your support! Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin Today at 10:22:21 PM Reply with quote #84 Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM diversion tactics won't work guys Roll Eyes
classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you.
Oh internet your so creative ahahha
Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here. but he's not.. what you just said is not true. for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them. so how can he be wrong on that point ? and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it. It's been explained.. so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth. And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy. And that IS the truth. if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner..
and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth .
Suck it up..
for the good of our scene please lol
Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad Angry |
|
|
|
Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoinToday at 08:20:32 PM Reply with quote #1 Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post: Quote - Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions. - Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000. And these parts of the source code: Code: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0) Code: static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN; static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN; MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin. |
|
|
|
if super coin is a scam so is cinni coin and silk coin
Its about super now  . First handle this scam. |
|
|
|
Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin Today at 10:22:21 PM Reply with quote #84 Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM diversion tactics won't work guys Roll Eyes
classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you.
Oh internet your so creative ahahha
Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here. but he's not.. what you just said is not true. for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them. so how can he be wrong on that point ? and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it. It's been explained.. so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth. And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy. And that IS the truth. if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner.. and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth . Suck it up.. for the good of our scene please lol Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad Angry
|
|
|
|
we need a official response from dev and someone reliable, until then im out
dev is offline now, he may solve this problem when he online. he may too tired to release the Anon Wallet.Hmmm..... Haha, he was too tired to change the max coin supply in the code too  |
|
|
|
we need a official response from dev and someone reliable, until then im out
dev is offline now, he may solve this problem when he online. he may too tired to release the Anon Wallet. Dumped all your coins? Or you are the mysterious dev? The truth has come out guy why i dump all my coins when i know the price will hit at least10k satoshi in few days? We will see, maybe you are still dreaming? |
|
|
|
ei dev, i apologize for my incompetence: the total amount of the coins will be around 50 millions... ok, but when? Within a few of days? one month? one year?
thanks
After 2 years. Because we have 2 years long PoS plan. that's great, then we will have a low inflation and the price will goes up then more people will join us. until now, not many people realized supercoin has a testnet Anon wallet now. when everybody realize this, the price will sky rocket. total PoW coins will be about 18.2 millions and total coins (PoW + PoS) is estimated at about 50 millions. This is new specs... it's about 1/3 of old plan... :-) true "total PoW coins will be about 18.2 millions and total coins (PoW + PoS) is estimated at about 50 millions. This is new specs...
it's about 1/3 of old plan... :-) "read the words of Supercointeam .... not lie , inicially was 150 millions . Poloniex are not a serious business Its still 150 million Unless you want worthless coins because the dev grabs another 100m and dumps them, just keep buying and holding.. And Cinny and Silkcoin ? ... sell all my cinny and silkcoins ? Sorry if my initial post was unclear, I was just pointing out that a lot of coins have the MAX_MONEY variable set much higher than what the actual maximum number of coins is. That alone is not proof that SUPER (or SC or Cinni or any other coins that works that way) is a scam. I did not understand correctly your post ... i´m sorry . My english its really poor :-( true ,also ... the variable MAX_MONEY can be in another file as main.h https://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin/blob/master/src/main.h#L38the post of Poloniex was really precipitate. Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin Today at 10:22:21 PM Reply with quote #84 Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM diversion tactics won't work guys Roll Eyes classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you. Oh internet your so creative ahahha Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ? yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here. but he's not.. what you just said is not true. for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them. so how can he be wrong on that point ? and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it. It's been explained.. so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth. And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy. And that IS the truth. if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner.. and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth . Suck it up.. for the good of our scene please lol Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad Angry |
|
|
|
we need a official response from dev and someone reliable, until then im out
dev is offline now, he may solve this problem when he online. he may too tired to release the Anon Wallet. Dumped all your coins? Or you are the mysterious dev? The truth has come out guy |
|
|
|
|
Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin
Today at 10:22:21 PM
Reply with quote #84
Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM
Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM
diversion tactics won't work guys Roll Eyes
classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you.
Oh internet your so creative ahahha
Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?
yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol
I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here.
but he's not.. what you just said is not true.
for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them.
so how can he be wrong on that point ?
and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it.
It's been explained..
so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth.
And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy.
And that IS the truth.
if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner..
and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth .
Suck it up..
for the good of our scene please lol
Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad Angry
|
|
|
|
Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoinToday at 08:20:32 PM Reply with quote #1 Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post: Quote - Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions. - Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000. And these parts of the source code: Code: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0) Code: static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN; static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN; MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin. |
|
|
|
100% agreed. Polo should list supercoin with no transaction fees for a week
There is the dumper. They made no mistake at all. Simple code change could unlock the coins. Fool yourself. |
|
|
|
GO FUCK YOURSELF ABINITO
You represent the average SUPER holder quite perfectly. Go on |
|
|
|
Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoinToday at 08:20:32 PM Reply with quote #1 Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post: Quote - Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions. - Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000. And these parts of the source code: Code: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0) Code: static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN; static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN; MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
