bitcoinwonders010
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:31:46 PM |
|
we need a official response from dev and someone reliable, until then im out
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:33:32 PM |
|
we need a official response from dev and someone reliable, until then im out
dev is offline now, he may solve this problem when he online. he may too tired to release the Anon Wallet.
|
|
|
|
Mrjitter
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:35:27 PM |
|
ei dev, i apologize for my incompetence: the total amount of the coins will be around 50 millions... ok, but when? Within a few of days? one month? one year? thanks
After 2 years. Because we have 2 years long PoS plan. that's great, then we will have a low inflation and the price will goes up then more people will join us. until now, not many people realized supercoin has a testnet Anon wallet now. when everybody realize this, the price will sky rocket. total PoW coins will be about 18.2 millions and total coins (PoW + PoS) is estimated at about 50 millions. This is new specs... it's about 1/3 of old plan... :-) true "total PoW coins will be about 18.2 millions and total coins (PoW + PoS) is estimated at about 50 millions. This is new specs...
it's about 1/3 of old plan... :-) "read the words of Supercointeam .... not lie , inicially was 150 millions . Poloniex are not a serious business Its still 150 million Unless you want worthless coins because the dev grabs another 100m and dumps them, just keep buying and holding.. And Cinny and Silkcoin ? ... sell all my cinny and silkcoins ? Sorry if my initial post was unclear, I was just pointing out that a lot of coins have the MAX_MONEY variable set much higher than what the actual maximum number of coins is. That alone is not proof that SUPER (or SC or Cinni or any other coins that works that way) is a scam. I did not understand correctly your post ... i´m sorry . My english its really poor :-( true ,also ... the variable MAX_MONEY can be in another file as main.h https://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin/blob/master/src/main.h#L38https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7314776#msg7314776the post of Poloniex was really precipitate.
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:36:25 PM |
|
we need a official response from dev and someone reliable, until then im out
dev is offline now, he may solve this problem when he online. he may too tired to release the Anon Wallet. Dumped all your coins? Or you are the mysterious dev? The truth has come out guy why i dump all my coins when i know the price will hit at least10k satoshi in few days?
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:37:34 PM |
|
we need a official response from dev and someone reliable, until then im out
dev is offline now, he may solve this problem when he online. he may too tired to release the Anon Wallet.Hmmm.....
|
|
|
|
L3pje
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:38:25 PM |
|
Indeed ... THAT answer makes me happy I got out
|
|
|
|
chedigital
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
WOW SUCH COIN
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:40:00 PM |
|
Let's take a look at some other popular coins on Poloniex: SilkcoinMaximum POW supply: ~45 million Great, let's check the code: static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 2000000000 * COIN; Uh oh, 2 billion is a lot more than 45 million! Better de-list SC right away! CinniTotal Coins: 15,000,000 Hmm... static const int64 MAX_MONEY = 100000000 * COIN; I'm not very good at math but I think 100 million may be slightly more than 15 million. Strange that you never gave a shit about things like this before? We have recently raised our reviewing standards to look for more than just trojans and security exploits. SC and CINNI were not subjected to that kind of scrutiny. We will investigate them, though. And if it turns out that they are like SuperCoin and deliberately inserted those values, then we might have a problem. I cannot comment on them at this point, since we have not looked over the code yet for things like this. We are attempting to raise the bar on the quality of the coins we list. We are well aware that this stance will be met with some opposition, particularly when a popular coin is rejected, but we are willing to take the heat for that. The idle pursuit of volume was never the intention behind Poloniex. LMAO
|
GPG Key ID: 80307E1A
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:40:18 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinwonders010
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:42:35 PM |
|
if super coin is a scam so is cinni coin and silk coin
|
|
|
|
fireinyourhole
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:43:23 PM |
|
Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin Today at 10:22:21 PM Reply with quote #84 Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM diversion tactics won't work guys Roll Eyes
classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you. Oh internet your so creative ahahha Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here. but he's not.. what you just said is not true. for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them. so how can he be wrong on that point ? and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it. It's been explained.. so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth. And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy. And that IS the truth. if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner.. and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth . Suck it up.. for the good of our scene please lol Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad Angry Go pop 2 bars, buy back in higher than your selling point, and then finally stfu
|
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:45:04 PM |
|
still works. let's do something good for community. Send Emails guys, more exchanges can prevent multipool's big dump.
|
|
|
|
chedigital
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
WOW SUCH COIN
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:45:10 PM |
|
Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post: - Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions. - Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000.
And these parts of the source code: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN; static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident. We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped. We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin. Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions: - GetProofOfWorkReward() - GetProofOfStakeReward() and - GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke!
|
GPG Key ID: 80307E1A
|
|
|
doch
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:45:54 PM |
|
if super coin is a scam so is cinni coin and silk coin
I'm gonna repeat this again so people don't get the wrong idea: My post was not meant to imply that Silkcoin and Cinni are also scams. There's zero reason to believe SC or Cinni are scams, I was just pointing out that other, more trusted coins have the same MAX_MONEY "issue" that SUPER does.
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:46:02 PM |
|
we need a official response from dev and someone reliable, until then im out
dev is offline now, he may solve this problem when he online. he may too tired to release the Anon Wallet. If the dev is in Asia, it's still early morning there. (6:40am) He released the anon wallet before going to sleep AFAICS. He'll soon wake up to this exciting thread I assume.
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:46:11 PM |
|
Here is a Simple a analysis on Supercoin reasonable price after Anon wallet release Until now, only Dark coin and XC coin has some Anon features Darkcoin has a worked mixer but also some problem with their master node XC coin has a test net mixer and do not worked Anon wallet yet, they will have a version2.0 two weeks later. Vericoin do not have a Anon wallet, they only have a development plan Supercoin has a Anon wallet on testnet. Dark coin Current total supply is 4.3 Million, the Price is 1.7 Million Satoshi/11$ XC coin Current total supply is 5.5 Million, the Price is 130K Satoshi/0.84$ Vericoin Current total supply is 26 Million, the Price is 15K Satoshi/0.1$ Supercoin Current total supply is 10 Million, the Price is 3K? /0.018$??? personally i think we have done much work on Anon features than Vericoin so the reasonable Supercoin price at least hit 15K*2.6=37.5K Satoshi if we compared with XC coin, the reasonable price will hit 60K Satoshi.now the Current Supercoin price is only 3K Satoshi. so what are we waiting for???. +1 thank you for your support!
|
|
|
|
|
Mrjitter
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:49:05 PM |
|
Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoinToday at 08:20:32 PM Reply with quote #1 Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post: Quote - Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions. - Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000. And these parts of the source code: Code: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0) Code: static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN; static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN; MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin. POLONIEX are retarded , its obvious and clear. should have waited several confirmations of expert developers before to launch the FUD News
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:50:11 PM |
|
if super coin is a scam so is cinni coin and silk coin
I'm gonna repeat this again so people don't get the wrong idea: My post was not meant to imply that Silkcoin and Cinni are also scams. There's zero reason to believe SC or Cinni are scams, I was just pointing out that other, more trusted coins have the same MAX_MONEY "issue" that SUPER does.sense of humor. lol now POLO are frustrated with all complaints. they are totally in a big mess.
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:50:55 PM |
|
This gets better and better.
|
|
|
|
|