Thanks for the photos. That must have been pretty much Arctic Silver to repaste that thing
|
|
|
Hey guys, I ordered one E3 the day it came out. Regarding Bitmain, payment was received 9th of April. And my unit is still not shipped? Really? Even batch 4 guys are going to get their units shipped soon.
Anyone from first batch, who did not get the E3 yet?
Rgeards
|
|
|
Took apart a bad (50%) Hash board.[...] Thermal grease on the backside and Thubber, Thermal Rubber, on the tops. Replaced thubber with Arctic Silver, may have dropped 1C, hash rate wasn't noticeably better.[...]
Using regular thermal paste in ASICs is generally not a good idea. Because of the 24/7 workload and the high temperatures, it tends to dry out quite fast and loose good contact. You will need to replace the paste quite often. The pads also dry out at some point but still have good contact.
|
|
|
Try a factory reset.
No such thing. You have to take out the sd card and reprogramme it to completely reset it. There isn't a reset button like on Antminers yeah, thats something you can also try. but before that, I would reset by restoring factory defaults in the settings. This is equal to a factory reset, as the support told me once.
|
|
|
... I'm ready to listen u , if have any solution <3
Thanks
Power off completely? Check cables and PSU. Factory reset? Apply firmware again. Disconnect hashboards (power and connection cable), try to boot controler only. If nothing helps, ask inno support. Concerning return times after warranty, my D9 hashboard is 3 weeks on its way now, still did not arrive. At the chinese customs at the moment. I sent it with DHL.
|
|
|
if miner resets to defaults after editing config file, you probably have a typo somewhere. can you tell me what kind of hash rate fluctuations you get? here is what mine look like after 15hrs runtime using 1350PLL and VID 170: https://imgur.com/4FVy3Yj(zencash @ suprnova) I feel like hash rates fluctuate more now...even though temps are colder. I dont really see a boost in performance. Seems the same with mine. You should look at the total daily income from your pool and dont care so much about that graph.
|
|
|
blacksheepwall
well done! it's working, but what are the options now? Now black sheep can enter the miner and do stuff I myself will try to find the miner configuration and just look if you can mess around a bit. Maybe cronjob for autoreboot for the guys who have the problem that after a given time, the miner hangs. Hmm.. what else? If there are some more professional people, maybe they can tune it even more.
|
|
|
blacksheepwall
If it works: thanks. Will try tomorrow. Anyone tested it?
|
|
|
change your personal message setting to allow messages from newbies. I accept pm from newbies. Why not posting it here?
|
|
|
It would be interesting to know how many units Innosilicon produced so far. Here is my theory and the reason why I bought the A9: I GUESS they did not manage to produce so many units at once and release relatively small batches at higher prices. I GUESS they rushed them out a bit, thats why the firmware is a bit beta. They might have wanted to get their miners on the market, even in relatively small batches before Bitmain - and they succeed. If they produces crazy amounts of batches, the difficulty and profitability would have been messed up a lot more. But now 2 factors kick in: Bitmain floods the market soon. And also Innosilicon ramps up the A9 production. If you buy now, you also get only one now and the other one at a time the profitability will be lower. So you get one at 10k$ at half the income until September compared to the first "buy one get one free" at which you got your 2 miners immedeately.
The interesting thing about this situation compared to other ASIC releases is, that (big) coins do not fork so fast this time. And its not Bitmain that releases the ASIC. I have the feeling that Bitmain has more production power and releases giant batches and crashes the market immedeately. Innosilicon send one batch from another production facility than the other. That makes me guess, they could not concentrate high production capacity at one place.
|
|
|
Hy Guys, Im new in Crypto mining. I bought 7 mashines today/tomorrow DHL will deliver. I payed 6700$ with shipment, VAT and PSU. My friend will install and connect all. Any suggestion from you guys what I need to know? And Im planing to buy 10-20 more coming 2 weeks time for the same price. Is it good investment or is it to late? Help. Is it possible to publish picture on forum here? Thanks Alex You mean 6700$ per unit, right? It is a common phenomenon that people that are "new to mining" just see the quick profits. I would be careful. There are a lot of people out there that also see the big profits and bought a lot of Z9s and Innosilicon also does not stop producing A9s. So the difficulty wil rise soon and crash our profits. Thats the circle Think of it a different way: These machines mine you coins. Do you think, they will mine you more coins than you could buy with the same amount of money you invested for the machines?
|
|
|
Unfortunately my X10 stopped working suddenly, no lights, just PSU switched on. Even replaced PSU but no lights , nothing. What could be the reason?
Sounds like defective control board.
|
|
|
Yes, I know that. But as I said, some miners of older batches work fine and stay below 90° even with 725 MHz. Some miners rise at stock 650MHz over 100°. So I suppose that the guide does not work for all hardware versions of S9.
|
|
|
How are people's HW error rates? What is considered normal? Looking at Innosilicon's Miner Status page, my HW #'s seem to be around 5-10% of my "Accepted" #.
I am running on Balanced performance profile, and have latest firmware installed. If this is not normal are there any suggestions to lower my HW errors? Could it possibly vary based on the pool I am mining on (currently on Flypool)? Thanks in advance.
Just FYI, today's 7/20 firmware release seems to have fixed all my HW error issues. I am not getting them anymore. I could not manage to update the firmware. After correct seeming update it reboots and has still old firmware. Weird, I just checked and I'm also having the same problem. My previous installed firmware was from 07/18. But after installing today's 07/20 firmware, it is now saying I have 07/06 firmware installed... I'm guessing they will push out a new firmware to fix this soon. I never had a firmware from 07/18... Did it come with the new batch?
|
|
|
How are people's HW error rates? What is considered normal? Looking at Innosilicon's Miner Status page, my HW #'s seem to be around 5-10% of my "Accepted" #.
I am running on Balanced performance profile, and have latest firmware installed. If this is not normal are there any suggestions to lower my HW errors? Could it possibly vary based on the pool I am mining on (currently on Flypool)? Thanks in advance.
Just FYI, today's 7/20 firmware release seems to have fixed all my HW error issues. I am not getting them anymore. I could not manage to update the firmware. After correct seeming update it reboots and has still old firmware.
|
|
|
You might not need the molex adapter since the PSU shoud have enough connectors. Check at the EVGA page.
|
|
|
Maybe you could also try halong mining passwords.
|
|
|
I don't know what exactly the filename of november batch firmware but someone said this filename Antminer-S9-all-201711171757-autofreq-user-Update2UBI-NF.tar.gz) is the november batch firmware and I already tried this firmware the temp is lower than the other firmware but I experienced weird issue it detects a bad chip then turn the frequency fixed to 400 reflashing and restoring to default factory settings solved this issue so if you going to try this firmware and experience some issue you reflashing and restoring them to factory default may solve the issue.
Also, what I notice about this firmware the hashrate is lower than the firmware you run on your two miners.
I already tried a factory reset after flashing. Unfortunately this did not fix the high temperatures. I dont know how the other people manage it or if they also face this problem.
|
|
|
|