Even more important probably. There are more of us and we like "easy" money
I dont think being part of the test net would bring any monetary reward, would be just for trying and testing it As I trust in this project. i would love to be part of the tester community without any rewards. |
|
|
|
Eventually they will need to show some working product if they want to succeed. I reckon they should have concentrated before on that and then, launch the ico  The product is a long game but, they are not even communicating here. I am not sure what are their plans. |
|
|
|
I think pynetx means: who is going to buy tokens through the ICO if they can get them cheaper on the secondary market?
- ICO price is higher than market price: nobody buys ICO tokens
- ICO price is lower than market price: tokens will be dumped on the market until below ICO price
In both cases: supply increases, therefore market price goes down.
It is true, and I regret it because for us it is more important that the token is bought during the ICO; buying the token after does not help the project, in the best case it increases the liquidity of the token. But, we have another strategy : > first, we do not list the token right after the ICO, we will wait to make a good launch, to increase the demand in the token. Listing a token without product and without traction is basically throwing away the value of the toke; hence we will list the token only on our exchange, and few month after our products are live. > then, buying the token during the ICO gives way more advantages: it gives you a special status, so you get more revenue, more commissions, as example, at the moment we plan on giving back 25% of our revenue to token holders : 20% to every token holders, 4% only share among ICO participants and 1% shared only between private sale participant (202 persons will basically share 1% of the revenue). We are studying the possibility to keep the 25% but to change the allocation to benefit more people supporting the project. Therefore, it is more interesting to participate in the ICO rather than after. It is normal to give more value and reward to the people who makes it possible. ICO were made to support a project, not to speculate. Now, it starts to make some sense. By the way, do you have any time frame to list it on your own exchange? |
|
|
|
|
So, what will happen to the unsold tokens, will they be burned or frozen for some time period?
|
|
|
|
I guess when it hits an exchange where you don't need to go through the KYC process.
in reality we do not need to wait for the dusk tokens to be listed on the exchanges to be able to buy them, as long as they will be movable and unblocked shortly they can be bought on the various dex (decentralized exchanges) in a fairly anonymous way... I don't think that we will be able to buy DUSK from any DEX as they don't have an erc20 token except the one sold on ethfinex. |
|
|
|
surely they(team) will reach the soft cap the project is valid and very useful if they could release the mvp before the ico i think they would collect many more funds...
they will have some more rounds of funding when the market is in better shape so I believe they will reach the softcap. the question is if they can manage to wait long enough for the market to turn around. No one from the team is even bothering to give an update here. People are left here just to speculate about things. |
|
|
|
The Ico is ending in December I guess. So, q1 2019 for the production release is quite a good timing.
They have changed the ICO dates, or better split it into a presale until Dec 23 and the main token sale in March 2019, so launch of the exchange might be even before ICO. What's the point of having an ICO if the token is already on the exchange? |
|
|
|
When will it be possible to buy Dusk without high volume and KYC requirements?
I guess when it hits an exchange where you don't need to go through the KYC process. One thing I am sure that it will be on bitfinex but, is there any information about expected date? |
|
|
|
|
It's good to see that team is actively replying to the queries here but, I would like to see a full fledged comparison chart between CosmosCR, mark.space, decentraland etc.
|
|
|
|
Can anybody confirm that they reached about %60 of their soft cap? I hope that ehealth can reach the soft cap maybe even hard cap, i ve been following this project since the beginning.
Some months ago Nikolay posted the information about the 1M$ contribution of an Indian private investor, so yes, it seems they indeed reached around 60% of softcap. Yes, leelavati hospital of India which is one of the biggest private sector firm invested in EHF eHeatlh |
|
|
|
You mean fully working exchange or just demo version before ICO? As I understand from roadmap exchange will be lanched after ICO... or before?
During q1 2019 they have in program to launch the exchange, so is going to be the real thing  not so much time to wait. The Ico is ending in December I guess. So, q1 2019 for the production release is quite a good timing. |
|
|
|
|
How is the token sale going? Is there any information about how much is raised til now?
|
|
|
|
|
I must say nice website design. One thing I am particularly curious to know about is that how cosmos is different than the decentraland?
|
|
|
|
I would be cautious to make assumptions with the situation the market is in general, not only the crypto. At least the team is flying around and trying to meet possible investors. Is not going to be easy, i reckon they should put more effort in trying to build something that is working, beside having a mvp ready to show to the investors. As per today we have not yet information about the development status, which is not very good  Not only that we have no information about the development status, we even haven't an idea what the mvp will be. Is someone even working on this project or it's been abandoned already? |
|
|
|
Anyway 25% is quite a lot money to give back to all investors hope it will be like this for long time, dev when the exchange will be ready?
It is a lot hope it wont affect there revenue in the first stages of operation, as you can see there is a lot of exchanges and upcoming projects that offers revenue sharing or give out token just to keep there traders. It's a nice way to show investors that the project really care about the ones who trusted it in the early stage. |
|
|
|
Yes, I would also like to know more about the token creation process and the benefits of choosing DUSK over other blockchain networks.
it certainly won't be a good idea to introduce KYC for token creation. why wouldn't anyone just choose ETH then? In my opinion it could be a good thing also. We don't need tons of shit tokens. By implementing kyc in token creation process the amount of shit tokens could be reduced by a large. |
|
|
|
Jarvis has a new task on Crowdholding. Log in, give feedback to Jarvis and earn crypto for your contributions! Click below to get started. Click here - http://bit.ly/2P3Cuj8Seems like this Crowdholding company has a great effort to any cryptocurrency project. I'm pretty sure you are a good guy. Crowdholding wow, seems a really catchy theme to me. I'll try to give my honest feedback. |
|
|
|
it would be interesting to see photos and videos of the lasts events where there was dusk, so anyone can launch a new token on the dusk platform is enough to pass the kyc procedure, excellent...
Yes, I would also like to know more about the token creation process and the benefits of choosing DUSK over other blockchain networks. |
|
|
|
In the long run 100% bonus is just bad, it's only good when the tokens or coins get locked up for more than a year.
Then it would be a good thing to give a big bonus, else those investors will dump on the later investors and crash the price..
I too feel there should be some locking system for the 100% bonus buyers. Otherwise the consequences when the token starts trading will be horrific for all the investors. Another suggestion would be putting a minimum investment barrier for these 100% bonus buyers. Locking will only delay the inevitable which is a dump, doesn't matter now or later. |
|
|
|
perhaps with these market conditions a real-time counter would not be the most appropriate move, but not even the total absence of data on fundraising, do we say a compromise like a weekly updated counter?...
Due to price fluctuation, it is impossible to guess how much money they raised and due to the price of ETH they the raised amount will be getting lower in the market. So it is good to wait until the company gave an update about it. Price fluctuation is there only if we tend to count in USD. If the count is in ETH or BTC it won't change a thing. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
