|
Why give attention to a rich banker? Their existence is incompatible with anything Bitcoin stands for.
|
|
|
|
spam:https://tabi.foundation |
|
|
|
|
Those coins have mini private keys, right? I'm not sure if Electrum takes those.
Considering the value of those coins, you should probably keep the key away from an online computer. Learn how to sign offline. It's more work, but there's no need to risk anything.
|
|
|
|
without having security concerns. Your idea is the security concern. |
|
|
|
|
You can't possibly know if someone didn't sell before. Changes are whales have more than one wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
If they only trade and don't want their own wallet, shouldn't they move to an ETF instead?
|
|
|
|
|
But why? They abandoned the gold standard so they can create infinite amounts of money. Backing it with anything goes directly against their interests.
|
|
|
|
I'm not buying it  I left you a little surprise somewhere, which you failed to mention  Haha that's bluff mate. Unless you left it in the past week or so. But I am not buying it either. I am an intern. I learn from you. So I don't buy it! Haha I don't bluff. I left it last year. Good luck! |
|
|
|
call LoyceV a liar for what he’s said about me stealing BTC from the treasury. Stop making thing up about me. If you can't find a link to prove it, it's safe to assume it only happened in your head. |
|
|
|
|
As long as you have the private key, you can recovery all forks. But don't risk your Bitcoin to recover forks!
LoyceV answer here tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Fixedfloat: who are the "partners" you mentioned? Who decides based on what criteria which Bitcoins are good or evil?
Bitcoin is fungible, attacking it's fungibility is attacking the fundamentals of Bitcoin.
LoyceV: read everything here.
|
|
|
|
|
Here's another one: if you don't do it, and Bitcoin goes up a lot, they'll still blame you for missing out.
Family and money can end badly in so many ways.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't mix family and money. If Bitcoin drops, they'll blame you. If you lose their Bitcoin, they'll blame you.
|
|
|
|
Kruw was just the icing to the cake. That's not how this expression works.... |
|
|
|
|
I recently discovered (when someone pointed it out) that my scraper failed to go to the second page on some threads, meaning it may have missed hundreds of pages.
|
|
|
|
Just out of curiosity, are the bribes offered comically small with respect to how much you're earning by honest means? Of course. There's no point in offering more than the cost of evil fees. "Bribes" is probably not even the right word, those people just want to pay in altcoins. They're just asking the wrong person. |
|
|
|
The shit-posting crossed so much that Switzerland got angry LOL. I didn't get angry, I got even To answer your question: I wouldn't leave negative for shitposting or buying an account. |
|
|
|
If it works, rest asure you will receive 0.1 BTC If it works, you've created a Bitcoin Fork in 2009, which was orphaned by the main chain. You're chasing something that's not going to work. end of story, its categorized as "orphaned" But im thinking.... why not creating a bitcoin fork to include all orphaned coinbase tx since genesis block up to this date? After all, the miners who received the "orphaned" made a computational work... so instead of a "race" to who finish first the "job" change it to "work as a service" and share proportionally with the miners based on their computational work done, which can be calculated.... in the counter side it will be a massive bitcoin price drop up to 80% - 75% .... so the thing is will miners consensus approve this kind of fork or they wont just to keep their "monopoly" .... and here comes the real question... bitcoin wont descentralized after all mmm? what you guys think With 2009-difficulty and today's hashing power, anyone can create thousands of orphaned 2009 blocks. It's pointless, orphaned blocks lost the race. |
|
|
|
|
Merit is for good posts. The user shouldn't matter.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
