i'm getting some Darksend Denominate transactions on Testnet.. is looking good.
I was getting 8 round denomination on testnet. Bring it to mainnet and post outcomes plz! Im still waiting for a single denom after redownloading blockchain and -reindexing |
|
|
|
Anyone know the command to reindex ?
for windows : -reindex in the target of yr shortcut Can you give me directions, i don't know how to edit the target rightclick on yr shortcut towards yr darkcoin wallet, press properties. in target you add -reindex for example (could look different at yr shortcut) C:\Darkcoin\darkcoin-qt.exe -reindex Thanks man, giving it a go now. |
|
|
|
Anyone know the command to reindex ?
for windows : -reindex in the target of yr shortcut Can you give me directions, i don't know how to edit the target |
|
|
|
|
Anyone know the command to reindex ?
|
|
|
|
thanks for testing, i don't know the answer to your question but someone will.
We need lots more people online with D+ wallets, thats the only thing! We only need D+ liquidity on mainnet for the tx to match and start doing rounds. In testnet we did heaps loads of D* ping-pong'ing without incidents. And with ricdiculous amounts of tDRKS. Mainet is a different bag of cats, like pseudo-ex-converted-trolls trying a bit more sophisticates toruble making. This is a SOLID release! Just needs adoption. Already contributing mixing some of mine, result soon to come. I put up 36 DRKs on 4 round. Better than 1500DRK doing 1 round. right now. How many of you have wallets denoming out there? +1 really well said! Not that solid, i have 0 denoms! Debug just says no funds need denom? just wait untill a lot more of us are updated to .30 ***** Just needs adoption. ****** I don't think its that. I had the same issue last version. No funds detected in need of denominating is doing my head in! I tried darksend auto to no avail |
|
|
|
thanks for testing, i don't know the answer to your question but someone will.
We need lots more people online with D+ wallets, thats the only thing! We only need D+ liquidity on mainnet for the tx to match and start doing rounds. In testnet we did heaps loads of D* ping-pong'ing without incidents. And with ricdiculous amounts of tDRKS. Mainet is a different bag of cats, like pseudo-ex-converted-trolls trying a bit more sophisticates toruble making. This is a SOLID release! Just needs adoption. Already contributing mixing some of mine, result soon to come. I put up 36 DRKs on 4 round. Better than 1500DRK doing 1 round. right now. How many of you have wallets denoming out there? +1 really well said! Not that solid, i have 0 denoms! Debug just says no funds need denom? |
|
|
|
|
Still saying no funds need denom!
2014-08-15 19:08:26 Added 122 addresses from 54.179.140.110: 25 tried, 10732 new
2014-08-15 19:08:27 CDarkSendPool::CheckTimeout() : REMOVING EXPIRED QUEUE ENTRY - 0
2014-08-15 19:08:29 CDarkSendPool::CheckTimeout() : REMOVING EXPIRED QUEUE ENTRY - 0
2014-08-15 19:08:29 socket closed
2014-08-15 19:08:29 disconnecting node 54.179.140.110:9999
2014-08-15 19:08:29 trying connection 79.135.64.168:9999 lastseen=0.5days
2014-08-15 19:08:34 connection timeout
2014-08-15 19:08:35 trying connection 31.210.52.213:9999 lastseen=0.4days
2014-08-15 19:08:35 connected 31.210.52.213:9999
2014-08-15 19:08:35 send version message: version 70035, blocks=119619, us=86.151.241.63:9999, them=31.210.52.213:9999, peer=18
2014-08-15 19:08:35 Added time data, samples 19, offset +4 (+0 minutes)
2014-08-15 19:08:35 nTimeOffset = +4 (+0 minutes)
2014-08-15 19:08:35 Moving 31.210.52.213:9999 to tried
2014-08-15 19:08:35 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.10.12.29/: version 70035, blocks=119619, us=86.151.241.63:51875, them=31.210.52.213:9999, peer=18
2014-08-15 19:08:35 send initial getblocks peer=18
2014-08-15 19:08:35 getblocks -1 to 0 limit 500 peer=18
2014-08-15 19:08:37 Added 328 addresses from 31.210.52.213: 26 tried, 10796 new
2014-08-15 19:08:37 Added 311 addresses from 31.210.52.213: 26 tried, 10822 new
2014-08-15 19:08:37 Added 142 addresses from 31.210.52.213: 26 tried, 10823 new
2014-08-15 19:08:49 DoAutomaticDenominating : No funds detected in need of denominating (2)
2014-08-15 19:08:53 new darksend queue object - 54.178.193.39:9999
2014-08-15 19:09:06 AcceptToMemoryPool: 108.61.209.146:9999 /Satoshi:0.10.12.29/ : accepted e6c53bb2773ba5f9df3f24aed5a5ad294a301b903ac5413f3198f6feefbefe98 (poolsz 4)
2014-08-15 19:09:24 new darksend queue object - 188.226.235.185:9999
|
|
|
|
Is RC4 working properly ?
That's the puzzling thing about it. RC4 is actually ok with darksend round = 1. The price drop surprised me. I cannot get it to denominate on one round. Is there a command i can use? |
|
|
|
The anon tech actually works but the market doesn't care.
"The market" doesn't know how... The anon works yes. But everything isn't hunky dory. Iv had darksend+ turned off until this morning. Selected 1 round and waited. A few hours later im still waiting, nothing has happened. Debug says 2014-08-15 09:29:22 DoAutomaticDenominating : No funds detected in need of denominating Its also unknown if 8 rounds of denom works yet. The market is very skeptical, but Evan will fix everything no doubt! |
|
|
|
Crazy stuff going on right now.
PICNIC PANIC! |
|
|
|
The dark star blew up !
Nah its still here...  |
|
|
|
FWIW, I agree with you. I don't think we are that far apart. Where we differ a little is reasons for the market reaction - you think the market is myopic whereas I think the market is objectively viewing what is on the table. I think we can also agree that until the code is open sourced, RC4 will be viewed with some scepticism.
Edit: We should not forget that Taaki is actively pursuing an open source solution to Btc anonymity, which he claims will be delivered for 40 Btcs and will include DACs. For many, that's good enough to stay put in Btc land.
I personally think darkwallet is dead in the water. It uses the original coinjoin protocol, which has issues. Evan has completely reinvented how coin join works and fixed the original issues it had. I think Taaki will either adopt Darkcoin, or use Evans method of mixing when its open sorced! Good news for both BTC and DRK |
|
|
|
So, I don't think we can legitimately say that people have been allowed a window into the processes, which other coins would not have allowed. This was an actively promoted, open source coin.
We? I'm saying it. And it is legitimate. Part way through, certain things were promised and part of the code was then closed source. The market liked the anon tech but was repulsed by the closed source approach.
This is how the window into the process happened. You are of course right that the market traded ahead of itself.
This is where you go astray again. Being traded before it's time was just a byproduct of the fact that it was visible before it's time. Being traded before it's time is just one of the symptoms of the matter. However, that is arguably inevitable given the promises made because we should be near open source at end of August but that is likely to drag on longer now.
The promises made were determined to be inadequate. The project was essentially re-started at this point to deliver a hell of a lot more than what was promised. I realise the pressure on the dev team is huge but I also think the market is taking a step back and saying: what is really available here, and pricing Drk accordingly. Perhaps, KA's code review will dispel some doubts but I think open sourcing will be key to any significant price increments.
I do not disagree with your assessment. I disagree with how you got there. I simply want "the market" to take a step back and realize what's actually going on, not merely the surface. DRK is a whole new thing than it was, and Evan basically re-wrote it from scratch, on the fly, with no intention to actually do so at the outset. What he's managed to pull off is fucking amazing given those circumstances, and the development of the past few months is unprecedented in public exposure. The inception and development of RC3/RC4 has been the equivalent of seeing a coin developed before it was even announced. That has not ever been seen before. The code isn't ready to be opened, but at least the process was. That's more than any other coin has ever done. No doubt, it happened by an accident of circumstances, but it happened and it seems so very inconvenient to acknowledge it... People are sheep, they will jump on board when dark hits 0.016 and then read and learn how darksend works. |
|
|
|
A question unrelated to my previous posts.
Darkcoin is forked from Bitcoin not Litecoin, correct?
Forked from litecoin, AFAIK. Edit: Might be wrong on this as I did not see litecoin copyright thing on darkcoin wallet. Good point, it does say it is copyright of the Bitcoin developers. I just did ctrl+f on the whitepaper and didn't find anything about where it was forked from, and can't find anything on the website. Someone just asked which it was forked from and I want to be sure I give them the right answer. When we looked at github we noticed it was forked from litecoin: https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoinBut strangely the wallet does not say litecoin copyright, which might be an oversight. Edit: https://i.imgur.com/U5HLN2J.pngI found LTC and BTC code in it in the beginning. Now all that remains of either is essentially an API that adapts old-school rpc calls to an infrastructure that does not in any way resemble the code that was once upon a time forked. It's so drastically changed that to call it a fork post RC3/RC4 is no longer accurate. If you set your top to refresh @0.1sec, and you stared at it as you killed the daemon, you could see it say "litecoin shutting down" for a fraction of a second. Last I noticed that was the inception of MNs. I haven't looked since. Last i heard Evan said drk is a fork of bitcoin. This will make merchant adoption easyer, as the merchants already have the inferstructure in place to adopt drk |
|
|
|
My wallet says 'salvage failed', so i wanna turn it off so it can't fail.
Close and reopen. How did you put it in salvage mode to start with? Long story made short. Evan fixed my wallet, sent me back a .dat and it came up with that message. Evan is going to send the coins to a new wallet address for me as he can access the .dat for some reason. Well done Evan. Now stop breaking your wallet and let Evan code  lol your right. Issue resolved. Evan made a point to not denominate funds yet |
|
|
|
My wallet says 'salvage failed', so i wanna turn it off so it can't fail.
Close and reopen. How did you put it in salvage mode to start with? Long story made short. Evan fixed my wallet, sent me back a .dat and it came up with that message. Evan is going to send the coins to a new wallet address for me as he can access the .dat for some reason. |
|
|
|
How to turn off salvage?
from shortcut just delete --salvagewallet What shortcut? The qt wallet? How do i change it? It isn't off on by default. You'd have to run the wallet with the command --salvage. I'm using windows not linux If you just ran the wallet it isn't in salvage mode. So what is happening that is freaking you out? My wallet says 'salvage failed', so i wanna turn it off so it can't fail. |
|
|
|
How to turn off salvage?
from shortcut just delete --salvagewallet What shortcut? The qt wallet? How do i change it? It isn't off on by default. You'd have to run the wallet with the command --salvage. I'm using windows not linux |
|
|
|
How to turn off salvage?
from shortcut just delete --salvagewallet What shortcut? The qt wallet? How do i change it? Btw im windows not linux! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
