Bitcoin Forum
January 17, 2017, 05:30:02 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.2  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
  Home Help Search Donate Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 524 »
1  Bitcoin / Mining / MOVED: Bitcoin Mining/Cost Efficiency U.K on: Today at 12:21:46 PM
This topic has been moved to Mining speculation.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1755624.0
2  Bitcoin / Mining / MOVED: I have free electricity and internet on: Today at 08:27:02 AM
This topic has been moved to Mining (Altcoins).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1754913.0
3  Bitcoin / Mining / MOVED: Antminer S7 on: Today at 04:50:41 AM
This topic has been moved to Mining support.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1708308.0
4  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 1% fee solo mining USA/DE servers 225 blocks solved! on: Today at 04:22:55 AM
Note that if you do not find a block, you get no reward at all with solo mining.
How do I withdraw in solo.ckpool.org? if indeed withdraw min 12.5 BTC, why my income (Accepted: 14.42636558 BTC) has not also pay into my wallet? explanation please.... thanks
Please don't quote entire posts for no good reason.

Read the part I left in the quote very carefully. I have no idea where you got "accepted 14.4" BTC from; there's no such measurement or accounting response from this solo pool.
5  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 1% fee solo mining USA/DE servers 225 blocks solved! on: January 16, 2017, 08:40:38 PM
ahhh i get you! With that in mind, how fast are CK Pool block changes on average? I mine here solo for this reason and because you have integrity but i am curious as to the exact average time for block changes.
By far the fastest of any full verifying node pool. Block verification and work building time is on average 140ms from notification of a new block.

Note there are other pools that get new work out faster (like the Chinese pools) but they do NOT verify the blocks and build empty block work on top which is a security threat, can potentially cause an invalid fork of the blockchain, and does not confirm any pending transactions so is bad for bitcoin on multiple levels. This site (when it's working - currently stalled on an old block) shows block change speeds, and you'll see solo ckpool is the fastest after the non-verifying pools: https://poolbench.antminer.link/ Note it's hosted in the USA so it's about block change speeds to USA miners specifically.
6  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why would banks use a blockchain? on: January 16, 2017, 08:26:27 PM
Banks need to maintain huge volume of data whereas blackchain efficiently manages huge volume of data in distributed mode. One simple advantage of this would be reversing or faking will be prohibited with the case of using blockchain technology, for example.
Reversing or faking is prevented in bitcoin through the use of mining which is how one can maintain a current "truth" in the blockchain in a trustless system. Blockchain technology by banks have no need for working with a trustless system with their own data in house. Blockchain provides a way to have a current state across many nodes, but for in house data there is no need for such protection against reversing or faking, and there is no mechanism to do so either.
7  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 1% fee solo mining USA/DE servers 225 blocks solved! on: January 16, 2017, 08:18:12 PM
I thought you used the old bitcoin relay network anyhow?
I use the old and new bitcoin relay as well, but this is even faster propagation between the two pools than either of those can provide and is specific for the pools' submitted blocks.
8  Bitcoin / Mining / MOVED: profit in mining on: January 16, 2017, 10:34:14 AM
This topic has been moved to Mining speculation.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1754327.0
9  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Giving up real solomining and going back to solomining on p2pool on: January 16, 2017, 06:49:54 AM
So essentially most if not all pools produce blocks that are not always full, not just p2pool Wink
You can't say all, but otherwise that's correct, except that the average from most pools is much larger than p2pool.

Here's a block size summary, no idea why p2pool isn't included:
http://data.bitcoinity.org/bitcoin/blocksize/6m?t=l
10  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Giving up real solomining and going back to solomining on p2pool on: January 16, 2017, 05:01:42 AM
what about these from today?
https://blockchain.info/block-height/448412
https://blockchain.info/block-height/448411
https://blockchain.info/block-height/448410
https://blockchain.info/block-height/448406
This is just a few from the first page I looked at of the most recent blocks, and from some of the largest pools.
So they consciously blacklist or set lower or use some other workaround to try and speed up their block changes. Doesn't mean there aren't transactions to put in there if they allowed it to.

See here:
https://statoshi.info/dashboard/db/transactions
11  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [14000Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB on: January 15, 2017, 11:43:15 PM
Without stats on the current pool it's hard to know what the hashrate of this pool is any more, and the opening post value looks incredibly out of date. Any chance of updating it to reflect the real hashrate? People have been asking me as moderator to edit it but I don't feel that's my responsibility.
12  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 1% fee solo mining USA/DE servers 225 blocks solved! on: January 15, 2017, 11:39:39 PM
To be fair, the stats weren't actually meant to reset on a restart so that's a new bug as well, but to fix that... I'd have to restart again... I'd rather see if I can just keep the pool up indefinitely now instead. The new code has had many changes internally, and if you've been watching the ckpool git you would have seen most of them. None of them are visible changes to miners though. The practical effect to miners will be that both pools now share transactions so are likely to always include the best transactions to maximise fees and block propagation between the two pools should be very quick, helping propagate blocks across the network and further minimise the risk of orphans. I'm tempted to set up other mining nodes elsewhere in the world to improve this even further but the profit margins of this pool wouldn't make it worth it unfortunately; I've been through that exercise before and the two nodes in DE and USA give pretty good coverage with minimal latency for most mining places in the world.
13  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 1% fee solo mining USA/DE servers 225 blocks solved! on: January 15, 2017, 10:44:45 PM
-ck, just one question - yesterday my best share showed over 2 bill, and now it shows 240 mill, have you restarted the stats? I'm at the .de node.

Look a few posts back...

Why do the stats keep resetting?  new feature to reset stats every so often?    just curious.
Been doing lots of restarts to update the pool with lots of improvements and sequential bugfixes and the stats have been going with that. I've posted about the restarts here and then deleted the posts so if you subscribed you would have seen the messages but I thought it would look like a flood of the thread to leave them all here. I keep hoping I'm on the last bugfix but that's just the nature of running code real world versus test environment that more shows up. I'm not planning more "internal features" so once the bugfixes are all in it should be months again before the pool will need restarting.
14  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER U3 Discussion and Support Thread on: January 15, 2017, 09:47:18 PM
Consider yourself lucky it even works at 250, given what a steaming pile of shit these devices are. You haven't got a snowball's chance in hell of getting them running at 400.
15  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Giving up real solomining and going back to solomining on p2pool on: January 15, 2017, 08:04:52 PM
I noticed myself some small blocks and some larger blocks, but that can also be attributed by the amount of time it took p2pool to find a block since the previous block was found, could it not?

Although my node is set at 970k doesnt mean that I will fill that block if I find it shortly after the previous block is found.
No, there hasn't been a time in the last 18 months where it wouldn't be full no matter how close together the blocks were unless you manually set it lower or were consciously blacklisting transactions. Unfortunately in p2pool the burden of validating and propagating blocks falls on the miner who finds the block and the size and latency of their own node then matters instead of at a regular pool.
16  Bitcoin / Mining / MOVED: Best starter hardware on: January 13, 2017, 08:07:44 PM
This topic has been moved to Mining speculation.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1745556.0
17  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 1% fee solo mining USA/DE servers 225 blocks solved! on: January 13, 2017, 01:28:55 PM
Just for fun, here's a screenshot of me testing the solo code on testnet which recently had its diff reset to 1. This is a screenshot when diff was 1024 (it's rising every 45 minutes instead of every 2 weeks).



Yes I'm more than 51% of the network Tongue
18  Bitcoin / Mining / MOVED: Hashthepla.net - Hast the planet hosting, Legit? on: January 13, 2017, 11:56:33 AM
This topic has been moved to Service Discussion.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1750742.0
19  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [25+PH] Kano CKPool kano.is 0.9% PPLNS US,DE,SG,JP,NL,NYA on: January 13, 2017, 03:51:07 AM
So who will take your place?
No one. Kano will continue to run the pool by himself.
20  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [25+PH] Kano CKPool kano.is 0.9% PPLNS US,DE,SG,JP,NL,NYA on: January 13, 2017, 03:42:06 AM
I'd like to notify miners that I'm no longer admin, support or a developer for this pool any more.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 524 »
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!