(2) more PSUs just failed. And I have one T1 that just stays in Autotune Hashing at 12.6TH/s for over 12 hours. Tried rebooting but just keeps Autotuning.  If they are running too hot during autotune it will refuse to complete and the display will wrongly show that autotune is still in process long after startup. What fanspeeds are you hitting in the first half hour of runtime? Will you please provide a specific range of what qualifies as "running too hot" that will trigger this problem -- or at least what temp range we should aim to be in when we autotune? Thank you.... The driver automatically throttles the device to prevent it overheating so in principle you should NEVER see them overheat now. But once it has throttled it will not complete tuning. If your fan hits 100% for any period, that's when you know it would have otherwise overheated. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the quick answer.
This is strange I saw myself listed in the payout section every other block. Can you fall back out into the delayed section once you were listed for payout?
Yes you can. It depends on the balance of hashes at the time. |
|
|
|
Hi, I'm a relatively new user of your pool.
I got a question about the payouts. It looked like I was in the payout section every other block, the last payment I received in my wallet and per BTC.com was the 2/28/18 block though. I should have received a payout on 3/23 (2nd block) and 5/27. for both of these I was listed in the payout section yet I have no records of receiving any payment.
Just trying to figure out what is going on.
Minner address is 1GzyZmmNyo2P16RUAh5TnKBFLFs4FbgfiC
Here are all the block details at length: http://ckpool.org/blocks/I see you only having made the payout queue on 2 blocks out of those. |
|
|
|
At what point in the mining cycle do new mempool transactions typically get added to the Merkle tree of a candidate block and what variables govern this?
Is a mempool snapshot taken once and then mined until a winner arrives or is found?
Or does cgminer continually add new transactions to the existing block opportunistically? If so is there any impact on the hashing speed due to the re-computation of the header? Maybe there isn't since the CPU can do that, while the ASIC does the mining? I suppose that would be an opportunity to reset the Nonce too.
Thanks for any insights, I am not a miner, but interested in the effect on the mempool and chances of a new TX getting into the next block.
The mempool snapshot is done at the server level in the bitcoin daemon which is handed off to the mining pool, about once per minute so they're always up to date. Cgminer is at the client end and does not do any of this unless you are solo mining with it. |
|
|
|
Hi folks,
one question:
We have 520THs running with S9 antminers. Actually all mining in antpool.
Would you either mine in a pool or does it make sense to try solo mining here? How big is really the chance to catch a block - is there any simple math calculation available?
thanks,
Sam
(Roughly) If you were lucky, and difficulty didn't change (which it will) you could expect to find a block with 500TH every 428.20 Days Or you could expect to find 12.5 BTC in around the same amount of time mining in a pool. Of course if you were really lucky you could find more than one block solo mining in the same amount of time. Or if your really, really, really lucky you could find a block in the next hour. A block can be found at any time. If you're luckier than anyone in the entire universe, you could find a block with just one hash... But realistically that's only doable with an infinite improbability drive (cue Douglas Adams.) |
|
|
|
Congrats on the block find  BTC.com shows the block to be BIP 109 Is this a new standard and does it affect mining in any way? Couln't find anything about this Means nothing, it's btc.com not interpreting version rolled numbers correctly. |
|
|
|
 Congratulation: Block 524676 solved by 1MQqTCv74JL2TFfULftX4JXHBG7x4Yfw9X Congratulations everyone on our latest block, courtesy of our 3rd biggest miner Another version-rolled block from a T1. [2018-05-27 16:43:29.244] Possible block solve diff 5505949358886.092773 !
[2018-05-27 16:43:29.397] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-05-27 16:43:29.445] Solved block 524676 by 1MQqTCv74JL2TFfULftX4JXHBG7x4Yfw9X.catia06
[2018-05-27 16:43:29.445] User 1MQqTCv74JL2TFfULftX4JXHBG7x4Yfw9X:{"hashrate1m": "1.05P", "hashrate5m": "1.06P", "hashrate1hr": "1.06P", "hashrate1d": "1.01P", "hashrate7d": "488T"}
[2018-05-27 16:43:29.445] Worker 1MQqTCv74JL2TFfULftX4JXHBG7x4Yfw9X.catia06:{"hashrate1m": "15.5T", "hashrate5m": "15.7T", "hashrate1hr": "15.2T", "hashrate1d": "15.2T", "hashrate7d": "6.48T"}
[2018-05-27 16:48:06.175] Hash for block height 524676 confirms block was CONFIRMED
Full payout details: http://ckpool.org/blocks/524676.confirmed |
|
|
|
I had tried reloading firmware but not rolling back , I will try that To be fair, while Dragonmint will be unhappy with me saying this, if it doesn't reliably run one or more chains with the latest firmware, I think the hardware is dodgy and needs replacing. |
|
|
|
(2) more PSUs just failed. And I have one T1 that just stays in Autotune Hashing at 12.6TH/s for over 12 hours. Tried rebooting but just keeps Autotuning. If they are running too hot during autotune it will refuse to complete and the display will wrongly show that autotune is still in process long after startup. What fanspeeds are you hitting in the first half hour of runtime? Do you think it would be possible to save autotuned settings for a mode once done and be able to apply it again later ? Without the whole autotune process ? Once you've chosen an autotune option, it will use those tuned values for every restart after that. However if you change the autotune type, it will start all over again. They had planned to implement storing cgminer's values to have multiple saved profiles but I see they've not done that to date. |
|
|
|
(2) more PSUs just failed. And I have one T1 that just stays in Autotune Hashing at 12.6TH/s for over 12 hours. Tried rebooting but just keeps Autotuning. If they are running too hot during autotune it will refuse to complete and the display will wrongly show that autotune is still in process long after startup. What fanspeeds are you hitting in the first half hour of runtime? |
|
|
|
good evening every one,
i have a antminer v9 when i connect it with the pool i got alot of hw.
when i connect it with a different pool i do not get any hw.
i tried the 2 different poorts the 443 get me less hw but still have it.
does some one know how i can put a start diff for the v9.
It's impossible for the pool to cause hardware errors in your device. Bitmain's drivers are garbage and they are probably just doing diff calculation wrong with a different value for diff than this pool provides and they are having to classify low diff shares as hardware errors. Just ignore them if the displayed hashrate is still okay. |
|
|
|
I've bolded the important part. This is solo.ckpool.org, NOT ckpool.org.
Is this the right place to view solo blocks generated by solo.ckpool.org? https://btc.com/stats/pool/CKPoolAlso how to see how much Terahashes miner was able to find the lucky block? Thanks. No, this: https://btc.com/stats/pool/Solo%20CKAnd you can't see any record of how many hashes the miners were unless you scroll through this entire thread and find each of the 249 posts of the block finds. |
|
|
|
all 5 are $25:-(
You should only be using one bitcoin address. Use different worker extensions but the same bitcoin address, otherwise you risk being postponed much longer for payouts. I use one bitcoin address with 5 workers... Then I misunderstood what you were talking about when you said "all 5 are $25." I guess you meant all 5 add up to only $25 |
|
|
|
...I mine using 5 pieces of dragon t1 since 3 days and my postponed balance seems to be $25 which should have to be much higher!...
At 118.1% of expected shares for one block, what makes you think that your five block difficulty payout amount should be more than $125 after only 3 days with ~80TH? The dragon miners are nice, but they're not actual dragons and as such do not produce magical amounts of hash. all 5 are $25:-( You should only be using one bitcoin address. Use different worker extensions but the same bitcoin address, otherwise you risk being postponed much longer for payouts. |
|
|
|
this is only for mining BTC ?
is there another algos ?
i have custom FPGA boards and i can connect to my FPGA with cgminer by using usb com port
it is minnig but very low hashrate so i need to mine different algos.
Yes No. Then you're asking for help in the wrong place. |
|
|
|
CK is right however there could still be sneaky ways they or others can hide a discreet low powered low level component based miner that mines while the consumer device is powered. This would hash at a super slow rate however when you do the bigger picture overview and realize maybe its about numbers and for example lets say they produce 20k TV sets with this discreet miner secretly within the design it adds profits to the manufacturers and integrators as such never the consumer. Now this would eventually lead to heavy legal issues if discovered such as class action lawsuits but thats a whole other topic... Fact is real mining requires like CK said lots of power and ventilation more so then one can pack into a modern flat TV set. But it goes to say if they really wanted to add a miner it would be a discreet low powered alternative if anything...
just my 2 cents
Even then people keep ignoring the pooled mining aspect I mentioned. Are you all assuming these will be mining solo - A consumer device couldn't support a full mining node and would need lots of bandwidth so that's not an option. Where would they point their hashrate? Would Samsung really start running a mining pool? Do you really think a company the size of Samsung would mine in secret and risk massive backlash when the profit margins DON'T WORK? |
|
|
|
Has the solo pool been updated to support version-rolling AsicBoost and the Halong Dragonmint T-1?
Well its run by the developer of the firmware for the miner, so yes.  I know ckpool.org is, but couldn't find a definitive answer for the solo pool. Assumed it was, but wanted to confirm before I threw any power over to it. Yes of course it is. I announced it here ages ago, but news gets drowned out. |
|
|
|
|
My moderation standards have not changed in many years as moderator here but I'm not the only moderator.
As for this mining hardware, specifically I'm contracted by MyRig for the driver to the HalongMiner T1 and have nothing to do with Innosilicon directly.
|
|
|
|
God, I'm an idiot. Ok, thanks. I will check the .bat file I created and make sure it's pointed to solo.ckpool.org instead. So, what has my miner been doing for the last couple of days? Anything? Thanks again for all the information. I'm new to this and it's been really fun learning about it. I'm not a huge computer person, so even creating that .bat file was a new experience for me...
You've been mining on a different pool. However your hashrate is so little that you won't have accumulated anything of note and will not get a payout from it so just forget about that and move on. |
|
|
|
Hi. Just started solo mining with a USB 2Pac on ckpool. I started on Saturday using 1 BTC address and changed to a different one yesterday. It's been running non-stop but when I check my address on solo.ckpool.org, it gives me a "NOT FOUND" response. Everything appears to be running properly and I got the "welcome to ckpool.org" followed by my BTC address, and I'm getting the "Accepted" messages every 30 seconds or so.
Does it just take some time (days?) before you can find your address using solo.ckpool.org, or should I be concerned that I did something wrong?
Thanks in advance for the help!
I've bolded the important part. This is solo.ckpool.org, NOT ckpool.org. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
