Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 03:39:17 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... 569 »
821  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: May 16, 2018, 08:53:23 AM
Sure, Will do.
Here is another 12hours round of hashrate:
https://imgur.com/a/PVfzTcf
Well I'd say that's very good. I'm going to ship it. Thanks for the feedback.
822  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: May 15, 2018, 09:36:50 PM
Ok here some results:
Here you can see post update hashrate history.
I deployed the firmware just before 08:00
https://m.imgur.com/a/vKNpv6Z

And now after 10hours running the new firmware.
https://m.imgur.com/a/A28N6St

I don't notice the 2 hours hashrate drop anymore.
The hashrate even seems to increase a bit.


But it seems to run hotter, fans are running at 10% more than before for the same temps 73-75°C




 
That is odd, but it does look significant. I guess you can't have extra hashrate without extra heat, but it does imply something funky going on internally if the hashrate changes depending on the diff the hardware is running at. Either way, keep running the faster firmware to confirm it remains reliable for days and I can push that firmware as official. Thanks for testing.
823  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: May 15, 2018, 07:54:31 AM
Yes, around 45% and balanced mode
Here, try this one:
http://ck.kolivas.org/temp/t1_20180515_060842.swu
It may be that increasing diff somehow leads to lowering of observable hashrate; this one won't change diff.

No need to autotune after update right ?
Right, just let it run with existing tuning.
824  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: The State of Cryptocurrency Mining by David Vorick (Sia) on: May 15, 2018, 07:18:13 AM

Here's the thing though, the Bitcoin will likely be surpassed by another crypto-coin and another and another etc as people with the knowledge start their own block of coins buried in the digital ether....
And that's bullshit that dreamers always keep going on about just because they want another coin to make them rich by capitalising on first mover advantage again. Guess what, the first mover advantage is over. Bitcoin isn't going away.
825  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: May 15, 2018, 06:55:56 AM
Yes, around 45% and balanced mode
Here, try this one:
http://ck.kolivas.org/temp/t1_20180515_060842.swu
It may be that increasing diff somehow leads to lowering of observable hashrate; this one won't change diff.
826  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: May 14, 2018, 09:32:49 PM
I noticed something else.
~2 hours after a reboot. Hashrate drops ~10%.
This happens every time.

I am talking about both hashrate readings : on DT gui and on slush dashboard

Not sure how I can provide proof, logs or anything that can help


Are fans below 100% ?
827  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: The State of Cryptocurrency Mining by David Vorick (Sia) on: May 14, 2018, 04:29:43 AM
A limit to hash power at diff 1 from an IP address works for gpus.
IPV6 gives every person on earth quadrillions of their own IP addresses. You'd have to limit it to a subnet for IPV6...
828  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: The State of Cryptocurrency Mining by David Vorick (Sia) on: May 13, 2018, 09:48:49 PM
Mining is an area I understand very little of, but I'm surprised it wasn't foreseen that behemoths like Bitmain would rise and something wasn't done to attempt to address it before it happened.
Satoshi predicted it. He simply said people should be nice and hold off doing the inevitable... The rest of us predicted it too but there isn't actually anything we could do to "address" it as you have said. Bitcoin is a diffuse collaborative and there are no weapons to defend us against transient centralisation of power and hashrate. Proof of work will inevitably ALWAYS have some element of this happening at regular intervals. Changing the proof of work algorithm will NOT, as the article said, make any difference at all; a new asic arms race will simply replace the old one.

Probably the biggest mistake everyone makes is buying stuff off bitmain only to find themselves competing against bitmain... duh.
829  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: The State of Cryptocurrency Mining by David Vorick (Sia) on: May 13, 2018, 09:05:07 PM
Yes it's a good article and it's accurate. What's frustrating for those of us that lived through the conversion of bitcoin from CPU to ASIC is that the rules and issues have never changed, and we see the same mistakes being made over and over by both new manufacturers and newcomers into the game trying to capitalise on a market they think they understand. Bitmain have got the mining world by the balls and that is not going to change by anyone trying to take them on by the same rules they play by. I've been warning people since the first ASICs got announced but alas no one listened, and then I just gave up trying to warn them... No one seemed to want to believe me and for whatever reason very few every considered consulting me despite my obvious position in the mining world.
830  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: May 13, 2018, 09:02:55 AM
I pushed a more conservative firmware update this time with a slightly lower speed for balanced mode due to complaints of high power and fanspeeds from those entering summer, and more tightly controlled temperatures for optimal minimum fanspeed.

It should be version t1_20180512_024327 if you check for an update from the web interface.

Running fine for 19hours now Wink

Great, thanks for the feedback Smiley
831  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: May 12, 2018, 08:14:45 PM
No, it's not if you know what you are doing.
All three hash boards have a separate power input.
You power one hash board and controller board with the first psu.
You power two hash boards with the second psu.

And it is not my recommendation.

This is my recommendation.
Just get rid of using the fucking 110V mains voltage and have an 220V outlet circuit installed.
And buy only one good PSU.
I did not say it was your recommendation, I saw it was Halong's. Yours makes much more sense though...
832  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: May 12, 2018, 07:19:13 PM
@BlockTangle

By the way, do you realise the fact that the Halong/MyRig 1600W power supply units do not work in the 110-120V mains voltage systems ?

Hagg, per the HM website in the FAQ's:

"Q. I have 110v supply at home, is this suitable?
A. Not really. Miners operate more efficiently with 220-240v and mining farms step down their own electricity supply to 220-240v. If you have 110v supply you will either need to purchase a 1600W PSU rated for 110v from an alternative source, use two of our 1600W PSUs for each miner, or arrange the voltage supply."

I bought 2 PSUs per miner (5 miners and 10 PSUs). Would 2 HM PSUs per miner do the trick?

Thank you! Smiley

If they say that two Halong Mining psus will do the job, then it should be ok.

I haven't seen the technical specifications label for the Halong Mining psu.
That's an odd recommendation. The power rails are connected between the chains so you'd end up having two PSUs connected to the one rail; most PSUs don't like you doing that to them...
833  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: May 12, 2018, 02:57:22 AM
I pushed a more conservative firmware update this time with a slightly lower speed for balanced mode due to complaints of high power and fanspeeds from those entering summer, and more tightly controlled temperatures for optimal minimum fanspeed.

It should be version t1_20180512_024327 if you check for an update from the web interface.
834  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: May 12, 2018, 02:56:14 AM
I would like to buy a spare PSU. What are the specs of the PSU and where can I buy one? Halong should sell separate PSUs...
1680W 92% efficiency (220+V). MyRig are the ones who sell them.
835  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: May 11, 2018, 10:28:21 AM
For those keeping track of the latest firmware updates, I've pushed a slightly improved version which is designed to more reliably keep all chains up and running, and to fix a small timekeeping bug which sometimes showed the miners up for 100 days. The version number is t1_20180511_034450, just check for an update from the interface.

Everything was messed up after this firmware update.
I had to run autotune again

Edit: this firmware is bugged as hell. Even after autotune if you reboot, temps are going crazy 2cards at 79c while the other one at 50. fan at 100% in efficienty
had to rollback to 0506 to get back to normal
Thanks for the feedback. Will roll back and investigate.
836  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: DragonMint T1 16TH/S halongmining.com on: May 11, 2018, 06:34:12 AM
For those keeping track of the latest firmware updates, I've pushed a slightly improved version which is designed to more reliably keep all chains up and running, and to fix a small timekeeping bug which sometimes showed the miners up for 100 days. The version number is t1_20180511_034450, just check for an update from the interface.
837  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [25PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool US/DE/CN servers on: May 10, 2018, 03:58:06 AM
Smiley
First block for me too since pointing our 3 T1's here.

Does anyone know where I can find more payout info for CK?

Our stats at:
http://ckpool.org/blocks/521726.confirmed

are:
"1FLhot6HnyaUTQ6a6Ms6gzuswt2kXBtCVZ": 6396126417.26,

Do we all get paid once the block hits X amount of confirmations (I've not received anything yet) or do us new miners not get paid till the pool hits 2 blocks?

i'm showing up 16th position for current hash power at:
http://ckpool.org/#/miners

any info totally appreciated, thanks so much all!
You did not get a payout. In the block summary you linked above your address is listed under "postponed", not under "payouts". It means you haven't accumulated enough shares to have gotten a payout with this block. However those shares are now added to your total for the next block in addition to your current running total. If you had gotten a payout you would have received it immediately when the block was found as payouts are mined directly to peoples' wallets.
838  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [25PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool US/DE/CN servers on: May 10, 2018, 01:19:21 AM
Welcome back Genie. Your hashrate is definitely noticed. Hope you can stick around Smiley
839  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [20 PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool on: May 08, 2018, 08:46:23 PM
@ck, I am a little confused.  Not complaining, just trying to understand.

I've changed my mining address around a bit, and for the first time noticed one of my older addresses was deferred.

However, it shows in the top 100 and I thought that the top 100 miners would be paid, and 50 of the smaller deferred payments as well.

33V..Jo8 in position 26 was paid
1Q3..MHD in position 90 was paid
1N9..Ype in position 77 was deferred

So does the worker listing shift around after a block is paid and that is why 1N9 now shows in the top 100 and did not receive a payout from this last block?

~nh



If you're in a deferred position when a block is found, the HERP is added to the next round - and it can effectively double the herp by doing so. If you are in the top 100 with the added herp the next time around you're guaranteed to get paid. If not, you will be in the interleaved group.

All of this shows you are much better off sticking to the one address. You'll get paid more regularly and are more likely to get the full payout with each block find. Additionally it means other miners get a look in sooner so it is nice manners to do so.
840  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [BLOCK PARTY] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool on: May 08, 2018, 12:47:53 PM
Woohoo! And with that block, I'm now in the payment section. I've been mining here since late December, 2017, starting with 4 2Pacs, and added 2 Terminus 808s recently.

All these people with their Terahashes and Petahashes are really stealing my thunder. Haha. I welcome them, though, since that means more blocks more often.

If I'm presently in the payment section, could I get bumped out? I'm not in the top 100 fastest miners, so I must have been added to the payout section because of the number of postponements.
Congrats. You'd never get a payout in many other pools with that hashrate. If you're in the payment section then you're due for a payout next block we find and then you'll go back into the postponed group till your turn comes around again.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... 569 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!