Hi forum,
I see alot of scammers and ponzi scammers on this forum. I think we need a new staff rank, scam buster.
No, we don't. Scams are already unmoderated. There's also no need for another staff rank, and giving regular members this rank and the ability to start banning people is really dangerous. It is just as a normal member, but this user can give "ban point" scammers with proof. If the scammer has 2 or more "ban points" than the scammer is getting IP banned.
That's a bad idea. Way too abusable, even if scams were moderated. And what if the community temporarily thinks someone is a scammer? Can you explain to me in what way it is abuseable? If u choose persons from DT, what is wrong? This is not possible, it will be an hard work for all the staff members and honestly they are here to moderate the forum ... not to catch the scammers  . |
|
|
|
Personally, I do click on some links that interest me, but I wanted to know if anyone else in the community thinks that these campaigns are worth it for the company(s) paying for these.
Thoughts?
I don't think this thread belong to Meta (but most probably I'm wrong).
However I don't click any sig. ad link. |
|
|
|
|
I've sent you another PM (about the script).
|
|
|
|
Apologies, I don't have anything else as collateral..
Should I just close this thread?
It is your choice but you should close/lock it because you cannot provide a valide collateral. |
|
|
|
You are welcome, if you need another loan (don't hesitate to contact me ).
Finally I've sold the collateral of the 0.16 btc loan (bitcoin1992) and that account is not longer in my possession. |
|
|
|
|
I also registered an account there, with the same nickname: redsn0w (the problem is that I didn't receive an activation email).
|
|
|
|
User RGBKey is making a large number of one sentence posts at a high rate of speed and is making the viewing experience of the threads he is posting in to be unpleasant. He has made 17 posts in the span of 18 minutes and 3 seconds, proof. I would like to formally request that someone with legal ban authority to review his case to prevent additional unpleasant viewing experiences. Have you reported the most 'spammy' post of RGBKey? |
|
|
|
You have 'doubled' the bitcoin that I've invested, that's all. Thank you. Your welcome, Not sure what the that's all bit is about. I've sent you a PM, can you reply? |
|
|
|
You have 'doubled' the bitcoin that I've invested, that's all. Thank you. |
|
|
|
I (want to) trust you with 0.10 btc, let's see what it will happen. Can you give me a bitcoin address so I can send the payment?
Bro you should everyone else is trusting us over 22 transactions today not one complaint. We are not here to rob people we are here to make money.. for you and for us. Give us a try.. you won't be disappointed. Ok, what is the bitcoin address? |
|
|
|
no collateral at the moment.
I am not a trader.
I think you should change the title, because it is misleading. I read 6 bitcoin but after I opened the thread... |
|
|
|
|
I (want to) trust you with 0.10 btc, let's see what it will happen. Can you give me a bitcoin address so I can send the payment?
|
|
|
|
worst case is if the price drop around a value that is not profitable anymore for the miners, at that point, they will shutdown their asic, and the netowrk will be unsafe
there is no return from that point, bitcoin would die
So the mining of bitcoin will returned to the CPU, this is a good scenario. |
|
|
|
-snip-
In general they are from multi sign wallets where you are not able to sign a message, that's all.
The bitcoin addresses that start with the number '3' are only multisignature add. and you are able to sign a message from them. I wanted to avoid the technical aspects here as I dont think they matter for OPs question, but the prefix '3' is "just" "pay to script hash" which can be almost anything. This includes multi sig. The problem with multi sig is that there is no standard way of doing a signature. Essentially there is no concensus how to sign a message with x out of y keys, thus its impossible to verify as valid in general. It would certainly be possible for a small group to find a way to use this, but for the overal community there currently is none and I dont think anyone is working on a way either. All that aside, the post in question still lead to someone changing the address to one that allows a signature and in fact even provided a post with a valid signature here -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg12493288#msg12493288It will be really no sense to sign a message from a multi-sign. address, this is the meaning but it is possible. |
|
|
|
Hi all bitcoiners, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg12492110#msg12492110I want to know your opinion about this post if it is constructive, is it helpful? Should it be considered as an ignored post or not? from signature campaigns. Personally i see that i tried my best to help (and warn) the user that addresses that begins with the prefix "3" are mostly from bit-x and xapo and you can't prove your ownership, you basically can't sign a message. And i successfully helped this user and a few hours later he was able to sign from another address and included this address with prefix "3" I added a poll let me know what do you think. If it would be my campaign I would not count any post in that thread. Your answer is also wrong from a technical perspective. I still didnt answer your question, eh? Yes, its helpful, yes as its helpful it should be considered constructive as you helped to avoid a possible issue in the future for someone else. i voted no because it is technically false. otherwise i'd think t is helpful. but as-is it just leads to confusion (addresses that start with a 3 have nothing to with specific wallets) You are free to vote, i will no change anything to show false results lol. I said mostly the addresses that has the prefix the number "3" are from bit-x and xapo (at least that i have seen) In general they are from multi sign wallets where you are not able to sign a message, that's all.The bitcoin addresses that start with the number '3' are only multisignature add. and you are able to sign a message from them. |
|
|
|
|
I think that post doesn't have nothing to constructive, so I voted: No. However you should ask the manager of the sig. campaign, because he is counting and paying your post.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
