... I have an impeccable reputation, so that matters for something. I only use Escrow, so I wouldn't be able to steal someones funds. You shouldn't be so rude.
I would expect people to be very cautious with whom they do business. My track record speaks for itself. If you think my offer is stupid, thats your opinion. But most of the respectable members of bitcointalk would disagree with you.
The problem is that you can easily recover the ico account ... so it's not suggested to sell or buy isk (in this way) , nothing of personal. Just my 2 cents. I don't want to give up my ICO account. I am talking about a transfer after the GUI launches but with a locked in price with funds locked in escrow. Once everything launches then I would release the Lisk and the escrow would release the btc. This isnt about me selling my ICO account. Its about someone being able to lock in a price now before the GUI launch fomo begins. Oh in this case I don't think there will be any type of problem, however a lot of guys will buy on an exchange at a price lower than yours .
|
|
|
... I have an impeccable reputation, so that matters for something. I only use Escrow, so I wouldn't be able to steal someones funds. You shouldn't be so rude.
I would expect people to be very cautious with whom they do business. My track record speaks for itself. If you think my offer is stupid, thats your opinion. But most of the respectable members of bitcointalk would disagree with you.
The problem is that you can easily recover the ico account ... so it's not suggested to sell or buy isk (in this way) , nothing of personal. Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
FUD par excellance!
Thank you for this i like it Thanks
I want at least 3xFUD and 2xFOMA with Lisk before I drop out of trading and going to vote for a deligate node Why all this FUD on Lisk? Because the FUDder want to buy some cheap lisk (on the various exchange after the launch). Basically they are spreading FUD (Fear, uncertainty and doubt) to cause a dump.
|
|
|
Ho fatto il conto e per tornare in pari dovrei vendere tutto a 740 euro. Ormai sono anni che aspetto. Ho praticamente i miei risparmi in btc. Sono serio. Spero che entro quest'anno ci sia una bolla...mi basta una piccola bolla, da 400 a 700, poi mi levo dalle palle. Pregate per me.
Chi non muore si rivede, welcome back angrynerd !
|
|
|
Ahh..I am at activity:1008 and by Tomorrow it will be 1022 , I guess i am of the the unlucky guys.. We'll be waiting for you buddy! Just one more day . Just noticed that i am legendary Now! Congratulations mcb1221, welcome to the legendary club !
|
|
|
This looks more like some kind of personal attack to smear Dooglus's reputation, especially with the last part of your comment. I understand your overall point, but I don't believe that Dooglus's intent was to A) be part of a ponzi or B) make a profit from it. I think you're mistaken and you need to consider the weight of the argument you're making with respect to the justification of it all. I think you've made your point, nuff said. Of course it is a smear campaign against dooglus, Quickseller wants to be on DT again while Doog who's currently in DT has crossed out QS... If Quickseller is known for one thing it's his smear campaigns. Exactly, a lot of times QS was right but other times completely wrong... Nothing of personal @QS .
|
|
|
i do not know where all the good campaingns gone and why did any new camapingn is not openning. sigmature campaingn are the good way to earn money rather than fauceting for small amount of coins they saves lot of time and also where a good way people can discuss about their problems
First of all this is not bitcoin discussion at all. More like Meta imo. And your crying about lack of available signature campaigns is not gonna change anything. Signature campaigns are still there maybe not so big like in the past but nonetheless. BTW your account is newbie, 99% signature campaigns are not allowing newbies to join anyway. Maybe better to move it to the service discussion board , @OP -- reported your thread. However you have not the right to be paid.. it is only a nice bonus (remember it).
|
|
|
This is really a 'good' news, what do you think ? 'Time to be your own bank'.
|
|
|
Oh QS, you *really* need to have your meds reviewed. Either that or start actually taking them as you're supposed to. I did help out. The scripts being used were really pretty bad. I fixed a few of the most obvious bugs but not all of them. I personally wouldn't be using these scripts on a live site. They feel like an accident waiting to happen. Apart from the fact Dooglus wasn't shilling for either the ponzi or the script, it hardly sounds anything like the sort of promotional sales pitch that ponzi-script sellers post "Hey everyone, I gotta ponzi script for sale. It is full of bugs and I would not recommend using it on a live site as it is an accident waiting to happen!" Tagging people with negative ratings is about communicating to members whether somebody has behaved in a way which proves them to be dishonest. The evidence you have presented so far suggests quite the opposite about Dooglus. But don't let that stop you obsessing about it some more, which you will. Dooglus has made his (fixed) ponzi script available for download for anyone who wishes on his GitHub account. Didn't you leave negative trust for someone for selling a ponzi script? What is the difference here? This is how github works... however as someone said, he doesn't owe money to nobody. It is not how GitHub works. If I were to create a github account then the script in question would not show up on my account. The script is on dooglus's GitHub account because he worked on it to make it better. Do you seriously think that someone who is improving ponzi scripts as someone who is trustworthy? I don't think you missed that post but let's quote it another time : .... I am not offering Ponzi scripts for download. I forked a crappy Ponzi project on github to fix a bug in it that was costing Klye some money. Github make the script available for download, as they were making it available for download before I forked it. That's how github works. ...
Now you will start to think, I'm supporting dooglus = I support ponzis, bla bla bla... c'mon Quickseller I don't support dooglus.
|
|
|
Oh QS, you *really* need to have your meds reviewed. Either that or start actually taking them as you're supposed to. I did help out. The scripts being used were really pretty bad. I fixed a few of the most obvious bugs but not all of them. I personally wouldn't be using these scripts on a live site. They feel like an accident waiting to happen. Apart from the fact Dooglus wasn't shilling for either the ponzi or the script, it hardly sounds anything like the sort of promotional sales pitch that ponzi-script sellers post "Hey everyone, I gotta ponzi script for sale. It is full of bugs and I would not recommend using it on a live site as it is an accident waiting to happen!" Tagging people with negative ratings is about communicating to members whether somebody has behaved in a way which proves them to be dishonest. The evidence you have presented so far suggests quite the opposite about Dooglus. But don't let that stop you obsessing about it some more, which you will. Dooglus has made his (fixed) ponzi script available for download for anyone who wishes on his GitHub account. Didn't you leave negative trust for someone for selling a ponzi script? What is the difference here? This is how github works... however as someone said, he doesn't owe money to nobody.
|
|
|
You can now validate your passphrases on the ICO website. We will post a more detailed guide later this evening.Please be 100% sure you insert the exact same passphrase as the ICO website gave you!We also made a few other changes. They will be mentioned in the guide later. Done !
|
|
|
Anyone have a guess on when we can actually hold the LISK we bought? Instead of having it sit on someone else's server?
11th April .. and there is not any server :/ the dev team should still create the genesis block !
|
|
|
Thanks odolvlobo , very interesting list I'll check it !
|
|
|
If the forum was looking to raise funds, I think it would be better to introduce a "Supporter" level that you can reach by donating 2 BTC.
I am much excited to know what would be the color of the half coin , if "Supporter" level is Introduced. Maybe half coin 'orange'.... but I don't think theymos needs more funds .
|
|
|
Sbaglio o ti sei dimenticato di lasciare il link ?
|
|
|
I'm sorry but I don't understand what a staked address / message is... could you explain a little bit please ? staked address = bitcoin address that you've posted in the forum. ... Or also sent to an user with a PM (if you remember the period or better the number of the message).
|
|
|
Status: 0/unconfirmed Date: 3/11/2014 03:28 To: 1CFFVq3RrbErM7y8XMdjsDwwXQWrMcfjZe Debit: -4000.00000000 BTC Transaction fee: -0.01000000 BTC Net amount: -4000.01000000 BTC Transaction ID: a9776e246ef655b66cc493f148e15cf71bc79e21caec687c00b511bfe6d803b7-000 ---------- Status: 0/unconfirmed Date: 3/11/2014 03:27 To: 1CFFVq3RrbErM7y8XMdjsDwwXQWrMcfjZe Debit: -1000.00000000 BTC Net amount: -1000.00000000 BTC Transaction ID: 40498d4c605170d1e970051cae159341d029b196cc4d1d7215eafba8826ee328-000
For the 49 BTC i don't have the transaction ID !
More Info : This is an old wallet that i neglected in 2014.. i re-opened it on my new laptot recently and i got this problem ! And please ! it's not a fake pic ! for the who doubt it , if u want come on Team Viewer and verify
Are you sure ? - https://blockchain.info/tx/a9776e246ef655b66cc493f148e15cf71bc79e21caec687c00b511bfe6d803b7 - https://blockchain.info/tx/40498d4c605170d1e970051cae159341d029b196cc4d1d7215eafba8826ee328Teamviewer, lol .. why not ? Send me the data with a PM .
|
|
|
Is there a tldr available?
I'm interested too, @Quickseller you opened a 2 thread and posted a lot of message about this... why can't you use only one thread?
|
|
|
|