Oh I see Spanishsoldier/Germangiant/Russianrainbow is here to provide faux interest in finding out just how great and profitable this one of his ponzI scams is.

Shill on, shill on!

No child, unless they have been subject to a grossly inappropriate environment, should have so much as an opinion on sex, let alone an 'intelligence' about sex.


I'm going by the quote you have presented which clearly says that whenever your prophet "wanted to fondle anyone of us" - which is plural, not singular.


Don't be so patently obtuse when that quote is blatantly referring to sexual interaction hence the reference to them having their periods, not what you are attempting to minimise down to a non-sexual, 'caress lovingly'.


Oh really, so 9 is ok for you, is it?

The decent thinking world, which understands the gross abuse of trust caused by pedophilia leads to serious psychological disorder in the victim, firmly says otherwise.

The charge still stands, your prophet was a pedophile and your religion joyously celebrates that fact, as is evidenced by the very 'Holy' texts you all reference.

Let me give you a small example:

Ok, but it's possible that a bunch of other people experienced the same thing. You might want to put something in place for when the front-end comes back online it doesn't rely on visitors to try F5'ing.

Well whenever I try to view the nicehash.com website I have been getting this these last couple of days:



[edit] now that's interesting. This is the message I've been getting from google Chrome but because you said it hasn't been down I just checked in Firefox and it loads fine. What could have caused that?

How? How was she possibly 'more than a child' when she was a child? Children who are described as 'sexually precocious', in that they exhibit sexual behaviour, do so because they are already damaged, not because they are 'mature'.


So he pretty much did what he wanted to many innocent young girls and gets praised for the fact that he didn't shoot his load so quickly?

That you think this quote serves your position underlines the fact you are seriously messed up by your religion.

At 6? Sure, that sounds reasonable /s

The issue of life expectancy is irrelevant to attempting to justify child rape in any case.

You'll probably find the reason for the dropping hashrate is because the front-end has been down for a couple of days and miners don't like to leave their machines hashing when they can't see how much, or if, they are getting paid for their hashpower.

No, no and no. Stop trying to normalise child rape, that's what gets your religion and culture into so much trouble in the first place.

NO CHILD CAN EVER CONSENT TO SEXUAL ACTIVITY

Just because children are brainwashed and groomed into believing it is something they want it does not make it any less of an abuse of trust by the adult(s) who condition them to believe such.

The *vast* majority of Islamic scholars cite that he 'married' her when she was 6 and 'consummated' the 'marriage' when she was 9. So your attempt to spin it as anything else is just you desperately trying to pretend it isn't what it absolutely was.

Your great 'prophet' was a middle-aged pedophile who raped a child.


We know. It doesn't make it any less wrong. 'Tradition' is no justification and one of the reasons why so many third-world countries are still third-world countries is because they are absolutely toxic cultures who cannot function at a level which would allow them to lift themselves out of the dirt.

She was conditioned as a small child to be the sexual plaything of a middle-aged man. Her immature mind was manipulated by deviant adults. Whether she kicked and screamed against it is irrelevant, it is and was grooming a child to then rape her.

Funny how so many people who are so enamored with scrypt.cc are also found to be promoting a large-scale bitcoin mixer, a service scrypt.cc has been cited as using themselves.

Nothing screams 'totally legitimate business' like regularly obfuscating millions of dollars worth of bitcoin transactions.

You obviously know nothing of biology. Which isn't a surprise for someone who is reducing their world-view to "Whoa, it is so complicated I don't comprehend how it all works, therefore God".

Now you're just being an apologist and you are also ignoring the commonly accepted fact in Islam that he married Aisha when she was 6 years old and had sex with her at 9.

That it has to be said he waited until she was 9 years old before he 'consummated' the marriage, as though that somehow makes it any less repugnant, is still a tacit acknowledgement that he is a child rapist.

An adult having sex with a child is raping them because a child is incapable of informed consent, even if a child has been conditioned to believe that it is something they want to happen it is still an adult abusing their position of trust to care for and nurture a child in order to satisfy their own selfish and grotesque sexual urges.

Child rape is about power and control and no sexual act by an adult to a child can be described as anything else other than a gross abuse of the significant power the adult has over a child.

Stop trying to down-play the reality that your religion celebrates a middle-aged man who had sex with a little girl who was 9 years old.
Stop trying to down-play the reality that your religion celebrates a middle-aged man who had sex with a little girl who was 9 years old.

There, I have written it twice so you know not to simply ignore what I am saying to you. A hand-wavy, "yeah, well, she was probably at least 11 or 12 so, you know, totallyokbecausehewastheultimateprophetright?

Except for the fact that the Koran has numerous explicit texts which these 'not Muslims' are easily able to work from.

Besides, let's not ignore the elephant in the room or, rather, the rape of a small child. How can any organised religion claim to be empowering and honouring and non-violent if the one person at its very core married a six year-old little girl and, if he didn't do before he certainly did later, raped her at age 9.

You cannot possibly defend somebody who raped a 9 year-old little girl and you certainly cannot hold them up as being the exalted human that Islam requires you repeatedly declare him to be.

Your prophet marries and rapes a small child and your religion approves of this.

Don't cite 'cultural differences' at me, either. It is indefensible and to pretend 'things were different then' is a reasonable way to compartmentalise the appalling nature of the crime, is to absolutely ignore the reality that at no point in the history of our species is an adult raping a small child justifiable or excusable.

I still don't understand what Vik thinks we, the FUD spreaders and trolls, did to his beloved get-rich-and-quick scheme.

Which part of the GAW/Hashlet/XPY scam are we supposed to have been responsible for the failure of?

GAW was fractional-reserve mining until it went full ponzi with Hashlets and then transmogrified into XPY, the hyper-flexing-ultra-megatronic-phase-shifting-interdimensional-coin which had no commercial support whatsoever.

How does Vik think that people who challenged the outrageous lies being spouted by Homero over the many months are to blame for his 'projects' failing when everything they were built on was bullshit in the first place?

They consider themselves to be Muslims. What makes your authority on declaring them 'not Muslim' any different from them declaring you 'not Muslim' because you don't interpret the instructions the same way they do?

Atheists don't need proof, they aren't the ones asserting anything. Atheists reject theist assertions on the grounds they are fallacious, not because atheism asserts a counter position to the theist assertion.

You might as well have said you take an agnostic side on the issue of invisible pink unicorns because neither side has definite proof.

If you're claiming XPY Paycoin to be a 'success' then you're exactly the kind of 'investor' a certain Homero Joshua Garza would like to meet.

Don't worry if you are on any international anti-terrorism watch-lists, or if you have what are colloquially referred to as, 'banking problems', Homero Joshua Garza will happily take your money and promise you massive profits 'soon'.

Complaints? Take a ticket and a seat.

 

Poe or Shill?

There are not many bitcoin ASIC manufacturers for sha256 and there are even fewer scrypt ASIC vendors, you have more fingers on one hand than there are scrypt-ASIC manufacturers. So for him to be citing an unknown manufacturer who sold him several hundred GH of scrypt-ASIC miners at an utterly absurd price compared to every other known mining unit you can buy sounds like utter bollocks to me.

You can check the going rate for scrypt ASIC miners that actually shipped all over this forum, from Innosilicon, KnC and Zeus, they all cost a large chunk of change to buy, far far in excess of what 'some guy in Brazil' claims to have paid for them.

No manufacturer would have stayed quiet about having a comparably cheap scrypt ASIC, there is absolutely no reason for them to and citing 'secret' ASIC manufacturers is ridiculous.

Besides:

As I said the other day, you can't hide 850GH of scrypt mining in the active scrypt networks, the hashrate you see mining is accounted for by way of the known scrypt ASICs produced during the second half of last year. So to suggest he has super-secret super-cheap scrypt-ASICs hashing away undetected is laughable.