leveldb will not,   some other changes done at the same time will help.   However I am still unconvinced i0coin having memleaks is the root cause of the issue.  I think it is an issue that is present in at least some of the mm patches.   I noticed that at the point that the mm kicks in, the memory usage starts to grow at the rate of about 10x per block as it did before the mm kicks in.

Additionally, I think the same behavior is in nmc test. I also see evidence of it in coiledcoin, and groupcoin.   I think the reason we don't see it for devcoin and nmc, is that the major pools for these form their blocks outside of the *coind codes logic.

http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=972

I just don't have the tools and resources locally set up to dig into this further, and was unable to find a good enough online block explorer to do so.  Since I am pretty much out of disk space on my laptop, it is going to be awhile till I can get back into digging into this, so hopefully someone else can beat me to it.



Are you sure of this?


Why are you so sure it is a memleak?   I think it is simply due to the issue above with mm, and the  number of blocks i0 has compared to the other chains.  dns lookup crap is due to it using ntp internally to enforce shorter windows of timestamps.   I know I used to advocate for a nontp option at least so on systems already keeping good time (running ntp already for example), all this crap can be turned off, and stop the load on the ntp public servers, and network use that is unneeded etc.

because we did not already learn from gg?

They seem to be doing a much better job of controlling swiss banks then I would have ever guessed they would have.

Dude, ofc you need an expert   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7lBJPMun2A

Is there anyway to convert sc 1.0 coins to sc 2.0 ? 

So has anyone gotten it to work with 3.2.0 yet?

That's why I sent you an email on May 9th suggesting you get in touch with your post office to have them know you will need the priority mail packaging.   Ah well...   seems they are all shipping now?  Hopefully we get them soon.   Did they get DoA testing?  Any of them prove to be DoA?

Would you do it all again knowing what you know now?  lol

Is there a consensus on the best miner to use with these?

I liked the old name better.  And yes I would like to test.

Seems the core idea is an answers/help site that you pay for help in coins.  Why not use something like devcoin for the site, and skip a new chain for it?

Luckily this law was changed April 5th.

You say daily 0.01, or 3.65 annum....  however actual dividends paid so far are 0.00010000 or 0.0365 annum.. bit of a difference don't you think?

I really hope you are joking....

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216652.msg2306219#msg2306219

This was meant as a real question.   Is your skipping it a way of saying it was too dumb to merit and answer, or that you don't know the answer?

At least it is compounded daily! 

I am curious why it is required to get the license in all the states that require them.  Why does it not require a nexus like sales tax currently does as the Quill case decided?

Got a request today in irc for 32 bit linux builds....   so

devcoin-linux-32.bz2
devcoind-linux-32.bz2

and ran it successfully?

I think picocoin which is for bitcoin is supposed to be endian dependence free.

red

Flushing in this context means to flush or empty out the memory buffers, and force the data to be written to disk.   Now this does not actually always work with modern consumer grade drives, but that is what it is at least trying to do when it logs that message.

One interesting thing is it uses the line


to do this. While another section of code seem to have been written thinking this is a nop.  Wonder what the actually behavior is.