Can someone give me the blockchain's official height?
Paste your getinfo's here please
Also some nodes would be osm.
Here we go (output from getmininginfo): { "blocks" : 108505, "currentblocksize" : 0, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 4.43937801, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "networkhashps" : 214397771, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false } |
|
|
|
Ok you are right, but still even with the 1/2ing it is not enough. The dev has shown no activity for a month, no update to his homepage for 1 & 1/2 months.
Block rewards need to get much lower, average of 100k.
The posting http://mooncoin.info/?p=160 was saying something like that already. But he has not released the reworked wallet until now, unfortunately. |
|
|
|
Mooncoin has been dying for a long time, every week the marketcap just keeps going lower & lower, main reason is because of the constant supply from mining.
It is still giving out close to 1Million MOON blocks, the DEV needs to ASAP cut this amount down with an emergency update to the coin. Limit coin generation to no more than 100k MOON per block.
It is still being way over issued !!!
The DEV needs to show responsibility and help the holders.
Block halving has happened since block 100000, so the average output of coins per block now is 500000, instead of the former 1000000, you describe. But deaconboogie really should publish the new wallet with static rewards and steadily decreasing blocks as soon as possible. |
|
|
|
I can confirm that you probably have no idea what you are talking about, I run MOON as one of my pools and have no issues whatsoever....
Having run a mooncoin pool myself and a ton of other coin daemons currently that aren't causing any issue like mooncoin, I can confirm that you can gfy Insulting others won't help the fact that you obviously lack the proper knowledge to run any kind of pool..... You insulting me doesn't make this coin any less of a pile........ insults is all shitcoin lovers have. to da moon  The only one who is insulting here, is you. And mattle74. He did not even say sorry for calling Mooncoin a shitcoin/crapcoin. And I'm sure, you won't do either. Mooncoin is fine. What is not so fine, are people that stumble into a thread, call a coin shit or crap and beat loose. So I see your posting as a joke only - regarding your signature. Right? I totally agree. It's a pitty that people don't put in some constructive efforts, if there's an issue ask the devs or the community and try to resolve it. There is one point that was made about bandwidth being used by MOON's daemon and I have to confirm this is correct, strangely enough it seems to be happening on the p2p port 44664, I see traffic between 5mb/s and 12mb/s where most coins only generate 500kb/s max. So it is definitely worth looking. This is still no reason to burn down MOON and it could have been resolved loooooooooong time ago if it would have been reported in a normal way. I have now also checked that thing a little bit closer with network-metering. And can confirm the numbers that you state above. Then I have found this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=153232.0 - see chapter: Tune bitcoind and P2PoolIf you can't use the methods above or they aren't enough you can limit the number of connections used by bitcoind and P2Pool. For bitcoind, use the parameter maxconnections in bitcoin.conf maxconnections=10 # 125 is the default, don't go below 8 There's a compromise here: the more connections, the faster your node will be notified of new blocks and avoid wasting work, the faster it can include transactions with fees in the coinbase and the faster it will propagate a P2Pool block minimizing chances it would become orphan. But the less connections, the less bandwidth used and the lower the latency. More than 20 for maxconnections is probably overkill: from my experience (trying various values from 6 to 100) it seems there's not much gain to have past this value (and if you don't have enough WAN bandwidth it can hurt your latencies by queuing transfers between P2Pool nodes during peaks). Note that this may change in the future if the behavior of bitcoind/P2Pool network changes: when in doubt, monitor your interface(s) bandwidth usage and raise this value when most peaks are below your link capacity. If your orphan rate is fine, don't tempt the devil and try tuning maxconnections below 20: you may reduce your income more than you increase it... Warning: P2Pool needs one connection to bitcoind and bitcoind tries to fill all the allowed connections after startup. If you start P2Pool just after bitcoind (or before, it will repeatedly try to connect), it shouldn't have problem connecting because bitcoind will still have connection slots available. If you set maxconnections too low P2Pool might not succeed connecting. For P2Pool, you can do the same by passing parameters to P2Pool: --max-conns 8 --outgoing-conns 4 Note: orphans will quickly rise if you have very few connections (they are the means to be notified of other shares after all). I would prefer reducing bitcoind connections before P2Pool's. In my experience you can get as low as 6 total connections (3 in, 3 out) without noticeable efficiency changes. The default values seem overkill (6 outgoing, 40 incoming). The large number of incoming connections (--max-conns) is designed to help the whole network (some nodes are behind firewalls that don't allow incoming connections). You probably should allow more incoming connections (and check that your network setup allows incoming connections) to do your part in helping the network. ... and thought, the problem could really be, that the mooncoind "out of the box" is set to accept the mentioned 125 connections (or maybe even more here, as the instructions above are originally for bitcoind), if you don't use the maxconnections-parameter. So I tried to limit the maximum connections to 10 on port 9664 via iptables as a first measure and guess what, the bandwidth on port 44664 immediately dropped from ~14 MBit/sec. to 300 KBit/sec. Therefore I assume, that starting mooncoind with the parameter to reduce the number of connections will have a similar effect. Could you try that? So that we can say, if you have problems with high bandwidth been used, reduce the maxconnections of your mooncoind, to resolve it ... I'll try to start the mooncoind also with the parameter set, and report back. Edit: Tried it now, and it seems as if starting mooncoind like this: mooncoin/src/mooncoind --maxconnections=10 ... yields the same result, effectively reducing the used bandwidth dramatically. Now we just have to check, whether this is problematic regarding accepting more than 10 miner-connections on a P2Pool. |
|
|
|
is the coin dead?I dont hear anything about the coin recently
What do you wanna hear? |
|
|
|
Although it has been mentioned several times in here I'll post it again:
All p2pool nodes please update your daemons and stop mining the wrong blockchain !!!!!!! I am still seeing wrong blocknumbers coming in, so if you are mining blocks starting with 87xxx then you are on the wrong chain and your coins are worth nothing, so do yourself and your miners a favor and update !!!
Seems as if the shouting worked at least for p2poolbrasil on http://177.148.255.149:9664/static. Has updated now obviously. :-) Could someone contact evilhumpty, too? http://85.25.197.187:9664/static/classic/I have already written him an email (link "Contact" on the pool-site). If you look at the list of payout addresses, it seems that P2Pool is still on the old blockchain, as there are only shown two payout-addresses, when - in fact - there should be at least ~10-15 (18 at the time of writing), if you look at the P2Pools, that are on the latest mooncoin-daemon. Also this pool seems to be on the wrong chain: http://144.76.107.241:9664/static/Shows only two payout-addresses, too. Please could write someone else the pool-operator an email, to tell him? Edit: BTW, see here for a P2Pool-node-scanner: http://5.45.105.66/ |
|
|
|
I can confirm that you probably have no idea what you are talking about, I run MOON as one of my pools and have no issues whatsoever....
Having run a mooncoin pool myself and a ton of other coin daemons currently that aren't causing any issue like mooncoin, I can confirm that you can gfy Insulting others won't help the fact that you obviously lack the proper knowledge to run any kind of pool..... You insulting me doesn't make this coin any less of a pile........ insults is all shitcoin lovers have. to da moon The only one who is insulting here, is you. And mattle74. He did not even say sorry for calling Mooncoin a shitcoin/crapcoin. And I'm sure, you won't do either. Mooncoin is fine. What is not so fine, are people that stumble into a thread, call a coin shit or crap and beat loose. So I see your posting as a joke only - regarding your signature. Right? I totally agree. It's a pitty that people don't put in some constructive efforts, if there's an issue ask the devs or the community and try to resolve it. There is one point that was made about bandwidth being used by MOON's daemon and I have to confirm this is correct, strangely enough it seems to be happening on the p2p port 44664, I see traffic between 5mb/s and 12mb/s where most coins only generate 500kb/s max. So it is definitely worth looking. This is still no reason to burn down MOON and it could have been resolved loooooooooong time ago if it would have been reported in a normal way. I hope deaconboogie chimes in soon, to get this sorted. Have you contacted him by PM already about that? How did you find out about the bandwidth used? Any quick method to monitor that, so that I can confirm that eventually? |
|
|
|
I can confirm that you probably have no idea what you are talking about, I run MOON as one of my pools and have no issues whatsoever....
Having run a mooncoin pool myself and a ton of other coin daemons currently that aren't causing any issue like mooncoin, I can confirm that you can gfy Insulting others won't help the fact that you obviously lack the proper knowledge to run any kind of pool..... You insulting me doesn't make this coin any less of a pile........ insults is all shitcoin lovers have. to da moon The only one who is insulting here, is you. And mattle74. He did not even say sorry for calling Mooncoin a shitcoin/crapcoin. And I'm sure, you won't do either. Mooncoin is fine. What is not so fine, are people that stumble into a thread, call a coin shit or crap and beat loose. So I see your posting as a joke only - regarding your signature. Right? |
|
|
|
I don't care if it gets fixed because the dev doesn't care.
Did you write him a message? What kind of argumentation is that anyway? Secondly: it uses up needless amounts of bandwidth. Pretty simple.
So you come here, drop a meaningless opinion and refuse to work together to find a solution (see above)? There are many pools out there, that obviously don't have problems like yours. Strange, eh? Lastly: I stopped running pools solely because I didn't have the time to support them. It had nothing to do with mooncoin.
Ah, there you go. Why does everyone here griping at me about this problem relate it to pools? Do you think that the only people running mooncoin run it on a pool? I was running it on a personal computer as a wallet and it ate up all my bandwidth. Why does it matter whether it was running on a pool server or not? Just because other people aren't having a problem with it doesn't solve the problem for me, crackfoo or anyone else that runs into the problem. If the dev wants to reach out to me to troubleshoot the problem further, I would certainly help. I have said it earlier: Why didn't you chime in, when you had the problem? Instead you come here, when everything is over for you? If you'd like to get more info about what is happening with MOON, read on reddit - especially the latest posting of deaconboogie (dev). He explains the personal reasons, why he was "absent" the last days, see here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MoonCoin/comments/24q9wg/official_update_may_4th_2013/I have informed him already in my comment, that you need help over here and posted more, that may be of help for you, also. You could add to it, by posting there. |
|
|
|
I don't care if it gets fixed because the dev doesn't care.
Did you write him a message? What kind of argumentation is that anyway? Secondly: it uses up needless amounts of bandwidth. Pretty simple.
So you come here, drop a meaningless opinion and refuse to work together to find a solution (see above)? There are many pools out there, that obviously don't have problems like yours. Strange, eh? Lastly: I stopped running pools solely because I didn't have the time to support them. It had nothing to do with mooncoin.
Ah, there you go. |
|
|
|
So basically what you want to say is that the over 400mh/s currently on the network mining MOON are all people smarter than you as they don't seem to have issues with MOON. Your claim about running a pool obviously is also based on air, Cryptohashery is not even online, GoDaddy reports a parked domain. If you don't like a coin or don't want a coin then just move on, go away, but don't use this forum to try and spread lies about a coin that works fine.
If you were paying attention, I quoted crackfoo and was confirming his findings that mooncoin has issues. So if you could start needlessly flaming both of us, that would make more sense. I'm not the only whose is apparently so dumb that when I type mooncoind -daemon the process go horribly awry on it's own. Do you really think, anybody would like to help you with those problems, if you smash the door and shout out loud "Mooncoin is shit" (well, sort of) - in the Mooncoin-forum? Even if if there are problems like you describe, please explain, what is the sense of behaving like that? Secondly: if you really like to get help instead of only accosting here, please describe, what are the problems in detail. Phrases like "going awry" or "going crazy" don't help anybody technically minded to get a clue what really could have gone wrong. And lastly: why don't you run your pool-server anymore? You could have dropped MOON only, if all the other coins on your pool were running flawlessly after that. So what is the real purpose of dissing MOON like that? Why didn't you come earlier, to discuss the problems in a friendly manner and possibly get help? |
|
|
|
I can confirm that you probably have no idea what you are talking about, I run MOON as one of my pools and have no issues whatsoever....
Having run a mooncoin pool myself and a ton of other coin daemons currently that aren't causing any issue like mooncoin, I can confirm that you can gfy Insulting others won't help the fact that you obviously lack the proper knowledge to run any kind of pool..... +1 Maybe he's talking about the other coins with little to nothing of hashing power, that don't have a real impact on a weak server. This is running mooncoin on a personal computer (i7 with 12gb of RAM), not on a pool server. I'm running about 20 coin daemons (litecoin, all merge mine coins, dogecoin, digitalcoin, megacoin, etc etc) and the only one causing any problems is mooncoin. I had it running as a P2Pool-server on the smallest Pentium available at the moment (G3220) with 4 GB RAM, running besides Vertcoin-P2Pool and Doge-P2Pool on a personal network. And guess what: NO problems whatsoever. The same unproblematic behaviour now on a P2Pool-node at a provider. So I guess it was a misconfiguration, a bad network-connection, too narrow bandwidth to handle many client-requests at the same time, too much latency in the line to your server (bad router-config or something like that), or a mixture of all the reasons. Or just simply FUD against MOON, as said by Spekske. |
|
|
|
I can confirm that you probably have no idea what you are talking about, I run MOON as one of my pools and have no issues whatsoever....
Having run a mooncoin pool myself and a ton of other coin daemons currently that aren't causing any issue like mooncoin, I can confirm that you can gfy Insulting others won't help the fact that you obviously lack the proper knowledge to run any kind of pool..... +1 Maybe he's talking about the other coins with little to nothing of hashing power, that don't have a real impact on a weak server. |
|
|
|
Hooly fuk! at what price you bought them? bought them at 12 litoshi. It's going to go up. I'd buy more if I had any more spare cash. It seems as if you're living up to your name, MoonWhale ...  |
|
|
|
Mooncoin needs a Brand Ambassador.
And a promotion-team. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
