I've read a little bit in that thread and they are saying, that they'd need a SPV (Simple Payment Verification)-compatible wallet, to implement the coin into Hive.
That's another reason to upgrade our wallet to the Bitcoin-code as soon as possible (as gjhiggins already mentionened above, it would also overcome the transaction malleability-problem), inlcuding changing from random rewards to static rewards for the miners (but leaving the rest of the algorithm completely intact).
See this link for more on SPV: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Scalability#Simplified_payment_verification

Edit: See this link, for information on bitcoinj, an implementation of SPV: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoinj

Cool video! 

Mooncoin?
Maybe you're interested in taking up the work of gjhiggins, who forked a new version already here: https://github.com/mooncoin-project/mooncoin-landann
The original (still active) wallet by deaconboogie can be found here: https://github.com/realmooncoin/mooncoin

The other explorer is mentioned in the initial posting, too.
Checked nautinsight, now. But no luck with the txid. Will try again later.

Edit: Worked now. Could find the transaction. Thanks for the link.

Hi NAUT-folks,

just wanted to check a transaction on the blockchain-explorer. Seems to be stuck at June, 6th:

http://explorer.nautiluscoin.com/chain/Nautiluscoin

Any information on that?

He's most probably referring to the "tanking" from the all-time highs at ~280 Sat to the now reached <= 30 Sat. But it seems as if DOGE is working its way up again, which is a good sign. And so could MOON - after its only "a little bit" more of tanking ...  

BUT: we need to fix those issues, that came our way. And to achieve this, we need an active developer (i.e.: someone capable of maintaining the code in a professional way).

Once again: deaconboogie, where are you???

I'd really rather see you come back and care for your coin yourself.
We can help ourselves only to a certain extent (if we don't decide to take over by a community-driven fork with a new development-mastermind or -team). And it is really great, to see the community working in a kind of concerted action now, to compensate for deaconboogies shortcomings. That's awesome.

What do you all think about that?

Yes, you know, that I advocate it too, to only do that, if really needed.
But I think this is such a situation. Just check the blockchain and you'll see, that it is extremely unfair. 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8 gets nearly all the big blocks (~250,000-600,000 Mooncoins), and the other miners receive only the small ones (1-300,000). We simply cannot let this happen any longer.

Ah, OK. I already thought, you'd call a change to prevent ripping off miners by other miners, who are probably "more clever", "inessential" ...

On the site above http://mooncoin.rocks, it still IS the original one.
We are only thinking about the future now here. Because deaconboogie seemingly does not. Edit 3: Or at least doesn't let us know about that.

Edit: What for is the installation-wrapper really needed? The .exe itself works flawlessly. But the random rewards don't.
Edit 2: An installation-wrapper would be a nice addon, but can lead to new problems, for example when using different paths for the files that are saved (blockchain, peers, wallet.dat) than the standard-ones. I've had several problems with other wallets because of that, not so with the Mooncoin.exe.  

We MUST do the change from random rewards to static ones.
Because otherwise the hard-working smaller honest miners are cheated by the big foul-playing ones, cherry-picking the highly-rewarded blocks only.
Do you want that? That's nothing else but unfair.

Edit: It is, by the way, something deaconboogie himself suggested in one of his earlier postings on mooncoin.info (edit: simultaneously with changing from KGW to DigiShield), but that never got done until today, unfortunately.

Hey, great. That's good news. Maybe you could ask Syntaks/twoturtles regarding the wallet. He is the developer of Bellacoin and as far as I remember, he helped deaconboogie, too, to get the last Windows-wallet working/compiled. I'm sure he could tell you what to do, to get this new wallet working. Perhaps he could also compile a new Mac-wallet then. If he needs a bounty for that, I'd gladly donate, of course and am sure others would do also. I think we should ask him. Could be possible, that he has more info on what happened to deaconboogie, too ...? What do you think?

Here the resources of Bellacoin (BELA):
Website: http://www.bellacoin.com
BCT: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=437825.0
Contact: http://www.bellacoin.com/the-bellacoin-team/

Edit:
I'll contact Graham (gjhiggins) by PM, too. Maybe he can tell us more on that, too and we can use the wallet, he already forked on GitHub as a basis for this ...?

Edit 2:
Just checked the .exe-file from mooncoin.rocks
Seems to be legit. These are the checksum-results of the downloaded .exe, which are the same with my own Mooncoin-1.862.1.exe:

     File: Mooncoin-1.862.1.exe
CRC-32: 63f8b21c
    MD4: 5a0fb654c0f45a5584ebd727e1b8a7e5
    MD5: edc341b411f2e138850827cc13570ea1
 SHA-1: f04fc5dde039af945fd70386066fdb5a75464480

Maybe someone else can check the contents of the 7z-files and also confirm the checksum results above? That way we can get the highest possible measure of confidence.

Does anybody know this Mooncoin-address:  2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8  ?

If I check out the blockchain-explorer, I see only block-solving-rewards of above ~250,000 Mooncoins going to this address. That seems to be strange, because then the other miners are being cheated, getting only the less profitable blocks to solve. Did this catch anybody else's eye, too?
Could you help investigating this?

Edit:
Please read this (again) - part 2 - number 1: http://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/207hfb/ann_dogecoin16_its_ready_all_you_need_to_know/

Seems, that we are now the target of this, too ...

So deaconboogie, you told us that you're thinking about changing from random to static block-rewards a while ago to overcome this, too, like Dogecoin. What about it now? The problem is real, as it seems.

peme is working on a backup-site: http://mooncoin.rocks
As soon as he has a working download-page for the wallets there, we all can check that out and see, if they have the same checksums as the original ones, so confirm that the wallets are clean and can be downloaded from that source, too. Just be a little patient, please.

Edit:
See his posting here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389403.msg8485849#msg8485849

What about adding Mooncoin?
The sourcecode for the wallet can be found here: https://github.com/realmooncoin/mooncoin

Still Litoshi, but with an enduring buy-support: https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/145

During the Apollo-phase (last ~10-15 days) it was up to ~300 LTC per day (edit: as an overall average). Now less, since the block-rewards dropped significantly, hence the supply is drastically chopped. The price kept stable over the whole period, which alone is remarkably.
To get the picture more clearly, I'd recommend http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/mooncoin/#charts. Click on "30 Day" there, for an even better overview.

Edit:
https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/145
If you click on "1M" to expand the shown timeframe in the chart to 1 month, you'll see the higher volume, too.

I think he'd like to know, what it would cost to add Mooncoin to Hive ...

They are back:


"Splashdown 3" by NASA - Licensed under Public domain via Wikimedia Commons


So the Mooncoin-Apollo-phase has come to an end. We reached block 203,157.
Let's hope the bunch of miners has not decreased too much, so that after a short time of recovery (via Kimoto Gravity Well), fast solving of blocks can resume.

And it's also staggering that the price is still stable, even though that mass of coins was spilled out.

The countdown has begun: the last remaining 500 blocks of the Apollo-phase will be mined today.