Its not very complicated, altexplorers.info never updated for the fork. They will need to update and resync. They have never been on the correct chain since July 23rd.
I was close, I have identified the symptoms, patients and care, I have only one thing wrong ... the disease most banal. LOL !!  I thought by now altexplorers.info had already completed the update, do you have any news on this? But remains the problem of how to inform also the last users who still use the old wallet and do not read this forum. They are just wasting their time and they will never spend what are staking after the fork. The former Dev gave you the keys of the alert system of the original wallet? Bye Bye |
|
|
|
I dont think its forked , looks like bittrexs wallet has lost sync From what I can see with a quick glance, it seems that few nodes have emitted a burst of blocks, probably from an outdated pre fork wallet (the reward is much less than the new minimum). These wrong blocks, have been accepted by xra.altexplorers.info:3021, but were rightly rejected by http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/XRA/, they are not present in my wallet, and I imagine, in any of the updated wallet. Also, if you check in your debug.log you can see that there is still some peers who try to use an older version. So, if your wallet indicates that you are now over the 116000 blocks, please, make sure your wallet is up to date to the latest version. Bye Bye |
|
|
|
As a 'technical noob' I must speak from experience that XRA transactions are practically instantaneous.
We are getting off on a tangent here but XRA is no more 'practically instantaneous' than BTC or any other coin. This discussion is really not important to XRA though. Looking at it from a 'mainstream perspective' BTC transactions take about 30-60min to confirm with most services. XRA takes a few minutes. For the general public that's what matters... Only a very small minority cares about the technicalities.  Yes, XRA was a rapid coin, but after fork the spec are changed. AFAIK the actual specs times are: Blocktime 3 minutes Transaction confirm 10 blocks (30 minutes, half hour ) Coinbase maturity 50 blocks (150 minutes, 2.5 hours) PoS Minimum Age: 4 hours This passage from 30 sec blocktime to 3 minutes, is also the main origin of the PosDiff rise. This is not a criticism, just to point out and give another perspective. Bye Bye |
|
|
|
- We are currently working very hard in integrating the Web Wallet and Mobile Wallets with the NavajoCoin blockchain.
- We faced a few complications due to blockchain protocols in the process and started adding Blockchain protocol improvements and upgrades , that's why it took time.
- We faced enormous complications and hardships while doing so due to it being a tiring and a process required careful implementation of the said improved protocols and also was needed to be done patiently and swiftly due to us trying to keep with the timeframes announced but we also didn't want make things go wrong in anyway.
Would you be so kind to explain in detail what are these problems and improvements to blockchain that intend to introduce? I ask because sometimes, I happened to find myself stuck in a project, but the simple act of trying to explain to someone else the problem, made me change my point of view, making myself see logical errors which watching from too close I had never notice before. At that point it became much easier to find a rapid solution. Changing the subject, the average time of the blocks continues to be too fast, near 20 sec atm. Do you have any idea about it? Some update on this? Bye Bye |
|
|
|
Hi! Someone has already broke the 100 XRA minimum wall, two times in block 114308 and 114303, getting the 3.37% after 9 days. Just as it should be.  Bye Bye |
|
|
|
I think the blockchain is moving faster than 1 block each 30 secs.
It looks more like 1 block each 20 secs if not even faster
BSPus, you have a good nose. In the last week (30196 Blk) the average interval between blocks is approximately 20.03 seconds, too fast. If we consider only the last 100 blocks, the average is 14.34 seconds. This is the chart of Pos and Block Time of last 6 Weeks. (Sorry for the delayed response, but I had to redo the procedure of the graph from scratch)  Am I right and if so, what would be the consequences?
At this I leave to answer the DevTeam. However, it is something that we have already overcome in the past. Bye Bye EDIT PS: However, for what it's worth, I would like to invite all, especially the top stacker to check their system clock. That never hurts. |
|
|
|
I did some corrections on the richlist script and I am rebuilding the complete database now!
In meantime the alt richlist, with the usual warning that the data shown are not official and the prohibition to use them for any form of trolling and FUD: Deep Watch Report from block 1 to block 1480915 at 2015-07-21 14:53:50 UTC
DWR Rank Address total Last (UTC) 1st (UTC) POS POW C-Pile
DWR 1 sWqp2p...K6grR 5970000.000000 2015-07-18 02:22:27 2015-02-13 0 0 10
DWR 2 sRXgDD...YmUAu 5241575.719289 2015-07-12 16:12:08 2015-04-17 11778 0 2446
DWR 3 sfdzo3...uMNxe 3971334.284431 2015-07-21 14:34:58 2015-01-12 119200 0 3269
DWR 4 sJVkG6...zaRCQ 3000000.000000 2015-02-13 02:02:39 2014-08-14 0 0 1
DWR 5 sfHdGy...Ehvw8 2102000.000000 2015-07-10 00:53:03 2014-06-12 0 0 3
DWR 6 sa17i3...HZC1u 1810183.754324 2015-07-21 11:20:33 2014-07-19 6358 0 500
DWR 7 sNoAao...EEVt8 1700000.000000 2015-07-18 02:25:24 2014-07-10 0 0 3
DWR 8 sh4ztZ...sg6xt 1499999.999900 2015-07-17 17:11:21 2014-08-24 0 0 4
DWR 9 seQ4HR...kRw2b 1071271.421639 2015-03-14 10:43:47 2015-01-22 117 0 46
DWR 10 sSM9nY...9JvDG 1026412.509168 2015-07-21 14:35:18 2015-03-31 20925 0 921
DWR 11 sVRy5x...K6bF1 993965.000000 2015-07-10 04:40:10 2015-03-24 0 0 2
DWR 12 sRsizG...FMBgU 748676.622967 2015-03-28 23:46:10 2014-06-24 0 0 2
DWR 13 sVXQUU...qcq7f 703624.433733 2015-07-21 14:35:53 2015-04-18 15278 0 666
DWR 14 sTRoU3...ZwzB4 677724.894650 2015-07-21 11:30:58 2014-06-05 23627 0 582
DWR 15 sd8dyP...81JWY 616611.287553 2015-07-21 14:31:21 2014-06-03 43081 0 580
DWR 16 sabh4N...gLMXu 611238.431507 2015-07-20 19:41:44 2014-06-06 20635 0 489
DWR 17 sKWtWm...Syjvq 600200.000000 2015-04-29 23:25:20 2015-02-17 0 0 2
DWR 18 sefNrb...QFfU4 597956.564453 2015-07-21 14:13:57 2015-04-20 12780 0 534
DWR 19 sKtTgv...zZxpG 597591.046682 2015-07-11 18:32:45 2014-06-20 5720 0 309
DWR 20 sLAucj...7ZSm2 560390.833803 2015-07-20 19:38:59 2014-08-03 2401 0 364
DWR 21 sa9r31...6ZgMk 550000.000000 2015-04-22 07:30:21 2014-07-09 0 0 55
DWR 22 sYda5n...ji5CF 542124.564667 2015-07-21 14:32:31 2014-07-17 42630 0 527
DWR 23 sYoVSp...5KBcM 528107.651972 2015-07-21 14:35:50 2014-06-09 16047 16 454
DWR 24 sNtBHm...ZnpVx 517773.086183 2015-07-10 00:53:03 2014-06-07 13655 0 534
DWR 25 sQmrFt...JoXD1 515718.201000 2015-06-30 11:38:02 2015-01-17 0 0 1
DWR 26 sNyNwM...dtqtr 499999.990000 2015-04-29 23:29:47 2014-06-04 0 0 1
DWR 27 sPjcDe...GGihk 499995.148579 2015-07-21 14:23:01 2015-07-06 1478 0 387
DWR 28 sdVwLj...dnmkd 454199.979312 2015-07-19 13:10:51 2014-07-31 4876 0 133
DWR 29 sb5oyr...G1eeA 441578.598212 2015-07-21 11:21:39 2014-08-11 7461 0 378
DWR 30 sbZuh8...JRrRi 412484.916000 2015-07-21 14:22:18 2015-05-05 2561 0 359
DWR 31 sUBhKt...tyjKV 411387.125261 2015-07-21 14:06:19 2014-12-29 20165 0 389
DWR 32 seaGLo...Ch5bi 410155.306960 2015-07-21 14:11:05 2015-04-06 8067 0 376
DWR 33 sSHFR5...HYmG2 405407.340554 2015-04-17 02:14:18 2015-04-17 0 0 1
DWR 34 sgkNQR...89j6V 404132.000000 2015-06-12 15:03:44 2015-03-19 0 0 2
DWR 35 sJNqJd...svXMe 400000.000000 2015-05-01 09:31:52 2014-07-14 0 0 1
DWR 36 sTrVPn...x2jTF 399999.800000 2014-09-28 15:47:57 2014-09-28 0 0 1
DWR 37 sbyhP1...Cy5Ld 385016.469750 2015-07-20 23:27:18 2015-01-22 3957 0 306
DWR 38 sJUNsL...AanGG 382453.087916 2015-07-21 14:25:00 2015-03-17 7009 0 340
DWR 39 sUS3fx...pWXJs 320002.577571 2015-04-24 15:45:15 2015-02-09 4 0 2
DWR 40 sVzRju...Y3Q4s 316665.177383 2015-07-20 19:32:58 2014-08-03 5257 0 231
DWR 41 sWtY6b...RLAek 300688.144607 2015-07-21 14:20:11 2015-02-16 7936 0 271
DWR 42 sdR5v6...FjuWJ 300000.000000 2015-03-27 19:26:29 2014-06-17 0 0 1
DWR 43 sVFUSF...nm44i 287683.760731 2015-07-10 00:53:03 2014-06-07 15657 0 252
DWR 44 sL2cHa...rCQbt 280336.922278 2015-07-21 13:44:01 2014-07-17 16250 0 137
DWR 45 sboGA4...DMtBK 270962.570180 2015-07-21 14:19:14 2015-02-26 7405 0 296
DWR 46 sU5VKf...aaHuR 265487.616342 2015-07-16 23:03:30 2014-11-01 3041 0 149
DWR 47 sX1TKv...6pZ1V 261472.377956 2015-07-21 14:31:32 2015-03-21 5858 0 271
DWR 48 sbTVL1...poAsk 256027.233785 2015-07-21 14:15:49 2015-03-28 4791 0 226
DWR 49 sfXvxS...uc5bJ 254136.548793 2015-07-21 13:55:25 2015-04-18 3633 0 237
DWR 50 sSLRfD...Dc5Kz 250113.977333 2015-07-21 14:23:57 2015-07-17 90 0 80
DWR 51 sWGP5E...HGoYk 250018.801487 2015-07-14 20:15:50 2015-07-06 18 0 14
DWR 52 sdeEZZ...WhSrS 247374.856105 2015-07-21 14:22:24 2015-03-21 5708 0 240
DWR 53 sJT5qP...3tmjJ 245641.826874 2015-07-10 00:53:03 2014-06-07 14858 0 222
DWR 54 sdUAeD...w5fzg 227341.398564 2015-07-21 14:19:30 2014-09-23 10778 0 209
DWR 55 sPkA1Q...SF7FM 225269.385302 2015-07-20 19:02:44 2014-08-03 3786 0 154
DWR 56 sfME8q...PPA7Z 225234.000000 2015-05-17 09:54:16 2014-06-06 0 0 1
DWR 57 sMUihp...kAeeo 220513.605702 2015-07-09 21:03:40 2014-11-09 2258 0 161
DWR 58 sQp9HC...1Y7hg 214599.099129 2015-07-20 19:32:56 2014-08-03 3648 0 173
DWR 59 sLT24z...x6pL1 202686.258645 2015-07-21 14:27:59 2015-06-10 1541 0 165
DWR 60 sfBhjn...45pf8 201645.003225 2014-08-09 11:38:13 2014-06-11 3 0 1
DWR 61 sgVhP1...AdQjR 200000.000000 2015-05-08 08:37:28 2015-04-06 0 0 1
DWR 62 sRARBC...ZMNx7 200000.000000 2015-04-18 18:11:57 2015-04-16 0 0 1
DWR 63 sPUCRb...KRw3N 200000.000000 2015-01-13 10:00:12 2014-12-03 0 0 1
DWR 64 sK5ogE...qfmtq 184179.000000 2015-04-30 06:12:52 2014-07-09 0 0 1
DWR 65 seDEqi...NtUVT 180182.131940 2015-07-10 19:03:30 2015-03-27 1455 0 137
DWR 66 sQFzZx...CZgDB 179984.662375 2015-07-21 14:30:35 2014-06-12 6998 0 159
DWR 67 sRvDoh...E1qRv 177339.092890 2015-07-21 14:29:08 2015-03-06 3196 0 159
DWR 68 scr7hU...snsH9 162857.934832 2015-07-21 12:28:03 2014-06-28 15974 0 154
DWR 69 sJiQJu...hRmib 162496.960808 2015-07-21 14:24:20 2015-01-16 6196 0 164
DWR 70 sMx3hv...p9yR3 160000.000000 2015-07-03 18:49:12 2014-10-02 0 0 1
DWR 71 sNdVzF...mboYE 159921.605445 2015-01-17 14:04:22 2014-07-03 1982 0 152
DWR 72 sLArGg...ogj3N 153369.597151 2015-07-21 14:13:15 2015-01-18 5100 0 139
DWR 73 sbP3nh...FxaSL 151391.714459 2014-07-16 18:13:30 2014-06-03 3953 0 1999
DWR 74 sZ7NLF...AQvWu 150870.943348 2015-04-24 13:16:57 2015-04-24 1 0 2
DWR 75 safd7Z...P2gQG 150300.013200 2014-07-12 07:11:08 2014-06-03 0 20487 993
DWR 76 sceBnh...T3qUa 149999.800000 2015-02-02 19:35:48 2015-02-02 0 0 1
DWR 77 sW6RQJ...Dk2XR 147635.498880 2015-07-21 13:41:05 2015-05-30 375 0 89
DWR 78 sKqMpP...4J2Ye 143222.858228 2015-03-01 09:22:38 2014-06-03 7687 0 135
DWR 79 sKHSvY...Q87Xo 133846.165588 2015-07-02 20:10:23 2014-06-04 3314 0 131
DWR 80 sRiAYM...sqzEZ 122755.709889 2015-05-13 08:14:32 2015-01-15 412 0 63
DWR 81 sSR9o3...uNr9g 121634.349508 2015-07-21 13:00:43 2014-06-27 10039 0 115
DWR 82 sUS3U5...r4ASi 119999.908901 2015-07-21 14:05:34 2015-01-15 3436 0 105
DWR 83 seB9ju...c66pT 118555.272213 2015-07-21 11:41:42 2015-01-24 3872 0 121
DWR 84 sRTSzg...p2YUM 116172.470113 2015-07-21 14:30:05 2015-03-21 2756 0 117
DWR 85 sQn22B...B2ZUQ 115966.420986 2015-07-09 19:15:11 2015-02-03 999 0 151
DWR 86 sUZtrs...58RFa 111020.824246 2015-07-20 18:59:10 2014-07-31 803 0 77
DWR 87 sJZL5Q...HXPLV 110948.916118 2015-07-20 18:51:56 2014-08-03 762 0 77
DWR 88 sQoZNi...XX2Qh 110349.516014 2015-06-02 17:04:31 2015-06-02 0 0 1
DWR 89 seJwpj...vZAyM 108078.885975 2015-06-26 17:37:55 2014-07-23 6419 0 101
DWR 90 sVvNHc...wJEdB 105244.857126 2015-07-21 14:02:59 2015-04-02 717 0 57
DWR 91 sJkVxT...BNco2 103958.786494 2015-07-20 19:51:55 2014-08-03 3135 0 83
DWR 92 sXQban...yWCZL 102548.018668 2014-09-20 06:40:48 2014-06-04 353 0 101
DWR 93 schay1...gEYp4 102334.035405 2015-07-21 14:02:47 2015-03-23 2026 0 92
DWR 94 sPBC2t...C9wnj 99723.140463 2015-06-22 16:55:24 2014-06-29 2286 0 87
DWR 95 sPaJXe...L9ogi 99205.189700 2015-05-26 07:02:31 2014-06-05 1097 0 74
DWR 96 sRBQ84...PKgZp 98226.196077 2015-03-08 15:32:24 2014-06-08 40 0 7
DWR 97 sTGR9c...m3VJy 93954.270789 2015-05-19 15:39:43 2014-06-09 4134 0 83
DWR 98 saNZFD...JNCoy 93593.729906 2015-07-11 12:10:09 2015-03-03 1405 0 47
DWR 99 sTofnn...5h6YD 87630.912774 2014-06-23 18:39:58 2014-06-13 701 580 834
DWR 100 sXfRzJ...X9SzK 84239.578717 2015-03-31 19:23:48 2015-03-31 0 0 2
@Pakage My Compliments! Have a nice trip! Bye Bye |
|
|
|
|
I found an oddity shown in the columns of CoinControl, the potential stake
shows only integer values.
Some of you can confirm?
Meanwhile I prepare a PM to PressTab, with the details.
Bye Bye
Edit: Sent.
|
|
|
|
We need choice lesser evil and keep this thread open even after we finish forum on Nav site.
And I would add, to make sure that the website forums are opened for reading, no required login or registration. Bye Bye |
|
|
|
Also the old dev sent me the twitter log in.
This fact and the link in the previous thread are unexpected events, and in some ways I find them laudable. Bye Bye |
|
|
|
21:05 <@presstab> as I have discussed with a few people. a minimum stake reward
will be added as well.
21:05 <@presstab> 100 coins per stake, would mean a mimimum of 48,000 coins per
day, which would be good for the network and a good incentive
for early stakers
Just making sure to post this here too. I believe that 100 coin minimum per stake is on the low side, it could be bumped up if anyone here has strong feelings about it. The higher the minimum stake reward is, the quicker we will be able to reward the initial stakers (all of you). I am going to code it in as 100 for now, if anyone has strong feelings speak up and I can add an additional commit before the fork. I Like!! Whereas the old version with the bug is not in able to bestow rewards greater than 2.63 per block, this new minimum for me this is a double WOW! With this minimum surely there will be active staking nodes.  Bye Bye |
|
|
|
Curious to see what the outcome of this will be, keep up the good work!
I thank you for the address that was given, the dash's whitepaper was an interesting read. Here as a reference it is the text part that concerns the formula for the ROI of a masternode: Due to the fact that the Masternode rewards program is a fixed percentage and the
Masternode network nodes are fluctuating, expected Masternode rewards will vary according
to the current total count of active Masternodes. Payments for a standard day for running a
Masternode can be calculated by using the following formula:
(n/t) * r * b * a
Where:
n is the number of Masternodes an operator controls
t is the total number of Masternodes
r is the current block reward (presently averaging about 5 DASH)
b is blocks in an average day. For the Dash network this usually is 576.
a is the average Masternode payment (45% of the average block amount)
Return on investment for running a Masternode can be calculated as
((n/t) * r * b * a * 365) / 1000
Where variables are the same as above.
But please be patient, there is still the initial question that is not clear to me: from what I understand, the DASH miners have to pay 45% of what they earn for each block found to masternode. But Dash is a coin purely POW, while Nav now is purely POS. This means that the reward for masternodes will come from a cut of the POS reward of all? Please tell me that I was wrong. Bye Bye |
|
|
|
Great work presstab and Remy, you did more work in a single day than most devs in weeks/months.
All the credit belong to PressTab, I just stumbled on a.... bug. Bye Bye |
|
|
|
I personally like the 30%, not sure what everyone else thinks? In my opinion what needs to be fixed is the 30 second block time. Bump that up to 2 or 3 minutes and it puts the coin on a long term path to success.
I like the High Rate Coin, but is a my personal opinion. And I like too a fast usable coin . Why the 30 second block time should be changed? Just asking. Remy_5 |
|
|
|
Close the thread without a word does not seem a very kind thing.
[...]
So, IMHO I do not know if it is more appropriate to speak of "when" or "if" that Dev will be back.
Coin is losing value over locked thread. There's no link on previous thread to point investors to this one. This thread is in no way linked to the previous and disappeared Dev, but was initiated by KK99, which has the merit of being the first to have opened a space for discussion. And I think KK99 should be thanked for that. About thread I would like to point out that PressTab has just opened another thread, that could become very interesting: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1119477.0Bye Bye |
|
|
|
Any ideas on when dev will get back on track?
Close the thread without a word does not seem a very kind thing. Moreover, according to the OP, the team should be composed of two programmers, plus a CEO. If hypothetically the "Dev Leader" has had some mishap, another of the staff could at least send a message on the forum. Instead nothing, and even no activity from that day of the burning of the proceeds of the so-called "Miner Apollo (13) Program". So, IMHO I do not know if it is more appropriate to speak of "when" or "if" that Dev will be back. Remy |
|
|
|
Masternodes are originally created by DASH. From a DASH perspective: Yes they're very profitable, especially now with a price rise of +25% it's a 'gold-mine'. On average a Masternode holder earns 2-3DASH per Masternode every few days. So for example: I run 7 Masternodes, so at best I would earn 7 x 3 = 21DASH every few days. Converted to current DASH/USD price that's 21 x $ 4,25 = $89,25 every few days. Also keep in mind that running a Masternodes requires you to run a VPS that also costs money. They're very inexpensive, at least some of them are: www.vultr.com Thank you for the explanation, finally some data on which we can be able to reason. But one thing I do not understand, where they come from these gains? From the normal transaction fee? by a percentage of those anonymous? There is a mandatory fee increase? And how many real transactions per day are needed to get those revenues? Bye Bye |
|
|
|
 OMG Im the #1 staker!! LOL!! Congratulations!! (ehmm... i got your vote?) |
|
|
|
New option added to poll.
@Remy
33% burned, 33% for development, and 33% for the staker.
Thanks, I voted. And now a bit of electoral propaganda. The following are the data collected in the last week of the top 20 stacker, compared with their position in RichList. The count was made in part automatically and in part by hand, are then possible errors, I propose them as an example only.
topStaker From block 30789 (2015-06-27 13:54:58 UTC) to block 52547 (2015-07-04 13:54:54 UTC)
topStaker Found 134 Address Counted 21759 Blk (Last 24H 2976)
topStaker Total: 26623.569569 Coin 2.526950 Max 1.223565 Average AVGTime 27.80
topStaker Rank : Address Block (Last 24H) RichList#
topStaker 1 : RGhrSQ...FE2t1 3077 508 9
topStaker 2 : RPpCTh...4Mhm9 1663 309 24
topStaker 3 : RLV63J...gccRK 1620 289 20
topStaker 4 : RVv7yB...cBPR6 1401 0 2
topStaker 5 : RBqXxB...1Pvj1 1114 186 34
topStaker 6 : RSkk6w...wDYgy 998 0 1
topStaker 7 : RUyWiA...7BUnB 930 215 7
topStaker 8 : RRs1ue...shEmZ 915 0 10
topStaker 9 : RNZbmM...Nef7b 897 163 29
topStaker 10 : RBL4r7...K3RaE 821 0 11
topStaker 11 : RYZ17a...3im3J 813 185 16
topStaker 12 : RCiacP...Fm361 726 153 26
topStaker 13 : RPwKDs...ytXhr 672 0 13
topStaker 14 : RA6azX...6FoTo 656 0 14
topStaker 15 : RPxpin...7cSzo 391 87 40
topStaker 16 : RGtUuJ...dwD9v 340 98 22
topStaker 17 : RX43YY...nnuGP 336 0 19
topStaker 18 : RUkzd1...fRjvz 306 65 50
topStaker 19 : RCRhw1...dkNKV 292 68 57
topStaker 20 : RAUoyq...9vYDt 291 69 48
Top 20 Staker generate 18259 block ( 83.9%) gaining in total 22508.830048
As will be noted in the top 20 staker list, there are a part of the 20 of the RichList, but also other active users in positions further down, until the 57 position, and also the first of RichList, hypothesized to be an exchange, in actually it produces many blocks POS. But despite these important presences, the overall gain of an entire week does not seem high. Bye Bye |
|
|
|
They actually do something for the network, they make sure that it works.
Extract information of the top 20 staker is not too hard, just count the
blocks in the main-chain generated by address. (with a routine ofc)
Does your idea not just make the rich even richer - I understand the idea of an extra reward for the biggest helpers towards blockchain stability, but it is still those WITH the most GETTING the most. Burning all the coins generated by the miner will make the coin rarer and therefore more valuable to EVERYONE with coins Let them burn and the benefit goes to all Yes and No. It seem to me fair to reward the active user, not just the rich list. Burn the extra would give a better vantage to who have more, even if inactive. But, Of course is just my opinion. Just my thoughts, a poll would sort it out though Right. Probably a wise solution might be a middle way, 33% burned, 33% for development, and 33% for the staker. Bye Bye |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
