It will be possible to reactivate mode PoW, automatically or via a global message, if there were unforeseen problems or
if there are too few active nodes or nodes scattered?

I mean, a kind of safety valve against the collapse of the network.

If you look at http://diamondblocks.info/chain/Philosopherstone, you can see that it is frozen for many weeks.

His last recorded block is: 195 239 2014 -04-06 09:48:55


We really, really, really, need a block-explorer running and updated.

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

The hash of this block is identical, we are in sync! 

I was beginning to worry me a little, now I can open a ticket on cryptsy knew to be right.

I had not thought about the number of coins of the entire network as a sort of checksum of the entire blockchain.
Effectively, thinking about it better, the number of coins generated is not fix, but also depends on PoS, and then by the amount of coins
transferred and / or in stock at each block.
Probably I think still in POW-only mode.  ^_^;

I learned one other thing. 

Thanks for the quick change to the site http://phstones.com/mobile.php.
To be more indicative, it would be possible to have a few more decimal for the PoS Diff?

Thanks again in any case.

Thanks for the reply.

More or less the number is what you indicated, but the number of the block is mostly a function of time.

I mean, the blocks must still be generated by the nodes of the (sub)net after x seconds, right fork or not.

So I guess that two parallel branches of a fork would have the same number of blocks + / - after
a short time.

The hash and the number of a block instead should indicate clearly, both the block, that the chain of blocks
that precedes it.   But I'm just a beginner, may be wrong.

Let's try it another way more precise.

Before opening a ticket on cryptsy, I would like to know if I am correctly synchronized with the blockchain.

For this purpose I would ask you to return the hash of a recent block of the blockchain.

Please, in the console of your wallet, what result do you obtain from the command:
getblockhash 214800

Thanks in advance.

Hi, I too have had problems similar to those described.

There is a BlockExplorer running and updated, with which we can check the TxID of Criptsy and that of our POS block?

Alternatively, to be sure i'm in the correct fork, can anyone confirm the current block number and Stake Difficulty?

Currently my wallet shows:
"blocks" : 214703
"proof-of-work" : 5.52517986,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.01082076,


TIA

PS:
IMHO I think an indication of the difficulty of the POW and the POS could be a simple and useful
addition to the site http://phstones.com/mobile.php

Well, thank you.

If I understand correctly, for example, the payment of one block of a pool to 100 individuals, will generates an additional 100 POS blocks,
then the day after that will generate 100 new POS blocks.

In the long run, it is not likely to create a geometric explosion of blockchain?

One last question, just a curiosity, considering that at the moment there is not a chain block explorer,
with some command of the wallet, can be traced to the difficulty of a specific block of the past?

Many thanks, by another newbies. :-)

Hello Dev, I have a question about the POS.

I like many other miners, I have accumulated a number of small payments from the pools.

Now that approach the POS, which of these things can I expect?

    1) A rain of small Stake, one for payment received
    2) A single Stake equal to the sum of all payments arrived after the previous stakes
    3) A single stake, but only for payments older than 24 hours, reserving the rest for the next stake
    4) None Stake for several days, because my figures are very small in comparison to those of the rest of the network

Or the system of POStake is completely different?

TIA

Hello, I had the same problem, 100% reject, but only on this pool.

In the name of your worker there was a number?

Try a different name without numbers. In at least one case it worked for me.

Hi, thank you for your efforts in making the CPU-only.

But it is not very efficient as I hoped.

By way of example, the present version for Win64 reports:

[2014-03-10 11:52:11] thread 1: 1278464 hashes, 116.94 khash/s
[2014-03-10 11:52:19] thread 0: 1272832 hashes, 128.75 khash/s
[2014-03-10 11:52:29] thread 1: 1169408 hashes, 128.53 khash/s
[2014-03-10 11:52:31] thread 0: 1287680 hashes, 117.47 khash/s

No share even after a long time, and then on the pool's site there are no signs that the worker is on-line and that is working.
Comparable results for the linux version.

For comparison, on the same machine the win version of xptMiner (1.5), however, shows:

[00:02:32] kHash/s: 316.90 Shares total: 0 / 0
[00:02:37] Share found! (Blockheight: 47112)
[00:02:40] kHash/s: 317.03 Shares total: 1 / 1
[00:02:48] kHash/s: 317.15 Shares total: 1 / 1
[00:02:54] Share found! (Blockheight: 47112)
[00:02:56] kHash/s: 317.25 Shares total: 2 / 2
[00:03:04] kHash/s: 317.53 Shares total: 2 / 2

And by the time the kHash stabilizes at about 340.

Maybe the problem is due to the Dif too high?

In this regard, before I never noticed, but a difficulty 116421.397088 is normal for MetisCoin?

PS:
The machine on which I effettuate the test is based on Athlon 64 X2 6000+.
I know, the machine is not very powerful, but that is available.

The new miner can operate in an efficient way, even in CPU-only mode?

Sources for Linux?

TIA

Also the pair PopCoin / LiteCoin would be usefull.

Having them both would be the best.

Oui... Nous venons des quatre coins du monde.

Yes... We come from the four corners of the world.

 

Many of the coins mentioned above are already present in some Exchange.

Imho, add another market, would result in a small benefit for both Exchanger and their customers.
The transactions  will be divided between different Exchanger in a market already well served, and then more fragmented.
Finally, a marginal benefit for everyone.

Conversely, be the first market exchange of a new currency, would result in a triple advantage:
1) the Exchanger will gain new loyal customers, all the customers with that coin.
2) Customers would have a reference market, so they could exchange their currencies efficiently.
3) A unfragmented market  imply more transaction, higher volumes, and lower spreads.

It's a triple win, minimum risk and maximum benefit for all.

So, imho, priority should go to the currencies that have not yet a market.

And among these coins, I would kindly suggest PopCoin.

Bye Bye