...
I think everybody forgot the 'dump it down to here' meme already...
Those who forgot will be dealt with.  |
|
|
|
Start posting trains.
Couldn't find a train  Watch the tard try to drink that beer in 3 2 ... |
|
|
|
What do you think you're doing, bulls? Unacceptable! Stop your shenanigans & put the price back where it belongs, or stun gun!  |
|
|
|
Why do you keep doing it, Bitcoiners?  |
|
|
|
See my post above. There may be "super-traders" that successfully play such complicated short-term trading strategies, and they may take money from less sophisticated traders; but, averaged over all traders, short-term trading will always be a losing game.
I'm curious what you think of poker and how it compares to the argument you are making. Poker where the house [exchange] takes a cut [rake; playing trading fee] is a net-negative game. Should be self-evident--the money in the game comes only from the players, and the house takes a cut. |
|
|
|
Lol, do you even try, bro? It's just you and me in this thread. If you can't even rope in any suckers here, you're pretty much done. Of all the lame shit in this sub, yours is almost charmingly inept. Also this, from the previous failthread: Plz tell me you're both joking. I refuse to believe that even Chef Ramsay, who "invested" in just about every scam on these august fora, is this gullible.  ...time passes...  ...maybe now? Lol NO   |
|
|
|
...
you never know. ...
Nah, you never know. We know, that's why we sodl. |
|
|
|
...
Are we sure that this is the real Jorge Stolfi? ...
Could it really be said that illiterate ditch-diggers such as yourselves may be certain of anything? In light of the multitude of wrongs you hold as self-evident certainties, what would that even mean? *A serious, deeply metaphysical question. |
|
|
|
I still think icedrillio is the best name ever. I mean, if anyone can say that without smiling... Props to DeaDTerra & team. |
|
|
|
|
^Not for the lack of trying. Never said you Bitcoiners are good at what you do.
|
|
|
|
^We must kill it before it lays eggs |
|
|
|
Tomorrow on CoinDesk: "U.S. Government printed billions to buy 51+% of BTC. And then printed more to cover the printing expenses. And then printed more to pay for the accounting involved in tracking the expenses. And then printed more so they could recover from loss of buying power caused by printing money." They don't have to do this. Just call bitcoins as proceeds from crime and seize them.  Pretty much. And make holding them a capital offense, so's we could shoot Bitcoin criminals & economic saboteurs on sight. Ha ha. That would be a bit extreme. They can just tax you into submission. Bitcoin parasites are typically libertardian, thus deadbeat tax cheats. They'll just continue to be a burden on society, mark my words. |
|
|
|
By my reckoning he sold pretty much where you did nlc.
You felt the need to troll bitcointalk for 6000 posts afterwards though sadly.
I didn't con the mentally feeble into stocking up on this wholesome goodness even as I was dumping it right into their buys. There's a slight difference Do you consider everyone else here on BCT other then yourself mentally feeble? Everyone has own brain to decide what to do. And it turns out that HODLING at 700 was sound advice because it went up to almost 1200. >Do you consider everyone else here on BCT other then[sic] yourself mentally feeble? No. Only those who listened to Reptilia. And not even every one of them those, either. >And it turns out that HODLING at 700 was sound advice because it went up to almost 1200. Not for those who continued hodling because Reptilia forgot to tell them to dupm even as he himself was sodling. While [accidently] telling them to hodl  Turned out pretty shitty for those mental giants, actually. |
|
|
|
Disappearing for weeks at a time might be charismatic in a way but disappearing for weeks at a time during critical times and meanwhile the competition is cutting all the grass... I don't honestly?
As for the trolls...
Go read zumzero. Then read notlambchop
Remember mpoe pr?
It's all the same tranny
Question is...
Post-op or pre?
Lol, I didn't protest when I was called Mircea, I didn't protest when I was called Eduardo de Castro, I didn't protest when I was called MPOE-PR, but zumzero is definitely below the belt, bro Coo coo ca choo and Happy Investing, ~The Walrus |
|
|
|
COngratulations! We had our first fall free SUnday. Only 5$ dropped this weekend.
 |
|
|
|
By my reckoning he sold pretty much where you did nlc.
You felt the need to troll bitcointalk for 6000 posts afterwards though sadly.
I didn't con the mentally feeble into stocking up on this wholesome goodness even as I was dumping it right into their buys. There's a slight difference |
|
|
|
...
Or you can be your own bank...
Why do so many here want to be their own bank? Why not start off with something reasonable, like be your own plumber, or garbageman, or proctologist? Right, but once you're already your own plumber, garbageman and proctologist then banker is certainly up next. Some of us already are proctologists :p You say amatur proctologist, I say just keep away from underage minor children, you twisted pervert. I guess it all depends on how you look at it  Don't turn a blind eye!
Help stop Bitcoin perverts!
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if I understand the analogy you used. In your example does that someone selling the broke family shares in a goldmine equate to risto advising people publicly on this forum to buy bitcoin? Or am I missing something and there is more to it? Yes it does. And telling them that if they see their "investment" tank, it's only because of Bankster cabal suppressing the price to secretly increase their holdings The Jews with Thermite, or, as his victims put it, "holding our hand through difficult times." TL;DR: Yes, but stop top-posting pl0x. To me that is not dishonest, he probably believed it himself. ... You've missed "What if he, at the very same time, is selling them *his own* shares" bit. When confronted with the fact that his strategy has backfired, his vanity got the better of him & he admitted to selling BTC [while telling his faithful to hodl]. As far as I remember he said he sold at 700 so no where near the top. Ok, I do see your point but in reality he was not such a large holder of BTC that he needed to Shill the market in order to unload whatever portion he did. What he sold represented a very tiny fraction of the BTCs being bought and sold during that time... You asked for an example of dishonesty. I gave you one. You countered with "well, he didn't profit that much." My point is simple: He is not merely insane (as in involuntary institutionalization insane, classified in DSM-5 as "Batshit Crazy"), but a sleazy lying piece of shit. You don't tell people to hodl while sodling hand-over-fist yourself. |
|
|
|
I'm not sure if I understand the analogy you used. In your example does that someone selling the broke family shares in a goldmine equate to risto advising people publicly on this forum to buy bitcoin? Or am I missing something and there is more to it? Yes it does. And telling them that if they see their "investment" tank, it's only because of Bankster cabal suppressing the price to secretly increase their holdings The Jews with Thermite, or, as his victims put it, "holding our hand through difficult times." TL;DR: Yes, but stop top-posting pl0x. To me that is not dishonest, he probably believed it himself. ... You've missed "What if he, at the very same time, is selling them *his own* shares" bit. When confronted with the fact that his strategy has backfired, his vanity got the better of him & he admitted to selling BTC [while telling his faithful to hodl]. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
