Thanks for the coins, Dumpmonkeys! Keep it up; I've got thousands and thousands of fiat FRNs I need to get rid of before the short squeeze.
Also, there are millions of bitcoins owned by unknown people with unknown intentions. Just don't take out any loans to buy those "cheap coins". How'z that any different than all the billions of unknown people who own dollars with unknown intentions? ... Well, dollar criminals don't keep diaries, so there's that...  |
|
|
|
Looking good, bulls, nice rate of climb. Moon soon?  |
|
|
|
I think we'll see a pump within an hour.
Oh well, you had the time sorta right... |
|
|
|
Gotta suck when someone throws down 15k btc and no one follows. Now they can not buy back in lower. LOL
Still It's amazing how they waited until now and all dumped at once, although there's nothing going on in the bitcoin world. This was a perfect example of a dumper hoping to cause panic. Not quite as pathetic as the failpumps of late  |
|
|
|
...
Situation is bullish as fuck , am i right? ...
Sarcasm? Maybe you're just not looking at it the right way?  |
|
|
|
Maybe you don't believe bitcoin has a future, but Coinbase just got 75 million votes to the contrary.
... Again: Coinbase is not Bitcoin. If someone wants to invest in USD, they don't invest in PayPal, they buy USD. Name one, really, just one large company (other than the producer) investing in Beanie Babies infrastructure - one of your favorite analogies for Bitcoin. If I am not mistaken, I believe that Amazon's original business plan was to build a $75 million platform designed specifically (and solely) to profit from people cashing out their Beenie Baby investment. You're mistaken on so many levels, hard to choose where to start. I'll assume that by BTCeanie BTCabies you meant Bitcoin. No biggie, many still confuse the two--not going to take offense or dwell on that any longer. To the chase: Amazon didn't invest $75 million in either Bitcoin or Coinbase, $75 million is the total raised by coinbase. Amazon's just one of the "investors." What i do find offensive is your implications of some sort of a mass divestment from BTCeanies. No one in his right mind is "cashing out their Beenie [sic] Baby investment." True, some weak hands are being shaken out, but serious people with understanding of BTCeanie BTCabies technology are increasing their BTCeanie holdings, secretly. If you was good with investing, you'd know that BTCeanie BTCabies is a long-term investment, not some overhyped internet get-rich-quick scheme like Bitcoin. The fundamentals are improving all the time, don't miss the rocketboat. ~Happy Investing! |
|
|
|
I think we'll see a pump within an hour.
>"sound money" >prays for a pump Stay classy, Bitcoin! |
|
|
|
Plz tell me you're both joking. I refuse to believe that even Chef Ramsay, who "invested" in just about every scam on these august fora, is this gullible.  ...time passes...  ...maybe now? Lol NO   |
|
|
|
^Great point. Have a flashing gif   |
|
|
|
How'd y'all get so smart, Bitcoiners?  |
|
|
|
Which one?
Please don't quote the troll who is posting Nazi shit. Thanks. Haha! Your marauding days are over, Bitcoin criminal scum!   |
|
|
|
Usefulness of something with claims to "a good store of value" is related to price, sure. Especially when said price has dropped by ~75% over the past year.
As a payment processor of any size, Bitcoin is a nonstarter--7 transactions per second limit is simply laughable.
New apps and tech can't fix the fundamental flaws of Bitcoin. It's flawed at the conceptual level, with cludgy workarounds (hardforks] now being proposed to smear salve over old sores.
7 per second.... oh dear... wasnt aware of that... the store of value stuff, im not sure where it comes from but in my mind thats a relative concept with too many variables to be a generally good statement. same logic for anything that is considered to be a store of value though. i dont know enough about the tech itself to comment on your last part, but it seems to me that a lot of people with much better understandings than i have a lot of faiht in the tech. im sure there are two sides to it all, but the weight seems to be on the positive side - i know 'people' better than the tech, so thats good enough for me :p "Oh dear" is right. That's called a non-starter. The tech? Nothing wrong with the tech per se, just doesn't scale & costs 12% of Bitcoin's market cap per year to keep the network secure. So if you don't mind the constantly tanking price, it's all good. Far as smarter people than you having faith in this tech? They have faith in [seemingly neverending supply of] greater fools, not tech.  |
|
|
|
Good morning, gentlemen! Guess what's in the box?  |
|
|
|
Relevant quote: "'We knew filthy criminal scum was guilty soon as Bitcoin was mentioned. Took us three hours to stop laughing at him,' foreman says." |
|
|
|
Strong buy recommendation, transparency & a top shelf cast of characters w/lots of potential for growth. Unlike most others on here.
Tragic if not joking. |
|
|
|
...this IS a financial war on the facist forces that are seeking to enslave humanity to their broken fiat monetary system for their own power.
...
Attempts to label bitcoin supporters a cult is just lazy sloganeering ...
Hahahahahahahaha  "All your human are belong to us!" ~Your Beneficent Reptilian Overlords |
|
|
|
...
From the 266 spike until the 1k spike, they were definitely supportive of each other. I guess the bitcoin price rollercoaster created an emotional rollercoaster in their marriage, and I'd bet pounds to peanuts dollars to doughnuts their marriage is far from the only one to suffer in this manner.
Agree except for the FIFY bit.  |
|
|
|
...
Even if it is a very elaborate troll, it doesn't mean that there aren't real marriages being ruined by bitcoin.
... Case in point: BitChick. Weren't they in it together, though? I'd say adam would be a better example: you can tell his wife probably didn't want anything to do with this shit. Sorta. If I remember right, she went to spread The Good News in India, and, while she was gone, hubby sold off most of the coin. When she got bored of slumming it in India her Good Works were done & she returned, she bought those coins back @270 because something about dogs & vomit. Marital tensions ensued. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
