With all the beauty that is happening I expected the price of Dope to go up instead of down. Although that gives the real supporters time to buy extra dope at a nice price, it makes me wonder why the price isn't going up. Any ideas?

Is your wallet unlocked?
Is your reservebalance set in settings > options > main tab?
Is staking=0 set in your seedcoin.conf file?

I'll ask the obligatory...'do you have the latest wallet?'

For a moment I thought the idea of giving away 90% was about to take shape... you know, to be able to create a (small) community out of nothing; some value, real value, out of nothing.

But, of course, I was wrong. Another idiotic scheme to try and keep engaged a few losers still believing in this piece of shit... while inflicting the ultimate strokes into Pink coin at the same time.

Masterful, Fayoling, you are a genius indeed.

Such a genius that you are going to have the dubious honor of driving to the ground two coins at the same time.

Congrats in advance.

Just to clarify a point I made days ago regarding that I saw "a slight opportunity when (not if) markrt cap goes under $10k..." That statement was made under the assumption that, long before now, fayoling and his four co-holdrrs of 60% of thevtotal coins would have already donated and burned 90% of their coins...WHICH IS THE ONLY POSSIBLE WAY FOR SEED TO SURVIVE. If 10% of those 1.7+ million coins are donated for future projects and ghe other 1.5 + million are destroyed, then there' a small, remote chance of survival for SEED. Otherwise nine whatsoever at all.
Reason being, obviously, a supportive community and a distribution that makes fair and logical sense.

Any chances of that happening? I'd say slim to none... but i have been wrong before...

One thing's for sure though: the parties have nothing to lose if they do it and potentially quite a bit to gain; not diing it is losing it all for sure.

growth period was finished, there was more sad and less happy moment. coz every one won't get that exact 269% of stake, ( included me coz i also cant get that much stake, i try to stake from day 3 WITH small amount of seedcoin) wahtever its a experiment and had fun,, i love it and suppoet this coin,

my question is , why no any word from dev?  where is he and what he doing for forther development of coin? whts the future roadmap of this coin?

who cares about your info that is 110% wrong they got alot more then 8 bitcoin i gave almost 0.50 of a bitcoin myself so you are saying only 16 people invested in this coin i think not and you do not even know how many bitcoins the dev of this coin got him being elusive like bigfoot like he is i do not believe only 8 bitcoins tell i see proof   

It's complicated. It really depends on when you got in on the ICO at this point, and how many you got. Everything aspect of SEED is designed to favor those that got in early. We realized early that the ICO was not going to be as successful as we anticipated we tried halting the price increases, but early investors were less than pleased. We had a quick discussion and it was decided to continue on as planned, basically shooting ourselves in the foot for money. The ICO raised less than 10 BTC. I guarantee the mining rig rental community as a whole is getting paid more than that right now to mine SEED.

What time does the 7 day Growth period end or has it already? So now its 16% anually halving yearly for 5 years? I cant imagine holding for 1 year much less 5!

So here's how I did. Mining only produced .023 so I bought .52 from bittrex sadly at .0677 ouch!.. but at that point it was low, it kept fluctuating up .08 to .1 BTC the previous days so seemed like a steal at the time. With that .543 SEED staking from Friday 10th, when I updated wallet Saturday to 1.0.5 I received 2.26 SEED shortly after, so I bought 2 more from Bittrex that to my dismay only cost .0035 each! So with the 4.8 staking (I realize the 2 I last bought req 24h before staking itself) now I have 960 SEED! Which is nice, however the price on bittrex now is 3k~4000 sat, which honestly means I'm only breaking even from my initial & subsequent investment in this 269% daily venture

So the question I pose is do you think it will rise or crash from here for those holding for 16%? Hold or Fold?



Edit: Saw this in OP: So, how much was raised during ICO & what would the buy wall be at then?

Do you suppose it would be just as advantageous to regularly regroup chunks during the next phase where staking gets you 16% a year? How often?

Disagreements are usually followed by a reasoning. Otherwise it is nothing more than a preference. Like I disagree with people who say that apples taste better than an orange. Cant really debate something like that if you know what I mean "Because that is wrong" is  not an argument either... that is simply circular logic (coke is better than pepsi because pepsi is worse than coke, etc).

you really need to go back and read the OP my friend - there are promises made there and they were not met - it's as simple as that. I speak not only for myself but dozens of pool members who feel ripped off by this whole process,

 my complaint has nothing to do with the value of the coin - that was a risk I was always willing to take. My complaint is simple - the staking process did not work as advertised in the OP - that is my complaint.

trust me when I tell you that it gives me no pleasure whatsoever to complain - this was a coin with an ROI promise - not a lottery...

that's the whole point - it's not random and it says this in the OP - the gains were supposed to be even for everyone depending on how many coins you had at the beginning of the staking process and people have been ripped off through the incompetence of the developers.

People who are owed money are as follows:
1) People who invested in the ICO
2) People who rented miners for the initial mining
3) People who used their own mining equipment for mining

in the above order.

Thank you, this is just the sort of thing I need.

More exchanges could help, but getting on bittrex was key. If there was higher volume this might be a big deal, but right now there's not a lot of incentive to trade. This should change near the end of the week as the coin finds its floor;)

Twitter is an excellent way to spread the word through social media. For a lot of people Twitter is their go to place for information, and as new coins trend people there really start to take interest;)

Completely agree all the rest would be great as well;)

Obviously some of the things on the agenda are Mac Wallet (we'd have one by now, but my dev pc took a dump last week. I'm actually doing everything with my laptop now. No I didn't lose any code.), android wallet, etc. I'm planning to completely overhaul the UI design for *user friendliness*. Yes that means I'm not going for resource heavy bling, or awkward custom bordered wallets. I want easy to use.

In the long term (6+ months) maybe doing something cool for people that missed this growth period. Celebrate with a 10% growth day or something. I don't know. Depends on the community sentiment for the idea.

I'm going to go back and make the shadowcoin messaging system easier to use and more intuitive (it does work, after all) and fix the stealth address issue, providing the a reasonable option for anonymous sending and receiving.

Something I really want to get into, but wont happen for quite some time in light of all the issues that we have previously faced, is redesigning how the blockchain is stored and managed across the network so that it isn't just so heavy on storage resources, and for compatability purposes, I'd look to have both versions fully compatible with eachother and able to run side by side.

Another thing I want to do is look into eliminating change addresses as the default, and instead make transaction change feed back into the address it came from, similar to what happens when coins stake (they get sent to their originating address). This design would make wallet portability and backups much more dependable and allow coins stored on paper wallets to send only a portion of their coins at a time.

I'm also looking at things like 2FA, USB authentication (to allow the option of unlocking your wallet by, say, plugging a usb stick that has a special key on it, or your mobile phone), and multi-option authentication, so you could possibly set your wallet to only unlock with both a password and a usb key, or even set both, but only require one or the other. Obviously each would have its advantages and disadvantages, but I like providing options, and not everyone likes having to use a password to unlock their wallet.

Another thing I'd like to add is the ability to share coins with other devices that you own. For example - suppose you could go to your main wallet on your PC, and set up an address in it called 'Mobile Phone', and any coins you sent to that address still remained in your primary wallet, but were also accessible from your mobile phone. And what if all you had to do in order to load that wallet onto your phone was to load it via a qr code that you could only access once you had properly authenticated?

Building up funds for an exchange buywall that functions the same way, or similar to how it was described in the ICO is something else I'm heavily contemplating. The possibility of backing the coin with resources that have stable value (I like the idea of seeds!) is awesome I think. I'm also very charitably minded, but I believe we need to build value for seed before we can build resources that we can afford to donate to charity. Like my grandfather always told me growing up, you have to be able to take care of yourself before you can take anyone else.  

I have lots of ideas that I plan on working on. I'm going to spend the next day or so putting some serious thought into how long they would take for me to implement, test, and introduce through a reasonable alpha-beta-release cycle. I plan on having a Roadmap together for everyone to look at on Tuesday or Wednesday.

All suggestions are welcome, and I'm happy to take them on board.

At the end of the day my primary expertise is in development and customer service. I'm not a big advertising guru, nor do I have much experience in design or multimedia. Having a logo contest sounds like a great idea, I love contests;)

i got 2.1 seed in my wallet from 3 days, every day its show "excepted time to earn reaward is , 1 day or 12 hours, or 7 hours ,3 hours everytime, why? whats wrong, only big amount holder can get stake or what? is this called fair POS ?

note: i run latest 1.0.5 wallet.

I asked the same question 4 days ago and the answere was the same as in the previous post: Wait 24 hour and you'll get your stake.

I think it most definitely did,  wagner is the heart and brain of the seahawks D. losing him was a huge blow.

I understand your frustration, I had 15 seed that is now "only" 350 seed- I was the # 6 wallet b4 the growth period, I'm now the #22 wallet. here is my address sb8nTWouADNjBHQpViGH8gpZ7rPcDrgTiu -- I know that barrabas says this isn't "proof" that I may have more wallets, but I do not. I have just this 1 wallet, just this 1 address. you can check it  on the block explorer under largest wallets tab here https://chainz.cryptoid.info/seed/#!wallets

I take it that you, like me staked a bit during PoW to try to cut down the overall supply of the coins
all I can say is some people did their research and played the game better then I did, I can't be mad all I can say is that Fayoled played the game very well and kept the info from his research to himself to better his position, which was the best thing he could've done imo.
we are all here competing against eachother to gain the biggest market share of the coin. had he shared his info he wouldn't have had the advantage he does now, there would be MANY more coins in the supply thus dilluting his share.