Has BTC32 been confirmed as scam? Is that the reason for the trade stop?
Their web hosting was suspended, due to lack of payment. I think it is safe to assume they did a runner. They paid a dividend today, I'm quite surprised! And it's weird, considering they made no announcement to go with it and their website is still down. Perhaps Cryptostocks emptied what was in their wallet to give back to shareholders? That was indeed quite a surprise, and I agree, an announcement would have been nice. I would really like to know why its a trade stop, Just another company I can kiss my btc goodbye I guess. No explanation? |
|
|
|
Its not a bump and dump tactic as much as it would be an anti-dumping tactic. It helped other coins to stop and with the introduction of pools as soon as BBR hits the top of the profitability list it just gets hammered and dumped. Eventually you won't have any investors left and the project ceases to exists. There needs to be a fine balance and at the moment the downward trend in the market dictates they don't have confidence in BBR. I thought it was a great coin and invested but seeing my BTC equivalent balance continually decrease doesn't look good and many traders will cut their losses and never come back. The two things that will give BBR a boost in the market would be reducing the coin supply ( You can keep the 10 year mining period but reduce the block reward) as a higher price will compensate miners for finding less blocks and reward early investors (On bitcointalk some people were buying in as high as 0.004 I'm sure they can't be to happy with a 0.0007 price for believing in the coin) GUI wallet, I know this is in the works and would help with a reversal. Otherwise we have a great coin that is currently sitting at almost 25% of Moneros price with 90% less coins, right now are market cap is about 90K. |
|
|
|
SpecificationsLaunch Date: 17 May 16:00 GMT Algorithm: Wild Keccak(Blockchain-based PoW hash) Block generation: 2 minutes Money supply: ~18,450,000 Premine: 0 Default Pp2P port: 10101 Default RPC port: 10102 Developer Bounty: 1% (One percent of coins found go to developer - can be turned off) Technical details:EmissionReward halving for 10 years: day block reward generated coins0 17.416264 0% 0.000000 183 15.359717 11% 2179953.768778 366 13.546011 22% 4102274.357256 549 11.946471 31% 5797411.627041 732 10.535808 39% 7292216.288657 915 9.291719 46% 8610365.351676 1098 8.194534 52% 9772737.277389 1281 7.226907 58% 10797742.784839 1464 6.373539 63% 11701616.548800 1647 5.620939 67% 12498674.414764 1830 4.957208 71% 13201540.208042 2013 4.371851 74% 13821345.733154 2196 3.855614 77% 14367907.128588 2379 3.400335 80% 14849880.376022 2562 2.998817 82% 15274898.428772 2745 2.644711 84% 15649692.128002 2928 2.332418 86% 15980196.828462 3111 2.057001 88% 16271646.419271 3294 1.814107 89% 16528656.232190 3477 1.599893 90% 16755296.148816  Hello fellow Boolberrians, I have recently joined the community by purchasing a couple thousand BBR. I have been following the project but preferred to wait for an exchange before I jumped in, thinking I might have to pay a small premium. When I first looked into purchasing BBR was trading on the forums for around 0.0035-0.004 which turns out to be about the ATH for the coin. I thought once it hit the exchange it would see at least 0.006 but when I looked it was only around 0.0015 so I sent some Bitcoin over and ended up buying up to 0.002 it has since fallen to 0.0009 and after reading the forums with people renting rigs it has me concerned that there are more people looking for the quick buck then really want to see Boolberry succeed. After doing some research I decided that I wanted to hedge my dark and XC with a cryptonote coin and decided the Boolberry seem to be the most innovative and motivated to complete a solid project first. With all the cloud miners coming online and offline have you considered reducing the Block reward to half or a quarter of the original mintage numbers. This move seemed to work well for both DRK and XC and seems that it could help reduce future bloating by simply reducing the number of coins (I realize their could still be as many transactions/ but with only 1/4 supply maybe not!) Also can anybody tell me why the block chain says offline on: http://whatmine.com/coin/601/- ? Anyways hope a GUI wallet comes out soon, and can't wait to see what the community develops  |
|
|
|
|
I think this thread needs to be retitled the DRK bashing XC thread....
Also With all the XC bashing going on claiming its all copied from DRK, and since there are so many DRK guys in here maybe you can answer these:
Is DRK's Anonymity 100% NSA proof and fully decentralized?
Has any independent review of the code been done to prove its Anonymity is free from vulnerabilities?
How is the Masternode Situation being fixed and what is the timeframe? ie in regards to securing from hacking as well as addressing the networking issues with denial of service attacks and anonymity when participation is either high or low?
If these issues haven't been proven or fixed yet, when both coins are working with a goal of creating 100%NSA proof Anonymity how can one be entirely copied?
That's it from me but why not just go back to supporting whatever coin you support in a Positive way, instead of bashing each others coins (Especially because I hold both)!
|
|
|
|
Hello.
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
IMPORTANT! +1 +1 Thanks for taking the time! |
|
|
|
All it takes to witness the professionalism and expertise of the "peer reviewer" of the code is to take a glance on his main page and read a few paragraphs. http://cryptopump.info/If that's a trusted and respectable source that can do such judgments as declaring anything secure then I am madonna. I won't even mention the article and conclusion of the review, because that has to be the vaguest thing I have read in a long time. With a premine IPO one could at least expect that those funds get spent properly. Guess not. There was no IPO, and the premine was declared from the beginning. When I joined the Premine was worth about a bitcoin. For all the work and cost associated with launching a coin, if there was no community interest then the Dev would have lost more (Opportunity cost) as he could easily make more money with his time working then the time he has spent on the forms responding to peoples questions and concerns. Would you expect somebody to do work for free? Shouldn't you be happy that the dev has incentive to continue to create a better and better coin (Makes his premine worth more) No incentive coins are either not original or dumped as soon as they hit the exchange. Also most of the people saying the code wasn't right were offered the opportunity to review it and turned it down because guess what....They admitted they don't understand it! |
|
|
|
24 H volume on coinmarketcap: $ 5,724,201
Is this dumped coins or pumped or both I dont understand?
Read my post 3 pages back, Basicly 2 days ago price was only 160-180k Just a price correction along are upward trend! (Look at Max chart on mintpal) (Or better yet Bittrex) |
|
|
|
|
Just a reminder for everybody screaming about price, and for those who claim they said be careful of XC on twitter and now today posting how much XC dropped...
I don't see one person that said anything about XC dropping in price yesterday only the day before when the price was between 130-180k. The proof, click on Mintpal 3 day chart and check it with their dates. Traders will always trade and pretty much for everybody who got in before yesterday they have made a profit on XC. Regardless of day to day trades, XC is on a Longterm trend UP!
For everybody claiming they are trying to save investor.... Please go take all your questions and analysis to one of the other 1000 coins on bitcointalk, you have had your say and we have made our decision. I have read hundreds of threads and have yet to find a better coin at a better price point! (If you find one PM me)
|
|
|
|
No, mixing is only part of it, XC now contains a completely new transaction protocol layer that is encrypted and will be leveraged as a platform for all sorts of concepts.... and it will leverage multi-path paradigm topology (which again is a custom This is the part that is confusing me personally wrt to what i looked at on github.. I assume that a transaction protocol layer would have to coded into the core coin code.. That is.. if i built XC src from github directly.. I wouldn't be able to take part in this transaction protocol layer, because there is no code for such a layer in the code on github. So is the only transaction protocol layer available in the windows binary.. and if so how could that work across all the people that built from src.. (which doesn't have the code). Did you read my post on the last page? (Including the links) Should help answer a lot of your questions! |
|
|
|
Don't forget these! For those looking for some more details... check out the link, our design incorporates some of the features from dual path paradigm concepts, although we are advancing this concept to be multi-path paradigm, and we will implement on top of tor to provide a high level of anonymity http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdfhttp://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdfThe principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005,[multi-path paradigm] the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day also the infrastructure for this will support numerous other applications, such as encrypted messaging, P2P exchange..etc granted we can only develop new features so fast, but we are putting the foundation for a multi-use, multi-purpose platform one the of the details we are still working out is the autonomous "supernode" function and best methods to prevent bad-actors.. We have implemented PKI and will leverage that as part of entire solution
I wanted to provide some more answers about the decentralized anonymous solution and how it will work
- 100XC to 1000XC's Required (#'s still being vetted)
- Any client having the required XC's can enable xnode option (windows, mac & linux wallets)
- xnodes will charge a fee which will be deducted from the transaction and kept in the local wallet << incentive based >>
- no masternode or supernode required to communicate xnodes to clients
- fully decentralized
Hope that answers all the questions, the majority of the code is already in the wallet and I expect a release supporting these features as outlined above to be available for testing in 3 weeks or less
Here is a fraction of the information. If everybody did a bit of research instead of asking everybody to spoon you information you will learn who the Dev is, and the fact he has been coding since at least 1992 as well as working on high level encryption and security. His real name is out there, XC is probably the only good investment Alt coin at the moment! |
|
|
|
why does it take that long to just confirm it?
Are you talking about POS staking or just transfer time, The stats I posted were for POS staking, just sending a coin I am not to sure when I transferred it exchanges it didn't take too long to fully confirm |
|
|
|
how long do I have to wait to just confirm a block?
Minimum 8 hours Max 30 days The more coins you have the better your chance of getting it quicker! |
|
|
|
Wondering when the 200k+ coin big boys will start cashing in  Those who missed the previous 370k top before the dumps probably don't wanna make the same mistake twice... fingers on the trigger this time. Why? Everyday traders will trade but the low has been increasing everyday. As more people actually research the coins, they will learn that XC is the best investment right now still easily 10x your money to be made. Everybody was calling for the coin to hit 1,000,000 Sats and that was when there was going to be more coins minted. Should easily hit at least 2-2,500,000 |
|
|
|
->>>>> 400 K soon
Already hit on Cryptsy, Someone on Mintpal trying hard to hold the price down. XC is the only good coin right now! |
|
|
|
Not sure if anybody is still in doubt however I live on the other side of the world and received my LimitedEdition Blackcoin card today! (I believe I was one of the first people to order) Thanks, IconicExpert |
|
|
|
Don't forget these! For those looking for some more details... check out the link, our design incorporates some of the features from dual path paradigm concepts, although we are advancing this concept to be multi-path paradigm, and we will implement on top of tor to provide a high level of anonymity http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdfhttp://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdfThe principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005,[multi-path paradigm] the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day also the infrastructure for this will support numerous other applications, such as encrypted messaging, P2P exchange..etc granted we can only develop new features so fast, but we are putting the foundation for a multi-use, multi-purpose platform one the of the details we are still working out is the autonomous "supernode" function and best methods to prevent bad-actors.. We have implemented PKI and will leverage that as part of entire solution Until you can ask the dev, why don't you read the information he has posted. |
|
|
|
Don't forget these! For those looking for some more details... check out the link, our design incorporates some of the features from dual path paradigm concepts, although we are advancing this concept to be multi-path paradigm, and we will implement on top of tor to provide a high level of anonymity http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdfhttp://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdfThe principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005,[multi-path paradigm] the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day also the infrastructure for this will support numerous other applications, such as encrypted messaging, P2P exchange..etc granted we can only develop new features so fast, but we are putting the foundation for a multi-use, multi-purpose platform one the of the details we are still working out is the autonomous "supernode" function and best methods to prevent bad-actors.. We have implemented PKI and will leverage that as part of entire solution |
|
|
|
For those looking for some more details... check out the link, our design incorporates some of the features from dual path paradigm concepts, although we are advancing this concept to be multi-path paradigm, and we will implement on top of tor to provide a high level of anonymity http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdfThe principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005, the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day Insanely good work Dev. ! +1 Bye bye haters! |
|
|
|
ppl stop using bittrex !! They are stealing coins !!
They stole my sync !!! And now they wont reply to any ticket !!
Never had a problem with Bittrex, are you sure you didn't sent it to Syn wallet instead of the Sync wallet? |
|
|
|
Think about this rationally. How easy is it to create a coin, claim that you're some sort of rainman programmer, provide some cryptic explanations of how your technology works, and then sit back and watch the pump? Compare that to actually developing a technology that is superior to what teams of others have been working on for 5+ years. Now which of these scenarios is more likely to occur?
But the dev never claimed he was a rainman programmer he was just coding away for weeks (possibly a lot longer you don't know if he has been working on it secretly since 2009) until a bunch of users used "clues" from past post, email address and twitter pictures to determine who the dev was and outed him (without his permission) The devs history shows he has been working in programing since at least 1992 as well as high level encryption and security. But I guess he could have done all that work just to try to scam you out of a premine that up to a few days ago was worth 1.35 btc. Seems like a lot of a trouble when he could have just created a million clones of some other shit coin with a shady instamined launch with a dodgy pool that ended after only a few days instead of the stated time, called it a fair launch although many miners didn't receive their coins from the official pool, claimed first anonymous POS coin and only delivered possible photo shopped screen shots or an encrypted block explorer, meanwhile yelling pump, buy, to the moon and censoring anybody who's opinion differed from that. Since I have been here I have only seen the dev: work hard and communicate quite thoroughly! I am invested if your not convinced then just sit out and wait to see what he releases. Nobody is forcing you to buy and right now a lot of us look at the price and think it is still quite cheap to what it could be (worth the risk right now) If you want to wait until he release something that solves all the problems you will be paying a lot more then 85K. Risk vs Reward |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
