When someone feels they need to keep repeating themselves, it detracts from their point, so fastbluff, I would suggest removing some posts as you look more like a spoiled brat.

...And yes I have used his bot v 1.4 and 1.5 and the times I lost big were when I was playing and did not comprehend the probability of long loss streaks and did not put in my stop level. Either way it is a gamble, and if it was not gambling it would be called 'a sure thing'. So if you are not greedy or impatient like a little child, then you will have a fairly high probability of coming out ahead. Yes it is all math and predictive analytics.

Over the years I have learned if you are in the right, go quiet, no one likes a boaster, if you are in the wrong go quiet, else you will look like a bigger fool than you do already.... would it not be nice if there was a lot more quiet?

Fastbluff, right or wrong, SPAM is SPAM, not wanted... make your point, build a bridge and get over it... for the record, you would appear to have a conflict of interest, considering how you promote a dice game... maybe you don't (or can't afford) people to use bots on your site?

so did you get 140 posts by spamming? trying to build rep that way is a good way to get a bad rep.

I never said it was impossible to loose anything, but if you test it out with safe variables you will see that you will earn more than you lose. Now delete those earlier posts, they are filling up my post and it's annoying. No one here cares for your opinion.

Just shut up. If you don't want to test it yourself then get off my post, quit spamming.

If you don't like the site, don't use it. It's as simple as that really. I love the website, have the utmost respect for Dean and will continue to use the site.

Fastbluff is a direct competitor and will obviously do any say anything to make the site less appealing to new users, as it's in their best interest. I would not personally trust fastbluff since it was for sale 6 weeks ago, and the owner was willing to go as low as 1 BTC for the entire package (I know because I was going to buy it myself). Right now the only activity is bots betting 0 bets over and over. Maybe they want some PRC regulars to play there?

uvwvj, I don't think is a correct way of running a gambling site. More often than not it's legitimate owners trying to make the best of a bad situation should they arise. When nakowa lost 7,000 BTC back to the house on just-dice.com, the owner dooglus changed max profit from 1% down to 0.25%, essentially stopping nakowa recouping his former winnings. Was it fair, or the right thing to do? I really don't know; how dooglus ran his site is absolutely none of my business. He claims it was to allow investors to chose their own risk level, and it probably was. If i was nakowa I would have been furious, but I'm not nakowa, or dooglus, so it doesn't matter.

Either way, I'm happy with how Dean handles his website. He's dedicated, puts a huge amount of time in and sides with legitimate players and bankrollers rather than a lone conman trying to pull a fast one, trying to bankrupt a site operator and investors out of self interest and greed. If you don't agree with his methods, go back to the gambling websites that you own or the ones that pay you.

At a 22 fucking max loss streak the amount of currency you win is more than its losses, test it you dumbass or fuck off this post.

Fastbluff still failing to understand I did not change or implement any new TOS.
The post where I quoted other sites started with the sentence "As a side note to all the people saying OTHER sites would pay". Then I pointed out how two of the largest online casinos in the UK would not.

No dishonesty on my part.

The decision has been made can't you understand?

Use your own goddamn math to find out the percentage of a certain streak. I am only saying that if you exercise caution while setting up the bot, you can win more than you lose.

better go with PD 

This does not in any way show that he is dishonest.  At worst, it shows he was unprepared for this type of situation.  But would we really want a shit-ton of legalese to read and agree to before using a site like this?

do you have any proof that really changed the TOS? or maybe you're bashing the site so that you can have a chance to gain people to play at ur site?

Why do you still insisting that he should pay sjess? He already said his final decision. jeezz

can you just shut the fuck up and try it for free and try to prove your point instead of bumping this thread every 10 minutes.

Thank you... and FastBluff, I never said it was impossible... but the % of it losing is almost astronomical, and if a minimum remaining currency is set then the bot will not be able to lose money. It will gain a lot more than it will lose.

Okay well the chance of it happening is really low...

If I were to be able to do that then I would have be botting myself...
But, if they follow my instructions then there is no way that they would loose.

1 month only 50 posts? Cmon!

Would be interested in this but only at SUPER HERO MEMBER STATUS  but most of my posts will be TROLLING!