Auch wenn ich dem Projekt und dem Coin selbst nur wenig abgewinnen kann. Ripple, XRP pumpt gerade stark nach folgender Nachricht: +15% Quelle: https://twitter.com/tier10k/status/1679512873498816519Das Pendel im Ripple-SEC Rechtsstreit scheint in Richtung Ripple auszuschlagen. Da einige von euch sicherlich noch Altbestände an XRP halten, sind die aktuellen Kursausschläge sicherlich eine positive Überraschung.  Quelle: https://www.coingecko.com/ |
|
|
|
Where did you see wBTC at $20k? That would be a great arbitrage opportunity since you can still unwrap it (redeem/burn) for real BTC onchain.  I took some screenshots earlier today and posted about it on the German board. It looks like WBTC had a significantly lower price than BTC for several ( !) hours. I just think that no large orders were possible during this period. If there were, some users certainly made a killing. It looks like CMC already fixed their chat (since you won't find this dips anymore, if you check the chart now). This is what it looked like this morning:  Source: CoinMarketCap, 7 day WBTC Chart. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/wrapped-bitcoin/ |
|
|
|
Most of the important threads are pinned anyway. See below. There is really no need to repost them, since this thread won't be visible anymore in a few days.  (Meta Board) (Beginners & Help) |
|
|
|
Mir ist aufgefallen, dass es bei uns im Board noch keinen Diskussions-Thread zu Polygon gibt. Es gibt zwar vereinzelte Threads zu Bridges und Metamask, aber ein allgemeiner Diskussions-Thread fehlt. Dementsprechend soll es hier ganz allgemein um Polygon und das Polygon Ecosystem gehen, damit wir uns gegenseitig über die neusten Entwicklungen informieren können.  Alle wichtigen Daten zu Polygon findet ihr hier: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/polygon
Polygon 2.0 Update - 13.07.2023:Polygon Labs hat heute am 13.07.2023 auf Twitter verkündet, dass die zweite Phase des Projekts anbricht, nämlich Polygon 2.0. Dies hat einige weitreichende Veränderungen zur Folge. So z.B. auch die Schaffung eines neuen Tokens POL. Alle Informationen, findet ihr in den folgenden Tweets:  Polygon 2.0 wird angekündigt.  Sofern die Community es bewilligt, werden alle MATIC 1:1 in POL getauscht.  Quelle: https://twitter.com/0xPolygonLabs/status/1679427540790681600 (siehe auch das Video im Tweet)Weitere Informationen zu Polygon 2.0 und den Tokenomics: https://polygon.technology/blog/polygon-2-0-tokenomics?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_content=token-2.0-blogFühlt sich ein wenig wie ein Rebranding an. Gar keine schlechte Idee, wenn man den Nutzern im kommenden Bullenmarkt eine "neue" Idee verkaufen möchte. Das birgt durchaus einiges an Potential.
Hinweise:
- Kein Off-Topic.
- Keine Pyramide-Quotes
- Keine Politikdiskussionen.
- Keine Anfeindungen anderer Nutzer.
- Keine Rechtschreibdiskussionen. Denglisch erlaubt. |
|
|
|
Nach 2019 wird es nun Zeit diesen sehr alten Thread wieder nach oben zu holen. Denn das nächste Litecoin Halving steht an. Der Halving-Counter bei Nicehash zeigt nur noch 21 Tage, also drei Wochen an. Es ist also bald soweit. Das Halving-Event findet bei Block 2,520,000 statt und wird stand Heute für den 3. August 2023, 08:49 UTC erwartet. Eine Übersicht findet ihr hier: Quelle: https://www.nicehash.com/countdown/ltc-halving-2023-08-06-11-00Weitere Informationen zum nächsten Litecoin Halving:What is a Litecoin block halving event?
Block halving event happens every 4 years on Litecoin blockchain. Litecoin's initial block reward was 50 LTC. The block reward splits every 4 years. This lowers the rate at which Litecoins are generated. The halving is periodical and is programmed into Litecoin's code. Current Litecoin block reward is 12.5 LTC, after the halving, the block reward will be 6.25 LTC. Halving will end approximately by the year 2142.
Why was this done?
Conventional FIAT currencies allow governments or banks to print money and cause inflation. In Litecoin's case, the total supply will be maxed out at 84,000,000 LTC. Printing extra money causes inflation, if there is no extra money printed, the value of the Litecoin should increase as the demand will rise (more people will start to use Litecoin) and supply will lower or stay flat (no more Litecoins are "printed"). This makes Litecoin similar to gold, which has limited supply and cannot be "printed" or artificially created. Dem Litecoin-Kurs scheint das anstehende Event zu gefallen, denn dieser konnte in den letzten Monate kräftig zulegen:  Quelle: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/litecoin |
|
|
|
Ist denn schon bekannt, ob hier KYC (also beim Testnet und evtl. nachfolgenden Claimen) notwendig ist?
Über das Testnetz ist bisher noch sehr wenig bekannt. Das schließt mögliche Testnetz Rewards, KYC-Prozess etc. mit ein. Das Team hat sich bisher eher vage geäußert, aber versprochen zeitnah weitere Informationen zu liefern. Meiner persönlichen Meinung nach wird hier aber auch ohne KYC nichts gehen. Die Projekte können gar nicht anders als sich an die rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen zu halten. Es ist (leider) nicht mehr 2017. Aber vielleicht finden sie ja doch eine Möglichkeit KYC-frei Token auszugeben - auch wenn ich davon nicht ausgehen würde.
Die KryptoEule stellt Firechain hier übrigens einmal vor: Eine heiße neue Blockchain! Was ist Firechain mit Public Sale in FIRE Coin! |
|
|
|
Es scheint als hätte der ERC-20 Token Wrapped Bitcoin seinen Peg zum Bitcoin in den letzten Tagen mehrmals verloren und ist zeitweise bis auf $23k gefallen. Anbei findet ihr den 7 Tage Chart. Weiß jemand was hier los ist? Ich konnte nur sehr wenige News zu diesem Thema finden. Man findet nur vereinzelte Tweets zum Thema und ansonsten relativ wenig. Es wird über Liquiditätsprobleme im Zuge des Multichain sell-offs gesprochen. Aber wirklich etwas handfestes dazu habe ich auch nicht gefunden. Aber durchaus bedenklich, wenn WBTC immerhin auf Platz 15 im Marketcap Ranking stundenlang knapp 30% unter dem Wert des gepeggten Coins handelt. Quelle: CoinMarketCap, 7 Tage WBTC Chart. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/wrapped-bitcoin/Info: Was ist WBTC?WBTC stands for Wrapped Bitcoin, simply an ERC-20 token that represents Bitcoin—one WBTC equals one BTC. A BTC can be converted into a WBTC and vice-versa. Being an ERC-20 token makes the transfer of WBTC faster than normal Bitcoin, but the key advantage of WBTC is its integration into the world of Ethereum wallets, decentralized apps (dapps), and smart contracts. At time of publication, there are over 280,000 WBTC in circulation. Quelle: https://decrypt.co/resources/what-is-wbtc-explained-bitcoin-ethereum-defi |
|
|
|
Also von einem erneuten Corona-Crash bleiben wir hoffentlich verschont
Ich würde sagen: We're back.  |
|
|
|
Freut mich das es so schnell behoben wurde. Top.
Bei mir ebenso. Ich hab auch noch ein wenig rumgetestet. Bis auf, dass gestern eine Bilder via Mobil nicht geladen werden konnten und selbst bei neuen TalkImg Links ein Gateaway-Error angezeigt wurde, habe ich nichts mehr bemerkt. Diese Fehler haben sich aber beim Neuladen der Website von selbst behoben und waren dementsprechend keine große Einschränkung. Dann hoffen wir mal, dass aktuell alles weiter rund läuft. Nichts ist ärgerlicher als wenn man einen Post schreibt und dieser dann nicht abgeschickt werden kann, weil das Forum spinnt. |
|
|
|
I used Bitnodes.io too
I double-checked the Bitnodes statistics and it looks like Hansen is indeed correct. Europe (ex. UK) has about 34.68%, while the US only has 30.91%. If you include the UK, the difference becomes even bigger, namely: 37.97% (Europe incl. UK). US: 30.91%
Europe (ex. UK): 34,68%
Europe (incl. UK): 37.97%
United Kingdom: 3.29%
Germany: 13.77%
Netherlands: 4.41%
France: 3.70%
Finland: 1.91%
Spain: 1.18%
Italy: 1.07%
Sweden: 0.95%
Czechia: 0.82%
Ireland: 0.79%
Austria: 0.79%
Poland: 0.78%
Belgium: 0.66%
Greece: 0.65%
Portugal: 0.62%
Romania: 0.41%
Lithuania: 0.40%
Hungary: 0.38%
Bulgaria: 0.35%
Luxembourg: 0.28%
Slovakia: 0.27%
Denmark: 0.17%
Estonia: 0.17%
Latvia: 0.15%
And a few smaller ones ...
Yes for German citizens, it's not so bad but it won't last long. Thanks to Europe when they will say the taxes shall be XX% for every country
To my knowledge, this is not true. As of today, the biggest part of tax legislation (income taxes etc.) in the EU is the responsibility of the individual member states and I have not been able to find any serious efforts on the part of the EU to change this. Accordingly, the competences in tax legislation on the part of the EU are still very limited today. And I honestly do not believe that this will change in the near future. The member states are neither willing to give up their tax sovereignty nor is tax legislation an easy legal field to harmonise. However, you're right on the last part: I also don't believe that Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies will remain tax-free in Germany forever (after holding them for a year ofc). Austria has just revised its tax legislation and introduced a 27.5% tax, the same as for shares. I can imagine that similar legislation in Germany will follow in the next few years. The government realised after the last bull market how much tax they were missing out on. |
|
|
|
Even if its just a rumour, sooner or later it will become reality as that will be the only way Binance will get license to operate in EU.
Yea, you are maybe right. What annoys me the most is not necessarily the fact that Binance may have handed over user data to the German authorities (that's also crap ofc, but if they want to operate in the EU, they have to comply with the law). But rather that this may have happened on a large scale and without a German court order. And it feels more like this: Hey authorities, take everything you want and much more, as long as you let us continue to do business in your country.If Binance, in anticipatory obedience, really passes on my data to any authority without my knowledge and without being legally obliged to do so, I find that more than questionable. To be honest, there can be no greater red flag. And the case around the German exchange Bitcoin.de is in fact completely different. Until the data was handed over to the German authorities, there was a long legal dispute, because Bitcoin.de was initially not willing to hand over the user data. Only when they were obliged to do so by a German court ruling they handed over the data. They at least tried to protect the privacy of their users. Binance, on the other hand, doesn't seem to care about the privacy of its users at all. |
|
|
|
I believe the data is manipulated.
That was my first impression too. I had always thought of Hansen as a reputable Bitcoin and crypto researcher and was therefore quite surprised by his post. Nevertheless, I would like to get some feedback, since different stats providers give different results. So we have Europe with ~23% while USA have 30%
Nodes: Europe has the highest number of Bitcoin nodes False
Where did you get that data from? Would be awesome, if you could link it. Bitnodes posts 61% n/a and US with 9.71% and Germany with 8.07%. See here: https://bitnodes.io/The majority of these jobs are remote jobs working for companies outside Europe. And that's normal, since the company's aim is to target the European population.
Two thirds, I doubt when you see how it's going on linkedin.com, cryptojoblist.com, and others.
Europe doesn't create jobs but foreign companies do it
Valid argument, true. However, any stats on this? That was a joke righ? the most killing regulation, worse than ...
Yea, MiCa.. I am not a fan either. Hansen posted this on MiCa some weeks ago: "One regulation to rule them all"... WTF, lol.  Source: https://twitter.com/paddi_hansen/status/1649070968579452933/photo/1These figures should have been compared with other types of investment in their country. The way it's shown could lead you to believe that these are rates created specifically for crypto, when that's not the case.
True, however in Germany the tax regime is indeed very intersting for holders. After one year your coins will be tax free if you don't trade them, while stocks will always trigger a 25% + church tax + soli tax. No matter how long you will hold them. Properties will trigger the regular income tax for 10 years. Accordingly, compared to other asset classes, cryptocurrencies are quite favourably taxed in Europe's largest economy, Germany. But that's only a part of Europe ofc. Even quoting 4 countries where the rate is low, you have to look at the other countries as well and make an average. Look at countries ranging from 30 to 40%. How it's favorable? I'm crying each year
True, the tax average in all member states would be a useful measure. However, one would also have to weight according to crypto users in the individual states, which would then again greatly limit the significance of the statistics. |
|
|
|
It looks like Binance is currently pushing Source of Wealth Declarations in several European countries.  Source: https://twitter.com/heartereum/status/1679152137182257152/photo/1In addition, there have been rumours in Germany for some time that Binance has passed on transaction histories and user data to the authorities on a large scale (but there is no direct source for this). However, the authorities have announced in the Bitcoin.de court case in which 4000 data sets were handed to the NRW authorities, that other exchanges could follow soon. In this case, suspicion falls on Binance again. If you have to use a CEX as a FIAT gateway, think twice if you still want to use Binance. |
|
|
|
Ich habe jetzt auch Post vom Finanzamt (oder so ähnlich) bekommen... ~ Zu 100% ein Scamversuch. Nicht drauf reagieren, auf keinen Fall antworten und recherchieren wie sie an deine E-Mail gekommen sind. Gute Möglichkeit zu checken, ob deine Daten kürzlich geleaked worden sind: https://haveibeenpwned.com/Die Mail ist zwar zurecht in meinem Spam Postfach gelandet, aber wenn ich mich recht erinnere wurde damals meine Email auch aus der Datenbank von Bitcoin.de "erbeutet". Da nun ja auch die Transaktionsdaten von Bitcoin.de kommen, scheint dies zumindest ein Angriffsvektor bei dem eine Warnung durchaus angemessen ist.
Kann durchaus sein, dass die Daten aus einem Bitcoin.de Leak stammen. Am besten mit der Ausschlussmethode vorgehen und abgleichen wo die E-Mail verwendet wurde. Dann kannst du den Angriff besser eingrenzen.
Zur Bitcoin.de Nutzerdatenherausgabe an die Behörden in NRW, anbei auch noch ein interessantes Video von dem deutschsprachigen Youtuber KryptoEule mit der Steuerberatungsgesellschaft Pekuna: NRWs Kampf gegen Krypto Steuerhinterziehung! Das musst DU wissen! Talk mit Werner Hoffmann |
|
|
|
Hat noch jemand neue Tips oder kann etwas zu meinem Geschriebenen hinzufügen?
Beachten, dass zu den Gebühren am Automaten selbst noch einmal Wechselkurs-Gebühren bei einem Tausch von/in Euro anfallen. Ansonsten kannst du für die Bity ATMs am besten direkt auf der Bity Website nachschauen. Dort findest du auch weitere Informationen zu den ATMs und Gebühren:  Quelle: https://bity.com/In den Bitcoin ATM FAQ findest du dann folgendes zu den Gebühren:  Quelle: https://help.bity.com/en/articles/4556986-what-are-the-atm-transaction-feesWenn also im schlimmsten Fall 9.5% Gebühren + Wechselkurskosten anfallen, lohnt sich das mMn überhaupt nicht. |
|
|
|
I recently found some interesting statistics on Twitter that left me a little surprised. Actually, I thought that the US and most Asian countries were ahead in the field of Bitcoin and Blockchain. Especially when it comes to big Bitcoin and crypto services and providers. However, the statistics below show a different picture. It seems Europe is ahead when it comes to: - Nodes: Europe has the highest number of Bitcoin and Ethereum nodes.
- On-Chain activity: Largest absolute number & relative share of on-chain activity
- Regulation: most comprehensive crypto-regulation globally (MiCa)
- Jobs: two thirds of global crypto industry jobs
- Venture Capital: 50% of venture funded crypto projects globally
- Tax: favorable tax regimes (especially Germany, Portugal, Poland, Belgium)
- Developers: largest share of blockchain developers (tied with US, 29% each)
- Values: Strong values of digital/data sovereignty and decentralization
(at least that's what Patrick Hansen, a well-known EU researcher on crypto strategy and policy, claims after analyzing the statistics; see sources below for original tweet).Bitcoin, Blockchain and Crypto Jobs: Global Cryptocurrency Transaction Volume: VC Investments: Crypto Tax Rates: Sources: https://twitter.com/paddi_hansen/status/1675439201347616768I still have trouble naming big European providers, since all the big names are located overseas. Somewhat established European crypto brands are Bitstamp, Bitpanda, Ledger, Bitcoin.de or Kaiko. However, the big guys are either located in the US or not located anywhere ( e.g. Binance). Opinions on Hansen's standpoint? If you have more statistics on Europe or the rest of the world, feel free to share them. Maybe we can map the development of the global crypto landscape a little better in this thread. |
|
|
|
Hey merit friends, I just updated the thread and added plenty of new merit milestones (I used the new TalkImg links). You can find the changelog here. Congrats to everyone! Especially @Rikafip (5k!), @icopress (5k!), @fillippone (13k!), @cygan (5555), @stompix (5k!), @pooya87 (9k!) & @RickDeckard (2222). Pretty crazy milestones! You all deserve it! And of course keep it up. I want to see more of this in the future.  If I missed any milestones you think are worth adding, please shoot me a PM or post here and I will try to add them within the next few days. |
|
|
|
This is not the decoupling I asked for.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
