|
1046
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CFC]Coffeecoin 丨POS+POW 丨NO IPO丨1000+ member丨MultiPool丨
|
on: May 15, 2014, 04:53:07 PM
|
Potential Rich List
OK, guys here's the scoop. Coinplorer will add us if we can raise the equivalent of $500 USD in ANY currency. Sure, I could just pay it out of pocket right now, but one person doesn't have anywhere near the effect of a whole community. They would even accept CFC, but I immediately thought about our trading price... I want some feedback: Should we go this route, or shouldn't we? If there is an open source version somewhere, list it and I'll see about hosting somehow.
We need to get our market cap up and make our currency worth more per coin. Then, and only then can we stretch our wallets' worth. We need the crypto community to see that we are serious about our endeavors. Let's come together and show them what we're made of! I don't know about you guys, but my veins are filled with coffee and win.
SO... to fundraise, or not to fundraise. THAT is the question. Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the dumps and sell pressure of outrageous pseudo-whales...
Keep voting on Mintpal and bugging Poloniex! Once we get rid of the weak-hands, we're golden!
Delving deeper into the Coinplorer website, it seems to be closer in relation to Blockchan.info than a rich list hmmm... I'm thinking more along the lines of http://coinia.net/blackcoin/getbalance.php?top=100I still stick by this: A rich list is not transparent as you can't see how many coins an individual owns on an exchange. The exchange wallet could have 10 million and that could represent 2 people or 20000 people there is no way to tell. It also doesn't address the fact that one person could create 50 wallet address and send 100,000 to each address therefore holding 5 million but "appearing" to be 50 different people according to the rich list. Absolutely zero transparency, however it is one more novel feature and I applaud you for willing to donate to help develop it. I think any development within Coffeecoin is a positive thing so well done on taking the lead to get the project developed!
Remember everybody Rome wasn't built in a day, we are only in our first week and a lot of comparison coins didn't go up substantially for at least a couple months. I know in crypto people act like a day is forever but its not, it takes time for word to spread and belief and understanding to grow. Do something positive to help the coin out whether its small or big!
Keep voting, stay positive and as a community lets make Coffecoin a great success!
Personally I would rather see fundraising go towards a stand alone multipool or an advertising drive of some sort; Seems a bit steep for a "gimmick" site, but if people want to donate for it then by all means, any development is positive in my eyes! Dude, yes. *standing ovation* I apologize for missing it the first time. You make some extremely valuable points there, and I will take them to heart. I'd like for others to chime in and give some feedback as well. New Community LeadSo... you guys have seen enough of me to realize that I am the "voice of CFC." Now, it's been made official, Coffee is turning over Community Lead to me, including Twitter, Facebook, BCT account and the remaining development fund. He'll be focused solely on wallet updates and repair. More to come on that later... I've got another CFC related project going (still top-secret, but awesome!) on top of my day-job, and I can NOT do it alone. Some of you guys are rock stars in terms of brain-storming, and believe me, you will be sought after for CFC Foundation membership. I can fund hosting out-of-pocket for any worthwhile project(I already am for my side project) but bear in mind, I am NOT a coder. If you guys want to see this coin prosper and have any special talents that you can bring to the table, let me know and I'll put your skills to good use on behalf of the CoffeeCoin Foundation. Could we pump the price back to 100 sat ? I mean thats what the coin should be atleast worth . |
|
|
|
|
1048
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CFC]Coffeecoin 丨POS+POW 丨NO IPO丨1000+ member丨MultiPool丨
|
on: May 14, 2014, 08:39:11 PM
|
Sent a message to BTer and Prelude.io. Prelude says they will consider adding if we continue to show activity. I doubt that'll be a problem for you guys. I couldn't ask to be a part of a better community...except for the dumpers. No one likes dumpers  BTER will be awsome actually it did wonders for C2 back in the days. IMO Poloniex is more important because every coin that enters poloniex get pumped to the moon and that would be good because we would get new Investors. |
|
|
|
|
1050
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CFC]Coffeecoin 丨100% Pure POS 丨 NO IPO丨
|
on: May 14, 2014, 04:52:48 PM
|
I hope to have more features, more applications. More people to participate in this coin.
The CFC community will continue to grow, we will continue to work hard to CFC I second that, me and Coffee are doing everything in our power to help this coin grow. We are attempting to build our reputation from scratch; not an easy feat by any means. With the help and feedback of the community, we will make a name for ourselves and standout from the crowd. In the mean time, keep voting on Mintpal and sending your requests to Poloniex. Let's show them what we can do! I just messaged @OldMankidd from Poloniex asking him if they would add Coffeecoin and he told that they will look into it. (can't promise anything though) |
|
|
|
|
1056
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CFC]Coffeecoin 丨POS+POW 丨NO IPO丨1000+ member丨MultiPool丨
|
on: May 12, 2014, 08:40:20 PM
|
Wallet Update... After a lengthy discussion with the dev, he realized he made a typo in regards to min and max stake... 30/90 are the "correct" values, and I asked him to change the OP accordingly. If it is indeed 30/90, then the staking isn't broken, and we can go on to focus on other things i.e. exchanges, more wallet features, merchants, etc. He is going to treat the POW aspect as a feature, rather than a bug, to keep transactions moving all the way through the first POS block and beyond. ANN changed to reflect POW/POS.
My take on this/full disclosure: Looking at the source code, it seems as though 3/9 was the intended staking target. I urge you all to sift through the code and come to your own conclusions before passing quick judgement. If someone can indeed confirm 30/90, vice 3/9, please do so and report back.
So the wallet is now fixed  ? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
we ahve to do something about that ! Because we will hit 1 satoshi if don't pump it . 
