Boys sell for a minimum of 95k sats !!
Don't sell a single XC if you don't want to cry when it hits 0.01 |
|
|
|
now XC vs DRK battle  I sold some DRK to buy some XC  Now that's the spirit! |
|
|
|
Dev and team, you guys rock. Thank you for your awesome work. I hope the tests turn out succesful but I am sure they will |
|
|
|
Hmm Dan Metcalf is buddies with the Dreamcoin dev?
Please don't spread FUD or blast my name...The team and I are working non-stop for tomorrow's night release, I was a shocked to wakeup- and find my name being posted online with out my consent, but it has happened and I have a wallet to launch... Although I resent the fact that people spread FUD and post your name, please be assured of the fact that you have a large following of "normal" people too. We have faith in you and your team. |
|
|
|
IE今天怎么没出来说话了？我是因为IE而喜欢上这个硬币的，我相信在IE的带领下，XLB一定会冲进市值榜前10！IE，加油！XLB，加油！
TIL I understand Chinese, I see "10" , "IE" abd "XLB" I think that translates to "IE will help putting XLB into the top 10" and you know what? You are absolutely right! |
|
|
|
Put your computer on a scale
I laughed way too hard at this, thank you  |
|
|
|
Wallet out, prices will not rise?  This is not the anonymous wallet, it's the "normal" wallet. |
|
|
|
I love how everyone here "believes" in this coin but are screaming to change the specs at an attempt to make it more rare. I hold quite of a few of these coins and I vote to leave it alone. Changing the specs is only an attempt to manipulate the price, which totally implies pump and dump. If the wallet actually is released and works the specs will not matter. It is good for a coin to increase in value, but to manipulate the specs in order to do this would make this nothing but a pump and dump with a good feature.
nail on the head, excellent post. Messing with the specifications of this coin will destroy or at least harm it's reputability. Please leave the coin how it is now, give it some time and it will grow. Let the miners do their thing, sell off their coins or keep them, slow but steady wins the race. |
|
|
|
daily output is tooooo much.
the market may not take it.
can we decrease reward and total supply?
let this coin grow organically, let it distribute evenly. Turning this into a pump and dump will kill it eventually. Buy on the dips and hold. |
|
|
|
|
Lol I love how people are trying to get the price down at Bittrex by selling into low buy orders, do not fall for it, hodl!
|
|
|
|
Hello kind people, it's 0800 am here in Europe, this is some news waking up to  I simply can say outstanding work Goeiemoggel Lol mogguh |
|
|
|
Hello kind people, it's 0800 am here in Europe, this is some news waking up to I simply can say outstanding work |
|
|
|
Progress has been made... still not there yet.. however I may offer a teamviewer session later to prove what I have said so far.... other than that the things are moving forward!
Thanks for the update dev never lost faith. |
|
|
|
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) f #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { } (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) finish Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366 1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0])) (gdb) where Does this mean only a wallet or also fork there aint no fork in that man thats debug log Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment. bitcoinrpc.cpp If thats beeing updated we need a fork. I remember you from the Poloniex trollbox, all you did there was spread FUD regarding XC. It won't work in here. Chill out dude, you prob. dont even know what fork means. Simply question the dev can answer so we can be prepared. Why the hate No hate, I think you are kinda cute actually  |
|
|
|
Just accurate would be good, there was certainly an implication in your earlier post that the anon worked......
"As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions "
Yes that was expectation, and during that test we encounter an issue, which is being worked on now... the info below may not mean anything to anybody but this is actually one of the dev's debugging (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) f #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 270 : _Alloc(__a), _M_p(__dat) { } (gdb) where #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 #1 basic_string (this=0x7fffffffe270) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:434 #2 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1361 #3 0x000000000045f983 in AppInit (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:160 #4 0x00000000004192b9 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at init.cpp:185 (gdb) finish Run till exit from #0 _Alloc_hider (__dat=<optimized out>, this=0x7fffffffe270, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/basic_string.h:270 CommandLineRPC (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe668) at bitcoinrpc.cpp:1366 1366 while (argc > 1 && IsSwitchChar(argv[1][0])) (gdb) where Does this mean only a wallet or also fork there aint no fork in that man thats debug log Dont wanna be rude but first learn code then comment. bitcoinrpc.cpp If thats beeing updated we need a fork. I remember you from the Poloniex trollbox, all you did there was spread FUD regarding XC. It won't work in here. |
|
|
|
The question is: how much issues are going to come? And what if there are issues after the wallet was released? People might loose their money.
If you won't sell at a loss you will not lose a dime. It's all in your head, nothing fundamentally has changed: -The dev is still cool -They are working on the anon wallet People tend to join in on epic panic buys and accept all risks, but when a dump occurs the fear of loss kicks in and, strangely enough, they sell at a loss. Buy low, sell high if you must. But with XC I'd buy in on the lows and hold. |
|
|
|
Let me quote myself from a couple of pages back before the rush to 20ksat:
With the cat (almost) out of the bag:
-Prepare for dumps of epic proportions
-Prepare for fudders trying to bash the coin and its functionality.
Don't be phased, hold tight, don't be scared out of your precious XC. Ride this rollercoaster all the way to wherever it may take us, but it will be somewhere around the edges of our galaxy.
To the dev and his team : Thank You for your honest and hard work.
|
|
|
|
how about letting him work and get it done? the less dumb ass questions he has to answer the quicker the finished product will be here.....ffs +1 I can't wait for the wallet to be released, but let the guy do his magic. Im excited but sure won't be conned out of my XC by dumpers. Hold tight! |
|
|
|
In 30 min the Dev will run with all the profits  Thanks, do you have more info? What is doing? i don't understand Lol stop this right now, in 30 minutes the new wallet with anonymous features will be finished. It will be a wallet for Linux. |
|
|
|
As promised, I am providing the 1pm EST update - the Team and I are about 30 minutes from successfully sending and receiving anonymous transactions
 PS. On a serious note : you are awesome. For the record, I don't consider it delivered until I have released the linux wallet, we are not there yet but so close Thank you for being so modest, I just cannot contain myself out of sheer happiness 30 minutes away.. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
