Bitcoin Forum
May 14, 2024, 11:52:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 247 »
1161  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB, HFA on: February 08, 2014, 08:53:48 PM
Unless you got one of the very few Block Erupter Emerald sample devices (never sold), you shouldn't be seeing BEE... just BES.

All of the Erupters were the ones sold by BTC Guild.

BFGminer sees them as just about everyone ASIC out there.

I've seen them detected as: ICA, BEE, BES, ECM, and even AMU a few times. And it's never all of them, usually 1 to 4 for each with no more than 4 ASIC 'types' at a time.

Probably an issue with the Linux USB driver, that confuses BFGminer as to what's actually attached.
I've never had a problem, though mine are all properly branded (and don't require the -S options)
1162  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB, HFA on: February 08, 2014, 08:44:55 PM
Unless you got one of the very few Block Erupter Emerald sample devices (never sold), you shouldn't be seeing BEE... just BES.
1163  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB, HFA on: February 08, 2014, 06:06:38 PM
i will install the bfgminer on raspberry. But its dont work.

What i do:
Code:
cd /home/pi/
wget http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/bfgminer/3.10.x/bfgminer-3.10.0.zip
unzip bfgminer-3.10.0.zip
cd bfgminer-3.10.0
sudo ./configure && sudo make

But now i become bfgminer version 3.2.90 with no support on antminers
No idea what you're doing wrong here, but you need to get 3.10.0 as you suspect.
1164  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB, HFA on: February 07, 2014, 04:54:28 PM
Pulled a new clone this evening and now seeing:

[2014-02-07 02:36:31] AMU: Applying rule antminer:clock=x0981: Unknown option: clock

... when bfgminer launches.

Suggestions?
This is during probe, before the "clock" option exists.
It should still be set successfully when initialising the device.
I'll reduce the message to debug loglevel so as to avoid confusing people...
1165  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3500Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: February 06, 2014, 05:57:32 PM
Yep, thanks. Fixed.
1166  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3500Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: February 06, 2014, 06:59:34 AM
HashBuster Alpha available in the Eligius store, shipping beginning Monday.
1167  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB, HFA on: February 06, 2014, 06:50:08 AM
Using Windows 7 x64, Catalyst 14.1, Multiminer (recent), R9-290, and most recent version of BFG miner I now get screen corruption as well as 1/3 the normal hash rate.

Apparently AMD changed something in 14.1 with the drivers and OpenCL optimizations. Not sure where to report this or to who.
I'm told this was a problem with the beta 14.1 driver, fixed in the final release.
Can you try fully uninstalling your driver, then redownload and install the final 14.1 release?
1168  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Blocks are [not] full. What's the plan? on: February 06, 2014, 06:48:00 AM
Rumour has it the Chinese pools can't get a decent internet connection in China and are too cheap to bother setting up a remote block-making node, so they just make tiny blocks and push the workload onto the other miners.
I don't have first-hand knowledge if this is true or not, so research it before acting on it...
Feel free to suggest they get in touch with me if it turns out to just be a technical problem of some sort (these pools aren't participating in the regular pool-operator communciations networks, so I'm not sure how to reach them off-hand).
1169  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Blocks are [not] full. What's the plan? on: February 06, 2014, 05:58:23 AM
Note: the equivalent Ltc transfer took less than 4 minutes. (I know it's meant to be faster, but still...)
Obviously an unused network is going to find room for your transaction with lower fees (although is it really "equivalent" in that case?).
Reality is that all things equal, Litecoin is not any faster, though!
1170  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Blocks are [not] full. What's the plan? on: February 06, 2014, 05:14:36 AM
I just tried to send BTC6.5 with a 0.0001 fee (per software recommendation) and it took 2.5 hours! Yes, this issue is impacting users like me now.
Sends are almost always instant with Bitcoin.

Confirmation may have taken 2.5 hours, but that's still relatively fast.
Outside of Bitcoin, it's typically 6+ months with expensive credit card fees or at best half a day with even more expensive wiring fees.
1171  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Pizzacoin with Innovative Proof-of-Pizza on: February 05, 2014, 11:36:55 PM
coin name is already taken or ? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=431508.0
That's just a fraudulent scamcoin. There's no pizza used in it at all!  Wink
1172  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3100Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: February 05, 2014, 07:05:23 PM
Perhaps naming the thread [16% world's hashpower] would be more informative than 3100TH ?
20% would be more accurate.
1173  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Should we rename BFGMiner? on: February 05, 2014, 07:43:04 AM
Totally unrelated side note: Doom's BFG actually means Bio-Force Gun.
* Luke-Jr ducks.
That was the weapons name in the Doom movie.  In the game itself, it was the Big F******g Gun.
I didn't think the game ever defined it?
1174  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Should we rename BFGMiner? on: February 05, 2014, 06:33:12 AM
Totally unrelated side note: Doom's BFG actually means Bio-Force Gun.
* Luke-Jr ducks.
1175  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB, HFA on: February 05, 2014, 05:25:38 AM
Poll: Should we rename BFGMiner?
1176  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB, HFA on: February 05, 2014, 04:28:20 AM
Noticed these messages after I recently restarted.  Have they always been there, or have I goofed up some library somewhere?  (A real possibility since I've been reworking my miners trying to standardize them.  If so, just need a hint as too which library I've accidentally downgraded)
Latest git has a lot of new untested code.
I believe I fixed this issue in the last 48 hours.

Thanks.  Figured it would be 3.10.1 if it had changed, but I'm new to the git world.
3.10.1 will be from the bfgminer-3.10.x branch.
1177  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA miner monitoring RPC linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 3.12.0 on: February 05, 2014, 12:47:10 AM
I tried your version when mining on windows and my antivirus (Bitdefender) wanted no part of it.
Oh well, nothing I can do about malware "antivirus software".

So I have no opinion whether or not it works. I settled on CGminer till I got the raspberry going. Then the instructions for the Raspberry were provided for CGminer. So here I am in the CGminer thread.
If it works and you're perfectly happy with it, great.
If it's lacking for you in any way, you might try BFGMiner to see if it already has your needs addressed.
If neither do, it never hurts to post a feature request to both.

My unmentionable "alt coins" are also chugging along on 3.7.2 without complaints.
I always advise against running unmaintained software.
Whether you go with cgminer, BFGMiner, Linux, Windows, or whatever, always use something receiving developer attention for security patches.
1178  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [Bounty] New GPU Miner - Scrypter on: February 04, 2014, 11:13:19 PM
KDE is far more user-friendly than Mac/Windows.
1179  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA miner monitoring RPC linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 3.12.0 on: February 04, 2014, 11:02:32 PM
Not centralized way of looking at anything (ignoring your typo). There was a project named cgminer. It existed yours as bfgminer didn't.
BFGMiner is merely a continuation of the same project under a new name.

The credit as such goes not to just you but the whole team that worked on cgminer at the time. Yes con and kano and lJr get credit in my mind.
Great, sounds like you're the exception here who understands that.

That being said the split off is where bfgminer started.
No, the split off was Con/Kano deciding they would no longer collaborate.
If any project started forking off at this point, it was the new cgminer.
One could argue it was simply a two-way split of the same project, but to say new-cgminer is a continuation and BFGMiner "merely" a fork is unreasonable since BFGMiner just continued on as things were prior to the split.

In any case, how one prefers to label these things is much less relevant than what works best, which is ultimately the proper metric to be using when you choose your mining software.
For some people, cgminer works better (hot unplug and Avalon dynamic clocking come to mind as cgminer advantages at the moment).
For many others, BFGMiner is the clear winner... and we strive to make it better all the time.
1180  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB, HFA on: February 04, 2014, 10:35:06 PM
Noticed these messages after I recently restarted.  Have they always been there, or have I goofed up some library somewhere?  (A real possibility since I've been reworking my miners trying to standardize them.  If so, just need a hint as too which library I've accidentally downgraded)
Latest git has a lot of new untested code.
I believe I fixed this issue in the last 48 hours.
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 247 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!