|
They are being assembled there. For the most part to get it from Malaysia MOQ is 100 units if you have a relationship if you don't MOQ can be much higher. Assembled in Malaysia. I mean the chips are from taiwan and logic boards and cheap as hell to make and so are the shells.
|
|
|
|
"Welecom" - noun 1. an instance or manner of greeting someone. Often spelled Welcome in the non crypto space. "you will receive a warm welecom when your miner over heats"
Not to my knowledge, a distributor sent this one for testing.
This distributor trying to send another for testing. I am thinking Taserz 24 hour mining in my basement then Taserz 24h mining outside in the heat then Taserz 24h mining in the freezer. Followed by Taserz 2.4 minutes deep cleaning with a paint brush. Followed by taserz 24 minutes write up. But I just want to buy one and get it like now  |
|
|
|
Seems legit. Where do I send my miners?
I wonder if they accept bitcoin too. |
|
|
|
doing business is a foreign country is hard...
Yeah I have been working on getting something setup in country very far away since we know people in the government to help us secure what we are looking for. The downside is we don't live out there. |
|
|
|
I had hopes it was some sort of secret coded message... or a private key to satoshi's millions... but alas, I believe it is just random chars in threads/posts he couldn't figure out how to delete?  AFAIK there are at least 2 restriction when delete posts : 1. You cannot delete thread created by yourself 2. There are few boards where you're not allowed to delete your own posts (but you still can edit) I think you guys like made him rage quit a forum lmao!
I doubt it. On a side note, you should lock the thread to prevent further off-topic if you're satisfied with the answer. Yeah, you guys are the homies thanks for the answers. Also, this thread makes me proud to have this as my 500th post. Closing thread Love you all |
|
|
|
Did all of Antimaxwellians comments just disappear? I mean, I'm all for removing spam, but this just destroys the entire dialogue and thread as a whole... Come on ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
edit: Or did he remove them all himself? -- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2589061;sa=showPostswhat the hell, didn't he have like 300 posts? Looking at his post history, seems like something in him snapped. I think you guys like made him rage quit a forum lmao! |
|
|
|
How much will I save on fees really though that's my question. I get paid out from slushpool every .02 and my list of coins in electrum is really long so I figure big transactions of moving lots of coins I could pay less fees.
The answer is... it depends. The two main factors will be how many UTXOs do you have? (that is to say, in Electrum, how many individual entries are on the "coins" tab?)... and what the fee "rates" are like when you create a transaction. One other thing to consider... is it possible to increase the slushpool minimum payout level so that you generate less UTXOs in the first place? Yeah I just set the payout to .05 to have less UTXOs As for how many UTXOs I have in my mining wallet there are hundreds maybe even close to a thousand at one point but I did consolidate the coins at one point a few months back when fees were lower. Has it been long enough where I can safely move all my coins from legacy to segwit wallets to save on fees or is the adoption not as widespread as I think it now is?
Perhaps you should spend more time reading the OP... and a little less time finding youtube videos of crickets  HCP is correct XD I think my best course of action is to increase my min payout from slushpool. The other thing I could do is have my newly mined coins go to a nested segwit wallet. If memory is correct lighting uses nested segwit so for me to get the benefit of taking the least amount of fees I would have to convert legacy to nested segwit at some point regardless and I should wait for transactions to decrease. Electrum was trying to make me pay close to $200 moving a little over a grand out of one of my wallets today and I was like hellll no and used a wallet that had me pay like $15 and I was content with that... Which is sad in itself because back in the early days I remember paying a fraction of a penny if that. |
|
|
|
How much will I save on fees really though that's my question. I get paid out from slushpool every .02 and my list of coins in electrum is really long so I figure big transactions of moving lots of coins I could pay less fees.
The answer is... it depends. The two main factors will be how many UTXOs do you have? (that is to say, in Electrum, how many individual entries are on the "coins" tab?)... and what the fee "rates" are like when you create a transaction. One other thing to consider... is it possible to increase the slushpool minimum payout level so that you generate less UTXOs in the first place? Yeah I just set the payout to .05 to have less UTXOs As for how many UTXOs I have in my mining wallet there are hundreds maybe even close to a thousand at one point but I did consolidate the coins at one point a few months back when fees were lower. Has it been long enough where I can safely move all my coins from legacy to segwit wallets to save on fees or is the adoption not as widespread as I think it now is?
Perhaps you should spend more time reading the OP... and a little less time finding youtube videos of crickets HCP is correct XD |
|
|
|
Was talking % wise on high input trans. |
|
|
|
Have been seeing these offered for sale on ebay and amazon but dont know if they will actually work with gpu rigs.
Have you done any tests with these as not everybody has a fpga to want to buy them if they only work with those.
Might be interested if you can say anything pertaining to the increase in hashrate for gpu mining.
Thank you.
Might want to take a look here: http://zetheron.com/That will probably answer most questions. My BCU-1525 is in the normal air cooling setup but I have a water block that was never installed or used which allows it to be clocked even higher. If you are looking to increase the hasrate for gpu mining you might be more interested in the Acorns which can be bought here: http://squirrelsresearch.com/ with increased speeds per algo listed on their site |
|
|
|
Use ghidra from the nsa and run it with the external libs you can find for the s9s you got. Diff both of these and see what YOU get 👌😂
You telling me to use the nsa's tool to unpack the official... It's like ida but better but I can't work this thing for my life. |
|
|
|
|
I got a pm asking about in-person pickup. Since they are hosted with squirrelreseach in up state ny right now I am not sure if that is doable.
|
|
|
|
So nested segwite sounds like the way to go then since it is backwards compatible. Probably, if you use a lot of online services. It's not that native SegWit isn't backwards compatible per se, just that some services don't support it yet. Aren't some wallets with a "3" multisig I remember the few multisig transactions I have done they always used a 3. Correct. All Pay-to-Script-Hash addresses start with 3. That script may be nested SegWit, may be multisig, or may be something totally different. How much will I save on fees really though that's my question. I get paid out from slushpool every .02 and my list of coins in electrum is really long so I figure big transactions of moving lots of coins I could pay less fees. Also, thank you! |
|
|
|
|
Scott <3 <3 thanks buddy very useful as always.
|
|
|
|
Okay now I never heard of nested segwit. I mainly used bitcoin-qt and a ledger with electrum or ledger live. So put very simply, there are 3 different types of bitcoin address: Legacy addresses, which start with "1". These are also known as Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash or P2PKH. Nested SegWit addresses, which start with "3". These are also known as Pay-to-Script-Hash or P2SH. (Note that while all nested SegWit addresses start with "3", not all addresses which start with "3" are nested SegWit, but you probably don't need to worry about this.) Native SegWit addresses, which start with "bc1". There are also known as bech32. If you were to create a new wallet with Electrum using your Ledger device, for example, you will be given these 3 options which I have listed above. Nested SegWit saves you some money on fees, and maintains full compatibility with all online bitcoin services. Native SegWit will save you more money on fees, but some services don't accept or recognize native SegWit yet: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bech32_adoption. So nested segwite sounds like the way to go then since it is backwards compatible. Aren't some wallets with a "3" multisig I remember the few multisig transactions I have done they always used a 3. |
|
|
|
|
Okay now I never heard of nested segwit. I mainly used bitcoin-qt and a ledger with electrum or ledger live.
|
|
|
|
Has it been long enough where I can safely move all my coins from legacy to segwit wallets to save on fees or is the adoption not as widespread as I think it now is?
I show 140,000 approx txs per day. Is that what you thought it was? More so adoption for services and exchanges and whatever else. As that is about 40% of the network is segwit. I think almost all, if not all services by now support nested segwit (and i'm pretty sure have always done so in the past since 3.. adresses were also used as multisig.) As for BC1, well, there are some services which have problems detecting these payments, (I'm looking at you G2A, & some random mixers), but overall it hasn't really been a problem for me personally. You could always safely switch to use nested segwit first and make the jump to native later. Now, what about just waiting it out for lightning to be the holy grail? |
|
|
|
Has it been long enough where I can safely move all my coins from legacy to segwit wallets to save on fees or is the adoption not as widespread as I think it now is?
I show 140,000 approx txs per day. Is that what you thought it was? More so adoption for services and exchanges and whatever else. As that is about 40% of the network is segwit. |
|
|
|
|
Has it been long enough where I can safely move all my coins from legacy to segwit wallets to save on fees or is the adoption not as widespread as I think it now is?
|
|
|
|
|
That is the same guy who was trying to sell firmware and trying to sell a script that just ssh'd and replaced bmminer if memory is correct. Compiling bmminer is not the hard part making a flashable firmware version that doesn't shit the bed is more a bitch than anything else.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
