made a deposit
Drop your deposit transaction ID with some screenshot of raising balance to 6 times. Also as tranthidung already suggested please consider moving it to scam accusations board. Re-uploaded for visibility.  |
|
|
|
If you are looking to advertise the service on the forum then best start will be to buy a copper membership and update this ann with a good design. |
|
|
|
I really urge people who have heart problems not to watch India versus Pakistan matches,,, lol. Especially the final few overs.
I can imagine the stress of the native supporters for both teams. For me it was fun to watch. I did not even check superbrue so I was completely unaware of which team was my choice. When they needed 28 runs from 8 balls, I was pretty sure that India was going to lose then the two sixes. 28 down to 16. It looked possible but not easy to get. About last night's match. Just wow. It's the festive season in India so I was running a few Diwali errands but for those last 3 overs, I pulled over at Dhaba even Mrs didn't complain  This means you are married now. The last update I had was she was your girlfriend and her father is in police :-P Congratulations. I am going to watch SA match while working on my desk. I guess I had SA on my list. |
|
|
|
Prevent AI Domination What is Prevent AI Domination?
Find members who are using AI text generators, article spinners, plagiarizing forum posting. Report it to me and if the member is in any of my campaign then you will receive the payment for the week instead of the accused member. Depending on the dept of the misuse, the accused member will receive some sort of penalty.
 ACTIVE CAMPAIGN(S)       CAMPAIGN(S) IN THE PIPELINE  SIDE PROMOTIONS                    Older Portfolio | # | | Project Name | | | Type (Budget) | | | Weeks | | | Visit | | | Status | | | Escrow | | 23 | | Riobet | | | Signature Campaign | | | - | | | Link | | | Closed | | | | | 21b | | [banned mixer] | | | Signature Campaign | | | - | | | Link | | | Closed | | | | | 22 | | Bitlucy.com | | | Signature Campaign (up to $100/w) | | | - | | | Link | | | Closed | | | $3,200 lost from own pocket | | 21a | | [banned mixer] | | | Premium Review & Suggestion (500 $BTC) | | | - | | | Link | | | Closed | | | | | 20 | | KYCCOIN | | | Social, Article and Signature (3 000 000 KYCC) | | | 8 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 19 | | PUMSWAP | | | Social, Article and Signature (1 000 000 PUM) | | | 8 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 13a | | Koinomo | | | Special bounty (100,000 KMO) | | | 4 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 18 | | CoinDogs | | | Social, Article and Signature (10 000 000 DOG) | | | 8 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 17 | | YURA | | | Social, Article and Signature (2,650,000 YURA) | | | 7 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 16 | | Shark of Wall Street | | | Blog/Video (500,000 TSWS) | | | 1 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 15 | | BET SPIDER | | | Signature Campaign (500 $BTC/w) | | | 4 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | | | 14 | | btc365 | | | Signature Campaign (500 $BTC/w) | | | - | | | Link | | | Closed | | | | | 13 | | Koinomo | | | Social, Article, Signature (200,000 KMO) | | | 4 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 12 | | NEOXCARD | | | Social, Article, Signature (75,000,000 NEX) | | | 19 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 11 | | LunaLand | | | Twitter & Signature ($15000 LLN) | | | 3 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 10 | | GREENEARTHMOON | | | ALL Bounty (700B Green) | | | 2 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 9b | | CoinChum | | | Article & Signature Bounty ($32,000 CHUM) | | | 4 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 9a | | CoinChum | | | Social Bounty ($48,000 CHUM) | | | 4 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 8 | | Wegain | | | Social Bounty ($15,000) | | | 2 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 7 | | Dogeporn | | | All Bounty (30 BNB) | | | 1 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 6 | | Evercoom | | | TG, Signature (12 Trillion Coom + 8 BNB Bonus) | | | 4 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 5 | | NightPlus.art | | | Twitter,TG,Reddit ($20,000) | | | 2 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 4c | | The Worldwide Tournament | | | Signature ($8,000) | | | 2 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 4b | | The Worldwide Tournament | | | Article Bounty ($20,000) | | | 3 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 4a | | The Worldwide Tournament | | | Social Bounty ($70,000) | | | 4 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 3c | | Whalemaker | | | Article ($20,340) | | | 2 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 3b | | Whalemaker | | | Social Bounty ($30,000) | | | 3 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 3a | | Whalemaker | | | Signature ($10,000) | | | 4 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 2 | | YouSwap | | | Social Bounty ($1,050 LTC) | | | 1 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Token | | 1 | | Monero CX | | | Signature ($2,400 BTC) | | | 2 | | | Link | | | Closed | | | Escrow | | # | | Project Name | | | Type (Budget) | | | Weeks | | | Visit | | | Status | | | N/A |
 From: Owner of /][banned mixer]Job: Translation of their bitcoin mixer site from English to Russian A really great job. Very professional, quick and high attention to detail. I really recommend Royse777.
  F.A.Qs We have small budget and we need quick ROI, please enlighten us.Building a brand takes time. There are many successful projects who launched on bitcointalk and now they are one of the leaders in their own industry.
Consider Chipmixer. Their weekly budget is 55*$300 which means $16,500 per week.
To build the brand they have been promoting their product since March 2017.
Another example is BestChange. We all know how hard it was for them to even launch their signature campaign. People were tearing them apart just because BestChange team refused to agree with them on escrowing the campaign fund. But today they are one of the best in their own industry because of consistency to build their brand.
We have example of many casino and sportsbooks too. Sportsbet.io, Stake, Fortunejack and many others are constantly spending money on their advertising for years to build their brand. Today all of them are market leaders.
To conclude, if you have a small budget and want a few weeks advertising but expects massive result in return then it's unrealistic. For a successful project, it requires long term advertising plan to monetize the traffic of a community.
What typical weekly budget do you recommend?$50/week for Hero/Legendary members are considered a low payout since average of signature campaigns pay around $70 for Hero/Legendary members, moreover the campaign already run at least 30+ weeks.
If the @OP want to get high quality posters, he need to give a guarantee at least 6 months the campaign will run and the payment for Hero/Legendary members is $100+
When designing a signature campaign one of the most important aspects a manager needs to consider is the attention the campaign will receive from the community. There are many factors to consider to make a campaign attractive, it's not just the budget. Number of required posts per week plays a big role along with the duration of a campaign. When manager is asking for 25 posts per week and rewarding $50 for it then it's too much to ask considering the ecosystem but if s/he is asking to make 15 posts to reward $50 per week then it's completely okay. The campaign will find many average participants. Another scenario could be like this: Manager is paying $100 per week and asking to make 50+ posts. S/he will definitely encourage spammers to spam on the boards. The campaign will fail to attract reputable forum members who have influence on different boards, even though it's paying $100 per week. Having high end members also matters for a brand promotion. A campaign manager needs to consider the project owners psychology too. Most of the project owners are not aware of the behaviors of the community members. For them it's just another place to advertise their platform. So if a manger thinks a project owner is going to spend $16K+ per week straight way like Chipmixer then it's wrong. It completely make sense that project owners will try to start from an economic budget to check the outcome. But in any case the duration can not be compromised if a project wants to create a positive brand awareness. A project wants to run a campaign with $5k per week budget but only for 4 weeks? They are going to waste the $20k only for few signups. It's the hard reality. After the four weeks everyone will forget about the brand (maybe they will remember it for few more weeks and that's it). But instead, if they spend $1k or even $750 (tight but still) per week and continue the campaign for 20+ weeks they will receive better response. For long five months, members are going to see the brand in front of them and slowly they will start trusting it. The longer a project continue the better influence it starts to create towards the members of the community. The secret for successful projects those are now leading the industry is their long term plan to build a positive value for their own brands. I have a 2 of 2 Multi-Sig bitcoin wallet, each key are accessed from two different devices. Whenever a client send payment upfront for a campaign, the coins are stored in that 2 of 2 Multi-Sig bitcoin wallet. So chances of losing the funds are slim. Besides, I have enough bitcoin in my possessions stored in the cold storage to cover any loss of fund from the escrow address. Your funds are safe and secure in my possession.   |
|
|
|
Request loan of 3500$ to buy antiminer s19 pro
Or buy to me
How isolated can you be to ask a loan in an anonymous place where no one knows you exists? |
|
|
|
Any comments, suggestions or concerns are welcome and I will be happy to respond.
If you are here to share information then it's fine, let few users to read it and some people to comment but if you are looking for investors then you will need much more than this. A little history...
Have a website where you put all relevant information for the investors to read and check reference. Consider having a pitch deck too. |
|
|
|
I don't think it's a bad idea but I think it'd be better for bounty managers to ask for account numbers instead of usernames and then the forum's search engine would pick up these alt accounts at a much more reliable rate and without being intensive as intensive on users trying to input this information.as there might be a lot without a bot that could do it. . It's easier for managers to have usernames than to have account number. OP can have a spreadsheet or can dump data in a thread between code tag. A manager who is interested to check accounts number against a given username they can use the data for their crosscheck. @Cantsay, forum admin or mods will not spend their time in such waste. |
|
|
|
|
I like the simplicity of the thread design. Good luck buddy.
|
|
|
|
^^ Bhai this thread is for pool participants only, sorry.
There are many users posting but I am sure those especially in the 1x campaign are not pool participant. After long time I watched cricket and this was worth watching. Kohli was outstanding and his believe paid off. 82 from 53 balls considering the situation, this is much more than it looks. Many thing went wrong for Pakistan. Maybe that was not a NO ball, the bowler could have not gone for wide balls, last two balls of Afiridi could be different not to take the score from 28 remaining to 16 remaining. But nothing compares the greatness of Kohli inning. DK nearly ruined it though :-P |
|
|
|
This will be my last response to any topic related to my personal account, the bitlucy scam where I barely had any control, my lost reputation, requesting everyone to remove me from trust list including everything else that is happening because of me and why I kept Casino Critique official account disconnected from my personal account. I decided to shake the peace and stop defending everything that is coming towards my way. I told the CC team that after today I am going to start fresh again. Please note: There are very few forum members still exists who are trying to make this place better, genuinely working for it. If you feel it from the heart that you are one of the very few then please do not get offended. Whatever I am saying are from my personal experience for the record. I don't expect anything to change from it. But since I will not talk about all these anymore, I want to tell my last words which are relevant. Why I requested everyone to remove me from their trust list?I lost faith from the trust system, I am sorry. It became a meaningless system to me. Trustlist has became a powerful tool for members to manipulate the trust system in their favor. They do not judge others feedback leaving accuracy at all. They do not care about the outcome for other of their wrong choices. People are leaving negative feedback - Just because one chosen to stay silent in a matter (My silence in Naim's ban evasion), - Keep confidential conversation in private because they respect privacy and decides to keep promise. - They demands why a project have a member who was banned. (An independent project decides who they will hire or partner with as long as not a threat to lose money). - A new service who do not want to settle with an escrow (Best Change case) - Demands to make private information public even when it was shared with handful trusted members - Continue leaving retaliatory feedback but others just ignore and decides to move on. People are leaving positive feedback - To impress high rank members to climb the reputation ladder. - To impress their employers - They want to have the person in their favour because the person is too arrogant and complected to handle People are leaving neutral feedback - They know leaving a negative will look them too bad People seeking positive feedback: - By taking loans - Busting scams as it's a profession - Hunting alts same as it's a profession - Constantly policing to make a name Members are doing all sorts of unethical practice (very less people are doing it from moral obligation) for their personal benefit and satisfaction just to build up a great reputation. Then they are pitching these reputation to advertisers to hire them. Again these are my personal observations. If I would give this post more time then I could have write more but anyway. Bitlucy and my lost reputationI had no control over any finance and independent decision making in bitlucy. It was not my project, I was offered 10% of the revenue. There were no contract, no legal documents (I was promised but there I made one mistake that I never should have done in my entire life, I can only regret it) but some verbal promise. My trust, my honesty, my loyalty was used so badly that even I lost over $6.2k from my own pocket plus 14 to 16 hours of works for two to three long months without having offs (one or two days I took I guess). But many people don't believe it, some people are even over interested and blaming everything on me. It made them pissed because I did not share conversation log, blockchain evidences (I can't remember if I did it in public) in public. I did not share in public because it could insecure my privacy, but they kept demanding it. What hurt me the most that none of the people from the bitlucy team who worked with me from the forum (Including Legendary and hero members) thought to say a word that bitlucy was not my project and I did not have major decision making role. But anyway, I respect others privacy and the decision they choose to take, they decided whatever they thought was good for them. Maybe they are scared to back me publicly, in case they also discover reputation crisis like me. Why I decided to keep casino critique official account disconnected from my personal account in public?After bitlucy scam, I gone through mental trauma. Losing savings, defending reputation eventually losing it, major clash with two over interested forum members - everything was too much to take. At some point I realized whatever I do, they will hunt to destroy me. I was in depression because I was too attached with everything related to save the forum reputation. I was too depressed that I had to consult with doctor and was taking treatments. I lost business, lost savings, lost the respect from the community - all were not easy to deal with especially when this place is a part of my daily life and mental emotion. In the mean time, I was looking for something. Then the idea of Casino Critique born. But with the ruined situation of my personal account especially not wanting to deal with the two specific members anymore, I decided to keep it disconnected from my personal account so that I can focus on the project only. I was successfully working until someone decided to create this topic. But they failed anyway, since I was ignoring to response trolls. Everything was going as planned until Poker Player decided to break the trust that I had for him. He felt himself so important that even knowing the reason, even knowing all other members who know who I am but respecting my private request - he decided to disclose it. Basically it's my fault that I picked wrong guy who was too sick to take this chance to get some attention. He was seeking for it from the last few days, that's another topic to talk anyway. Truth is the reason I trusted him because he successfully created an image around him of trusting him but it turns out trusting poker player with nondisclosure information is a wrong choice.Again, since I will not have any contribution in the related topics, anyone who tells anything after this post, is not going to get any response from me. It's not that I am ignoring you, or don't want to response to clear anything that you want to know, it's because I need peace, I want to stay mentally healthy. I am working on to shake the peace and going to give my 100% focus in casinocritique.com. I am proud to have a lovely team, they are backing me mentally. I don't want to let them down. Our hustle will end once Casino Critique will be one of the leaders in crypto casino industry. Cheers, And many more users, I do not have a list in hand and I can not remember all of them.
Then I'm totally confused now why this was such a big deal with 5 pages of cover up. I appreciate you read the last long post, I don't expect you to read everything from this too. Here is the straight answer of your simple question. "...with the ruined situation of my personal account especially not wanting to deal with the two specific members anymore, I decided to keep it disconnected from my personal account so that I could focus on the project only. " |
|
|
|
I don't understand the logic of not disclosing your sockpuppeting to people involved in the project but disclosing it to outsiders, if I correctly understand what's happening here.
Pardon if I am confused now. Are you telling the CC team members and former escrow team did not know who is forum account Casino Critique? If that's you got then you have wrong information. All core team members and former escrow team members know Casino Critique is me. In addition to, there are some other known forum members (I felt comfortable to disclose) to whom I offered free chips or other to whom I was reaching out to assemble the team - I told them who casino critique is and why I am hiding it from public. One of them were Poker Player too, I trusted him to keep it in PM and hidden from public. Update:I just noticed Poker Player, you left negative feedback to Casino Critique account too. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3490051Poker Player 2022-10-16 Reference Alt account of Royse777. I don't trust him/her for the reasons exposed in the reference thread. Casino Critique is not a personal account but an official account which represent the project CasinoCritique.com. The project consists of other 5 forum members. How it's appropriate to leave a red feedback because of whatever reputation I managed to have? |
|
|
|
It's not like if you create a new account you get a fresh new start like no one knows what your past was.
Casino Critique is an official account which is representing a business where I am not the only one. Hack it's worthless to tell you anything. It was my fault that I chose wrong guy to tell the secret who seemed a member I thought I could trust. My worse nightmare of keeping Casino Critique disconnected from my personal account turned out to be a reality now. I simply did not feel secure to do so.
But, and here comes the important part, what evidence do we have that Royse777 did not play a major role in Bitlucy(777)?
There are evidences. But like I said always, I am not going to make the log pubic, I explained my reason too why I can not. There are also members who were shown data in private (since I do not want to bring everything public) that at least should prove that bitlucy and me was not the same person. Now coming to major roles or minor roles, It was no secret that I always told I was offered 10% that he was promised me but of course it was just promise. There were no written contract or legal things. It was just words. In reality I lost cash out of my pocket, which is no secret. You did not have to believe my word if some of the people who were involved (worked) in Bitlucy would willingly come and tell about my involvement and role. There were at least 4 to 5 users including Legendary and Hero members who are still around but I never seen them to tell a single word yet. Are they scared that they may have the same reputation issue if they come and tell anything? At least one or two of them could come here and tell that I and Bitlucy were two different persons and I was offered 10% of the profit that bitlucy will make. They obviously was seeing who was controlling finance and every major things on the website. Promise, privacy even if that was not confirmed by me to keep or not, matters for me (that's why even after all these insults, disbelieve, trashing - I am still not mentioning any of the names). I was trusting you with Casino Critique keeping hidden but you broke it (yeah you did not promise, I get it). Should you think anyone else will ever tell you anything that was meant to be private for them. I will not trust you anymore with any confidential information. And I suggest everyone to think twice to do the same. it turns out that not only does Royse777 keep it a secret that this guy is ban evading It's not like I was actively defending AnotherAlt, I was just ignoring and not talking about it. I can act/react/stay silent[1] in anything that I want. Are you telling I am forced to speak every single incident that is happening on the forum? we can't trust and hire him for a big project with money involved, you can't be trusted. We? "you can't be trusted"? Who are these we? There are still a lot of people who trust me for over $0.01*10,000x. Still I am actively single handily holding a bitcoin wallet key for an escrow that I did not ask for, it sounds cheap that I am using it in an argument. Feel free to find it. So when you are saying "we", you are manipulating your logic to fit your desire instead of apologizing of the wrong doing you did by breaking the trust I put in you. And trusting with the money involved in the CC project? I still don't understand how would you fail to understand it was a 2 of 3 multisig wallet unless you believe that the two other cosigners have not earned a name yet to listen whatever I tell them. Hire naim for project when he is banned from the forum? Should I not hire people who will work hard for the project even knowing that they are not getting paid for the work until the project makes money. Start a project with zero fund in hand. Then you will realize how hard it is. I PMed over 10 users to be the cosigner of the escrow once two of the escrow told they can not continue for their busy schedule. All of them denied more or less for the same reason. One was going extra mile saying he does not think he can do it considering the reputation/mess, in other words he sounded he was not feeling secure because it may effect his reputation. He was also saying we can not raise the money we are expecting so there is no value in it for him. You see, when you have money everyone will do everything for you but when you don't have it then no one will take risk, very few will be same like minded as you and will be willing to work. I have contacted a lot of users to be in the project but when they learn they will not get paid until we make a revenue then they back up. Yeah we are lucky in the way we got few people who are currently in the team and believe in the project. If they were not in the project then it would have been impossible to bring it live (technically we are still working to bring it live). [1]. I do not want to specifically point it since none of you may not notice, it's better to keep it that way. I noticed similar example of being silent from another user (well not just a user but far more than a user). Everyone has their right to stay silent in any incident if they chose to. |
|
|
|
He published his private email address willingly, everything else has already been crawled by spiders since his website was public anyway. That's exactly why I said that his so-called concern for his privacy is a bunch of bullshit. When I go to the website I see some inappropriate texts right now but since you archived it or it was archived before, when I go to the archived version I can see there is a picture, phone number with the email address. One can not find it via the forum only if you remove the URL. The information can be in the clear net which is not a problem but it can not be linked to the forum via public boards. It has to be in the investigation board if it's necessary to have it on the forum. |
|
|
|
EDIT: added an archived version of the site
FatFork, you are not allowed to post archive link that has personal information. Knowingly or unknowingly it may harm the person. If you really want to keep the link then everything deserve to be in the investigation board or it should be deleted. I don't know what consequences it will bring for you if you don't delete it, you can not move it to investigation board since you are not the topic creator. If you are not aware then read this The reason that doxxing has been allowed up until now is that it's occasionally very useful in scam investigations. However, oftentimes doxxing someone is used as a weapon in itself instead of a part of any investigation, and as a result innocent people are sometimes hurt. So to protect the innocent while hopefully not hampering scam investigations too much, here are some new rules on doxxing:
1. Personal information must be confined to the new "investigations" board (under Scam Accusations), which is only visible to Members and above. Personal information is defined as anything which links a user's online identity (username, email, etc.) to their meatspace identity, excluding links that the person himself has posted. It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.
2. It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon. For example, if there are no remotely-plausible trade complaints, then the person can't be a scammer, and their dox should not be posted.
3. As before, anything that the legacy insecure government/banking system requires to be secret is not allowed anywhere. This includes social security numbers, credit card numbers, and certain account numbers.
This applies retroactively to old posts. If a thread contains a lot of personal information strewn throughout it, then the whole thread will be moved to Investigations. If it's only a few posts, then those will be split off. From now on, it's probably a good idea to create two threads for big scammers: one in Scam Accusations and one in Investigations.
Did naim ever posted the URL on the forum? If he posted it before then it might be fine but if he did not then you are liable for it to bring it on the forum. Update: I reported the post so that mod can take care of it. But I think it's better if you delete it before search engine crawl it and have a cache version. It may already did, we don't know. Another update: EDIT 2: removed an archived version of the site (everyone can find it on their own)
It's better if you remove the website URL too. It still exists in the clear web which is linked to the forum. |
|
|
|
Well, in view of recent events, I, who did not promise to keep the secret (I was simply asked for) am going to confirm that Royse777 is Casino Critique, which I could prove with the PM, but I don't think it will be necessary. No it is not necessary. But I think this was an unnecessary move from you. I was trusting you like I did some others. Yes Royse777 not only helped to keep secret that AnotherAlt was Naim027, a known cheater and plagiarist while evading the ban, but also included him in his Casino Critique project.
For casino critique project we need people who will work there, believe in the project. Why it matters if a user is banned? When a campaign manager is hiring a participant, what does he consider? He consider user who will follow his rules. He does care less how good a poster is. Have you not seen it from your example. As a project owner my concern is who will fit to my needs or better say our needs. Naim seemed a good fit who is hardworking, I offered him and he accepted. What does it has to do with someone who is banned forum? The forum is not sponsoring the project or the forum does not have a rules such like a ban user from the forum can not start a bitcoin project or involve in a bitcoin project. Now about hiding CC from my main account. 1. It's an official account. May be it worth to know who is behind it but should it be mandatory, is a project obliged by some rules that they will have to announce it from their own account? 2. After bitlucy there were few users including two specific users who are waiting to destroy anything that I will do or take, do you think it was good for the project to announce that CC is the project I am going to start. I simply did not feel secure to do so. Now since you brought it open, you made my life harder. |
|
|
|
Would you like to make a roll call?  A neigh, neigh, neigh LOL I gave up volunteering for the forum unfortunately. Dropped out myself from many things already. People are greedy. Alternative accounts are not created out of love for the forum and not to increase knowledge commensurate with the number of accounts. KYC won't change anything. I don't think any of us are against having alternative accounts as long as the intention is not bad for the person. KYC was the joke anyway. |
|
|
|
And Royse777, yahoo62278's reputation far outweighs your own. If you seriously want to start attacking his credibility, you ought to know he has way, way more allies than you do. That's not a battle you're going to win.
Allies It's a top secret and shouldn't we keep it that way? Discussing it openly do not make us great. It's our own shame that we created it in the community. There are even a topic about it of different type of allies we have in bitcointalk LOL. But we don't seriously admit it except we like to make fun from it. Thick skin gang, merit recycling club, wall observer gang these are some good ones IMO. Obviously yahoo does not fit to any of these gangs. Does he fit in car clowns? Not sure :-P Anyway it's not about win or loss for me, it's about like and dislike. I didn't like the way yahoo62278 dragged me in. He was asking for a pick on him. What secrets Royse? Now 1 has to wonder what else is being hidden? It was okay if he would just stop here but no. Is the conspiracy theory true? Is royse777 casinocritique? Is royse Bitlucy? What is true? What is a lie? I just don't know who to believe on this forum now days. He had to add this. Why? How it's related to what happened in BitLucy drama and Royse77 being casinocritique? He was asking for a pick instead of asking a simple question that was easy to answer. The topic is about Naim - hello world and his confession, not about what I had in bitlucy. |
|
|
|
If I want to call you out for being shady I will. Don't like it? Ignore me.
You think you are freaking clean? Have you never been sold yourself for money in the past? What was yobit to you? Protecting forum from spammers? Fuck your ass off, with all BS. Remember you get what you throw for me. You claim to care about this forum... Don't question my integrity to the community while you have no idea what a person I am like. I am not responsible for others but myself. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
