To bad diggit lost all it's credibility. Trust take long time to gain, but can be lost in no time! Such a shame, diggit was my favorite site
yeah man... he could have sold it for a few hundred btc easily if only he had maintained it.. |
|
|
|
This is james.lent ... Answer to the question is people before profits  I'm too lazy to take control of the account so lets move to round 2 |
|
|
|
I have told you several/many many times that I am ranochigo on Bitcointalk and asked you to verify my identity. I was trying to prove my point but was repeatedly accused as being vortex. However, since the facts were proven true, I would apologise for saying that. I couldn't rule out possibility that it was a fake at that time.
Kindly enlighten me on where did you mention this to me several times Perhaps you did not see this as you joined slightly later. I remember clearly that hmos was claiming that I'm vortex and I told everyone to verify that I am in fact ranochigo on bitcointalk (several times) those in the chat could hopefully verify this. And kindly base on your accusations of me being an alt of vortex20000 on concrete evidence. Ah, wrongly quote. Thought you were referring this to me. Im not accusing anything, vortex used the same name on the join.me session the other day. Must be a coincidence then  |
|
|
|
I have told you several/many many times that I am ranochigo on Bitcointalk and asked you to verify my identity. I was trying to prove my point but was repeatedly accused as being vortex. However, since the facts were proven true, I would apologise for saying that. I couldn't rule out possibility that it was a fake at that time.
Kindly enlighten me on where did you mention this to me several times |
|
|
|
I have just experienced a problem sending 50 BTC from my account. The account says the funds were sent, but blockchain says there is no transaction. Please fix the problem ASAP. Funds are missing when I need them.
Its a common issue when using external wallets like from an exchange for example. You wont be able to see the transaction on blockchain until it hits 1 confirmation. Had been experiencing this for the past few days. Weird... I've never had this issue. And even when withdrawing from HaoBTC, it showed up instantly. Not too sure mate, i thought it was due to the blockchain malleability attacks |
|
|
|
OP, I'll post this in public. I'm more than happy to agree to pay you 0.05 BTC as soon as I get the funds. Ouch I have multiple brain cancers from cases of ad hominem in our Skype chat. Anyway:
The funds were taken from my 1KQ address in my profile. Over .1 was stolen (the first .1 transaction made recently was legitimate, for something I won't mention here).
was this before or after bipolarbob granted you the loan? I don't remember taking any loans from any BitcoinTalk user...? How'd you come across this? Guess you forgot but you were using this username during the join.me session we had on regards this issue with hmos. |
|
|
|
Ouch I have multiple brain cancers from cases of ad hominem in our Skype chat. Anyway:
The funds were taken from my 1KQ address in my profile. Over .1 was stolen (the first .1 transaction made recently was legitimate, for something I won't mention here).
was this before or after bipolarbob granted you the loan? |
|
|
|
I have just experienced a problem sending 50 BTC from my account. The account says the funds were sent, but blockchain says there is no transaction. Please fix the problem ASAP. Funds are missing when I need them.
Its a common issue when using external wallets like from an exchange for example. You wont be able to see the transaction on blockchain until it hits 1 confirmation. Had been experiencing this for the past few days. |
|
|
|
i have added tipping address 18FjVHraAds4DUg5Zbk2PPtC5dxzq5Pphm sent a small tip too : 0f4ccb61602e7e1a7a0ecfef89a29edbf6c3a151ef7fe1be38a44afd9270e8d6 keep up the good work. |
|
|
|
Cant blame him for your actions op. You lent someone money to gamble , what did you expect? Pure profits? More ever on a scam site..
Wow, so you are justifying someone who borrowed coins and did not return on the premise of the purpose of the loan? I agree lender was a bit naive (or greedy, which could be morally questionable), but theft is a crime, and yes borrower is to be blamed here. No i didnt say that, it's wrong to not return the coins. It's just that when giving someone coins for gambling its really hard to expect back any returns thats all. Anyways, a loan is a loan and it should be returned. |
|
|
|
I wanted to suggest Primedice because it is the most trustworthy dice site at the moment, but according to http://dicesites.com/ they have no invest option. Tha's strange IMO. How this can be that you don't need investors? I thought it works this way: the more investors you have the better. Maybe I'm missing something in understanding economy. They have enough bank to cover payouts hence they dont require any investors to support the site. Just-dice would be a good place to invest imo but it's in clam though. |
|
|
|
Forgot about Dank This thread seems to be on a high note  she'd be living with him in a storage unit then haha |
|
|
|
the problem with it being called a scam is because the admins are running away with a small pot...
This isn't always the case, granted it happens. A lot of times a ponzi fails because of math, and the site owner isn't running away with anything. The whole idea is person 1 puts money in, person 2 puts money in and doubles person 1, now person 3 and 4 have to put in to cover person 2. You can see how quickly this will fail, my example is people putting the same money in. Yeah maybe but those here run away with the pot. Everyone understands that ponzi's are bound collapse at one point but a sincere admin wont run away once his targeted balance is reached. That doesn't seem to be the case with the admins here though. so you think only hyip at bitcointalk, they always run with pot and never not have enough money left? i think that is very silly accusation... you think that just at bitcointalk this is the case and no where else... you have to understand that some site want to continue but can not because no activity. hyip suffer dead seasons and high seasons, many dead in the last few month not "scam". you need to know this, as i see you post in threads and kill GOOD projects, and support BAD projects. since we are here on bitcointalk , hence why im talking about bitcointalk..i never said this dont happen out of bitcointalk so get your facts straight. there are many greedy admins, you yourself know that... not saying they are all scams but most are.. you're saying that my comments on their threads kill their projects? lmao. people have brains and they know what to and not invest on mate regardless of what ever i post. your comments may not be warranted...some project, you have to give credit they put hard work to be different from others,rihgt? i am not attacking you, i am just saying, sometime if they are not scam it is best to keep quiet, let the game run. we all know that everything here is a game and eventually ends (all games end) A little warning never hurts anyone...warranted or not ain't the issue here as people can judge the projects for them-self. Your service thread is a good one though, at-least people have a one stop thread now view the project/site status. Keep up the good work |
|
|
|
the problem with it being called a scam is because the admins are running away with a small pot...
This isn't always the case, granted it happens. A lot of times a ponzi fails because of math, and the site owner isn't running away with anything. The whole idea is person 1 puts money in, person 2 puts money in and doubles person 1, now person 3 and 4 have to put in to cover person 2. You can see how quickly this will fail, my example is people putting the same money in. Yeah maybe but those here run away with the pot. Everyone understands that ponzi's are bound collapse at one point but a sincere admin wont run away once his targeted balance is reached. That doesn't seem to be the case with the admins here though. so you think only hyip at bitcointalk, they always run with pot and never not have enough money left? i think that is very silly accusation... you think that just at bitcointalk this is the case and no where else... you have to understand that some site want to continue but can not because no activity. hyip suffer dead seasons and high seasons, many dead in the last few month not "scam". you need to know this, as i see you post in threads and kill GOOD projects, and support BAD projects. since we are here on bitcointalk , hence why im talking about bitcointalk..i never said this dont happen out of bitcointalk so get your facts straight. there are many greedy admins, you yourself know that... not saying they are all scams but most are.. you're saying that my comments on their threads kill their projects? lmao. people have brains and they know what to and not invest on mate regardless of what ever i post. |
|
|
|
the problem with it being called a scam is because the admins are running away with a small pot...
This isn't always the case, granted it happens. A lot of times a ponzi fails because of math, and the site owner isn't running away with anything. The whole idea is person 1 puts money in, person 2 puts money in and doubles person 1, now person 3 and 4 have to put in to cover person 2. You can see how quickly this will fail, my example is people putting the same money in. Yeah maybe but those here run away with the pot. Everyone understands that ponzi's are bound collapse at one point but a sincere admin wont run away once his targeted balance is reached. That doesn't seem to be the case with the admins here though. |
|
|
|
Good idea, but you should also add yours to the list mate  |
|
|
|
user : mexxer-2 amount lent : 0.09 BTCrepayment date : 14/10/15 repayment amount : 0.12 BTCPlease add this to the ledger too mate, much appreciated.  |
|
|
|
|
the problem with it being called a scam is because the admins are running away with a small pot...
|
|
|
|
Love the design mate... good job |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
