Yeah, some hunting around and I figured that out...

I did notice that there wasn't a similar feature for an alternate payout address for LTC like there is for BTC. If you do implement that, I'll be making use of it.

-- Smoov

Any windows bunnies available?

-- Smoov

There's a payout button?

nvm... I found the menus... finally...

been holding off for months to add p2pmining as a failover until I could see how things are done... not knowing, how things were done... finally just added it... and NOW I get menus...

that one bit of info on the faq page, would have been a big help.

still don't know about signing yet, but so far so good. think I have figured out this part too.

-- Smoov

ps: hey JayCoin... mind if I put together a text file with Q/A of these couple/few things, together, and send them to you, for you to paste onto the FAQ page? (since I just worked through it all as someone who didn't know WTF had to be done to get going with p2pmining? )

Would  someone  PLEASE

Put the instructions of how to set/change your payout addresses on the FAQ page of the website?

I asked for this a couple months ago already, and that damned page keeps saying "Soon"...

Can that PLEASE be made something of a priority!?

Trying to hunt it down in the thread is a real pain.

Preferably written for someone who has never signed a thing through the daemons in his life, and how to set one for a coin they don't have a local daemon for. (like DVC, for those of us windows people who still don't have a DVC binary available)

-- Smoov

I wonder what the legal status of an essentially anonymous shareholder is, in the first place.

Nefario is correct about Nefario=GLBSE... as, from what I read, he is the only one who stepped up with his RL identity to run the company. Therefore, as far as the law is concerned, wouldn't he be considered the only owner?

His name is on everything. Even if he sold off all of his interests, everything is still in his name, and as far as the law is concerned, he's the one responsible.

Now, if the other shareholders wanted to step up and put their own identity on the line along with him, then they also are entitled to the representation, and consideration about the company.

The atty would be correct in not speaking with anonymous shareholders.

It is easy to heckle the guy with his freedom on the line, when you're sitting in the cheap seats.

Shareholder2 is particularly an idiot it seems. Realities escape his logic.

-- Smoov

daemon=1
server=1
rpcuser=username
rpcpassword=password
rpcport=8332
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1

all these defined in bitcoin.conf?

-- Smoov

Are you limiting the # of connections in bitcoind, and, is bitcoind already at that limit? (that's what the problem is on my end when that happens... it keeps retrying so if you lose a peer connection in bitcoind, then p2pool can get in)

-- Smoov

if he would have just left the site up, and suspended all trading, we could have just withdrew our own coin using the site's existing accounting/withdrawal system, and there would have been no problem at all.

now? he's got a clusterfuck...

love how people gotta keep making things harder on themselves...

-- Smoov

He may be just working one problem at a time.

Get the refunds out, then do the asset lists...

I imagine, that if he is still getting claim info being submitted to, he's still working through that.

If he starts sending asset lists, they're going to be very incomplete, and with new claims still being filed, that'll change the lists, so putting that aside for now and just focusing on refunds until I'm caught up, and then sending out the initial lists with as much complete information as possible, is probably how I would handle it too.

As for the refunds tho... think those emails being sent out should be including the amount and the txid, for those who haven't received their transaction yet.

-- Smoov

Status: 45 confirmations
Date: 10/15/2012 20:28 EDT
From: unknown
To: 1EPqCwxdw45Jzvh1D1bfF29xNwHFtStKD8 (own address, label: GLBSE)
Credit: 0.0635004 BTC
Net amount: +0.0635004 BTC
Transaction ID: 8f6bf91ad5c54bcd09a4da66aac8d93f0aa71717795f1097acfe9077aa855b77


Thought I had more, but very possible a buy order hit before it closed.

So far so good.

-- Smoov

Received the same 90% payment email as posted above...

No payment received yet.

-- Smoov

wait... Batman?

...

oh, right, I see him now...

somehow, I didn't even notice the first time I looked at it... wierd...

-- Smoov

Serious interest only...

He has plenty of work to be done, but other coders haven't worked out, putting his plans on hold for too long.

CapEx is a well-established SLL-based market.

-- Smoov

Exactly... this is basically the share-/bond-holder list that the asset issuer has received.

The issuer doesn't know who "codexxxxx" is... the share-/bond-holder, is given that code, to be used to identify himself to the asset issuer, who can then update his list, with the name/email of the owner of that entry.

All the code is, is identity. Nothing more.

Replace that code with your name, or your email, and it is still a code, just of a different type.

-- Smoov

Actually, last night I was in the freeroll... and on one hand, I knocked out 3 people in a single hand... and on another hand, 2 people... which sparked the thought, that it is a shame that there aren't any tournaments with a knockout bounty...

So, perhaps that could go on the to-do list, and bring back The Drifter as a knockout bounty tournament?

-- Smoov

What Nefario should also do. is reinstate the TYGRR assets, so that our contact information can also be sent to Goat via GLBSE as well...

As long as those assets remain delisted, I suspect that Goat is stuck having to manually work out the claim codes.

-- Smoov

Where this comparison falls apart, is that with an MtGox code, MtGox has something of value that needs to trade hands with the person who redeems the code. In this case, Bitcoin (or is it paper, I haven't needed to use one).

When you give someone the code, you are doing so as payment for something, and the recipient expects to be able to take that code to MtGox, and turn it in, to get the funds that code represented. This is something that MtGox actually does have in its possession.

The codes from GLBSE, do not represent funds, or a transaction, or even shares/bonds.

The GLBSE codes represent identity. Nothing more.

-- Smoov

>bangs his head against the wall for a moment<

Ok... one more time...

GLBSE does not hold, or possess your shares/bonds. All it did was track them, and handle the accounting. Your shares/bonds, are from the asset issuer themselves.

The only purpose of the code, is so the asset issuer, can match up the anonymous owner of those shares/bonds, to the list that they have received from GLBSE at the time the asset was delisted.

The list, is a list of anonymous owners, represented by the code, and all the code does, is identify the owner of his shares/bonds, when the owner makes himself known to the issuer.

The only part of this section that you are correct on, is "The shares/bonds are still owned by the people who bought them through GLBSE, just as they always are."

GLBSE's cooperation, was providing the codes, without identifying who owned the shares. You can't have expected GLBSE to continue managing your shares in an issue that is no longer trading on GLBSE (completely setting aside the actual closing of GLBSE which is a whole other mess, and which I agree, the way he handled that particular fiasco, does warrant a scammer tag, even tho this TYGRR mess, doesn't.)

GLBSE offered a service to those issuing bonds/stocks listed on their exchange, for as long as they were listed on the exchange, and when they are no longer listed on the exchange, they are under no obligation to continue offering said service.

They _are_, however, still obligated to maintain the anonymity of the traders, who agreed to that anonymity when they signed up. Hence, the codes.

GLBSE can't set that anonymity aside for you, you have to do it yourself.

Now, if the new exchange is willing to put in code, where the issuer lists their asset, where they can input the ownership list, using the codes themselves, and then the trader, has a method where they can go into a menu for that asset where they can claim ownership of their shares/bonds using the code, preserving the anonymity from the asset issuer, that is up to the new exchange.

I don't wanna have to keep going back and forth with you over this, but damnit, you have GOT to get your logic straightened out!

You can't redeem the codes with GLBSE, because there is simply nothing to redeem those codes for, that GLBSE has, to give you. If you still believe you have to redeem them with GLBSE to get your shares/bonds, just what is it do you think they are able to give you?

-- Smoov

Redeem them for what, exactly?

GLBSE doesn't possess the shares/bonds. Never did.

-- Smoov