bitcoinspinner? do you know if that wallet can receive generated coin? you should confirm that before you mine to that wallet.

-- Smoov

um...  yeah, I'm just not into watching a whole bunch of fat guys in their underwear and unwashed hair, in dark room, shouting "ARISE CHIKUN" and acting all mental...

I'll just stick to the trollbox.

-- Smoov

The ability to ignore has been asked for for over a year now... they've given it the same priority as they do finishing the notifications...

-- Smoov

Well, that's exaggerating it a tad...

It'll take a long time until next retarget, sure, but hardly "unrecoverable"...

-- Smoov

Whoever is tweeting under the Vircurex name is not affiliated with Vircurex and doesn't speak for them.

Kumala has confirmed that Vircurex does not have a twitter account.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49383.msg1754962#msg1754962

That poser with the Vircurex twitter may be sticking to valid info right now, but he could say anything later on just to mess with the exchange.

I particularly am getting annoyed that the faker keeps saying "we" when he isn't a part of Vircurex to begin with.

-- Smoov

The trollbox is the only reason I stay logged in there all day, and watch the trading...

Without it, the rest of the incomplete features that I use, but are useless in their present form? I wouldn't be trading there at all.

-- Smoov
FIX THE NOTIFICATIONS PROPERLY, and FINISH THE EMAIL NOTIFICATIONS... you guys have procrastinated too long already.

8bvLFE8yQhXhKCaDbHnNhyMu2FpZDyRZiC

What coin are you trying to mine, and what --network do you have p2pool set up for?

-- Smoov

I just want it to be clear.

Is that "Not real." in reply to the question about the twitter account that keeps posting right now?

That is not being controlled by Vircurex? Has nothing to do with Vircurex?

-- Smoov

Don't forget NibbleCoin

-- Smoov

P2Pmining's focus was 2-pronged...

First, it allowed smaller miners to still participate with p2pool without the big variance headache.

P2Pmining would earn shares of its own on the p2pool network, same as any miner, but it also ran its own share system, to further subdivide the p2pool payouts proportionally among the P2Pmining userbase.

This worked well for small miners that only had a couple hundred MH/s to work with.

The other focus was it also facilitated merge-mining for the userbase, saving them from having to run 4 or 5 different daemons at the same time on top of their own p2pool node.

IMHO, P2Pmining was nice to have. I usually had my miners set up to round-robin between my own p2pool instance, P2Pmining, and BTCGuild. What P2Pmining offered me at the time was that it was also merge-mining DVC, which I couldn't merge-mine locally as there wasn't a windows binary daemon for it, although there is one now.

As more ASICs hit the scene, P2Pmining would have become even more important for GPU miners, who are finding it harder to hold onto the shares they generate as their orphan rate climbs.

(the TRC p2pool was having this problem when I got fed up and segregated my own TRC p2pool network so it didn't touch the main network... some very high hash miners just kept orphaning 75-80% of my shares, sometimes a whole minute later, and there weren't any more than 7 or 8 connected nodes at the time. Latency of basically empty blocks and a small p2pool network, shouldn't have been an issue at all, but those high rate miners just overwhelm the lower rate ones... and I can't confirm it,  but I also think one of them was intentionally ignoring shares of others, only building on their own, but that is beyond this topic)

P2Pmining just helped with scale. As the p2pool network difficulty climbs, P2Pmining was a way to still offer lower difficulty shares without having to have the whole p2pool network change to accommodate it.

-- Smoov

No I don't...

The scammer tag belongs to those who set out to defraud from the start.

It doesn't get tacked onto people who are making an honest effort to honor his obligations, but due to circumstances beyond his control, is no longer able.

If I just walked away, with no more effort to repay, not even bothering to communicate? Then yes, you can make an argument for the scammer tag.

This isn't that situation, and your position completely ignores realities that can't just be tossed aside.

-- Smoov

Well, the last word was it went down when the host shut down (I think that's what happened to the company hosting it)

It sounded like someone else was working on picking up the ball and running with it, but that was a little while ago, no word since.

-- Smoov

Far as I'm concerned, we have plenty of coins already... could probably do with one less in fact...

What I'd be more interested in, is additional trading pairs.

NMC/LTC, more than anything else...

-- Smoov
ps: isn't it about time the email notifications were finished? also include the trading pair label on the web notifications? I hate to keep bringing this up at every opportunity, but we've been waiting a very long time now...

I'm also in this situation, and at this point, I am unable to keep the repayment schedule, no matter how I try to do the math it isn't possible... the remainder of the payments on my loan are going to be late... and the more the exchange rate rises, the later they will be.

Nothing else I can do... sucks... I barely stayed on time as it is.

I considered the possibility of BTC rising to 20 USD, or 30 USD on the outside... almost 110 USD? WAY beyond any schedule I can keep.

At the current price, it is 1000% more than what I cashed out the BTC from my loan for, not including the loan interest itself.

-- Smoov

Alright, this is the kind of thing that sets off my pet peeve when dealing with financials...

<peeve>
Ya wanna round to 4 digits where you're showing the balance on the Buy LTC and Sell LTC parts of the trade page?

Well, ok... it annoys me, but I'm not pissed about that, because I can easily click on it to find out the real number...

But on the withdrawl page? I don't want to see rounded numbers. I want the real numbers that I'm dealing with.

The exchange is handling my money, and I want the real number down to the last satoshi. I don't need to explain it, or justify it, beyond the fact that it is _MY_ _MONEY_.

Don't just go rounding off the numbers because it is convenient for you. You have to give us the real numbers every single time, and the only time you should be rounding a number is if you can justify it about why it HAS to be rounded, and why you don't have any other choice available, but to round it.
</peeve>

-- Smoov

That's a shame... hope you reconsider in the future and look into planned reinvestment.

Or, perhaps use the funds from liquidating those shares, to invest into another more favorable project?

-- Smoov

Could this be something optional for us? Personally I prefer staying with a static deposit address. Keeps my address book tidy.

The sites that use throwaway deposit addresses just annoy me.

-- Smoov

Do you have any plans for obtaining more shares as well?

Such as... are 100% of dividends paid by those funds, being passed through to us, or is there a percentage being retained by the fund to be used for re-investment?

-- Smoov

Doesn't appear to be dead...

There was a dividend paid out this week. Glad I bought up all those shares at 0.0001 a couple weeks ago. XD

-- Smoov