My 6 BFLs have now paid themselves off, including electricity usage, PSU, and all other components to get it working  |
|
|
|
Exactly. It's like a dick size contest where you measure yourself.  So it's inaccurate but not nearly as gay? Lol, I guess that's true. Btw I own a whopping 0.08 BTC atm :-D but that will change soon. Also, I did have 41 at one point. I did this at Uni once and well.. the girl measuring was hot as fuck... I'm sure that helped me win...  |
|
|
|
Well i say this is good news for the community,  lots of people will go search the internet for information again and they will learn that bitcoin is develping very quick in a positive way , and yes its start out negative again but everybody knows that you can use ur money for the good or the bad anyways...  Then they'll come across this place and come to the conclusion it's run by a bunch of contrary fuckwits |
|
|
|
|
Give me an
R
Give me an
A
Give me an...
you get the picture.
|
|
|
|
It seems the only reason he's so vehemently against stratum is that it was a competing protocol to what he was working on, and therefore anything he didn't do must be wrong in his eyes. Essentially what it comes down to. As far as I can tell, we have: GBT: + Easier to implement in existing code - Larger bandwidth requirements - Includes redundant features for miners Stratum: + Tiny bandwidth + Streamlined features for mining - Difficult to implement in existing code To my mind, Stratum wins. Maybe initially more difficult to roll out, but ultimately will hold out better as hash rates continue to increase. |
|
|
|
... Last time someone broke my brain this hard (barely at all) it was on 4chan.
They asked a simple question:
Why for is the hole?
The two triangles do not have the same slope, so putting them together the line they form is not straight. In the top pic the line is concave, in the bottom, convex. The area between the concave/convex slopes adds to one square. Next. |
|
|
|
|
btw, will you be including jesus-miner's GBT code?
Also, how will the selection of protocol work... Automagic or manual?
|
|
|
|
Well done. Con |
|
|
|
Capitalism FTW |
|
|
|
|
Godwins law!
(or has it already occured here?)
|
|
|
|
|
Those of you against 'The Foundation', consider this:
You're on Atlas' side.
Just think about that for a moment.
|
|
|
|
Sure, I've chosen the values arbitrarily at this point, because I wasn't sure what optimal values would be.
Why do you choose 20, just out of curiosity? I chose 8 at first, but that seemed to really crank the difficulty, then 12... we can move to 20 and see how that plays out.
You should find the difficulty which lowers the traffic to a minimum, whilst also minimising stales and maximizing hashrate (obvioulsy). So pick a value to start with, then vary that (up and down) to minimise GW/m + shares/m. The whole point of this Vardiff, is afterall, to minimise traffic. Have a play, build a table, see what results you get. |
|
|
|
They work together regardless because people desire certain things. Some of these protocols remain untouched and need no oversight because they are fine as they are.
Sorry? Software suddenly started communicating over vast distances through desire and haven't be touched since? It's magic people, magic! Or... http://www.rfc-editor.org/ |
|
|
|
They are exactly alike.
Linus Torvalds is to linux, as Satoshi Nakamoto is to bitcoin.
The Linux kernel can be contributed to by anyone, as can bitcoin code and protocol.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Go do your own thing. See how many people follow you.
So it's alright if Gavin imposes a tax within the network that will go to governments under the legitimacy of The Bitcoin Foundation? We shouldn't oppose this if it occurs? We're dealing with money here. Not a product. Would the members agree to that? |
|
|
|
The American internet has had no central government since its inception. Nobody is regulating the bandwidth providers. People are free to lay their own data cables, centers and routers as they please.
Errr, telecommunications are very much regulated, as is the WWW, domain names, http, tcp, ip, ftp... Those are all iterations of various protocols, additions to the internet. The core infrastructure is not regulated. Which are regulated by committes, foundations, groups etc. or they wouldn't work together, would they? Dipshit. |
|
|
|
|
They are exactly alike.
Linus Torvalds is to linux, as Satoshi Nakamoto is to bitcoin.
The Linux kernel can be contributed to by anyone, as can bitcoin code and protocol.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Go do your own thing. See how many people follow you.
|
|
|
|
The American internet has had no central government since its inception. Nobody is regulating the bandwidth providers. People are free to lay their own data cables, centers and routers as they please.
Errr, telecommunications are very much regulated, as is the WWW, domain names, http, tcp, ip, ftp... |
|
|
|
stock 700mhz ARM gets right around 118Kh/s.
EEEeeeerrrrr... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
