Hold my beer, I got this, man.
--J. H Christ--
I raise you mate... --Holy mole-- Guys please ...     I've just lost my erection. I don't even have an erection, and it gone. Possibly forever. So thanks for that. Some nickels in that mountain of flesh, you just gotta lose the cheerleader vision (girls in groups get more attractive in hot groups and more ugly in ugly groups, it's science yo) Seriously cover the bottoms two rows and top row isn't that fat. There must be a couple of extra rows i'm not able to see in that picture. And believe me, my standards are NOT high. |
|
|
|
I've just lost my erection. I don't even have an erection, and it gone. Possibly forever. So thanks for that. |
|
|
|
Still limping along in the same price range, there’s got to be a move up or down soon, surely?
Nope. $2.5k-5k is the new boring range for the next 2 years. Don't expect anything more interesting than that. Keep accumulating. This is my belief*. *Based on the smell of my own farts (aka absolutely nothing). |
|
|
|
When we talk of %invested, do we mean original amount invested, or current ratio? Because mine are VERY different.
That begs an interesting question with regard to rebalancing of investments. For any investment, it should represent a minimum and maximum % of the portfolio. Sales and purchases rebalance when it gets outside the range. I would guess BTC s limits for an investor would be a lot wider than for conventional investments (example min 2%, max 50%) but the balancing would still apply. Opinions will be interesting. Every single time I rebalanced my stock portfolio, I lost potential gains. The explanation is simple: winners (could be either individual stocks or sectors) continue to be winners and losers continue to be losers for much longer than you expect. In other words: make the initial allocation, then, if it works, don't balance anything, apart from cashing out. Happy with that  |
|
|
|
mines never laughed at me but he has stated i have big cajones for not selling more than i did during the `17 bull run. hes actually very interested and we always talk about it when i meetup with him. ive told him 1% has a very limited downside and a potentially stupid high up side and he agrees. but he hasnt recommended it to any clients afaik. which a cant say that i blame him, at this point. he needs to fully understand it 1st of all. and hes pretty old school, which is fine by me. he covers the low risk stuff (per my instructions), as ive always told him i have the high risk bit covered. he certainly agrees on the high risk bit lol. but he is absolutely impressed with my btcs performance. Thanks for sharing some of your back and forth with your financial advisor. Recently, I have kind of gotten into the 5% to 10% recommendation area for people, but I still stick with the conservative 1% as you mentioned as kind of a bare (bear?) minimum.. In any case, it seems that we continue to be really early adopters in terms of BTC, and most financial advisors are going to be negative or dismissive about BTC, so it is good that you have some kind of a dialogue going with your financial advisor even though it is likely that he has a bit of a financial biased against BTC since there are very few BTC financial instruments in BTC in which they could recommend BTC and that they can also makes some money too (on fees). Still, also contrary to one of your interests of your financial advisor is that one of the best and most powerful ways to invest in bitcoin is directly, rather than going through a financial advisor, which, in the future, may cause you to wonder about why you are investing much of anything through your "financial advisor" and allowing that third party to take fees from you and likely to be underperforming your BTC investment(s). When we talk of %invested, do we mean original amount invested, or current ratio? Because mine are VERY different. |
|
|
|
I approve. For those of you who accidentally thought about selling an btc.  |
|
|
|
My god, did not appreciate quite how much BTC was locked up in MTGOX. |
|
|
|
I just got a shock when I mistook my unread mail count for the bitcoin price in crome's tabs.
I'm now pleased it's only gone down $300.
My unread gmail count is over 16,000+. THAT would be a nice surprise 67,709  J H Christ guys, and I thought I was bad! |
|
|
|
|
I just got a shock when I mistook my unread mail count for the bitcoin price in crome's tabs.
I'm now pleased it's only gone down $300.
|
|
|
|
I like the video... It is fun, and pro-bitcoin.
I also did not know what the fuck or who Zhou Tonged is, but it appears that from the urban dictionary,
"getting zhou tonged" has gained some notoriety, like the way we say "getting roached" in this thread.
Anyhow getting zhou tonged is getting margin called.
You didn't get Zhou Tonged? noob, I lost 10 BTC to the guy and no, it is not getting margin called, What is getting "Zhou Tonged," then? By the way, I don't play with margin. I got the definition from here> https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Zhou%20Tonged>>>>>>Zhou Tonged Bitcoin Slang, Your positions are automatically liquidated due to insufficient trading balance after a margin call. This occurs when trading using "leverage buying" at high levels 5:1 or 10:1 The large swings in the Bitcoin exchange rates can force automated margin selling, when the Broker sells out the customer without notice.<<<<<< I guess they call it getting 'REKT' now. |
|
|
|
Zhou Tonged - Bitcoin's Back (Eminem - Without Me)
 Good vibes! Guess who's back??? BITCOIN! I like the video... It is fun, and pro-bitcoin (even though I had not seen it before - from 2013.. funny that). I also did not know what the fuck or who Zhou Tonged is, but it appears that from the urban dictionary, "getting zhou tonged" has gained some notoriety, like the way we say "getting roached" in this thread. Anyhow "getting zhou tonged" is getting margin called on your trade. Oh, you would have loved it |
|
|
|
|
When a co.pany cones out and says they want to use 'blockchain technology', it doesn't really mean much. That just says 'linked list' to me.
|
|
|
|
The word search is irrelevant as it doesn't contain hodl.
What're you talking about, mate? It's crystal-clearly present. Yay it is there! I didn't bother checking as it wasn't in the words list. I do wonder, however, if that's intentional or not. Things that make you go hmmmmmmm... |
|
|
|
|
The word search is irrelevant as it doesn't contain hodl.
|
|
|
|
Crazy how much more Bullish things are than 2015. Just to name a few... Bakkt coming soon ETFs just a matter of when, not if Samsung putting wallets in their flagship phone Fidelity Roach an Gembitz apologise and turn Bullish Elon Musk comes out of his Crypto Closet and declares moon. White House Chief of Staff for potentially the next 2-6 years is a Bitcoin lover. We have Crypto Mom at SEC, plus another new commissioner is pro Bitcoin, and Stein, the Bitcoin hater just finished her term Ive been converting nocoiners to Bitcoiners for 5 years out in the real world and its never been easier for me personally to convert them than now, they are dying to understand it. We dont have to worry about chinese miners blocking segwit and big blockers have disgraced themselves over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over Lighting is here and ninjas are buying pizza with it and sheeeeiiit. Did I say lighting is here and its awesome. Jack Dorsey is hard core Bitcoin maximalist. Less people than ever believe the MSM Bitcoin haters, more percent of people than ever get there Bitcoin info from places like Twitter, Reddit, and the CEO of Bitcoin Known as WO. Bitmain is going out of business as punishment for their sins against Bitcoin. Google added our symbol to its keyboard. The US gov doesnt have tons of coins to dump on our head everytime we pump. and much much more.  Now all we need is for the mt Gox custodial to accidentally send all its Bitcoin to a burner address and the rally can finally begin. Or mine. I'd be ok with that. |
|
|
|
jbreher and the bcash SV shitcoin crew.  We are followings God's (satoshis, lol) vision hahaha. I think Jbreher is still upset computers moved to those newfangled transistor things from valves. Even those he had to be convinced about. Relays did the job ok. |
|
|
|
Problem is that nocoiners and the new crypto enthusiast will fall for this scams and they will buy into bCash before even introduced to the real Bitcoin.
Well, from a protocol aspect, SV does have more in common with the original Bitcoin protocol than does BTC. #justsayin' still pumping (supposedly defending) bcash, trash? #yeahright Just making a point. Do you wish to argue the contrary view? Again: from a protocol aspect, SV does have more in common with the original Bitcoin protocol than does BTC. And the significance of that is... what? |
|
|
|
Also many people think Satoshi is dead but you can't rule out a day when he decides to dump one million bitcoins on the market, just sayin......
I believe he is still alive - unless he was very unlucky. Satoshi of course is not that sorry excuse of a person claiming to be so (Craig Wright Wrong). No doubt on this one - 100%. Yes Jbear. The following is my argument. If Satoshi was greedy, or wanted to become possibly filthy rich in the future, he wouldn't have disappeared into thin air. Instead, he did the only honorable thing to do. He set it free, without leaving any trace or room to be worshiped like a God or something. It was a carefully executed plan. He did the only thing he could do, to ensure the survival and success of BTC. Took himself out of the equation. Like Prometheus and fire. Only the later was not so careful. Believing Satoshi would pop out some day, cashing in his 1m coins, is believing that BTC will fail. I rest that there is a very tiny chance that this might happen, based only on the art of seduction & misdirection on a global scale. No. I like to think he ritually destroyed his keys. |
|
|
|
Yeh lets abandon the Bitcoin Network and jump on xrp version 2 lightning network (LN) instead.
I beg your pardon ? Lightning IS Bitcoin. Right and Elephant IS a Car Bitcoin network is bitcoin network Lighting network is lightning network claiming otherwise is a dishonest shill. A Bitcoiner supports Bitcoin network with mining or mining shares. A shitcoiner supports a shitcoin node whatever his preferred flavor my be, XRP node, LN node, JPM node or what not crap node (cheap crap computer) LN (in)directly supports JPMCoin, XRP..... with atomic swap any crap is instantly interchangeable Crappy worthless nodes Version 1, XRP erks me like..., no difference with version 3, LN or version 4, JPM Are you crazy? Is that your problem? Didn't you know? When you use TCP, you're no longer using over IP, and is in fact something completely different. Also, IP is amazing and TCP is a shit protocol. I am confused. You don't use TCP over IP? Irony maybe?  It's not funny if you have to explain it. |
|
|
|
Yeh lets abandon the Bitcoin Network and jump on xrp version 2 lightning network (LN) instead.
I beg your pardon ? Lightning IS Bitcoin. Right and Elephant IS a Car Bitcoin network is bitcoin network Lighting network is lightning network claiming otherwise is a dishonest shill. A Bitcoiner supports Bitcoin network with mining or mining shares. A shitcoiner supports a shitcoin node whatever his preferred flavor my be, XRP node, LN node, JPM node or what not crap node (cheap crap computer) LN (in)directly supports JPMCoin, XRP..... with atomic swap any crap is instantly interchangeable Crappy worthless nodes Version 1, XRP erks me like..., no difference with version 3, LN or version 4, JPM Are you crazy? Is that your problem? Didn't you know? When you use TCP, you're no longer using over IP, and is in fact something completely different. Also, IP is amazing and TCP is a shit protocol. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
