Eu particularmente acredito que o "lastro" do Bitcoin existe e é real, e é mais forte que o lastro em ouro, ou ainda mais forte que a imposição dos governos, eu acredito que (pelo menos por enquanto) o Bitcoin está lastreado em ganância (greed), e a ganância é uma força imparável.

Só agora bitcoin esta recebendo atenção de grandes investidores do vale do silício, empreendedores, desenvolvedores, designers, etc. Então a verdade é, nem começamos ainda. kkkk

A questão é justamente essa krixzaok, o bitcointalk não é um fórum de humor, se você reparar bem nem seção "off topic" o sub-fórum português tem. Aqui discutimos assuntos sérios relacionados a criptomoedas, eventualmente até quebramos o clima sério e nos descontraímos um pouco, mas isso não é regra.

Sobre o tópico do nosso colega ViniS, ele possui apenas duas postagens, e as duas poderiam ter sido postadas na área de novatos sem prejuízos para ele, sendo a mais desnecessária essa postagem aqui. Que embasamento tem alguém para falar do futuro do Bitcoin se a pessoa chega aqui e nem se dá ao trabalho de passar na área novatos para ler, pesquisar e tirar dúvidas. Esse tipo de tópico só polui a página principal do fórum, quando entrei as regras com novatos eram muito mais rígidas e sou muito grato por isso, pois se não fosse as limitações não teria aprendido tanto e teria postado muito mais porcaria do que postei mesmo com as regras.

Att

Why ask questions you know the answer too?

Thanks for quoting that, I ignored him a while back and that's good for a laugh. He's such a hypocrite.

 
He actually wanted John running this forum, but as soon as things go sideways he's so quick to blame others. He says whatever suits his agenda at the moment. And to think I respected the guy at one point. It's sad seeing people stoop to this level.

Maybe some evidence? Do you even understand what evidence is?

Evidence is photographs, authorised interviews, notorised statements. Seriously, do you people not cover this in school? Saying 'I went there' is just as trustworthy as me saying 'I have a pet dragon in my garage' - both entirely based on hearsay.

Give us some real evidence.

the CEO of bfl has prooved he delivers (see their fpgas).
i dont care about his history. everybody has a chance to change himself.

i am still looking forward to my - really early ordered - bfl asic

I wouldn't respond to your post either if I were Ken.

You freely admit you are demanding that Ken do this. Ordering a stranger to do something is being plain rude. It is also disrespectful. You have no authority over Ken to demand him to do anything shareholder or not. And you don't need to drop good manners and respect for someone to be direct with them.

You sound like the sort of person who thinks they can order waiting staff around in a restaurant because you think you have some sort of authority over them. I've got news for you, all human beings are equal and employing someone does not mean you attain a right to disrespect them.

Good manners gets the best out of people. It shows you respect them and when you do that they will respect you back. Ken has had enough disrespect thrown at him to last lifetime on this forum and I'm not too happy standing by letting that happen anymore to a stranger who could potentially make me a lot of money. But it's not just the money, no-one deserves to be treated the way Ken has been on here. I can't imagine what actually being in our CEO's position with all the pressure would have done to me over the past 8 months. I would have given up for sure, maybe turned to drink/drugs.

Just saying I have a very low tolerance for anything that has a go at our CEO now. No-one needs to be disrespectful to question the business decisions being made. Keep it professional and ask whatever or suggest whatever but ordering people about it not the way to make progress in any business.

from:  DO NOT POST SESC LINKS


Ken, you are surely joking when you say I'm at the bottom of the list for refunds right? Given your website is in tatters there is no actual process to follow. You can just refund it via BTC in 2 minutes ( you have my BTC address)  or you can pluck out my order reference number and write the check?

If you read the Attorney generals letter I posted it specifically states that they are prevented under Federal law to act on behalf of a private Citizen(me)

Therefore they could never have contacted you specifically on my behalf or even mentioned my name.
So in you saying that I was pushed to the bottom of the stack because of the AGO inquiry is nothing but lies. If you look at the dates of my postings to your 'customer services' this debacle all started before the A

Now, Having posted said letter on here (see below) , you're now clutching at straws and using this as a reason to say I'm at the 'bottom of the list' for refunds.

All you're really doing is painting yourself as a man with no integrity whatsoever. This is childish playground taunting at it's finest.

That said, the refund queue is non existent as you say in previous posts.

You admit you owe me money.

I look forward to my refund Ken.

Man, for a VIP member, you sure seem sour and jaded.  Did the price crash get to you?

Did you sell your forum account?

Let him handle it as he wants, and he will get it to Mr. Nakamoto when, and how, it is most convenient to himself, and to Dorian.

So by all means call someone a scammer when you have absolutely no evidence of that, but I hope you will be apologetic if and when you are proven wrong. I would certainly apologise to you for doubting you in that case.

What is your agenda in repeatedly stating that Andreas is running a scam?

Whilst that is of course possible, it seems highly unlikely that one of the best known names in the bitcoin community would destroy their reputation for a relatively small sum.

Will you be posting a public apology after Andreas delivers the funds?

community showed support, great thing happy to be part of it

nope.
EDIT: they haven't even resume trading. According to havelock announcements, havelock itself
decided to change name on the asset and let it trade, freely.

So, there's that. Right now, people sold their actuall neobee shares for coins, and people are buying neobeeq shares
the value of which is questionable.

If it wasn't for the $1Mill  they paid to eASIC to build the ACtM 28nm ASIC that theory might have some legs.  

It's pretty logical that the ActiveMining scammers chose to associate with the HashFast scammers.
Both companies really don't care about their customers; everything is fine as long as they can get a few coins.

Otherwise I wouldn't even be surprised if kslaugther was selling the boards at a loss. But we probably will never know.