Ok i will try again I added your transactions to couple accelerators.

For me it is fine Thank's
18eqKhcXDbwXDNLfDkCZefXiTifucxAqpB

You didnt answer what about me.

My recommendations would be, if you're not going to get a hardware wallet like a Trezor or a Ledger, and you don't want to run full nodes like Bitcoin Core or BitcoinABC:

BTC - Electrum
BCH - ElectronCash (it's basically a BCH version of Electrum)

You should avoid web wallets in general.

Just for your future reference, the problem wasn't just the wallet... but the way you were using it has also contributed to your problem. Here are your inputs:

16wgAfS2wtEmCECQXeziejSFLzcDTVbMm2 (0.00200737 BTC - Output)
16wgAfS2wtEmCECQXeziejSFLzcDTVbMm2 (0.00048817 BTC - Output)
1HzibzLKAsG2BS7YfU2aoe9XcCFRHajFgo (0.00030408 BTC - Output)
13GxV7nBWe1Eon7d8HRtdBEqzPsDVLryMo (0.00013353 BTC - Output)
16yYrvQWijeDGkj3RrQNkWd2ZJmQXvub7V (0.00000802 BTC - Output)
16wgAfS2wtEmCECQXeziejSFLzcDTVbMm2 (0.00200536 BTC - Output)
15eGdKmfmYT5BD7v2eWYf7AEJF4MyGdeDv (0.00048109 BTC - Output)
19eSzsr5V8aaLEWruceX2wLrHhFoyHnE77 (0.0036802 BTC - Output)
1P34turmZmndGX2n9CXGNe9FjB8CCdbuSk (0.00387093 BTC - Output)
1LdbgzKvZKozhdNvo3KpGLxmXmRiPLnqwe (0.00001775 BTC - Output)
12LK3UQQxfSbg2K5oh27Q96cmw6arVAXzr (0.00002398 BTC - Output)
1GyStcHEHYdoW4QHnuohbnho4qB9pHGzV4 (0.00003053 BTC - Output)
13DPJFwGo82YzcRYoQKfqmmba2niSmTpZs (0.00005296 BTC - Output)
16SAeGqQ4KKZVSPK9Kw7k2bBQc5HoEc3ze (0.00081348 BTC - Output)
1MnxDEZYtpY71XwEXNPr1UDS2GU7Tq9i7E (0.00020206 BTC - Output)
1A6586u3iN4ac4E3gjZvBjHxw23frAvVPa (0.00004058 BTC - Output)
16z2FwHE3Y1XEXFgWp3TLcynrsrDN1qdbe (0.00233479 BTC - Output)
1D9PhacQiHn9aJWytsvNXkcz7NhG4NTKDG (0.00079057 BTC - Output)


Each one highlighted in red, actually cost way MORE for you to send, than it was actually worth!!?!

Each one of those inputs is 148 bytes, you used a fee of 310 sats/Byte, therefore, those inputs cost you:
(6 inputs * 148 bytes) * 310 = 275280 sats = 0.00275280 BTC...

However, those inputs are only worth:
0.00000802 + 0.00001775 + 0.00002398 + 0.00003053 + 0.00005296  + 0.00004058 = 0.00017382

That's a net LOSS of 0.00257898 BTC!!?! In fact, the ones marked in orange also cost you more to send than they were worth... with your fee of 310 sats/byte anything less than 45880 sats (0.00045880 BTC) cost you more to send than it was worth

What you should have done, was import your wallet into a wallet that has "Coin Control" (Like Electrum)... and then selected ONLY the larger coin values:
16wgAfS2wtEmCECQXeziejSFLzcDTVbMm2 (0.00200737 BTC - Output)
16wgAfS2wtEmCECQXeziejSFLzcDTVbMm2 (0.00200536 BTC - Output)
19eSzsr5V8aaLEWruceX2wLrHhFoyHnE77 (0.0036802 BTC - Output)
1P34turmZmndGX2n9CXGNe9FjB8CCdbuSk (0.00387093 BTC - Output)
16z2FwHE3Y1XEXFgWp3TLcynrsrDN1qdbe (0.00233479 BTC - Output)

This would have resulted in:

Total Inputs: 0.01389865 BTC
Transaction size: approximately (5 *148) + 34 + 10 = 784 bytes
Fee: 310 sats/byte
Total Fee: 784 * 310 = 243040 sats = 0.00243040

Total Output: 0.01389865 - 0.00243040 = 0.01146825 BTC

Compared with the 0.00890956 BTC you actually got... plus you'd still have the smaller BTC that you might have been able to "rescue" at a later date when fees are a bit less ridiculous.


TL;DR: Don't collect dust... and use a wallet with Coin Control.

Yes, thank you both, if LoyceV agrees we can send you both a tip, preferably in BCH because of low fees and guaranteed delivery of funds.

Yipieeee..... Goodbye Blockchain.info - not going to use you anymore!!!


 

Your transaction is now confirmed

I see you transfered this money. Problem fixed?

I haven't used blockchain.info in a long time, but if it says your balance is 0.016, it should add up on some of the addresses.

This is how you get scammers to contact you.

Assuming you have your recovery word phrase, I suggest you try this:
See if your full 0.016 pops up in Electrum, and go from there.

I agree with user above about captcha. Recaptcha sometimes is too difficult to solve and I have to skip these faucets which are using Recaptcha. And to be correct, Freedoge.co.in have Recaptcha and SolveMedia integrated and users can choose their prefered captcha. I think having both captchas integrated would be great. It's only advice from user perspective and offcourse, you should do what you think is best for your business.

as stated below FreeDoge.co.in is using reCaptcha and Solvemedia but the most important it gives an opportunity to choice. many users face the problem with reCaptcha. I know it because have discussions on forums. And I talked to admins of several projects that used only reCaptcha. after my words they agreed to add Solvemedia as another option.

and it's not so difficult technically to add option to choose between reCaptcha and Solvemedia. this will make your site more attractive to users.

I'm in a similar boat -> https://blockchain.info/tx/8f8e4928592a27f69b7ec910e8cb71a4341b0358d81a3713e5fea28ac9a0660d

Didn't think 120 sat/byte was a bad fee but there you go.

Feel there must be a better way, something to make miners take a chunk of low fee, high wait transactions instead of just 'skimming the cream' all the time.

are you still going to use that address for receiving bitcoin payments?
if not... have you tried archiving that address? so it won't be listed under your main wallet addresses
btw 16wgAfS2w... still have 3 utxo (2 conf'd and 1 unconf'd),
you might want to use those 2 unspents before you archive the address

It's a public service, limited to 100 transactions per hour. It's typically in high demand at peak mempool congestion periods (usually above 100k as I've noticed), and now that it's one that almost everyone knows about, you can bet everyone's lining up to try it.

It resets every hour, on the hour. I've seen recommendations from people to try exactly 1 second after the hour. The only time I was successful in recent weeks was when I clicked just a fraction of a second past the hour. I've also read about bots now being used to automate this process, I've no doubt it's true. You do not want to try that.