|
705
|
Other / Archival / Re: deleted
|
on: July 24, 2012, 08:41:01 AM
|
|
Well, somebody with a big ltc investment might want to also buy a fuckton of EC2's and defend the blockchain. Just a thought
|
|
|
|
|
706
|
Other / Archival / Re: deleted
|
on: July 24, 2012, 08:03:21 AM
|
|
Well I guess the last thing we have to do is switch to solo/private pools and hope for the best.
|
|
|
|
|
708
|
Other / Archival / Re: deleted
|
on: July 24, 2012, 07:55:24 AM
|
51%ing is not a challenge. It's undermining the safety of the network. Cryptocurrencies have enough trouble catching on as it is, and here comes an asshole who has nothing better to do than to challenge to fuck it up. In cyrptocircles this is a serious crime. It's the ultimate crime. Scammer tag should be applied just for this statement.Of course I hope you fail and lose tons of money.
Not too familiar with my success rates on hitting alt chains are you? I would be a scammer if I made a promise and didn't deliver, I will. Sadly I actually protected LTC in the early days with a huge amount of hash power to fend off 51% attacks by the Solidcoin crew. Over the course of the last year I've bought a couple thousand BTC of LTC to bump it up ahead of SC and keep prices stable. But hey, looks like the LTC community needs an attitude adjustment. ~BCX~ What happened over in btc-e that set you off? I've been trying to keep the peace for days  |
|
|
|
|
709
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Pushpool - Tech Support
|
on: July 24, 2012, 05:02:33 AM
|
I have libmysqlclient-dev (mysql-devel) installed, but I am still recieving this error: server.c:106:2: error: #error ("No valid database engines defined")
make[1]: *** [server.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/tittiez/pushpool'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Any help? Edit: Nevermind I had to configure again. |
|
|
|
|
710
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer
|
on: July 23, 2012, 09:44:30 PM
|
There might not be enough info in opencl to do this from cgminer. What does
cgminer.exe -n
report on these cards?
[2012-07-23 17:43:40] CL Platform 0 vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[2012-07-23 17:43:40] CL Platform 0 name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
[2012-07-23 17:43:40] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (938.1)
[2012-07-23 17:43:40] Platform 0 devices: 2
[2012-07-23 17:43:40] 0 Barts
[2012-07-23 17:43:40] 1 Juniper
[2012-07-23 17:43:40] GPU 0 AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series hardware monitoring enabl
ed
[2012-07-23 17:43:40] GPU 1 ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series hardware monitoring enabl
ed
[2012-07-23 17:43:40] 2 GPU devices max detected
Why? What do you mean? I'm mining right now. |
|
|
|
|
713
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer
|
on: July 23, 2012, 09:10:26 PM
|
Am I misunderstanding, I thought it was supposed to select the best values? It selected 8192 for both of them.
Yeah, I'll stick with my settings that are supposed to produce invalids but aren't. My 6850 runs at 6144 and I can take it up 15+ in intensity. My 5770 running at 3584 and I push intensity 18 on it without any invalids.
No it wont pick the best. Read again. It will pick the largest. Then find the multiple of your shaders less than or equal to that and YOU set that manually. That's why I put that list of shader counts below... 6850 is 960 5770 is 800 Therefore you should try tc of 6850: 7680 5770: 8000 OH. I read wrong, thank you for clarifying. And those actually pull better numbers. Now I can give my friend (and anyone else) better number to try too. Awesome. |
|
|
|
|
718
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer
|
on: July 23, 2012, 05:26:44 PM
|
good information
Great! I'll rebuild it all, I just woke up. Edit: Well I started it up with no settings like you said, my result?  Top is 6850 and bottom is 5770. Am I misunderstanding, I thought it was supposed to select the best values? It selected 8192 for both of them. Yeah, I'll stick with my settings that are supposed to produce invalids but aren't. My 6850 runs at 6144 and I can take it up 15+ in intensity. My 5770 running at 3584 and I push intensity 18 on it without any invalids. And the win32 build that includes the latest 4 commits: http://www.mediafire.com/?7yg352cu8mxwnuw |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
