Did you create the thread with the account you are using right now? Since looking at your post history, you don't seem to have any threads that are posted in Bounties (Altcoins).
If you created the thread using some other account, it could've simply been pushed down to the second page since the Bounties (Altcoins) board moves really fast and the threads that are popular tend to get constantly bumped by new participants.
|
|
|
Since this isn't the first board request topic I'm responding to, I'm going to quote (albeit with minor adjustments) what I've previously said on the subject so as to not repeat myself (since AFAIK the same soft requirements still apply): Unless a subset of possible board topics is dominating the front page (+50% of topics on the front page belong to said subset), it's highly unlikely that it'll have a sub-section created for it. Not much point in creating a board that will be dead on arrival.
As with all sub-forum requests, I'm gonna ask a question - how many topics about Satoshi mini-PCs are currently on the first 3 or so pages of any board? Or on several boards combined? If there aren't enough topics (at least 20 on the frontpage and around 10 on later pages in my experience) to fill a board (meaning such topics do not dominate the discussion sphere of an existing board), what's the point of making a new section that'll be dead on arrival.
In the overwhelming majority of cases, boards are created not to encourage discussion of a subject but to stop a certain subject from dominating a board meant for a larger array of topics.
|
|
|
I was the one who issued the ban - 30 days to the OP and 14 days to each participant. I have a zero tolerance policy for people running or participating in altcoin giveaways. Unless it's an edge case where the definition might or might not cover it, a new rule or a new broader interpretation of an existing rule, I issue 30 day bans (on the first offense, that is) to anyone who either creates or sponsors the creation of on-forum altcoin giveaways. Unless theymos explicitly modifies the "no altcoin giveaways" rule to exempt certain altcoins, I will continue to ban people at the same severity level as for any other coin or token.
Ban duration reduction appeal denied. You're free to appeal it to the head admin, theymos, but that's my final decision.
|
|
|
There are no set rules on how long you can be banned for. A mod can give you a 1 day ban or 100000 day ban if they see fit.
7, 14 and 30 day bans are the most common ones used by global mods and admins. While I usually default to these, whenever there's a situation where an offense just doesn't match the most common severity levels (is lower than the lowest, higher than the highest or in between), I tend to use 3, 5, 10 or 60 days for such offenses.
I understood, but the guide of @hilariousandco should be updated with a few words on what you both disclosed. Currently, if a newbie visits that thread, they will be misguided somehow. They will think there are only three types of temporary bans, with 7-days, 14-days, and 30-days ban period. Staff do not want to hand out bans for unconstructive posts but if we feel that you as a user are continually making very poor or unsubstantial posts due to your paid signature the following bans will be issued:
First offence: 7 days Second offence: 14 days Third offence: 30 days Fourth: Permanent ban
I also know there is a rule quoted below, but I still think if that guide updated with some details on ban periods of temporary bans, it is likely better, IMO. 23. When deciding if a user has broken the rules, the staff have the right to follow their interpretation of the rules.[e]
The issue with that is that's how I do it. Other global mods or admins might have their own go-to ban durations. As hilariousandco said, there are no set durations, only common practices (then again the same applies to the forum's rules, hence the "unofficial" tag at the start of my rule thread's title).
|
|
|
7, 14 and 30 day bans are the most common ones used by global mods and admins. While I usually default to these, whenever there's a situation where an offense just doesn't match the most common severity levels (is lower than the lowest, higher than the highest or in between), I tend to use 3, 5, 10 or 60 days for such offenses.
|
|
|
I was the mod who issued the SEER ban. While I was on the fence (due to you mentioning you weren't interested in fulfilling all of the bounty requirements), the fact that the OP included you in the winner's list is what pushed me to include you among the other banned participants. Looking through your post history as well as considering the aforementioned circumstances, it does seem like a ban is a bad fit for this situation. Unbanned. In the future, do try to avoid posting semi-entries in giveaway threads that give out altcoins, even if they've been posted in the wrong section.
|
|
|
In regards to the local rule, I'm going to quote something I've posted previously that is surprisingly perfect for this topic: The fact that you are making a thread directed to a single member (which is what PMs are for) in a board that disallows self-moderated threads, I'm gonna go with "local rules do not apply" here. If you want theymos to reply, message him directly. If he doesn't reply, tough luck but I guess he wasn't interested in responding.
|
|
|
Updated the FAQ question on how the Trust system works, added new questions about Trust flags as well as the new bumping system, removed the retired translation and legacy FAQ question (both clutter up the thread and anyone who gives a crap has probably archived the older version of the thread already): Q: What is Trust and how does it work?A: Trust is Bitcointalk's feedback based on trust (hence the name). The Trust system is made up of 2 components: the Trust list and left feedback. The Trust list is where you select the users whose feedback on other users you trust and how deep is this trust. You can either trust just their feedback (select the Trust depth as 0), theirs and their trusted users feedback (Trust depth 1), and so on (up until Trust depth 3). Trusted feedback will be counted when displayed as numbers to the left of a users post in trade boards such as Marketplace or Goods. If a you don't set up your own trust list, a default one is used (info on how it is generated can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.0).The feedback page is where you can leave feedback on other users or see a detailed view of a users feedback. Trusted feedback will be shown first and untrusted feedback will be hidden by default. You can view it by clicking the link "Show ratings". Last of all, you can see all the feedback the user has left on others. This covers the basics of the Trust system. If you want a more in depth description of the Trust system and details I probably missed, go here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.0. Q: What are Trust flags and how do they work?A: While Trust feedback is meant for trade-related endorsements or accusations, which other forum members can read through to get a general idea of a user's trade history, Trust flags are meant to serve as a more serious equivalent of a negative Trust feedback. There are 3 types of flags: 1. Warning to guests / newbie users that "anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money". Anyone can create this type of flag, even if they weren't impacted by the actions of the user they are flagging. 2. Violation of "a casual or implied agreement". This type of flag should only be created by a member who was directly damaged by the actions of the user they are flagging (e.g. got scammed out of goods or services). 3. Violation of "a written contract". Same as the type 2 flag, but the victim had to have had a written contract with the user they are flagging. When a flag is created, other forum members can support or oppose it. When calculating if a flag has more supporters or opposition, it uses the same Trust list mechanics as the Trust feedback system (only counts votes of users you "trust"; see previous question for more info about how "trusting" users works). For logged out users (a.k.a. guests), a default Trust list (with the default depth) is used (see previous question for info on how it is generated). A type 1 flag is active if it has more supporters than opposition. For a type 2 or type 3 flag, the flag has to have 3 more supporters than opposition for it to be active. Active flags are displayed on the flagged user's Trust feedback page (above the trusted feedback list), as warnings on threads they've started (shown only to guests and newbies for type 1 flags and to all users for types 2 and 3) and on their Trust score on their profile page and beside their posts (shown as # symbol for type 1 flags and as a more verbose warning for type 2 and 3 flags). Inactive flags are only shown on the flagged user's inactive flag page (the link to which can be found on the flagged user's Trust feedback page under the "Inactive flags" section). For a more in depth and detailed explanation, see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153344.0. Q: Why is there a warning displayed on my thread / topic?A: Either you've been flagged (see previous question) or you have more negative pre-flag (before the flag system was introduced) Trust feedback than positive. The pre-flag feedback (both positive and negative) that is included in the calculation is determined by the thread viewer's Trust list and Trust list depth. <...> Q: I bumped / A user posted on my thread but it didn't get bumped up to the front page. What's happening?A: The way bumping works has been changed for certain boards. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183553.0
|
|
|
Hello, 1. No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads. [1][e] Examples:
1. Such posts as "SELL SELL SELL", "I agree", "+1", "Support", "Watching", "Interesting", "LOL", "SCAM", "LEGIT", "FAKE", other one word posts, posts consisting mostly of swearing, quote pyramids, useless introduction threads, threads about a topic already recently discussed in several other threads.
Here are links to users posting exactly this: 1. mosprognoz: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2091093.msg52093485#msg52093485https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2091093.msg52094535#msg52094535https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2091093.msg52092932#msg52092932https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2091093.msg52091206#msg52091206https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2091093.msg52091371#msg52091371https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2091093.msg52091452#msg520914522. gorbal: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2091093.msg52092760#msg52092760This isn't where you report posts. Use the "Report to Moderator" link on the bottom right side of said posts (if you haven't already) if they break the forums rules and wait. Sooner or later someone from the staff team will take a look at your reports. We are all reporting these insults mrep! but what happens is the opposite posts with facts are getting deleted and his posts stay there with poor insults! That means your posts break the rules and his either don't or the reports on him are still in the queue, pending review.
|
|
|
|