do you need french translation please for this post? i could post it for you

Regarding the rule No. 33 about plagiarism, is there a consensus for the correct way of the citation?  I think the most appropriate way is to enclose contents from other websites/posts by "quote".
[EDIT: quotation for other posts in the forum in the standard form automatically comes with the link to the post, but quotation for external webpage one should write the direct link to the specific webpage near the quotation.]

If the above quotation style is a consensus, it would be good to clarify the definition of the correct way of citation in the rule because some users are making use of the absence of it as a loophole: sometimes people use the contents without "quote" but with small citation which looks like they are trying to hide it, e.g.,

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3199418.msg33194095#msg33194095
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818999.msg32274273#msg32274273

and other users post the contents even without mentioning the original threads, which I think conflicts the rule No. 33, see, e.g.: 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3130158.msg32381100#msg32381100
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818999.msg32791816#msg32791816

These things are also being discussed in these threads:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3255944.0 (use of "quote" for external webpage with link)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3272524.0 (validity of small citation without "quote")

Since the number of these gray area posts seems increasing after merit system, it would be useful to clarify in the rule No. 33 whether the small citation without "quote" would be bad or good, and the definition of the correct way of the citation.

Thanks

I may be wrong but they just switched the incentive activity (PTS: Paid To Spam program) to another of their topic in the
Announcements (Altcoins) > Tokens (Altcoins) located here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3172860

Previously it was this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3187296.0.

If you check the same links I posted in the original post, the google doc has been edited (?) and redirecting to the new topic URL to spam
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3172860

I get it - pool advertising is a little over the top.

Why don't you just ban the worst offenders rather than punish ever single other pool owner who just makes ONE post in the ANN thread.

You have pools that spam the ANN threads 10 times with their pool info, in 800x600 image format with 2 full pages of unnecessary fluff - then you have pool owners who pop in to say " XYZ pool added this coin with the connection string below" - and I see that as a benefit to this community not a detriment.

(also just realized this is an older post and the rule is largely being disregarded and unenforced)