Yes! Some movement at last - kudos to you. All that was needed was a little kick up the backside by someone to get things going again, well done for taking the initiative  Looking forward to seeing where this goes now...... |
|
|
|
One day at 5.49Th/s? On a single unit? How's that possible?
something weird happen i had a spike to 30TH out of no where That's not a spike - that's a whole day, 24 hours. According to that screen shot, your 1.7Th miner was churning out 5.49Th for 24 hours - that's impossible. he had someone point ~30th to his address! it was pointed for so much time that it gave the average per day at 5.49Th. is that hard??? Well....yes - because that's his miner username, not a payment address. If you are asking me if ghash or someone else accidently entered exactly the same miner name as his, after presumably entering exactly the same password/2fa in order to do so, then accidentally pointed 30Th at it for however long - then yes, that's pretty hard. I don't use ghash, for obvious reasons, so I'm not really familiar with their (lack of) security measures though. |
|
|
|
One day at 5.49Th/s? On a single unit? How's that possible?
something weird happen i had a spike to 30TH out of no where That's not a spike - that's a whole day, 24 hours. According to that screen shot, your 1.7Th miner was churning out 5.49Th for 24 hours - that's impossible. |
|
|
|
|
One day at 5.49Th/s? On a single unit? How's that possible?
|
|
|
|
I just noticed there is a scam thread dedicated to this pool & bitclubnetwork containing a HUGE amount of proof - check it out: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1152263.0..then avoid this scam outfit at all costs.Kudos to member tmfp for starting the scam thread. |
|
|
|
|
I'm tempted to buy one of these S5+ miners, but my lack of faith in Bitmain firmware is preventing me from doing so. I think I'll wait for the first batch to arrive with guinea pigs customers & see what the feedback is before making up my mind. Hopefully they have finally managed to find someone who knows how to write their firmware properly using the mainline cgminer instead of their terrible fork using crazy settings.
|
|
|
|
You would have thought that sfards & it's customers would be keen as hell to get the stats up for everyone to see.......  |
|
|
|
now whereisblock ? me hungry
There it is Nom nom....... |
|
|
|
Businessinsider........  |
|
|
|
Proposed Myriadcoin changes
posted 3 hours ago author 8bitcoderMyriad - stickied post
Over the last few months various proposals for changes to Myriadcoin were made here, on bct and on irc. After discussion with Myriad members and developers, the following changes to Myriadcoin are proposed:
1 - Implement auxpow and enable for SHA and Scrypt.
This will allow SHA and Scrypt to be merge minable. It increases the security of the block chain by having high difficulties on the ASIC algo's.
2 - Increase block time from 30s to 60s
This will decrease block chain bloat, give transactions more time to propagate in the networks without too much of an increase in confirmation times.
3 - Modify the chain work calculation to use a geometric mean instead of an arithmetic mean across algos.
There are security advantages to using this method, as previously proposed by MentalCollatz.
4 - Reduce block reward
Cut reward from 500 MYR to 50 MYR per block, with the reward increasing by 1 MYR every two years.
This will reduce the current high inflation in Myriad. https://www.reddit.com/r/myriadcoin/comments/3d0ml7/proposed_myriadcoin_changes/I like this, good idea. Is there a time frame for when merge mining will be implemented? So, this coin has now been abandoned by the devs or what? Any devs out there fancy taking this coin forward? |
|
|
|
Another two blocks in 24 hours......Nice!  |
|
|
|
The issue is really with bursty applications (which bitcoind certainly is and I suspect p2pool is). It is possible to saturate a pipe, causing issues, for relatively short periods of time. Applying a little traffic shaping will often not affect things adversely but provide an improved perception of performance all-round. This is the essence of QOS. There is no point paying huge amounts of money for a smoking-fast internet connection if you are only using that speed for a dozen milliseconds every hour.
Also, many of us are on ADSL where even someone also on ADSL connecting to us can saturate our upstream whilst only taking a small fraction of their own downstream. Bandwidth management is a thing.
I'm afraid you might be doing something wrong with your LAN. I too have a ADSL connection with a measly 3mb down/1 mb up bandwidth, but I am able to run a file server & a mining rig 24/7 that run 2 p2pool nodes & 15 different wallets (including 2 Bitcoin) as well as my daytime PC & a laptop without issue or bottlenecks, here is a screen of my router network usage:  ...as can be seen, my usage rarely goes above 40kBs download & 34kBs upload, so running one p2pool node & one Bitcoin wallet is not a problem on even the slowest ADSL line. It's simply a case of setting maxconnections on your wallets & making sure your QOS settings are right, no changes to p2pool connections are needed - I use the standard settings. If you are still having bottleneck issues/slowdowns after checking your settings then it's time to buy a new router......  Edit: The only time you will drown your network is when you sync your wallets/p2pool (ie: restarts etc). |
|
|
|
lot of people are "receiving" these but no one can be bothered to post some pics...
Maybe they're too embarrassed? It's been weeks since sfards commented on their product - I'm beginning to think they screwed up & it's now dead in the water. Either that or they're shipping miners to their own farm & there won't be any public sales until they've mined the f*ck out of them themselves - then charge stupid prices for used units. Dejavu? |
|
|
|
I did wonder if it was domob who was doing it, as I noticed he had forked the CRW repo some time ago - but there had been no changes made since, so I was beginning to have my doubts..... If you'd like to get more miners involved, a little more communication would help........ |
|
|
|
Whee, I got a chunk of this one. I'll be back on board as soon as I can work out not killing my daughter's ping.
i restrict to 30 connexions and 150MB of cache. I only use 16 connections & it runs fine, in fact, up until recently I used to only used 12 connections as my internet speed is crap |
|
|
|
Some real chunky payouts atm More of this please!! |
|
|
|
Looks like a few "luck chasers" have moved on & missed that last block......more for me |
|
|
|
We are progressing with the AUXPow implementation. Soon, we should release pull request with new updated source code and offer public testing of merged mining with Bitcoin. We will let you know, once it will be ready for public testing. Thx
Still no news? Is the dev having problems? Who is supposed to be doing the auxpow code? A little communication would be appreciated by your miners |
|
|
|
|
So, Sfards are indeed using alt accounts to fake delivery of miners to customers? If this is true, oh dear..........
|
|
|
|
I received yesterday miners.
saw the pics what did you pay? And do they work? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
