As of July 22, upon logging into this account, the subscription is still valid.

As you can see above, OP has sent me a vouch copy on July 8. Two weeks later, you can see that I am logged into this account, and based on the screenshot below, my Photoshop is open, along with the proof that the account referenced above (freebitcoinexpert@gmail.com) is logged into Adobe Creative Cloud:

If you still need someone to vouch for you, I'm available.

But beware, my experiences in the past with these types of accounts is that they do not last nearly as long as promised by the seller.

Quick question; do these subscriptions include access to Adobe Stock? Or are they just subscriptions for unlocking app access and usage?

I'd like to point out a few things, and this also goes for anyone else submitting an application:

1. "[FULL]"
2. "Merit: 500" (default distribution amount since Merit was introduced)
3. "BTC Address (must be SegWit): 1Bynu..." (what part of "must" do you not understand?)
4. Your post history. It's absolute crap.
5. "Note: If the campaign is full, but you are a very trusted member of the community, feel free to apply." / "Trust:   0: -0 / +0"

I'm going to save @DarkStar_ the breath of having to reply...

Declined.

Can you be sure to update this thread when this is resolved? If you have used a throwaway email account to contact ChipMixer, they will resolve this issue for you. If you look through the previous pages and pages of this thread, you'll see that ChipMixer has provided great support and solutions for people that have had issues.

I just used this mixer on Thursday and can confirm that all is working normally, as expected.

Don't know where the troll is coming from, but sounds like a disgruntled campaign reject, if you ask me

This team account is no longer working. It only lasted a week or so before the subscription stopped working. Waiting for OP to respond before adding any updates here. Will await a response here, as well. Hopefully, this service can be continued.

As of now, the subscription is stating that it is expired; be cautious when purchasing, for now!

Much like your post. Transparent it is not. Why don't you just come out and say what you want to say instead of beating around the bush? Your lack of candor makes you appear salty about something.

OP has responded to me, and he has applied my subscription to a new team account. Although the invitation was in German, Google Chrome had no issues translating the sign-in/acceptance pages.

OP sent the invitation to an existing Adobe account that I had previously had a subscription on, and once I accepted the invitation, I was able to log back into that account and use any of the creative suite apps.

Make sure to get your invitations before he sells out! My vouch is still applicable as of July of 2018!

OP was the fastest replying vendor I've dealt with on the forums so far. I reached out to them on Skype, and they immediately (within 30 seconds) had my Adobe Creative Cloud account setup, and I was up and running within a minute.

They went first and sent my invite. I will provide monthly updates as to the longevity of this account.

They were very responsive, and I hope to do business with them again in the future!

Screenshots (look at the timestamps of the Skype message and delivery time of the email!

I just tried logging into my vouch copy subscription, and it is showing that my subscription has ended. I received the vouch copy on January 17, and it hasn't been a year yet, but I'm not sure if the vouch copy was setup for a team account that is different than the one OP is providing that's for sale.

Either way, I'll be using the autobuy method to renew this subscription, so sit tight, folks! I'll give you a play-by-play regarding the purchasing results!

EDIT: I was not able to auto-buy this, as it shows that you're out of stock. I've reached out to you on Skype, please respond when you have a chance. Thanks!

Quite honestly, I think the forums are better off without you, Lunarics. I think you stir the pot moreso than you contribute, and I’m okay with your account being permabanned.

I need a VCC, but first, how many of these can you create? The only reason i ask is that another guys I bought a card from vanished on me after I tried to reload the card. He kept asking me if I was still using it, and I kept replying that I was, but it sounded like he was trying to delete my card so he can create more for someone else.

I just want to make sure that you have no intention of doing this before I place my order. Please let me know, thanks.

One of the biggest differences with ChipMixer vs. other tumblers is that ChipMixer doesn’t charge a fee to use the service.  As far as I know, ChipMixer is the only mixer that is free to use. That’s the major difference between ChipMixer and everyone else.

Can I just say that neither side has yet to prove their case? No none has provided any form of evidence or documentation to support either side.

But I will say this... Holy shit the "press release" on the Cuubaz website is near impossible to follow. How they've raised $20M yet failed to hire a proper translator baffles the shit out of me...

Is no one going to address this?

Bruno, the madness is that you never clearly explained what the situation was after this whole thing went down. You left it up for speculation, as can be seen in one of the multiple threads dedicated to this subject. You could have confirmed or denied any of the speculation, but you didn't; you posted a picture, which is good, but you still didn't address the hype while the hype was hyped. So, yeah. Madness.

Quoted, but you should look at following my advice in the post above yours, as well, and sign a message from that address to prove that you own that address. Cheers!

I am quoting this for you; make sure you don't edit the post again, or it will show that it's been edited, which may null your stake.

Additionally, I want to suggest that you sign this address to prove that it's yours. You can learn more about how to do this here: How to sign a message?! (specifically here for Blockchain v2)

I forgot to mention this a few weeks ago, but happy birthday, ChipMixer campaign!

---

Thanks @DarkStar_ and @ChipMixer!

For everyone who hasn't done so already, they should leave positive feedback for both of these accounts, as they have shown that week after week, they are very trustworthy and have fulfilled payments without incident or fail for over a year.

Additionally, I'm considering making custom avatars/personal pictures with a "badge of honor" of some sort... Would any members like a personalized one? I can make it animated with a few frames if you'd still like to keep your favored avatar; it would rotate between frames with your personal avatar and the ChipMixer badge. Anyone interested? I'll make an example and post it here within the week!

Simply put, suchmoon was open and transparent with the reasoning behind why Gleb's account was "bought". Red tags are given to account sellers/buyers that have the purpose of trying to game the forums and/or bounties/campaigns here. Because that issue was addressed and full disclosure provided by suchmoon that the account won't be used for any of the purposes mentioned above, I personally find it to be trustworthy.

IF, however, the Gleb account is used for any other purpose than what suchmoon has stated, then yes, it should be tagged to death by DT members.

Red tags for account sales are at the discretion of the DT member tagging it, so in a nutshell, I agree with your statement that they only tag whomever they want. Because at the end of the day, it's their prerogative and not a requirement, especially because full disclosure was provided in why the account changed hands.

But it's fun to see that you're on this new crusade. Regardless of whether I dislike you or not, @digaran, you do provide... hmm, I'll call it "entertainment".

There's no need to get hostile about this. You can calmly present your case and intelligently explain what the situation is, and ask for other Default Trust members to review your claims. If it all makes sense and you have properly and legitimately convinced them that merit abuse wasn't a factor with the exchange of said merits, then I'm sure they could help you make a better case to the person who left you the negative feedback.

However, I will say that the merit activity truly does look suspicious; you're going to have a hell of a hard time trying to convince Lauda that this wasn't abuse of the merit system, if I'm being honest with my opinion.

But I am confident enough to tell you that by being hostile, that negative feedback isn't going to go anywhere.

If I'm being honest, when I considered how this was done, I told myself these exact words: "I could just look at the source code, but I'm too lazy. I hope LoyceV or DarkStar_ sees this thread; once they do, they'll break it down for sure"

OP, why don't you use market depth to gage and select the results, instead of market cap? (Shameless plug)