Any connection to serverius?

1)
If you want it to be secure, probably a not good idea not to use this system running just a usb to go to websites that you don't trust 100%.
It's holding your backup/savings wallet, if you want it for dual purposes, use another usb or HD that matters less if it gets comprises. Saying that most such sites infect windows based machines and have no effect on linux ones. That is what the anti-virus is there for, incase you do something stupid, since that is how most virii get on peoples computers.

2)
Yes, I would make sure you install 12.04.

3)
Unless you made your usb partitioned for specific folders, easiest way is to open up any folder, click on it's properties and you can see it's free space just like in windows.

4)
Software Center will allow you to install/uninstall anything you want to. There is plenty of things you don't need, but 4Gb sticks might be too small, unless you get a specifically trimmed down version of 12.04 ubuntu. Personally I would of gone with 8-16Gb sticks, not much can be done now. Btw don't bother with setting any swap space, realistically you system shouldn't have a need to use it, so that will save some space. Think Xubuntu uses up less space than vanilla ubuntu.

The article is telling how to install and configure a firewall and antivirus for ubuntu so really I'd say it's done a okay job of making sure it's secure atleast from the outside. It's abit outdate since most would install 12.04 now, but it's easy to adapt to that.
Of course the client like electrum you still need to make sure you follow sensible precautions and secure it, lock it, which I kinda remember it bugging me to do.

I prefer Electrum over multibit. I don't know enough about the later to be honest. Thin clients are ideal for those who want to install to a usb, where you don't have the room (or want a lot of writes) for the blockchain, but your private key isn't shared, so no risk there.

http://electrum-desktop.com/
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=100502.0 (electrum thread here)

Your biggest hurdle is that most alternative uses that potentially any FPGA can be re-purposed for, often requires a decent amount of fast on board memory to be of much use. None of the ones built for bitcoin needed this fast on-board memory, so were not built with any significant amount of them. So you have to consider that when you look into what it's going to be reused for.

I could be wrong, but projects suggested so far, are kind of memory hogs, how much that hurts it's ability to do it's job I don't know.

My FPGA's will be held onto till these are unaffordable to operate, which should take a while. Even then I will just store them for the day when they might be needed for bitcoin mining again. After all if the hashing algorithm ever changes, these FPGA's can be changed, ASIC's can not. I don't expect it to change any time soon if ever all, after all it would be pretty significant event and cripple all ASIC's in the process, more of a just incase scenario. It will take GPU's a while to get to the same level of energy-efficiency and we all know how quickly bitcoin has advance in 3 years.

I've never used any " " to reference the usbports, so I assume that would be the problem.
So it's more like:
Also it depends on which bitstream you are using to what ports to reference.

Make sure you have issued the modprobe command as well before hand.

Mak's only uses 2, hashvoodoo uses all 4.
If you need a simple guide on flashing new bitstreams;
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=78239.msg1110647#msg1110647

If you search through this thread, there is a ton of information, just a matter of searching for it.

An asset wouldn't have to pay out fixed, it could have a range and still be valid, that would just have to be stated very clearly in the template contract. I'm sure some of what I suggest won't apply to all assets, it's just ideas, a different view point that what has been said so far.

So if a asset contract thinks it can do between 0.01 and 0.05 a share and pays out between 6 and 8 days, it's still valid as long as it's states that in the system and the asset operator does that.  Also for my 2nd idea it would always go off the 8 days in that example. For ranges, they would have to be pre-set before dividends are paid out or done manually.

For a more complex example, Specifically for mining bonds, I'm sure mathematically you could write one based on difficulty (or price if needed), which is useful for these bonds and shares as it's not unusual will not pay dividends at a flat rate over time, so if your IPO start at 1 and you said you do between 0.91 to 0.02 a week * {diff equation} per share, difficulty rises massively above what you started at, say enough for it to be half the returns, you perfectly within your rights to pay out 0.05 to 0.1 until the price raises.

The point is not to penalise asset operators, it's to ensure dividends are actually clear and could be automated. Some might not choose to do automate it, but it would allow a reportable system in place to work. Nefario and other investors often do not always know something is wrong until it hits the forums.

Firstly welcome Stefan,
Also does the donate page require an update now? Due to their being a change in the admins.

I don't have much of a legalese background, so I won't try, but I do my best to give my input.
Nearly all assets are quiet simple, they have a price they start at, they say they'll pay a certain % or static dividend.
Most should have some clause for a payback price if something goes wrong.

Two thing I suggest;

1)
I think it will help if all contracts are tied to a system which tracks if the basics are occurring, like dividends being paid out for a set amount or a % of, or customised based on various api figures, at the set interval, daily, weekly, monthly, twice a week etc.

More details need to be given surrounding basis for late payments, non-payments and in the event of stopping the share/bond, the buy back price due to this breach in contract, with time frames and penalties for any/all of them.

Securities can be both fixed dividend amounts and ranges and we have to consider moving to an automated method. Those with a dividend which could vary from 1-2% for example, would either have to make sure it's value is set to something that is valid in the contract before each pay out.

This would make it so GLBSE itself can trigger dividend payouts, instead of it having to be manual trigger. I don't run a security, so to me it has always appeared to be operated manually, rather than on auto. So aslong as their is bitcoins there, it pays out exactly as the contract states it should.

If dividends fail to be paid out, due to lack of funds, it's an automatic flag for notification something is wrong. Then it's upto GLBSE to warn him/her about a potential failure in their contract agreement. No action needs to be taken if it is fixed quickly and is within their terms to allow for penalties to be paid and is. But once outside the timeframe, then action to roll down, moved to the black market should occur, if the owner of the asset doesn't cooperate. What to do after that, I don't have any hard line advice for.

2)
Also it might be a good idea to add something that, if a stock usually pays out dividends out every 168 hours days (7 days), if you bought it less than 42 hours before it pays out dividends, you don't get included in dividend payouts (1/4 of the dividend period). Likewise a daily dividend would require you bought it 6 hours before dividend payout.
This helps the owner of the assets and prevents unnecessary payouts on investments that haven't really had time to be invested.
It would slow down people from doing quick buys and sells just for the dividends. As far as I'm aware this is not in place on GLBSE, but they do use such a system in places like the NYSE for exactly that reason.

20amp (230v) breakers are not unusual here in the UK. Unless you have really old electrics, then maybe it's 10-15.

I also use my atom D525 (ION) as a HTPC with XBMC on ubuntu. So yes it's a good little mini-pc.
When mining it's CPU happy hovers at around 1%, it's barely noticeable that it's needing any processing power.
I use cgminer 2.7.5 if it makes any difference.

Black market was a listing I suggested for stocks that clearly broke their contract and are now winding down their operations or have already stopped operating. It's suppose to signify a market no one should be trading these stocks anymore, unless of course to buy-out, or sell them off to the risk takers.

It doesn't list anything that is against their TOS from it's start of operation, but sometimes a ponzi or scam will end up there due the above mentioned reason for this market existing.

You've basically admitted the reason behind why legitimately he rejected it.
It wasn't so much your IPO asset he reject, it was you. You refused to fully verify yourself; when creating an asset that is needed.
Stop with the butthurt and realise you don't get special exception just because you talked to the owner first.
You were aware of the rules, he shouldn't need to remind you of something you already know. You can't turn around and blame him for not double double checking and reminding you, knowing he'll reject it based on something you already know is a reason to reject it.

I'll bite. Same page as before. PM me the details.

Think it as seeding your page.
Sometimes just having alot of likes/fans to a page, can encourage more to join.

Bit of a difference in first impressions between 5 likes and 500.
After that yeah I agree it probably won't make a huge difference, unless you want to diversify your reach, which is not guarnteed.

Can't blame you for making this change. It's reasonable without making it unrealistic.
If it stops just a few junk assets from ending up there I'll see it as a good thing.

Now upto 736 Fans. They definitely look like all new fans, since of course as the lead developer, I've recognise my beta testers quiet well now.

Thanks n00dle.

From what I can tell, they used the bitstream which was originally used for them as a base and modified it for the specific needs of this board.
So no it wouldn't work any more.

That is easy to explain: Variance.

It was the same answer, last time it was asked.

Depending on your browser you use the password manager for might let you view saved passwords. It be somewhere in the settings - advance or settings - security.

Most people reuse their passwords, so it might help remind you of what it could be even if you didn't save you password for that particular site.

If you want to send some free likes my way, I won't say no to abit more to my FB beta game.
https://www.facebook.com/Battlelords.of.the.23rd.Century
Current Likes: 708