I rarely type anything of importance on this thread other than double bottoms and legit TAs... So; I'm sorry If my comment about snoop-dog-coin made you feel uncomfortable; or in anyway disrupted your way of thinking while observing what the people here say, in order to buy or sell your bitcoins. I assure you it won't happen again (to post serious stuff here, that is).  I quite enjoy those though. |
|
|
|
|
That spam doge is getting annoying.
Don't they have their own forum to dump their junk to ?
|
|
|
|
|
Somebody's buying all bitstamp ... I wonder what's up there
|
|
|
|
Here is a handy table for those that need it. BTC milli BTC micro BTC Satoshis nano BTC
---------- ----------- ------------ ----------- -------------
1.00000000 1,000.00000 1,000,000.00 100,000,000 1,000,000,000
0.10000000 100.00000 100,000.00 10,000,000 100,000,000
0.01000000 10.00000 10,000.00 1,000,000 10,000,000
0.00100000 1.00000 1,000.00 100,000 1,000,000
0.00010000 0.10000 100.00 10,000 100,000
0.00001000 0.01000 10.00 1,000 10,000
0.00000100 0.00100 1.00 100 1,000
0.00000010 0.00010 0.10 10 100
0.00000001 0.00001 0.01 1 10
I understand that a protocol change would be needed to get a resolution smaller than the Satoshi. But I may be wrong. |
|
|
|
That someone's able to manipulating the days destroyed chart? Lots of old coins moved but no significant increase in transaction volumes suggests age caused the spike, not volume. +1 some old coins have been moving around |
|
|
|
Sell at 650, and buy back at 450 => 44% more coins.
Sell at 650, and stop-loss buy at 1170 => 44% less coins.
So if you estimate that the pullback has any greater than 50% probability to happen, you should sell a part of your holdings. Simple as that.
Don't oversimplify things, please. You have a point, but you can't conclude your argument with: "simple as that". You make at least one (implicit) assumption: a linear risk/reward preference. Let me fix this Sell Buy at 650, and buy sell back at 450 1170 => 44% more coins. Sell Buy at 650, and stop-loss buy sell at 1170 450 => 44% less coins. as simple as that |
|
|
|
I dont feel too good about selling at M15 tripple bottom, maybe i am retarded, we ll see.
+1 |
|
|
|
|
Avec un nom pareil vous risquez d'être confondus avec un site de Q
|
|
|
|
I have a bad feeling about this trend, I am afraid that we will see a new low over the next couple of days  There is a strong support @ 630 |
|
|
|
|
Reptilia said to hodl
no, wait, ...
|
|
|
|
|
Tu lui suggères de faire un Pool-basket quoi !
|
|
|
|
I want to end my contribution to this thread with this post We can't trust you, can we ? |
|
|
|
this is something that I can't wrap my head around. Isn't it enough that your bitcoins gain thousands of percent per year? I have few bitcoins and I'm happy with that, they will be worth a lot anyway if bitcoin will succeed. Why many of you have to have moar and moar bitcoins instead of just increase in value? When you speculate you are making volatile market and hurting bitcoin economy which is bad for all...
Human greed has no limit. |
|
|
|
I want to end my contribution to this thread with this post That's the point where I stopped reading. |
|
|
|
in a few years once the CNY goes in the toilet china will announce that it will let the free market decide what money should be.
just a heads up.
And you call others trolling? What a hypocrite. hehehehe its a well known fact i constantly troll my own thread its my favorite pass time ROFL! |
|
|
|
So is ASIC mining still coming to scrypt anytime soon? Or can I feel safe investing in a mining rig for Christmas?
Scrypt FPGAs coming first. Well, for this to work, the FPGA will have to be interfaced with some memory. If most of the time spent performing the scrypt algorithm is spent in memory accesses, it will not be faster than a simple microprocessor, and GPU will still be faster (densier). If you develop an architecture similar to GPUs, well, you'll get a GPU. So at the end, I'm not convinced FPGA and/or ASIC are that much of interest here. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
