Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 04:23:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 232 »
901  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Bitcoins not showing up on: December 15, 2017, 08:05:39 PM
Update to 0.96.3.99 and post dbLog.txt as well. Don't paste that stuff here, use pastebin instead.
902  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Using Armory on the BCH chain on: December 15, 2017, 08:04:48 PM
Copy the raw tx instead of broadcasting. Paste that in whatever service. There is no guarantee this will work, as you are obviously grabbing the utxos from Core node.
903  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Bitcoins not showing up on: December 15, 2017, 06:18:49 PM
Post your logs
904  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Blocks on Armory and Bitcoin core vastly different on: December 15, 2017, 06:18:20 PM
Quote
Under file > settings > Bitcoin home Dir: I have it pointing at c:\Bitcoin. Do I need to do anything else?

That should do the trick, otherwise read this guide.

https://btcarmory.com/docs/pathing

You will have to delete your databases folder first though.
905  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Blocks on Armory and Bitcoin core vastly different on: December 15, 2017, 05:56:07 PM
Quote
blkfile dir: Z:\Users\ryssk\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin\blocks

It's looking for blocks in this folder, where is did Core download blockchain data to? Chances are, somewhere else.
906  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Segwit questions: P2PKH versus P2SH-P2WPKH on: December 15, 2017, 05:16:05 PM
1) Yes

2) It won't pick SegWit unless the tx you are spending from is SegWit. Otherwise it will pick P2SH-P2K. You would have to manually set your change address to nested P2WPKH to get it to create SegWit change when spending from a legacy outputs.

3) Doesn't matter for Core as long as it's a SegWit compliant version (13.1 and later iirc). For new address types, you want to keep the signer and online instance in lock step until the code congeals.

4) The fee is computed on the basis of full sat/byte for the non SW part, and discounted sat/weight for the witness data. Here's an example to illustrate:

You are setting the fee at 200 sat/B in the GUI for a 400 bytes tx that is half tx data, half witness. That gives you:

- 200 bytes at full 200 s/B (the 200 bytes of the plain tx data)

- 200 bytes at 50 s/B (discounted 200 bytes of witness data)

Your total fee is 50000 satoshis, your tx weighs 250 units, you effective fee is 200 s/wu.

If you choose the enforce a flat fee manually on a SW tx, the code will display the estimated s/wu of your tx.

All values in the GUI for unsigned tx are estimates, as signatures can vary by 1-2 bytes from the high end value Armory uses.
907  Local / Développement et technique / Re: [Aide] Mes 85 btc peuvent-ils être récupérés ? on: December 15, 2017, 02:16:20 PM
Je dis ca juste pour aider, la recompense ne m'interesse pas et j'ai pas le temps de lire l'OP pour voir les details. On m'a envoye un lien pour ce thread, je lis pas le forum FR d'habitude. Ce que je vais dire a peut etre deja etait couvert ailleurs.

En gros pour faire simple, Core a 2 type de wallet:

1) Les originales qui n'utilisent pas de chaines determinees. Dans ce cas la, tu l'a dans le baba, dsl. Les cles de ces wallets sont generees aleatoirement et il n'y a pas moyen de les recrees. Le "brute force" n'est pas une solution. Il n'y a pas assez d'energie sur la planete pour creer une collision sur un champ aussi large que 256 bit.

2) La version courante, qui est reglementaire BIP32. Dans ce cas, les cles privees sont generees de maniere determinee, et tout particulierement en utilisant la derivation "legere" de BIP32 a partir du noeud qui te concerne. Ainsi, simplement avec la chaine de cles publiques et une seule cle privee, tu peux recreer le xpriv du noeud et le restaurer dans n'importe quel programme qui supporte BIP32.
908  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Funds are not being displayed on: December 15, 2017, 01:20:34 PM
If you double click on the wallet to open the properties dialog, do you see its correct balance in the bottom right corner?
909  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: If i dont want to use armory on: December 15, 2017, 01:18:57 PM
I understand. I may try it at a later date but for my small amount of coinage, dodgy internet connection, sluggish computer i think i willl have to go lightweight for now. but i thank you all for your help merry christmas everyone

Armory is a wallet for power users. You are expected to know your way around Bitcoin and be willing to invest in the recommended hardware to even begin to use it properly. New comers should start with training wheels. Godspeed.
910  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Using Armory on the BCH chain on: December 15, 2017, 01:16:05 PM
I assumed this just meant the BTC chain didnt recognize the transaction

Correct.

Quote
but its not popping up in my BCH wallet either...

For that to happen, you'd have to submit that transcation to the BCH network, not the BTC network.
911  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Trancaction if frozen for 24 hours on: December 15, 2017, 02:20:33 AM
Quote
Is anything to do for cancelling the transaction and make a new one with the "correct" fees?

RBF

Quote
Is anything else i can do to "push" this transaction ?

CPFP
912  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Bitcoins not showing up on: December 14, 2017, 11:39:35 PM
Because you had not blockchain data, should be gone next time you start Armory (you should still let Core sync first).
913  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Restored armory wallet does not recognize passphrase on: December 14, 2017, 11:24:01 PM
Post armorylog.txt
914  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Bitcoins not showing up on: December 14, 2017, 11:23:39 PM
Let Core grab the entire chain first, better this way.
915  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Bitcoins not showing up on: December 14, 2017, 10:49:01 PM
Do you have Core installed and synced?
916  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Restored armory wallet does not recognize passphrase on: December 14, 2017, 10:48:11 PM
If you are using a paper backup (or have the backup string somewhere), you can restore from that again, it will prompt you to either replace the existing wallet or change the password.
917  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: 0.96.4 RC1 on: December 14, 2017, 10:46:35 PM
Quote
Sadly I'm not all that clear in the head and I'd be making assumptions based off that and need a more layman-friendly answer... would one private key of one address, and a bunch of public addresses jeopardize the entire wallet's private keys?

ELI5: any private key + the WO wallet is enough to reveal the whole wallet.

Quote
ALSO, if that key was P2PKH and I only use P2SH-P2WPKH keys, does it extend to them, or would it only compromise that one branch?

There's only one derivation branch in Armory wallets. A key pair is an asset, addresses (p2kh, p2sh and what not) are tied to an underlying asset.

918  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Restored armory wallet does not recognize passphrase on: December 14, 2017, 09:23:18 PM
Quote
When I restored the wallet, I dont remember putting in a passphrase

Did you restore the from root over an existing copy of the wallet?
919  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: 0.96.4 RC1 on: December 14, 2017, 09:21:50 PM
To reveal the root, you need:

1) Private Key N
2) The public key chain from 0 to N
3) The chaincode
920  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Funds are not being displayed on: December 14, 2017, 08:46:44 PM
Delete this folder and try again:

C:\Users\Murf\AppData\Roaming\Armory\databases
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 232 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!