902
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Using Armory on the BCH chain
|
on: December 15, 2017, 08:04:48 PM
|
Copy the raw tx instead of broadcasting. Paste that in whatever service. There is no guarantee this will work, as you are obviously grabbing the utxos from Core node.
|
|
|
906
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Segwit questions: P2PKH versus P2SH-P2WPKH
|
on: December 15, 2017, 05:16:05 PM
|
1) Yes
2) It won't pick SegWit unless the tx you are spending from is SegWit. Otherwise it will pick P2SH-P2K. You would have to manually set your change address to nested P2WPKH to get it to create SegWit change when spending from a legacy outputs.
3) Doesn't matter for Core as long as it's a SegWit compliant version (13.1 and later iirc). For new address types, you want to keep the signer and online instance in lock step until the code congeals.
4) The fee is computed on the basis of full sat/byte for the non SW part, and discounted sat/weight for the witness data. Here's an example to illustrate:
You are setting the fee at 200 sat/B in the GUI for a 400 bytes tx that is half tx data, half witness. That gives you:
- 200 bytes at full 200 s/B (the 200 bytes of the plain tx data)
- 200 bytes at 50 s/B (discounted 200 bytes of witness data)
Your total fee is 50000 satoshis, your tx weighs 250 units, you effective fee is 200 s/wu.
If you choose the enforce a flat fee manually on a SW tx, the code will display the estimated s/wu of your tx.
All values in the GUI for unsigned tx are estimates, as signatures can vary by 1-2 bytes from the high end value Armory uses.
|
|
|
907
|
Local / Développement et technique / Re: [Aide] Mes 85 btc peuvent-ils être récupérés ?
|
on: December 15, 2017, 02:16:20 PM
|
Je dis ca juste pour aider, la recompense ne m'interesse pas et j'ai pas le temps de lire l'OP pour voir les details. On m'a envoye un lien pour ce thread, je lis pas le forum FR d'habitude. Ce que je vais dire a peut etre deja etait couvert ailleurs.
En gros pour faire simple, Core a 2 type de wallet:
1) Les originales qui n'utilisent pas de chaines determinees. Dans ce cas la, tu l'a dans le baba, dsl. Les cles de ces wallets sont generees aleatoirement et il n'y a pas moyen de les recrees. Le "brute force" n'est pas une solution. Il n'y a pas assez d'energie sur la planete pour creer une collision sur un champ aussi large que 256 bit.
2) La version courante, qui est reglementaire BIP32. Dans ce cas, les cles privees sont generees de maniere determinee, et tout particulierement en utilisant la derivation "legere" de BIP32 a partir du noeud qui te concerne. Ainsi, simplement avec la chaine de cles publiques et une seule cle privee, tu peux recreer le xpriv du noeud et le restaurer dans n'importe quel programme qui supporte BIP32.
|
|
|
909
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: If i dont want to use armory
|
on: December 15, 2017, 01:18:57 PM
|
I understand. I may try it at a later date but for my small amount of coinage, dodgy internet connection, sluggish computer i think i willl have to go lightweight for now. but i thank you all for your help merry christmas everyone
Armory is a wallet for power users. You are expected to know your way around Bitcoin and be willing to invest in the recommended hardware to even begin to use it properly. New comers should start with training wheels. Godspeed.
|
|
|
910
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Using Armory on the BCH chain
|
on: December 15, 2017, 01:16:05 PM
|
I assumed this just meant the BTC chain didnt recognize the transaction
Correct. but its not popping up in my BCH wallet either...
For that to happen, you'd have to submit that transcation to the BCH network, not the BTC network.
|
|
|
912
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Bitcoins not showing up
|
on: December 14, 2017, 11:39:35 PM
|
Because you had not blockchain data, should be gone next time you start Armory (you should still let Core sync first).
|
|
|
917
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: 0.96.4 RC1
|
on: December 14, 2017, 10:46:35 PM
|
Sadly I'm not all that clear in the head and I'd be making assumptions based off that and need a more layman-friendly answer... would one private key of one address, and a bunch of public addresses jeopardize the entire wallet's private keys?
ELI5: any private key + the WO wallet is enough to reveal the whole wallet. ALSO, if that key was P2PKH and I only use P2SH-P2WPKH keys, does it extend to them, or would it only compromise that one branch?
There's only one derivation branch in Armory wallets. A key pair is an asset, addresses (p2kh, p2sh and what not) are tied to an underlying asset.
|
|
|
919
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: 0.96.4 RC1
|
on: December 14, 2017, 09:21:50 PM
|
To reveal the root, you need:
1) Private Key N 2) The public key chain from 0 to N 3) The chaincode
|
|
|
|