He had 700k XMR stolen? 

How?

Well I guess finding the term is tough enough. I'm not entirely sure who we are targeting I was just thinking about seo. Maybe something with freezing or forcing or moving. What words are synonymous with economic pegs?

So the closest term in economics is crawling peg?! Cool term but not explicit for newcomers who won't be able to visualize it

Dear stereotype, you might think that our EON coins are somehow connected to the company's valuation. That is quite correct: EON coins are fuel of the system and, in particular, EON Blockchain. So, our ICO considerations are:

• we want to transfer those 150,72mln EON to the community, launching the blockchain. EON is not a share or a stock-like valuable;
• we have created a mechanism of unsold EON coins distribution, in order to correct the price of 1 EON by the hand of the market: e.g. you buy X sum of EON, and at the end of our ICO you get additional EON coins proportionally to your X sum of previously purchased coins. This is the way where the investors themselves correct the EON price, but at the same time do not lose their money;
• As we have already stated in our documents: the more money you invest, the less system commissions you get.

If you have any further questions, we are glad to clarify.

Yeah or maybe liquid peg? Moving peg is actually more direct than "rolling peg". Pegging is a word I want to avoid. Despite being an economic term (which is not used so often) now has a bizarre sexual term that seems to dominate google. So from an SEO perspective it would be nice to target a niche keyword that also fits within our target market but also explicitly describes what the currency is doing.

Dear stereotype, we don't know where you got this information from. You might have mistaken 100% of EON emission for the amount, which will be available on ICO (150 720 000 EON). Our objectives are stated in the document "ICO Keypoints Development Plan" published on our site. It contains all the info of how the money will be spent:

For example, if 1 000 - 3 500 BTC is invested:
Formation of a decentralized EON network.
Expansion of the ecosystem products to the second stage.
Expansion of the ecosystem products to the 3rd stage.
Certification of the company as a financial institution in accordance with international
standards.
General marketing and product launch.

If 3 500 - 10 000 BTC is invested:
Increase of the liquidity of the ecosystem in fiat currency to reduce commission and
time delays when working with fiat currencies through our partner banks.
Opening of the company’s operational offices in China, USA, Great Britain.
Local procedures of legal conformity in some countries which will enable us to work
with financial institutions.
And so on, continue to read here.

We just did not want to limit the ICO with artificial boundaries, that's why the current scheme is following: all the EON coins unsold during the ICO will be divided (50%/50%) between a special EON Fund, which will then be a financial source of further EON blockchain development, and our investors. The investors will get the other 50% of unsold EON coins proportionally to the sum they investedin during the ICO.

You may find more details in our Project whitepaper and EON Blockchain Whitepaper.

The point you are missing is the liquid amount changes HOURLY or DAILY. So the idea that there is some "fixed" liquidity emulating a large marketcap is totally not true. The liquid coins can certainly inflate and they would to punish any vicious pumpers who try to take advantage of ultra-cheap pumps. The idea is to force harmony between volume (demand) and price (supply).

The frozen assets are quickly available once the volume increases. So only a low volume coin (might) have a lower effective marketcap. And you would definitely want it that way because you don't want supply to so far beyond demand of the target price!

This is the entire problem with Crypto!! They don't have any way to truly EMULATE larger markets. Forcing stability and consumer confidence.

Also, this is a massive benefit over hard pegs that rely on "trading tricks" and insanely unstable voluntary incentives (like parking) not to say we can't offer "bonds" like parking but this is truly the only decentralized free and fair way to do it.

There can certainly be two asset classes within the same "asset" as you call it because of the way I'm going to have miners analyse the coins being spent. They can force the division of the two by looking at prospective outputs and force you to make change on the ones not leaving your account. Although I've put together a very technical 20 page whitepaper, not yet published so its a lot more complex than I'm letting on.

Thus there are two styles of assets on the same chain. The frozen coins and the liquid ones. The frozen coins can thaw and become liquid quite fast if the volume rises and the price rises based on the communities collective wishes. And they would certainly want to freeze some of the supply if price goes too low and that my friend should increase volume!! Why? Because a person buying liquid coins knows a certain amount will be more valuable by watching the voting rate. If hes long on BitBay he will want this.

Also, once it reaches a stable target price volume again will increase because people know when Bitcoin goes down, they have a stable hedge far superior than the broken Tether!! Yes Tether went below a dollar proving yet again 3rd parties cannot be trusted. So it would be wise for an investor to quickly cash out BTC for BitBay because they can wait in BitBay as they watch BTC decline. And even potentially watch Bays value rise because the peg is "rolling" or "moving" and not fixed.

This dynamic system is exactly the same as how governments do it with the caveat that its decentralized and all users are in control (or an algorithm can handle it too). In my opinion its what Bitcoin should have been. Regardless we shall see soon enough! Fun times ahead.

"Rolling peg" is what I used to describe it. But also "moving peg", "user value protection", "freezing/unfreezing", "inflation/deflation" were some of the names tossed around. Let me know if you can think of other names for this as it's never been done before.

+100 yes its because lack of communication between developers and investors

Michael, Martin: Please arrange someone to copy-paste the essential info about my ownership in this coin in public in this thread, please. I believe the disclosure of my role needs to be made in public since ppl are speculating with incomplete info now.

Before you said


which I took to mean that you hadn't received a response from support at all. Unfortunately it looks like we are back to square one, because the ticket I thought must be yours makes no mention of a 'trade specialist'. I'd love to help you, but since you refuse to give me the ticket number, there's nothing more I can do at this point. Hopefully you will hear from us soon and if not I guess you can keep posting updates about how you haven't had the response you expect in X days. But this doesn't really show much except that, yes, it is sometimes possible for a support request to get lost, overlooked, accidentally solved, etc. If 100 days pass and you still haven't heard back from us, it is just one experience out of many many thousands that support has helped in that time and can't be taken as representative at all. Again, I'd love to help you out, but can't do so without the ticket number.

ok

then we need find an escrow.

And again more evidence of my expertise.

It is important for me to clear up the record on the following because I am preparing to blog on a ToE which ties in everything we've been discussing lately.  

Hitler Gregory had moved it from the original thread where it belonged in context, and he renamed the thread to this adhominen insult name, OT crap from Compact Confidential Transactions for Bitcoin.

What is so ironic is that I think I ended up later potentially solving the proof-of-square requirement (required by the flaw Andrew Poelstra aka andytoshi has discovered) for Compact Confidential Transactions (CCT) when I merged that homomorphic encryption with Cryptonote ring signatures prior to the similar attempt to merge Blockstream's less efficient CT with Cryptonote.


Lol, you linked to where I had been the first one to point out to Gregory Maxwell, that CoinJoin can always be jammed with DoS because one can't blacklist the attacker because the entire point of CoinJoin is to provide mixing so that an attacker can obscure his UTXO history.

You are so careless that you didn't even realize that was my famous shaming of Gregory. Did you miss the post where I declared "checkmate" then Gregory responded with ad hominem and then by the force of my correct logic he had to STFU.


Lol, again you missed where at the end I showed the math derivation of how to defeat selfish-mining which was the basic idea behind published designs such as GHOST (which I wasn't aware at the time and only became aware of when I read Vitalik's blog).

You linked to a guy who is technologically ignorant and is currently a BU shill.


Yes Gregory did point an error in my conceptualization of Winternitz which I had only become aware of just hours or days before that, and I admitted it. I even went on to write Winternitz code and become quite expert on it, even incorporating Winternitz it into my anti-DDoS conceptualization.

But you failed to cite the other occasions where I put Gregory's foot in his mouth, such as my recent expose on how Bitmain checkmated Blockstream and in 2016 I pointed out that his flawed logic and math on why Ogg shouldn't have index (which was a format in which he was intimately involved as a co-designer of one of the key compression codes!):


Ah that reminds me why @stereotype keeps trolling my threads, again, and again and continuing to be habitually incorrect.

Bounties will be paid out start of May and lastly on start of June. 


Game will hopefully be out a few months after.

I am looking to buy Ultimate and champion tokens.
Best prices paid.

Thats right. The small minority of 00,0000001% thats not saying crap includes me. Lots of people are looking at them like they are nobody. I think that your message doesnt have any added value to this discussion. Go home and get your shinebox. Nobody cares.

My conscious is pretty clear,

I have inside news that Gox will open again, they will pay to their old customers what they can when they open, then refill their wallets with the trading fees, like Poloniex did.

They will also accept Litecoin