He had almost identical results to my testing of the 1070 ti - though I tested more settings than he did, the 60% TDP (106 watt) +200 core +700 memory settings in Afterburner were the most efficient I found as well for the EVGA SC card. Cooling on that card is very very good - I never got it over 66C at about 72% fan no matter WHAT I tried on it (though I didn't go over 100% of factory TDP (180 watts) at any point in my testing). I didn't think to test it on DSTM, as my results to date on my very limited testing of DTSM gave LOWER hashrate at the same settings on the same card vs EBWF. There should be significant increases with the DTSM miner for the 1070. Not for the 1080 though. |
|
|
|
Here's mine for what it's worth. Efficiency isn't quite as good, but it's stable enough for a little web browsing on the side. Using the Voltage/Frequency curve seems to be a little more stable for me. 1070 Gaming X  Could you post a screenshot of your curve ? I have never overclocked like that. Could you give please more tips. I have Asus Strix 1070 8g This is good I would be very interested in 1070ti results at such settings. |
|
|
|
Hello anyone tested the new 1070ti on this miner? It should get very decent results. My preorder is delayed unfortunatelly  But I expect it should hit over 570 sols. Please report someone thanks! .) Why should the new dstm release change anything about the hash rate? Here are my results with v.0.5.2 GPU0 = GTX 1070 Ti the rest GTX 1070  +35 GPU, +500 Memory, 70% PL for the TI, 68% PL for the regular 1070. That is awfully low I am getting 485 sols @ 135W with normal 1070 cards. You should play with your settings. Also Power Limit is not unified and is totally different for each card so it does not really say anything. The same applies for increases since each card has different stock clocks. EDIT: I see in the miner your cards are running around 115W thats why the low hashrate. |
|
|
|
Hello anyone tested the new 1070ti on this miner? It should get very decent results. My preorder is delayed unfortunatelly But I expect it should hit over 570 sols. Please report someone thanks! .) |
|
|
|
|
Bad test, using outdated miners. 1070 can do 485 sols @135 watt and almost all cards can go over 500 on max settings. I expect the 1070ti to go over 540 at worse.
|
|
|
|
How long do you wait on confirmation on cryptopia?
20 20 blocks? I am waiting more than 30 minutes already and nothing |
|
|
|
|
How long do you wait on confirmation on cryptopia?
|
|
|
|
|
How long does it take to confirm on cryptopia to be availible for trading?
|
|
|
|
How to mine this thing? Cannot find anything anywhere |
|
|
|
So i just checked my 1070's. They used about 120W/h mining etherium. Right now with ccminer they are chilling somewhere at 65W.
Like that pretty much. (Load is at 100%)
If anyone gets an idea how to restart the ccminer bat every now and then, let me know pls.
:loop ccminer.exe bla bla timeout 15 goto: loop The watts are because of the algo, it uses mostly memory and less core clock which is much more energy demanding. You can actually downlock the core to get even low watt at the same speeds. |
|
|
|
Just getting this error all the time
00:32:37.132234 WARNING [81.27.54.81:46000 OUT] Exception in connectionHandler:
TcpConnection::read, WSAGetOverlappedResult failed, result=10054, An existing co
nnection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
yup same issue here. |
|
|
|
|
Doesnt matter you will be getting instantly disconeccted while mining - getting the same on all of my rigs.
|
|
|
|
|
Also minign but the wallet disconnects from the blockchain forcibly after syncing.
|
|
|
|
I cant sync the wallet, anyone has some functioning nodes? Thanks!  |
|
|
|
Can anyone confirm that this works for 6x vega56 as well? I have read the article i just want to make sure before i buy the rig |
|
|
|
|
What you are saying has already been done and is availible for free.
|
|
|
|
Ok i did not mean to fud and thanks for the links. It is just weird they do not have or share any official company or their address, also no whitepaper etc. I did not check the twitter which is my bad. Also does not say anything about their ability to create a working product, but that is a different story up to the investor to evaluate. |
|
|
|
Using their website to post news is no proof and there is no info about it on the digital glue website. |
|
|
|
With 4xGTX 1070 you will get eaten alive in the first hour of mining  Thousands of 1080Ti's will be jumping on this from the get go. Im just kidding, lets see what happens, but i'm sure its not gonna take 24hours for everyone to jump on it, its gonna happen a lot sooner. 1070 is better to stay with ETH. Let the 1080Ti or 1080 mine the Equihash. That is really stupid reccomendation. 1070 is way better for mining equihash than the 1080ti and 1080. At this moment I can buy exactly two 1070 for the price of one 1080ti (prices in my country). One 1070 does 485 sols @135 watt, so I will have 970 sols for 270 W for the same price as one 1080ti. We all know how much the 1080ti does on equihash. The difference is so large that I really dont understand how you can recommend this. The 1080 is even worse for equihash again due to GDDR5X memory. |
|
|
|
Seems very fishy. Dont want to say it is scam right away, but I am hard pressed to find any proof? Do you guys have any? I cant find their office address nowhere. I cant find their official company listed nowhere? The burn was probably not audited by a third party - this is a bad sign. No ratings on Icobench. I even cannot find proof that theese guys are the ones doing the ICO. Maybe it is just inability on my part, I would be very welcome if someone could proove me wrong |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
